Manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux and response to omeprazole therapy in patients with chronic posterior laryngitis: an evaluation based on clinical practice

A Comparison Between W Score and RYAN Score in Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic value of the W score in differentiating laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) patients from the normal population by pharyngeal pH (Dx-pH) monitoring, compared with the RYAN score.

METHODS

One hundred and eight patients with suspected LPRD and complete follow-up results after more than 8 weeks of anti-reflux therapy were enrolled from the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gastroenterology and Respiratory Medicine of seven hospitals. Their Dx-pH monitoring data before treatment were reanalyzed to obtain the W score in addition to the RYAN score and then the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were compared and evaluated with reference to the result of anti-reflux therapy.

RESULTS

In eighty-seven (80.6%) cases, anti-reflux therapy was effective, and in 21 patients (19.4%), therapy was ineffective. Twenty-seven patients (25.0%) had a positive RYAN score. The W score was positive in 79 (73.1%) patients. There were 52 patients who had a negative RYAN score, but a positive W score. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the RYAN score were 28.7%, 90.5%, 92.6%, and 23.5%, respectively (kappa = 0.092, P = 0.068), whereas those of the W score for LPRD was 83.9%, 71.4%, 92.4%, and 51.7%, respectively (kappa = 0.484, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

W score is much more sensitive for the diagnosis of LPRD. Prospective studies with larger patient populations are necessary to validate and improve diagnostic efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1800014931.

Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Past, Present, and Future-A Mini-Review

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a variant of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in which gastric refluxate irritates the lining of the aerodigestive tract and causes troublesome airway symptoms or complications. LPR is a prevalent disease that creates a significant socioeconomic burden due to its negative impact on quality of life, tremendous medical expense, and possible cancer risk. Although treatment modalities are similar between LPR and GERD, the diagnosis of LPR is more challenging than GERD due to its non-specific symptoms/signs. Due to the lack of pathognomonic features of endoscopy, mounting evidence focused on physiological diagnostic testing. Two decades ago, a dual pH probe was considered the gold standard for detecting pharyngeal acidic reflux episodes. Despite an association with LPR, the dual pH was unable to predict the treatment response in clinical practice, presumably due to frequently encountered artifacts. Currently, hypopharygneal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH catheters incorporating two trans-upper esophageal sphincter impedance sensors enable to differentiate pharyngeal refluxes from swallows. The validation of pharyngeal acid reflux episodes that are relevant to anti-reflux treatment is, therefore, crucial. Given no diagnostic gold standard of LPR, this review article aimed to discuss the evolution of objective diagnostic testing and its predictive role of treatment response.

Changes in laryngopharyngeal reflux after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnea: An observational study

PURPOSE

To estimate laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) changes after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using the reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) questionnaires.

METHODS

A total of 91 participants were recruited and divided into three groups: control (n = 27), OSA mild to moderate (n = 29), and OSA severe (n = 35) groups according to polysomnography. All participants completed the preoperative RSI, and underwent blinded evaluation on videolaryngoscopy using the RFS questionnaire. Thirty-four OSA patients who underwent UPPP surgery completed postoperative polysomnography and questionnaires again after a 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The RSI score and RFS were higher in patients with OSA than in those without OSA. Patients with severe OSA also had a higher RSI score and RFS than those with mild to moderate OSA. Apnea and hypopnea index degree and percentage of recording time for <90% oxygen saturation showed positive correlation with LPR symptoms. But the lowest blood oxygen saturation during the recording time was negatively correlated with LPR symptoms. The mean RSI score and RFS before UPPP surgery were 15.88 ± 4.85 and 13.18 ± 4.80, after surgery decreasing to 9.53 ± 4.16 and 8.65 ± 4.87, respectively (P <.05). In 25 patients where surgery was successful, RSI scores, RFSs and individual RSI variables decreased after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

LPR symptoms are common among OSA patients, and the coexistence of OSA and LPR cannot be ignored. Successful UPPP surgery potentially reduces LPR symptoms and improves laryngoscopic signs by alleviating sleep respiratory disorders. Level of Evidence: 3.

