Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation as immunotherapy for kidney cancer and other metastatic solid tumors

Treating breast cancer with cell-based approaches: an overview

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Despite there being considerable progress in the treatment of this disease, metastatic dissemination is still considered an incurable condition at the present time, causing 500,000 deaths worldwide every year. Although most of the research efforts have been focused on pharmacological approaches, over the last three decades, the use of bone marrow and peripheral blood-derived cell therapy approaches have been attempted and developed. Areas covered: This review will briefly address cell therapy for breast cancer, including autologous stem cell transplantations for overcoming the myelosuppressive effects of high-dose chemotherapy, allogeneic stem cell transplants and adoptive immunotherapy using bone-marrow derived T-cells. Expert opinion: The treatment of breast cancer using bone marrow or peripheral-blood derived cells has evolved from a supportive care approach to allow dose escalation of conventional chemotherapy to a therapeutic strategy aimed at eliciting immune cell mediated anticancer immunity. This latter principle has led to the development of adoptive immunotherapies, either with 'natural' or genetically engineered effectors, which are being intensively investigated for their great potential against several solid tumors, including breast cancer.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation in children and young adults with ultrahigh-risk pediatric sarcomas

Some subsets of pediatric sarcoma patients have very poor survival rates. We sought to determine the feasibility and efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in pediatric sarcoma populations with <25% predicted overall survival (OS). Patients with ultrahigh-risk Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT), alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, or desmoplastic small round cell tumors received EPOCH-fludarabine induction, a cyclophosphamide/fludarabine/melphalan preparative regimen, and HLA matched related peripheral blood stem cells. Thirty patients enrolled; 7 did not undergo alloHSCT because of progressive disease with diminishing performance status during induction. All 23 alloHSCT recipients experienced rapid full-donor engraftment, with no peritransplantation mortality. Five of 23 alloHSCT recipients (22%) remain alive (OS of 30% by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3 years), including 3 of 7 (42%) transplanted without overt disease (median survival 14.5 versus 29.0 months from alloHSCT for patients transplanted with versus without overt disease, respectively). Among the 28 patients who progressed on the study, the median survival from date of progression was 1.9 months for the 7 who did not receive a transplant compared with 11.4 months for the 21 transplanted (P = .0003). We found prolonged survival after posttransplantation progression with several patients exhibiting indolent tumor growth. We also saw several patients with enhanced antitumor effects from posttransplantation chemotherapy (objective response to pretransplantation EPOCH-F was 24% versus 67% to posttransplantation EOCH); however, this was associated with increased toxicity. This largest reported series of alloHSCT in sarcomas demonstrates that alloHSCT is safe in this population, and that patients undergoing alloHSCT without overt disease show higher survival rates than reported using standard therapies. Enhanced chemo- and radiosensitivity of tumors and normal tissues was observed posttransplantation.