Liver transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis C and alcoholism

The Lower Survival in Patients With Alcoholism and Hepatitis C Continues in the DAA Era

BACKGROUND

Alcohol liver disease (ALD) may coexist with hepatitis C (HCV) in many transplant recipients (alcoholic cirrhosis with hepatitis C [AHC]). Our objective was to determine whether there were differences in postliver transplantation outcomes of patients with AHC when compared with those with alcoholic cirrhosis (AC) and/or alcoholic hepatitis (AH).

METHODS

Using UNOS explant data sets (2016-2020), the survival probabilities of AC, AH, and AHC were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis was used to determine outcomes after adjusting for disease confounders. The outcomes were also compared with predirect antiviral agent (DAA) period.

RESULTS

During study period, 8369 biopsy-proven ALD liver transplant recipients were identified. Of those, 647 had AHC (HCV + alcohol), 353 had AH, and 7369 had AC. MELD-Na score (28.7 ± 9.5 versus 23.8 ± 10.7; P  < 0.001) and presence of ACLF-3 (19% versus 11%; P  < 0.001) were higher in AC + AH as compared with AHC. AHC and AC+AH has similar adjusted mortality at 1-y, but 3-y (hazard ratios, 1.76; 95% confidence intervals, 1.32-2.35; P  < 0.0001) and 5-y (hazard ratios, 1.64; 95% confidence intervals, 1.24-2.15; P  = 0.0004) mortality rates were higher in AHC. Survival improved in the DAA era (2016-2020) compared with 2009 to 2013 in AHC, but remained worse in AHC group versus AC and/or AH. Malignancy-related mortality was higher in AHC (15% versus 9.3% in AC) in the DAA era.

CONCLUSIONS

AHC was associated with lower 3- and 5-y post-LT survival as compared with ALD without HCV and the worse outcomes in AHC group continued in the DAA era.

Outcome after liver transplantation for cirrhosis due to alcohol and hepatitis C: comparison to alcoholic cirrhosis and hepatitis C cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Data on outcome of patients after liver transplantation (LT) for cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV+) alcohol are limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Analysis from United Network for Organ sharing data set (1991 to 2010) for cirrhotics with first LT for HCV (group I, N=17,722), alcohol or alcoholic cirrhosis (AC; group II, N=9617), and alcohol+HCV (group III, N=6822). Five-year graft and patient survival for group III were similar to group I (73% vs. 69%; P=0.33 and 76% vs. 76%; P=0.87) and worse than group II (70% vs. 74%; P<0.0001 and 76% vs. 79%; P<0.0001). Cox regression analysis adjusted for recipient and donor characteristics showed (a) graft survival for group III similar to group I [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-1.09)] and worse than group II [HR 1.27 (95% CI, 1.19-1.35)] and (b) patient survival for group III worse than both groups I [HR 1.09 (95% CI, 1.02-1.15)] and II [HR 1.27 (95% CI, 1.19-1.36)]. In group III, graft failure was common for graft and patient loss and de novo malignancy more common compared with group I.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing LT for cirrhosis due to combined alcohol and HCV have (a) graft survival similar to patients with HCV cirrhosis and worse than AC and (b) worse patient survival compared with AC and HCV cirrhosis. Better strategies for anti-HCV treatment and screening for tumors are needed for patients undergoing LT for combined alcohol and HCV.

Recurrence of non-viral liver disease after orthotopic liver transplantation

Liver transplant remains the ultimate treatment for decompensated liver disease. However, many diseases do recur after orthotopic liver transplant, which may affect recipients' quality of life and survival rate. We performed a systematic review of relevant epidemiological studies available on Medline that provided information on the recurrence of non-viral hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation in adult patients published until August 2010. All data were compiled from either review articles or retrospective studies. Primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic steatohepatitis and haemochromatosis can recur after liver transplantation. The rates for disease recurrence varied according to the indication for transplantation, and ranged from 7 to 50%. Although the survival rate of patients with liver disease has increased with the advent of liver transplantation and novel immunosuppressive protocols, recurrence of the primary liver disease remains a concern. The recurrence rates differ not only according to the cause of underlying liver disease but also vary within the indication for transplant. Further studies are needed to elucidate the risk factors for varied disease recurrence.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease

End-stage liver disease due to hepatitis C (HCV) and cirrhosis from alcohol (ALD) are the commonest indications for liver transplantation in the western countries. Up to one third of HCV-infected transplant candidates have a history of significant alcohol intake prior to transplantation. However, there are few data available about the possible interaction between alcohol and HCV in the post-transplant setting. Patients with both HCV and alcohol are more likely to die on the waiting list than those with ALD and HCV alone. However, after transplantation, non-risk adjusted graft and patient survival of patients with HCV + ALD are comparable to those of patients with HCV cirrhosis or ALD cirrhosis alone. In the short and medium term HCV recurrence after transplant in patients with HCV + ALD cirrhosis does not seem more aggressive than that in patients with HCV cirrhosis alone. A relapse in alcohol consumption in patients with HCV + ALD cirrhosis does not have a major impact on graft survival. The evidence shows that, as is currently practiced, HCV + ALD as an appropriate indication for liver transplantation. However, these data are based on retrospective analyses with relatively short follow-up so the conclusions must be treated with caution.