The management of suspected or confirmed laryngopharyngeal reflux patients with recalcitrant symptoms: A contemporary review

OBJECTIVE

To summarise current knowledge about the prevalence, aetiology and management of recalcitrant laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients-those who do not respond to anti-reflux medical treatment.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies that reported success of anti-reflux medical treatment with emphasis on studies that attempted to be rigorous in defining a population of LPR patients and which subsequently explored the characteristics of non-responder patients (ie aetiology of resistance; differential diagnoses; management and treatment). Three investigators screened publications for eligibility from PubMED, Cochrane Library and Scopus and excluded studies based on predetermined criteria. Design, diagnostic method, exclusion criteria, treatment characteristics, follow-up and quality of outcome assessment were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 139 articles screened, 45 met the inclusion criteria. The definition of non-responder patients varied substantially from one study to another and often did not include laryngopharyngeal signs. The reported success rate of conventional therapeutic trials ranged from 17% to 87% and depended on diagnostic criteria, treatment scheme, definition of treatment failure and treatment outcomes that varied substantially between studies. The management of non-responders differed between studies with a few differential diagnoses reported. No study considered the profile of reflux (acidic, weakly acid, non-acid or mixed) or addressed personalised treatment with the addition of alginate or magaldrate, low acid diet, or other interventions that have emerging evidence of efficacy.

CONCLUSION

To date, there is no standardised management of LPR patients who do not respond to traditional treatment approached. A diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm is proposed to improve the management of these patients. Future studies will be necessary to confirm the efficacy of this algorithm through large cohort studies of non-responder LPR patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2a.

Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

To give, if possible, an answer in the long-standing debate of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) through published systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

METHOD

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from 1984, the year the term LPR first appeared in the literature, until October 2018. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing the treatment response of PPI therapy in patients with LPR were included in our study.

RESULTS

Nine eligible studies, two systematic reviews and seven meta-analyses, were identified and analyzed in our study. Three of these were published in 2006, one in 2007, one in 2013, and four in 2016. Five studies published before 2016 and one in 2016 showed no benefit from PPI therapy for LPR patients while the three remaining meta-analyses of 2016 showed a significant improvement in LPR symptoms but no significant difference in response rate and reflux finding scores (RFS) between PPI therapy and placebo treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the existing data, the use of PPI therapy for the treatment of LPR remains questionable. Six out of the nine systematic reviews/meta-analyses concluded that PPI therapy is not superior to placebo and three concluded that PPI therapy significantly improved LPR symptoms although they did not identify any difference in the post-treatment laryngoscopic findings. There is still a long way to go until we can give a definite answer to this question but in the meantime, the use of PPI therapy for the treatment of LPR will continue even though existing evidence is poor and weak, coming mainly from individual uncontrolled studies.

Clinical outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the therapeutic benefit of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over placebo in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to analyze the epidemiological factors of heterogeneity in the literature.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted to identify articles published between 1990 and 2018 about clinical trials describing the efficiency of medical treatment(s) on LPR. First, a meta-analysis of placebo randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PPIs versus placebo was conducted according to diet. The heterogeneity, response to PPIs, and evolution of clinical scores were analyzed for aggregate results. Second, a systematic review of diagnosis methods, clinical outcome of treatment, and therapeutic regimens was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

RESULTS

The search identified 1,140 relevant publications, of which 72 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 5,781 patients. Ten RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The combined relative risk was 1.31 in favor of PPIs and increased to 1.42 when patients did not receive diet recommendations. Randomized controlled trials were characterized by a significant heterogeneity due to discrepancies in clinical therapeutic outcomes, diagnosis methods (lack of gold standard diagnostic tools), and therapeutic scheme. The epidemiological analysis of all articles supports the existence of these discrepancies in the entire literature. In particular, many symptoms and signs commonly encountered in LPR are not assessed in the treatment effectiveness. The lack of diagnosis precision and variability of inclusion criteria particularly create bias in all reported and included articles.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis supports a mild superiority of PPIs over placebo and the importance of diet as additional treatment but demonstrates the heterogeneity between studies, limiting the elaboration of clear conclusions. International recommendations are proposed for the development of future trials. Laryngoscope, 129:1174-1187, 2019.

Decreased Esophageal Sensitivity to Acid in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Cause for Concern?

Background/Aims

To evaluate esophageal sensitivity to acid between morbidly obese (MO) patients and non-MO controls with abnormal esophageal acid exposure.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 58 patients: 30 MO (cases) and 28 non-MO (controls). Esophageal symptoms and esophageal sensitivity to 0.1 M hydrochloric acid solution (Bernstein test) were compared between MO and non-MO patients with a prior diagnosis of abnormal esophageal acid exposure.

Results

MO patients were less symptomatic than non-MO controls (14% vs 96%; odds ratio [OR], 0.006; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.001 to 0.075; p=0.000). MO patients were more likely to present with decreased esophageal sensitivity to the instillation of acid than non-MO controls (57% vs 14%; OR, 8; 95% CI, 1.79 to 35.74; p=0.009). Subgroup analysis revealed no differences in esophageal sensitivity in MO patients with and without abnormal esophageal acid exposure (43% vs 31%; p=0.707).

