Inhibition of oncogenic and activated wild-type ras-p21 protein-induced oocyte maturation by peptides from the guanine-nucleotide exchange protein, SOS, identified from molecular dynamics calculations. Selective inhibition of oncogenic ras-p21

Inhibition of CD40-induced N-Ras activation reduces leishmania major infection

Leishmania major is a parasite that resides and replicates in macrophages. We previously showed that the parasite enhanced CD40-induced Raf-MEK-ERK signaling but inhibited PI3K-MKK-p38MAPK signaling to proleishmanial effects. As Raf and PI3K have a Ras-binding domain but exert opposite effects on Leishmania infection, we examined whether Ras isoforms had differential roles in Leishmania infection. We observed that L. major enhanced N-Ras and H-Ras expression but inhibited K-Ras expression in macrophages. L. major infection enhanced N-Ras activity but inhibited H-Ras and K-Ras activity. TLR2 short hairpin RNA or anti-TLR2 or anti-lipophosphoglycan Abs reversed the L. major-altered N-Ras and K-Ras expressions. Pam3CSK4, a TLR2 ligand, enhanced N-Ras expression but reduced K-Ras expression, indicating TLR2-regulated Ras expression in L. major infection. Whereas N-Ras silencing reduced L. major infection, K-Ras and H-Ras silencing enhanced the infection both in macrophages in vitro and in C57BL/6 mice. BALB/c-derived macrophages transduced with lentivirally expressed N-Ras short hairpin RNA and pulsed with L. major-expressed MAPK10 enhanced MAPK10-specific Th1-type response. CD40-deficient mice primed with these macrophages had reduced L. major infection, accompanied by higher IFN-γ but less IL-4 production. As N-Ras is activated by Sos, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, we modeled the N-Ras-Sos interaction and designed two peptides from their interface. Both the cell-permeable peptides reduced L. major infection in BALB/c mice but not in CD40-deficient mice. These data reveal the L. major-enhanced CD40-induced N-Ras activation as a novel immune evasion strategy and the potential for Ras isoform-targeted antileishmanial immunotherapy and immunoprophylaxis.

Peptides for cancer therapy: a drug-development opportunity and a drug-delivery challenge

Therapeutic peptides (TPs) are a class of peptide-based agents capable of eliciting a therapeutic response by modulation of targets within or on the surface of cells. TPs are advantageous because they are amenable to rational design, they have high specificity for their targets and can be made to target almost any protein of interest, including proteins for which we have no small-molecule drugs. Owing to this versatility, TPs have a great potential for cancer therapy in an age of personalized medicine, in which we need novel drugs to target the many novel pathways being discovered as tumor drivers. However, in order to utilize TPs as drugs, many obstacles must be overcome. TPs have short half-lives in systemic circulation, are easily degraded by proteases in plasma and target cells, are often cleared by the reticuloendothelial system and can be immunogenic. This article will discuss ways of overcoming many of these hurdles by utilizing macromolecular peptide delivery systems and tumor-targeting agents.

Comparison of the predicted structures of loops in the ras-SOS protein bound to a single ras-p21 protein with the crystallographically determined structures in SOS bound to two ras-p21 proteins

We have previously computed the structures of three loops, residues 591-596, 654-675 and 742-751, in the ras-p21 protein-binding domain (residues 568-1044) of the guanine nucleotide-exchange-promoting SOS protein that were crystallographically undefined when one molecule of ras-p21 (unbound to nucleotide) binds to SOS. Based on our computational results, we synthesized three peptides corresponding to sequences of each of these three loops and found that all three peptides strongly inhibit ras-p21 signaling. More recently, a new crystal structure of SOS has been determined in which this protein binds to two molecules of ras-p21, one unbound to GTP and one bound to GTP. In this structure, the 654-675 loop and residues 742-743 and 750-751 are now crystallographically defined. We have superimposed our energy-minimized structure of the ras-binding domain of SOS bound to one molecule of ras-p21 on the X-ray structure for SOS bound to two molecules of ras-p21. We find that, while the two structures are superimposable, there are large deviations of the residues 673 and 676 and 741 and 752, flanking the two loop segments. This suggests that the binding of the extra ras-p21 molecule, which is far from each of the three loops, induces conformational changes in these domains and further supports their role in signal transduction. In spite of these differences, we have superimposed our computed structures for the loop residues on those from the more recent X-ray structure. Our structure for the 654-675 segment is an anti-parallel beta-sheet with a reverse turn at residues 663-665; in the X-ray structure residues 655-662 adopt an alpha-helical conformation; on the other hand, our computed structure for residues 663-675 superimpose on the X-ray structure for these residues. We further find that our computed structures for residues 742-743 and 750-751 are superimposable on the X-ray structure for these residues.

Comparison of the average structures, from molecular dynamics, of complexes of GTPase activating protein (GAP) with oncogenic and wild-type ras-p21: identification of potential effector domains

GTPase activating protein (GAP) is a known regulator of ras-p21 activity and is a likely target of ras-induced mitogenic signaling. The domains of GAP that may be involved in this signaling are unknown. In order to infer which domains of GAP may be involved, we have performed molecular dynamics calculations of GAP complexed to wild-type and oncogenic (Val 12-containing) ras-p21, both bound to GTP. We have computed and superimposed the average structures for both complexes and find that there are four domains of GAP that undergo major changes in conformation: residues 821-851, 917-924, 943-953, and 1003-1020. With the exception of the 943-953 domain, none of these domains is involved in making contacts with ras-p21, and all of them occur on the surface of the protein, making them good candidates for effector domains. In addition, three ras-p21 domains undergo major structural changes in the oncogenic p21-GAP complex: 71-76 from the switch 2 domain; 100-108, which interacts with SOS, jun and jun kinase (JNK); and residues 122-138. The change in conformation of the 71-76 domain appears to be induced by changes in conformation in the switch 1 domain (residues 32-40) and in the adjacent domain involving residues 21-31. In an accompanying paper, we present results from microinjection of peptides corresponding to each of these domains into oocytes induced to undergo maturation by oncogenic ras-p21 and by insulin-activated wild-type cellular p21 to determine whether these domain peptides may be involved in ras signaling through GAP.

Inhibition of ras-induced oocyte maturation by peptides from ras-p21 and GTPase activating protein (GAP) identified as being effector domains from molecular dynamics calculations

In the accompanying article, using molecular dynamics calculations, we found that the 66-77 and 122-138 domains in ras-p21 and the 821-827, 832-845, 917-924, 943-953, and 1003-1020 domains in GAP have different conformations in complexes of GAP with wild-type and oncogenic ras-p21. We have now synthesized peptides corresponding to each of these domains and coinjected them into oocytes with oncogenic p21, which induces oocyte maturation, or injected them into oocytes incubated with insulin that induces maturation by activating wild-type cellular ras-p21. We find that all of these peptides inhibit both agents but do not inhibit progesterone-induced maturation that occurs by a ras-independent pathway. The p21 66-77 and 122-138 peptides cause greater inhibition of oncogenic p21. On the other hand, the GAP 832-845 and 1003-1021 peptides inhibit insulin-induced maturation to a significantly greater extent. Since we have found that activated wild-type and oncogenic p21 activate downstream targets like raf differently, these GAP peptides may be useful probes for identifying elements unique to the wild-type ras-p21 pathway.