The FIMR evaluation: objectives, concepts, frameworks, and methods

Perinatal periods of risk: a community approach for using data to improve women and infants' health

This paper provides an overview of the origins, purpose, and methods of the Perinatal Periods of Risk (PPOR) approach to community-based planning for action to improve maternal and infant health outcomes. PPOR includes a new analytic framework that enables urban communities to better understand and address fetal and infant mortality. This article serves as the core reference for accompanying specific PPOR methods and practice articles. PPOR is based on core principles of full community engagement and equity and follows a six stage community-based planning process. In Stage 1, communities are mobilized and engaged, related planning efforts aligned, and community and analytic readiness assessed. In Stage 2, feto-infant mortality is mapped, excess mortality is estimated, likely causes of feto-infant mortality are determined, and appropriate actions are suggested. Stage 3 produces action plans for targeted prevention strategies. Stages 4 and 5 include implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Stage 6 fosters political will to sustain efforts. PPOR can be used in local maternal child health (MCH) practice for improving perinatal outcomes. MCH programs can use PPOR to integrate health assessments, initiate planning, identify significant gaps, target more in-depth inquiry, and suggest clear interventions for lowering feto-infant mortality. PPOR enables greater cooperation in improving MCH through more effective data use, strengthened data capacity, and greater shared understanding of complex infant mortality issues. PPOR offers local health departments and their community partners a comprehensive approach to address the health of women and infants in their jurisdictions.

Is neonatal neurological damage in the delivery room avoidable? Experience of 33 levels I and II maternity units of a French perinatal network

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of avoidable neonatal neurological damage.

STUDY DESIGN

We carried out a retrospective study from January 1st to December 31st 2003, including all children transferred from a level I or II maternity unit for suspected neurological damage (SND). Only cases confirmed by a persistent abnormality on clinical examination, EEG, transfontanelle ultrasound scan, CT scan or cerebral MRI were retained. Each case was studied in detail by an expert committee and classified as "avoidable", "unavoidable" or "of indeterminate avoidability." The management of "avoidable" cases was analysed to identify potentially avoidable factors (PAFs): not taking into account a major risk factor (PAF1), diagnostic errors (PAF2), suboptimal decision to delivery interval (PAF3) and mechanical complications (PAF4).

RESULTS

In total, 77 children were transferred for SND; two cases were excluded (inaccessible medical files). Forty of the 75 cases of SND included were confirmed: 29 were "avoidable", 8 were "unavoidable" and 3 were "of indeterminate avoidability". Analysis of the 29 avoidable cases identified 39 PAFs: 18 PAF1, 5 PAF2, 10 PAF3 and 6 PAF4. Five had no classifiable PAF (0 death), 11 children had one type of PAF (one death), 11 children had two types of PAF (3 deaths), 2 had three types of PAF (2 deaths).

CONCLUSION

Three quarters of the confirmed cases of neurological damage occurring in levels I and II maternity units of the Aurore network in 2003 were avoidable. Five out of six cases resulting in early death involved several potentially avoidable factors.