Conclusions

Silent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common among MO individuals, likely due to decreased esophageal sensitivity to acid. The absence of typical GERD symptoms in these patients may delay discovery of precancerous conditions, such as Barrett’s esophagus. We believe that these patients may require a more aggressive diagnostic work-up to rule out the presence of silent GERD.

Gastro-pharyngeal reflux and total laryngectomy. Increasing knowledge about its management

PURPOSE

Investigate the incidence, the degree and the effect of gastro-pharyngeal reflux (GPR) in laryngectomised patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Behavioral and 24-hour pH- and impedance-monitoring data were prospectively analyzed for 25 laryngectomised patients with no previous history of GER in outpateints' setting. Reflux detected was characterized as either acid, weakly acidic or nonacid. Proximal reflux was found at 15cm above the LES.

RESULTS

40% of patients presented a pathological number of reflux episodes in the upright position (p<0.0001); 9 of them presented a pathologic bolus exposure time. Bolus exposure at the proximal sphincter was one fourth-fold lower than 5cm above the LES (p=0.3593). There was a prevalence of acid reflux at both sphincters (p<0.0001); liquid reflux was prevalent at the LES (p=0.003) and mixed reflux at the UES (p=0.0001). Median REs was higher than time acid exposure (p=0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre- and post-surgical reflux investigation could identify preexisting reflux severity and screen potential high-risk cancer patients for postoperative complications. This might allow the early onset of acid suppressive therapy in presence of pathologic findings in high-complication risk cancer patients.

A Review of Diagnosis of GERD

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the incidence of some of its complications have risen strikingly over the last few decades. With the accumulation in our understanding on the pathophysiology of GERD along with the development of proton pump inhibitors, the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to the GERD have changed dramatically over the past decade. However, The GERD still poses a problem to many clinicians since the spectrum of the disease has evolved to encompass more challenging presentations such as refractory GERD and extraesophageal manifestations. The aim of this article was to provide a review of available current diagnostic tests of the GERD, includes proton pump inhibitor test, ambulatory pH monitoring, impedance pH monitoring, mucosa impedance, and high resolution manometry. This review discusses different modalities for the work up of GERD.

Adult and paediatric GERD: diagnosis, phenotypes and avoidance of excess treatments

Detailed investigations and objective measurements in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux should be performed with the intent of making the correct diagnosis, thus enabling choice of appropriate therapy. Establishing the most effective therapy is particularly important in adults who do not respond to standard treatment and in children. The use of PPIs for suspected GERD has increased substantially over the past decade, providing great relief in patients with acid-related symptoms, but also leading to adverse effects and a considerable economic burden. Adults with functional heartburn do not benefit from PPIs, while prolonged PPI use in patients with extraoesophageal symptoms remains a controversial area. Moreover, PPIs are not indicated in infants with GERD unless symptoms are proven to be acid-related. With regard to antireflux surgery, patients must be carefully selected to avoid the need for ongoing PPI treatment postoperatively. Correct diagnosis and phenotyping of patients with symptoms attributed to gastro-oesophageal reflux through detailed investigations is therefore imperative, leading to improved patient outcomes and rationalized use of available treatment options. In this Review, we outline currently available diagnostic tests and discuss approaches to limit any unnecessary medical or surgical interventions.

Factors influencing treatment outcome in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: outcome of a prospective pragmatic trial in Asian patients

BACKGROUND

Predicting response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment can aid the effective management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim was to investigate the predictors of symptomatic response to pantoprazole in Asian patients with GERD; the first study of its kind in Asian patients.

METHODS

Asian patients with GERD symptoms (N = 209) received pantoprazole 40 mg daily for 8 weeks in a multinational, prospective, open-label study. Response was assessed using ReQuest™. Baseline and demographic factors were examined using logistic regression to determine if they were related to treatment response.

RESULTS

Response rates were 44.3% (Week 4) and 63.6% (Week 8) in Asian patients versus 60.7% (P < 0.001) and 72.2% (P = 0.010) for the rest of the world. Higher response rates at 8 weeks occurred in patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD; 71.3%) versus those with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) at baseline (48.5%). The presence of ERD (P = 0.0143) and lower ReQuest™-GI scores at baseline (P = 0.0222) were associated with response. Improvements in quality of life (QoL) and anxiety and depression at 4 and 8 weeks were associated with treatment response (both P < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction correlated with treatment response (P < 0.0001), and improvement in anxiety and depression (P < 0.0001) and QoL (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Asian patients with GERD, especially those with NERD, may have lower response rates to PPIs than Western populations. ERD and less severe gastrointestinal symptoms may help to predict symptomatic responses to PPIs in Asian patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT00312806.

