Modified approach for apoptosis detection reveals changes in apoptotic processes in the seminoma-associated tissue

Gene Expression Profiling in Seminoma and Nonseminoma

Purpose

Gene expression profiles of seminoma were compared with nonseminoma to get insights into tumorigenesis.

Materials and Methods

Eleven testicular tumor biopsies (five pure seminoma, six nonseminoma; pT1N0M0 to pT2N2M1) and biopsies from unaffected sites were analyzed once per patient using a macroarray (1,176 genes). On the same patients, six genes were validated using real-time quantitative (RTQ) polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Additionally, in a separate cohort of 19 patients, 24 genes selected from the macroarray were measured using RTQ-PCR.

Results

(1) The agreement in gene expression was 94% between the two methods and two different patient cohorts. (2) Two features in gene expression were independent of the tumor entity: Most changes of gene expression occurred in five functional groups like “cell cycle” and “apoptosis.” Genes within these groups were almost similarly (> 80%) up- or downregulated. (3) Nonseminoma were characterized by downregulated genes (75%), but in seminoma, upregulated genes (64%) prevailed. Furthermore, 64.4% of those genes that were differentially expressed in both tumor entities were usually upregulated in seminoma but downregulated in nonseminoma. A reverse pattern was found in 24.4% of such genes. Eleven percent of these genes showed a similar up- or downregulation in gene expression in both tumor entities.

Conclusion

Seminoma in this preliminary study can be differentiated from nonseminoma due to almost opposing gene expression profiles (89% of the significantly differentially expressed genes) and are in line with the histological discrimination of both tumor entities. Underlying mechanisms and implications regarding the origin and tumor progression of both entities are discussed.

Fas/Fas ligand system and apoptosis induction in testicular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor-infiltrating, Fas ligand (FasL)-expressing lymphocytes are able to eliminate Fas-bearing tumor cells by apoptosis induction. Activated cytotoxic T-cells that express Fas may enter apoptosis in the presence of FasL tumor cells. To date, no studies of patients with testicular carcinoma have correlated the differential expression of Fas and FasL in both cell types with the corresponding apoptotic index (AI).

METHODS

Fas and FasL were investigated immunohistochemically in paraffin embedded tissue sections from 25 patients with nonseminomatous testicular tumors. The percentages of positive cells and the ratios of Fas cells to FasL cells were correlated with the AI of tumor cells and lymphocytes, respectively, using Spearman correlations.

RESULTS

No association was found between the rate of FasL positive cells and AI of the other cell type or between the rate of Fas positive cells and the AI of the same cell type. Ratios between Fas positive cells and FasL positive cells were not correlated with the AI; however, a significant positive correlation was found between the AI of tumor cells and the AI of lymphocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems unlikely that the Fas/FasL system is responsible for immune escape of the tumor in testicular carcinoma. Rather, the significant positive correlation between the AIs of tumor cells and lymphocytes implicate a previously unknown mechanism of apoptosis induction in both cell types.