Identification of the site of inhibition of mitogenic signaling by oncogenic ras-p21 by a ras effector peptide

Two peptides derived from ras-p21 induce either phenotypic reversion or tumor cell necrosis of ras-transformed human cancer cells

PURPOSE

We investigated the effects of two peptides from the ras-p21 protein, corresponding to residues 35-47 (PNC-7) and 96-110 (PNC-2), on two ras-transformed human cancer cell lines, HT1080 fibrosarcoma and MIAPaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cell lines. In prior studies, we found that both peptides block oncogenic, but not insulin-activated wild-type, ras-p21-induced oocyte maturation. When linked to a transporter penetratin peptide, these peptides induce reversion of ras-transformed rat pancreatic cancer cells (TUC-3) to the untransformed phenotype.

METHODS

These peptides and a control peptide, linked to a penetratin peptide, were incubated with each cell lines. Cell counts were obtained over several weeks. The cause of cell death was determined by measuring caspase as an indicator of apoptosis and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as marker of necrosis. Since both peptides block the phosphorylation of jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) in oocytes, we blotted cell lysates of the two cancer cell lines for the levels of phosphorylated JNK to determine if the peptides reduced these levels.

RESULTS

We find that both peptides, but not control peptides linked to the penetratin sequence, induce phenotypic reversion of the HT-1080 cell line but cause tumor cell necrosis of the MIA-PaCa-2 cell line. On the other hand, neither peptide has any effect on the viability of an untransformed pancreatic acinar cell line, BMRPA1. We find that, while total JNK levels remain constant during peptide treatment, phosphorylated JNK levels decrease dramatically, consistent with the mechanisms of action of these peptides.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that these peptides block tumor but not normal cell growth likely by blocking oncogenic ras-p21-induced phosphorylation of JNK, an essential step on the oncogenic ras-p21-protein pathway. These peptides are therefore promising as possible anti-tumor agents.

Functional interactions of Raf and MEK with Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) result in a positive feedback loop on the oncogenic Ras signaling pathway

In previous studies we have found that oncogenic (Val 12)-ras-p21 induces Xenopus laevis oocyte maturation that is selectively blocked by two ras-p21 peptides, 35-47, also called PNC-7, that blocks its interaction with raf, and 96-110, also called PNC-2, that blocks its interaction with jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK). Each peptide blocks activation of both JNK and MAP kinase (MAPK or ERK) suggesting interaction between the raf-MEK-ERK and JNK-jun pathways. We further found that dominant negative raf blocks JNK induction of oocyte maturation, again suggesting cross-talk between pathways. In this study, we have undertaken to determine where these points of cross-talk occur. First, we have immunoprecipitated injected Val 12-Ha-ras-p21 from oocytes and found that a complex forms between ras-p21 raf, MEK, MAPK, and JNK. Co-injection of either peptide, but not a control peptide, causes diminished binding of ras-p21, raf, and JNK. Thus, one site of interaction is cooperative binding of Val 12-ras-p21 to raf and JNK. Second, we have injected JNK, c-raf, and MEK into oocytes alone and in the presence of raf and MEK inhibitors and found that JNK activation is independent of the raf-MEK-MAPK pathway but that activated JNK activates raf, allowing for activation of ERK. Furthermore, we have found that constitutively activated MEK activates JNK. We have corroborated these findings in studies with isolated protein components from a human astrocyte (U-251) cell line; that is, JNK phosphorylates raf but not the reverse; MEK phosphorylates JNK but not the reverse. We further have found that JNK does not phosphorylate MAPK and that MAPK does not phosphorylate JNK. The stress-inducing agent, anisomycin, causes activation of JNK, raf, MEK, and ERK in this cell line; activation of JNK is not inhibitable by the MEK inhibitor, U0126, while activation of raf, MEK, and ERK are blocked by this agent. These results suggest that activated JNK can, in turn, activate not only jun but also raf that, in turn, activates MEK that can then cross-activate JNK in a positive feedback loop.

Comparison of the average structures, from molecular dynamics, of complexes of GTPase activating protein (GAP) with oncogenic and wild-type ras-p21: identification of potential effector domains

GTPase activating protein (GAP) is a known regulator of ras-p21 activity and is a likely target of ras-induced mitogenic signaling. The domains of GAP that may be involved in this signaling are unknown. In order to infer which domains of GAP may be involved, we have performed molecular dynamics calculations of GAP complexed to wild-type and oncogenic (Val 12-containing) ras-p21, both bound to GTP. We have computed and superimposed the average structures for both complexes and find that there are four domains of GAP that undergo major changes in conformation: residues 821-851, 917-924, 943-953, and 1003-1020. With the exception of the 943-953 domain, none of these domains is involved in making contacts with ras-p21, and all of them occur on the surface of the protein, making them good candidates for effector domains. In addition, three ras-p21 domains undergo major structural changes in the oncogenic p21-GAP complex: 71-76 from the switch 2 domain; 100-108, which interacts with SOS, jun and jun kinase (JNK); and residues 122-138. The change in conformation of the 71-76 domain appears to be induced by changes in conformation in the switch 1 domain (residues 32-40) and in the adjacent domain involving residues 21-31. In an accompanying paper, we present results from microinjection of peptides corresponding to each of these domains into oocytes induced to undergo maturation by oncogenic ras-p21 and by insulin-activated wild-type cellular p21 to determine whether these domain peptides may be involved in ras signaling through GAP.

Inhibition of ras-induced oocyte maturation by peptides from ras-p21 and GTPase activating protein (GAP) identified as being effector domains from molecular dynamics calculations

In the accompanying article, using molecular dynamics calculations, we found that the 66-77 and 122-138 domains in ras-p21 and the 821-827, 832-845, 917-924, 943-953, and 1003-1020 domains in GAP have different conformations in complexes of GAP with wild-type and oncogenic ras-p21. We have now synthesized peptides corresponding to each of these domains and coinjected them into oocytes with oncogenic p21, which induces oocyte maturation, or injected them into oocytes incubated with insulin that induces maturation by activating wild-type cellular ras-p21. We find that all of these peptides inhibit both agents but do not inhibit progesterone-induced maturation that occurs by a ras-independent pathway. The p21 66-77 and 122-138 peptides cause greater inhibition of oncogenic p21. On the other hand, the GAP 832-845 and 1003-1021 peptides inhibit insulin-induced maturation to a significantly greater extent. Since we have found that activated wild-type and oncogenic p21 activate downstream targets like raf differently, these GAP peptides may be useful probes for identifying elements unique to the wild-type ras-p21 pathway.