Lung diffusion capacity in children with respiratory symptoms and untreated GERD

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with many respiratory disorders, among which, chronic cough, laryngitis, and asthma are among the most common. We investigated lung function, including gas diffusion capacity, in children with poor asthma control or chronic laryngitis with untreated GERD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 71 children, aged 6-17 years, with chronic respiratory and other symptoms suggestive for GERD, were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: chronic laryngitis and asthma. Participants underwent 24-hour pH monitoring and lung function assessment, measurement of single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) measurement.

RESULTS

24-hour pH monitoring was positive for GERD in 92.1% of preselected children with asthma and 90.1% of children with chronic recurrent laryngitis. All flows (PEF, MEF75, MEF50, and MEF25) were significantly lower in the asthma group, while FENO and DLCO were significantly lower in the laryngitis group. A significant inverse relationship was found between DLCO and all reflux indexes in the laryngitis group. Each unit change of Johnson-DeMeester score and Boix-Ochoa score increased the odds for significantly lower DLCO in laryngitis patients by 3.9% and 5.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with uncontrolled asthma and chronic laryngitis, the regurgitation of gastric contents due to GERD contributes to poor asthma control and aggravation of chronic laryngitis. Despite having normal lung function, the gas diffusion capacity should be controlled in patients with GERD and chronic laryngitis, and it might be the very first abnormality in distal airways.

[Updated guidelines 2012 for gastroesophageal reflux disease]

In 2010, a Korean guideline for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was made by the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, in which the definition and diagnosis of GERD were not included. The aim of this guideline was to update the clinical approach to the diagnosis and management of GERD in adult patients. This guideline was developed by the adaptation process of the ADAPTE framework. Twelve guidelines were retrieved from initial queries through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II process. Twenty-seven statements were made as a draft and revised by modified Delphi method. Finally, 24 consensus statements for the definition (n=4), diagnosis (n=7) and management (n=13) of GERD were developed. Multidisciplinary experts participated in the development of the guideline, and the external review of the guideline was conducted at the finalization phase.

The Value of Routine pH Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Objective. To assess the need for pH testing in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Study Design. Case series with planned data collection.

Setting. Tertiary care center.

Subjects and Methods. On the basis of symptoms and/or abnormal endoscopic findings, more than 500 patients underwent 24-hour pharyngeal pH testing at a single center (using the Dx-pH probe) between January 2009 and June 2011. A total of 163 patients not on proton-pump inhibitors at the time of study and with complete data available for analysis (pH results, body mass index, smoking status, pretest reflux symptom index) were divided into 2 groups by positive (n = 70) and negative (n = 93) Ryan Score. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) was compared between groups and assessed overall against Ryan Score parameters at different pH thresholds. The diagnostic utility of an RSI ≥ 13 for prediction of Ryan Score was assessed.

Results. No significant difference in RSI was seen between Ryan-positive (17.50 ± 11.47) and Ryan-negative (14.95 ± 11.43) patients ( P = .161). Overall, RSI correlated poorly with percentage time spent below pH thresholds 6.5, 6.0, 5.5, and 5.0 and upright and supine Ryan parameters at these thresholds (as determined by linear regression analysis). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RSI ≥ 13 for Ryan positivity were 55.7%, 47.3%, 44.3%, and 58.7%, respectively.

Conclusion. Our findings show that in our population of otolaryngology patients, the diagnosis of LPR cannot be reliably made on the basis of symptoms alone. Diagnosis, and in particular treatment decisions, should ideally be made on the basis of a combination of symptoms, signs, and confirmatory testing.

The role of laryngopharyngeal reflux as a risk factor in laryngeal cancer: a preliminary report

Objectives

To evaluate the significance of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as a risk factor in laryngeal cancer.

Methods

We performed a case-control study with 29 consecutive laryngeal cancer patients who had undergone 24-hour ambulatory double pH monitoring from 2003 to 2006. The control group included 300 patients who had undergone 24-hour ambulatory double pH monitoring due to LPR-related symptoms. We analyzed the prevalence of LPR and numerous parameters from the 24-hour ambulatory double pH monitoring in the laryngeal cancer patient and control groups. Pathologic LPR is defined when more than three episodes of LPR occur in 24 hours.

Results

The prevalence of pathologic LPR was significantly higher in the laryngeal cancer group than the control group (P=0.049). The reflux number of the upper probe was significantly higher in the laryngeal cancer group (P<0.001). However the effects of pathologic LPR on laryngeal cancer risk were diluted after adjusting for smoking and alcohol consumption in the multivariable logistic regression.

