[The Care of Intellectually Disabled Children and Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders in Hospitals for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy in Germany]

OBJECTIVE

This study explores the care situation of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities (ID) suffering from mental problems in Germany in 2014. It complements the study of Hennicke, which was conducted a decade ago.

METHOD

All clinics and departments of child and adolescent psychiatry in Germany (n=138) were contacted via mail or personally and requested to fill out a questionnaire. We received data from one-third (n=46) of all hospitals contacted.

RESULTS

Eight hospitals (17%) offered specialized services for this client base as either inpatient or outpatient treatment. Three hospitals (7%) provided both. Average proportions of children with ID treated were 6.6% for inpatient, 7.9% for day hospital, and 3% for outpatient services. More than half of responding institutions (54%) judged inpatient services as being defective. Slightly less (43%) reported their outpatient services as being defective or inadequate. For the treatment of mental disorders in young patients with ID, different treatments were used, according to the degree of the ID and applying the standard of child and adolescent psychiatry. Some interventions were used independently of the degree of ID, such as practical exercises, interventions in the patient environment (parents, family). Other interventions, such as psychotherapy were used to a lesser degree when the degree of ID increased. Youth with mild ID received twice as much psychotherapeutic interventions compared to children and adolescents with severe ID. The latter received more psychopharmacotherapy instead. Youth with severe ID received twice as much (67%) psychotropic medication compared to children and adolescents with mild ID.

CONCLUSION

The defective care situation of the highly vulnerable children and adolescents with ID did not change much between 2004 and 2014. The amount of specialized care services increased only marginally. Non-pharmacological treatments were used to a larger extent, compared to psychotropic medication, independent of the degree of ID.

[Inclusion - pediatric and adolescent psychiatry aspects]

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities became legally binding in Germany in March 2009. “Inclusion” is the major concept–all people with any kind of handicap must have the same rights to full and effective participation and inclusion in society. Preceding inclusion come adjustments in society with regard to ethical, legislative, administrative, conceptual, structural, economical, and thus also to healthcare-political frameworks, in order to make disabilities are as far as possible no longer a handicap in an individual’s everyday life. This review first outlines the present social status influencing the development of children, a child’s welfare, and especially the healthcare of children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders and conditions indicating barriers to inclusion. It focuses on those articles of the UN convention which are relevant with regard to ethical attitude, epidemiology, healthcare framework, diagnostics, therapy, teaching, and research with respect to child and adolescent psychiatry. The analysis points to a significant backlog demand in child psychiatric healthcare, teaching, and research.