Cirrhosis of mixed etiology (hepatitis C virus and alcohol): Posttransplantation outcome-Comparison with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and alcoholic-related cirrhosis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease is enhanced by alcohol consumption. Of HCV-related liver transplantation (LT) recipients, 25% have a history of alcohol intake. The purpose of this research was to determine whether LT outcome differs between patients with cirrhosis of mixed etiology compared to HCV or alcohol alone. Of 494 LT (1997-2001), recipient/donor features, post-LT histological, metabolic complications [hypertension, diabetes-diabetes mellitus (DM)], and de novo tumors were compared in 3 groups [HCV-related cirrhosis = 170 (HCV group), alcohol-related cirrhosis (alcohol group) = 107, and cirrhosis of mixed etiology (mixed group) = 60]. Protocol biopsies were done in HCV patients. Severe recurrent HCV disease was defined as: 1-year fibrosis >1, cholestatic hepatitis, recurrent cirrhosis, or HCV-related liver retransplantation (reLT) within 5 years. Patients in the mixed group were younger (mean age: HCV group = 59 years; mixed group = 49 years; alcohol group = 53 years; P < 0.05) and mainly men (% men: HCV group = 51%; mixed group = 97%; alcohol group = 87%). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was more frequent in HCV patients (HCV group = 44%; mixed group = 35%; alcohol group = 18%; P = 0.05). Five-year survival was lowest in the HCV group (HCV group = 49% versus mixed group = 73% versus alcohol group = 76%; and P < 0.01 for the HCV group versus the alcohol group or the HCV group versus the mixed group; P = 0.74 for the alcohol group versus the mixed group). Metabolic complications and de novo tumors were more frequent in the alcohol groups. Severe HCV disease was similar in the HCV+ groups (HCV group = 45%; mixed group = 45%; P = 0.66). Patients with in the mixed group were more frequently treated with antivirals (32% versus HCV group = 18%; P = 0.03). In HCV patients, factors independently associated with lower survival were older donor age, LT indication (HCV alone), and increased body mass index (BMI). Antiviral therapy was a protective factor. Post-LT survival was lower in the isolated HCV group compared to the alcohol or mixed groups despite a similar recurrence of HCV disease. A greater use of antiviral therapy in the mixed group may explain these differences. The incidence of metabolic complications and de novo tumors was greater in the alcohol groups.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Patients with end-stage alcoholic liver disease should be considered for liver transplantation. A careful pretransplant evaluation must be undertaken to assess for both medical and psychiatric factors that will continue to require attention following transplantation. Although most programs require at least 6 months of ethanol abstinence before consideration of liver transplantation, there is little evidence that this conclusively predicts a reduction in recidivism. Most programs continue to exclude those with alcoholic hepatitis. Postoperatively, attention to psychiatric issues, recidivism, compliance, and assessment for tumors, especially squamous cell carcinomas, should be undertaken.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease with or without hepatitis C

Alcoholic cirrhosis with or without hepatitis C is a common indication for liver transplantation (LT). Comparative post-LT data for the 2 groups are not available. Our aim is to compare the clinicopathologic features of patients with alcoholic liver disease (ETOH) and ETOH/HCV at the time of and after LT and to determine the impact of concomitant hepatitis C virus (HCV) on ETOH patients undergoing LT. A comparative clinical and pathologic analysis at LT and after LT was performed for 56 patients with ETOH and 32 patients with ETOH/HCV. All 88 had cirrhosis at LT. Other native liver features for ETOH and ETOH/HCV, respectively, were: >2+ inflammation 50/56 and 26/32, Mallory's hyalin 12/56 and 6/32, steatosis 9/56 and 7/32, large cell dysplasia 12/56 and 6/32, hepatoma 4/56 and 4/32, iron deposition 24/56 and 12/32; none was statistically significant. The post-LT findings for ETOH and ETOH/HCV were as follows: 1-year survival 93% and 97%; alive 36/56 (419-4,348 days) and 27/32 (488-5,516 days); deaths 20/56 and 5/32; ETOH recurrence 5/56 (all alive) and 3/32 (1 dead); post-LT HCV 4/56 (acquired) and 22/32 (recurrent). Native liver histology in ETOH and ETOH/HCV patients was similar. Post-LT HCV recurrence was common (69%) in ETOH/HCV patients but resulted in death in only 6%. Post-LT ETOH recurrence was uncommon (9%) and progression to liver failure was rare (1.1%). Post-LT outcome for ETOH was excellent, and concomitant HCV did not affect survival.