Conclusion

The pathologic LPR might be a possible risk factor in the development of laryngeal cancer. A further study should be necessary to verify the exact role of LPR in laryngeal cancer.

Prediction of response to PPI therapy and factors influencing treatment outcome in patients with GORD: a prospective pragmatic trial using pantoprazole

Background

Management of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) can be assisted by information predicting the likely response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The aim was to undertake a study of GORD patients designed to approximate ordinary clinical practice that would identify patient characteristics predicting symptomatic response to pantoprazole treatment.

Methods

1888 patients with symptoms of GORD were enrolled in a multicentre, multinational, prospective, open study of 8 weeks pantoprazole treatment, 40 mg daily. Response was assessed by using the ReQuest™ questionnaire, by the investigator making conventional clinical enquiry and by asking patients about their satisfaction with symptom control. Factors including pre-treatment oesophagitis, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), Helicobacter pylori status, anxiety and depression, and concurrent IBS symptoms were examined using logistic regression to determine if they were related to response, judged from the ReQuest™-GI score.

Results

Poorer treatment responses were associated with non-erosive reflux disease, female gender, lower BMI, anxiety and concurrent irritable bowel syndrome symptoms before treatment. No association was found with age, Helicobacter pylori status or oesophagitis grade. Some reflux-related symptoms were still present in 14% of patients who declared themselves 'well-satisfied' with their symptom control.

Conclusions

Some readily identifiable features help to predict symptomatic responses to a PPI and consequently may help in managing patient expectation. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT00312806.

Impact of pH monitoring on laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: improved compliance and symptom resolution

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) often suffers from poor patient compliance and hence poor symptom improvement. The aim of this study was to determine whether 24-hour oropharyngeal pH monitoring was associated with higher rates of treatment compliance and symptom improvement compared with empirical treatment for LPR.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, case-control study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Charts were reviewed from 170 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with LPR from January 2008 to March 2010. After clinical diagnosis, all patients were offered the option of empiric treatment with a proton pump inhibitor versus treatment based on a 24-hour oropharyngeal pH study using the Dx-pH system (Restech, San Diego, California). Treatment compliance and pretreatment and posttreatment reflux symptom index (RSI) scores were compared for the 2 groups. Only consecutive patients with complete data were included.

RESULTS

One-hundred and seventy patients were included in 2 groups. Group I consisted of 73 patients who underwent pH monitoring. Group II consisted of 70 patients treated empirically. Compliance with medication therapy (68.5% vs 50.0%, P = .019) and lifestyle modification (82.2 vs 25.7%, P = .0001) were greater among patients in group I. Symptom improvement was greater among patients in group I following treatment compared with patients in group II, with a significantly greater reduction in RSI (36.6% vs 24.4%, P = .023).

CONCLUSION

Among our patient population, treatment of LPR based on pH monitoring resulted in greater compliance, as well as greater symptom improvement, compared with empirical therapy alone.

The effect of esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily on acoustic and perception parameters of the voice in laryngopharyngeal reflux

BACKGROUND

Randomized, placebo-controlled studies have failed to demonstrate a significant treatment effect for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) using traditional clinical endpoints. We compared the effect of esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) vs placebo on voice and acoustic-related measures in patients with LPR.

METHODS

Patients with LPR underwent endoscopy and pH testing. Subsequently, patients underwent videostroboscopic recordings of the larynx, acoustic voice and speech analysis. A voice use and quality diary and oesophageal symptom diary were completed at baseline. Thereafter, patients were randomized to esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily vs placebo for 3 months. The voice use and quality diary and oesophageal symptom dairy were repeated during the last week of treatment. Videostroboscopy and acoustic voice and speech analysis were also performed at the end of treatment.

KEY RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were randomized to the esomeprazole group and 17 to the placebo group. There was no significant difference in videostroboscopic reflux finding scores from baseline to post-treatment. Acoustic measures also failed to demonstrate significant differences within the same or between groups, even when a sub-group analysis of patients with endoscopically documented oesophageal inflammation at baseline was performed. Additionally, no significant differences were found between groups when using voice use and quality diary.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Use of more specific laryngeal functional parameters such as voice-related acoustic measures of pitch range, fundamental frequency and intensity also failed to demonstrate a significant response to proton pump inhibitor treatment as compared to placebo in patients with suspected LPR.

