Stigmatisierung essgestörter Frauen in Abhängigkeit vom diagnostischen Ansatz und der Form der Essstörung

Stigmatization of binge eating disorder in men: Implicit associations with weight status and femininity

BACKGROUND

Eating disorders are highly stigmatized, but stigma against binge eating disorder (BED) specifically is relatively understudied, especially in men. We compared perceptions of a male target with BED to one with alcohol use disorder (AUD), which shares the key characteristic of subjective loss of control over consumption. We also investigated how participants' eating and alcohol use behaviors and attitudes towards psychotherapy influence perceptions of these disorders.

METHODS

Participants (n = 402) viewed vignettes describing a male target engaged in excess alcohol use or binge eating and rated the target on various attributes and as being responsible for or in control of their behavior and suffering from an addiction warranting treatment. Participants completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Binge Eating Scale, and questions about attitudes towards and experience with psychological treatment.

RESULTS

The BED target was rated as significantly less "thin," more "overweight" and "obese", and higher on several positive attributes and traits traditionally associated with femininity; the AUD target was thought more likely to be suffering from an addiction and in need of psychological treatment (all p < .05), with no differences between targets in ratings of responsibility for or control over the problematic behavior. Ratings were unrelated to participants' attitudes towards or experience with psychological treatment and personal alcohol consumption or binge eating behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

BED in men appears less stigmatized than AUD but is implicitly associated with weight status and femininity, which may increase reluctance to seek treatment. Both AUD and BED were generally recognized as pathological and warranting intervention.

Kreativ? Innovativ? Effizient? Defizient?

Zusammenfassung. Anhand der sorgfältig begutachteten Veröffentlichungen der letzten vier Jahre in der Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie werden Schwerpunkte und Schwachpunkte, Vielfalt und Einseitigkeit, Bewährung und Mängel, Effizienz und Defizite unseres Fachs deutlich. Diese Übersicht mündet in Anregungen und Wünsche, die sowohl in der Forschung als auch in den Veröffentlichungen Berücksichtigung finden sollten.