Anastomotic longitudinal stress due to modification of arterial longitudinal properties after anastomosis

Evaluation of fibrin, cyanoacrylate, and polyurethane-based tissue adhesives in sutureless vascular anastomosis: a comparative mechanical ex vivo study

The stability of a microvascular anastomosis is an important prerequisite for successful tissue transfer. Advances in tissue adhesives are potentially opening new avenues for their use in sutureless microsurgical anastomosis, however they have not yet gained clinical acceptance. In this ex vivo study, a novel polyurethane-based adhesive (PA) was used in sutureless anastomoses and its stability compared with that of sutureless anastomoses performed with fibrin glue (FG) and a cyanoacrylate (CA). Stability was assessed using hydrostatic (15 per group) and mechanical tests (13 per group). A total of 84 chicken femoral arteries were used in this study. The time taken to create the PA and CA anastomoses was significantly faster when compared to the FG anastomoses (P < 0.001): 1.55 ± 0.14 min and 1.39 ± 0.06 min, respectively, compared to 2.03 ± 0.35 min. Both sustained significantly higher pressures (289.3 mmHg and 292.7 mmHg, respectively) than anastomoses using FG (137.3 mmHg) (P < 0.001). CA anastomoses (0.99 N; P < 0.001) and PA anastomoses (0.38 N; P = 0.009) could both withstand significantly higher longitudinal tensile forces compared to FG anastomoses (0.10 N). Considering the background of an in vitro study, the PA and CA anastomosis techniques were shown to be similar to each other and superior to FG, due to their stability and faster handling. These findings need to be validated and confirmed in further in vivo studies.

Mechanical strength and hydrostatic testing of VIVO adhesive in sutureless microsurgical anastomoses: an ex vivo study

Conventional anastomoses with interrupted sutures are challenging and inevitably associated with trauma to the vessel walls. The goal of this study was to evaluate a novel alternative adhesive-based suture-free anastomosis technique that uses an intraluminal stent. Overall, 120 porcine coronary vessels were analyzed in an ex vivo model and were examined for their mechanical (n = 20 per cohort) and hydrostatic strength (n = 20 per cohort). Anastomoses were made using the novel VIVO adhesive with an additional intraluminal nitinol stent and was compared to interrupted suture anastomosis and to native vessels. Sutureless anastomoses withstood pressures 299 ± 4.47 [mmHg] comparable to native vessels. They were performed significantly faster 553.8 ± 82.44 [sec] (p ≤ 0.001) and withstood significantly higher pressures (p ≤ 0.001) than sutured anastomoses. We demonstrate that the adhesive-based anastomosis can also resist unphysiologically high longitudinal tensile forces with a mean of 1.33 [N]. Within the limitations of an in vitro study adhesive-based suture-free anastomosis technique has the biomechanical potential to offer a seamless alternative to sutured anastomosis because of its stability, and faster handling. In vivo animal studies are needed to validate outcomes and confirm safety.