The Significance of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Benign Vocal Mucosal Lesions

OBJECTIVE: To determine the significance of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in benign vocal mucosal lesions.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A case-control study at the tertiary referral medical center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From April 2003 to December 2006, we studied 110 patients with benign vocal mucosal lesions who had undergone 24-hour ambulatory double pH monitoring. The control group included 200 patients who had undergone ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring due to laryngopharyngeal reflux-related symptoms without specific findings of benign vocal mucosal lesions. Reflux symptom index and reflux finding score were measured. We compared the prevalence of pathologic laryngopharyngeal reflux and various parameters of the pH monitoring such as total reflux number, fraction time of pH below 4 in various positions, and DeMeester scores.

RESULTS: The prevalence of pathologic laryngopharyngeal reflux was 65 percent in the control group, 66 percent in vocal nodule group, 75 percent in the vocal polyp group, and 90 percent in the Reinke's edema group. Patients with Reinke's edema had a significantly higher prevalence of pathologic laryngopharyngeal reflux than controls ( P = 0.016). LPR was associated with a significantly increased risk of Reinke's edema (odds ratio: 4.846, 95% confidence interval 1.093∼21.492). Total reflux number and DeMeester scores in the Reinke's edema group and fraction time of pH below 4 in the supine position in the vocal polyp group were significantly higher than those in the control group.

CONCLUSION: Laryngopharyngeal reflux might play a role as an etiologic factor in Reinke's edema and vocal polyps.

Predictors of response to short-term proton pump inhibitor treatment in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess benefit from one and three months' empirical proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux, and to define pre-therapy factors which may predict success with short-term proton pump inhibitor treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, open clinical study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred adult out-patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux were enrolled in the study. Laryngopharyngeal reflux patients underwent endoscopy and received omeprazole for three months. Efficacy of treatment was assessed at one and three months. Patients were classified as responders if their total symptom score had improved at least 50 per cent, their videolaryngoscopic score had improved by at least two points, and they were satisfied with the results. Pre-therapy factors assessed for an effect on omeprazole outcomes included: patient demographics, reflux symptoms, videolaryngoscopic scores, endoscopic findings, overall vocal dysfunction degree, self-rated voice handicap index, hospital anxiety and depression scale scores, and general well-being score.

RESULTS

Fifty-six per cent of patients were classified as responders at one month of treatment; this proportion rose to 92 per cent at three months. Those patients entering the study with a higher heartburn score showed a significant response after one month of omeprazole treatment. Non-responders were found to have significantly more anxiety than responders. Logistic regression analysis revealed these factors, plus the medication dose, as being relevant for faster response prediction. No significant association was found between pre-therapy factors and three-month response to proton pump inhibitor treatment.

CONCLUSION

Three months of proton pump inhibitor treatment twice daily is warranted for confirming suspicion of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Baseline anxiety levels and heartburn scores, and the medication dose, may be relevant factors when predicting faster response to proton pump inhibitor treatment in carefully selected patients.

Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since the publication of the Asia-Pacific GERD consensus in 2004, more data concerning the epidemiology and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have emerged. An evidence based review and update was needed.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group developed consensus statements using the Delphi approach. Relevant data were presented, and the quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, and level of consensus were graded.

RESULTS

GERD is increasing in frequency in Asia. Risk factors include older age, male sex, race, family history, higher socioeconomic status, increased body mass index, and smoking. Symptomatic response to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test is diagnostic in patients with typical symptoms if alarm symptoms are absent. A negative pH study off therapy excludes GERD if a PPI test fails. The role for narrow band imaging, capsule endoscopy, and wireless pH monitoring has not yet been undefined. Diagnostic strategies in Asia must consider coexistent gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. Weight loss and elevation of head of bed improve reflux symptoms. PPIs are the most effective medical treatment. On-demand therapy is appropriate for nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients. Patients with chronic cough, laryngitis, and typical GERD symptoms should be offered twice daily PPI therapy after excluding non-GERD etiologies. Fundoplication could be offered to GERD patients when an experienced surgeon is available. Endoscopic treatment of GERD should not be offered outside clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to clarify the role of newer diagnostic modalities and endoscopic therapy. Diagnostic strategies for GERD in Asia must consider coexistent gastric cancer and peptic ulcer. PPIs remain the cornerstone of therapy.

Vocal Evaluation in Teachers With or Without Symptoms

The aim of this study was to perform voice evaluation in teachers with and without vocal symptoms, identifying etiologic factors of dysphonia, voice symptoms, vocal qualities, and laryngeal lesions. Eighty teachers were divided into two groups: GI (without or sporadic symptoms, 40) and GII (with frequent vocal symptoms, 40). They answered a specific questionnaire, and were subject to a perceptual vocal assessment (maximum phonation time, glottal attack, resonance, coordination of breathing and voicing, pitch, and loudness), GIRBAS scale, and to videolaryngoscopy. Females were predominant in both groups, and the age range was from 36 to 50 years. Elementary teachers predominated, working in classes with 31-40 students. Voice symptoms and alterations in the perceptual vocal analysis and in the GIRBAS scale were more frequent in GII. In 46 teachers (GI-16; GII-30), videolaryngoscopy exams were abnormal with the vocal nodules being the most frequent lesions. These results indicate that a teacher's voice is compromised, and requires more attention including control of environmental factors and associated diseases, preventive vocal hygiene, periodic laryngeal examinations, and access to adequate specialist treatment.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in chronic laryngitis: prevalence and response to acid-suppressive therapy

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is thought to cause chronic laryngitis through laryngopharyngeal reflux. Response of laryngitis to treatment with acid-suppressive therapy supports this causal link.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with chronic laryngitis and response to proton-pump inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

Patients with chronic laryngitis were recruited. The frequency and severity of reflux and laryngeal symptoms were scored and laryngitis graded by laryngoscopy. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring before receiving lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was 65.6% (21 of 32). Based on positive pH test, the prevalence was 25% (eight of 32). The change in laryngeal symptom score and laryngitis grade was significantly higher in GERD compared with non-GERD patients (P = 0.010 for both). The proportion of patients with marked/moderate improvement in laryngeal symptoms were significantly higher in patients with reflux (14 of 21, 67%) compared to those without reflux (two of 11, 18%; P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease amongst our patients with chronic laryngitis was high. The response to treatment with proton-pump inhibitors in patients with reflux disease compared to those without underlined the critical role of acid reflux in a subset of patients with chronic laryngitis.

Value of heartburn for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease in severely obese patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in severely obese patients and the association between symptoms and objective data of GERD in this population.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A total of 158 consecutive severely obese patients (BMI > or = 40 kg/m(2)) were prospectively evaluated. Symptoms were evaluated by a structured clinical questionnaire. Objective assessment was made by ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and endoscopy. GERD was defined by the presence of symptoms or complications (esophagitis). The clinical criterion defining GERD was the presence of at least two episodes of heartburn per week.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 138 patients subjected to complete study was 42.6 +/- 10.2 years, with a BMI of 50.1 +/- 6.9 kg/m(2) (range, 40.6 to 69.4 kg/m(2)); 78% were women. The prevalence of GERD evaluated by symptoms and/or esophagitis was 33.3% (46/138). Clinical criteria of GERD were present in 31/138 cases (22.5%), and 26 (18.8%) had esophagitis. In 69/138 patients (50%), pHmetry was abnormal. Fifty-three patients with esophagitis and/or abnormal pHmetry were asymptomatic. The sensitivity of heartburn as a diagnostic criterion of GERD in patients with severe obesity was 29.3%, with a specificity of 85.7%. No significant association was observed between severe obesity grade and the prevalence of symptoms and/or objective data.

DISCUSSION

Asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux (abnormal esophageal acid exposure and/or reflux esophagitis) is more common than symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in severely obese patients. Increased BMI is not associated with a greater prevalence of GERD in these patients.

Empiric treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux with proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to define the outcome of empiric treatment of suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

DESIGN

The authors conducted a systematic review of the English and foreign literature. Studies that used PPIs as an empiric treatment modality for suspected LPR, whether alone or in combination with other acid suppressants and/or placebo, were included. Studies that did not include PPIs as a treatment option were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A lack of common outcome measures was evident in the uncontrolled studies. In the randomized, controlled trials, outcome measures included symptom questionnaires and videolaryngoscopy. Only one study used computerized voice analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen uncontrolled studies together with one unblinded, nonrandomized study with a control group of healthy volunteers and six double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials were identified from 1994 to 2004. Selection bias, blinding of the results, and lack of common outcome measures were some of the problems preventing a formal metaanalysis. Although uncontrolled series reported positive results, randomized, controlled trials demonstrated no statistically significant differences for changes in severity or frequency of symptoms associated with suspected reflux between PPIs and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for empiric treatment of suspected LPR with PPIs, by far the most common ear, nose and throat practice in the United Kingdom, are based on poor levels of evidence from uncontrolled studies. The few randomized, controlled trials have failed to demonstrate superiority of PPIs over placebo for treatment of suspected LPR.

Laryngeal examination is superior to endoscopy in the diagnosis of the laryngopharyngeal form of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

The laryngopharyngeal form of gastroesophageal reflux disease (LF GERD) is a frequent manifestation of supraesophageal GERD. Diagnosis of LF GERD is difficult: most of the common diagnostic methods of GERD have insufficient accuracy in establishing LF GERD. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of endoscopic and laryngologic examination in the diagnosis of LF GERD and to create a laryngoscopic reflux index (LRI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 108 LF GERD patients and 90 controls were investigated. The criteria for LF GERD were: complaints, reflux-laryngitis, and esophagitis (endoscopically or histologically proven). Lesions in four laryngeal regions were evaluated: arytenoids (A), intraarytenoid notch (IAN), vestibular folds (VF), and vocal cords (VC). Three types of mucosal lesions were evaluated on a points basis: alterations of the epithelium, erythema, and edema. Total LRI was calculated by summing-up the indices in the separate laryngeal areas.

RESULTS

The LRI mean value (11.48+/-3.78 points) of LF GERD patients was statistically significantly greater than that (1.64+/-1.93 points) of the controls. The most significant laryngoscopic changes of LF GERD were: mucosal lesions of IAN, mucosal lesions of VC, and edema of VC. A combination of these three findings reliably distinguishes the LF GERD patients from controls in 95.9% of cases. The mucosal lesions of IAN have the greatest importance in diagnosing LF GERD: the odds ratio to LF GERD - 21.32, p<0.001. Endoscopic esophagitis was established in 36 (33.3%) cases. The severity of esophagitis did not correlate with the severity of the laryngeal findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Laryngoscopy is superior to endoscopy in diagnosing LF GERD. Endoscopy has limited value in the diagnosis of LF GERD. Establishing the LRI could be helpful in the differential diagnosis of the disease in the everyday clinical practice.

Supra-oesophageal manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The extra-oesophageal signs that are most commonly related to gastro-oesophageal reflux include chest pain, asthma, chronic cough, posterior laryngitis and dental erosions. It is characteristic to find in such patients a poor presence of symptoms and endoscopic and pH-metric findings that are common in typical reflux. The therapeutic response to antisecretory drugs has become the most cost-effective tool for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. Both the evidence available and expert agreement in consensus conferences support the use of proton pump inhibitors with doubled standard doses for at least 12 weeks in most cases. While an acceptable response is achieved with this significant acid inhibition, there are still questions to be answered in these and other aspects, such as the true prevalence, path physiology and diagnosis of this condition. It is therefore necessary and increasingly useful to create multidisciplinary teams with the aim to improve and promote understanding and the care of patients suffering from these supra-oesophageal symptoms caused by gastro-oesophageal reflux.

What is the evidence that gastroesophageal reflux is involved in the etiology of laryngeal cancer?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent literature on the possible mechanisms and role of gastroesophageal reflux in the etiology of laryngeal cancer, in patients with and without the accepted risk factors of smoking and alcohol consumption.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent systematic review was not conclusive. The issue remains a popular one for small-scale clinical surveys, when different inclusion criteria and a range of diagnostic tests are used.

SUMMARY

After three decades of interest, there is still no unequivocal evidence for the role of reflux in the etiology of laryngeal cancer, whether in smokers or in nonsmokers.

The importance of multichannel intraluminal impedance in the evaluation of children with persistent respiratory symptoms

OBJECTIVES

Previous evidence suggests an association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic respiratory disease in children. Despite antisecretory antacid therapy, respiratory symptoms often persist supporting a role for nonacid reflux. The aim of this study was to determine whether nonacid reflux occurs in children with chronic respiratory disease.

METHODS

Twenty-eight children (mean age: 6.5 +/- 5.6 yr) with persistent respiratory symptoms on antacid medications underwent 24 h pH/multichannel intraluminal impedance (pH/MII) recording. The symptom index (SI) and the symptom sensitivity index (SSI) were calculated for each patient. Logistic regression was performed to determine which reflux characteristics were associated with a high degree of symptom correlation present during the occurrence of symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 1,822 reflux episodes were detected by pH/MII, 45% of which were nonacidic. The mean SI increased using pH/MII (35.7 +/- 28.5) compared to pH probe alone (14.6 +/- 18.9; p= 0.002); no differences in the mean SSI using pH/MII compared to pH probe alone were identified. Significantly more patients had a positive SI using pH/MII than pH probe alone (p= 0.035); there was no difference in the number of patients with a positive SSI using pH/MII compared to pH probe alone. Multivariate analysis revealed that symptoms occurred more frequently when the reflux was nonacidic, mixed, and full column. Also, younger children were more likely to have the simultaneous occurrence of symptoms and reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonacid reflux may be an important predictor of respiratory symptoms. pH/MII provided important information in the evaluation of children with intractable respiratory symptoms.