Time to Move Again: Does the Bereitschaftspotential Covary with Demands on Internal Timing?

When Bereitschaftspotentials (BPs) are measured, participants are required to voluntarily perform a predefined number of identical movements, with varying intervals between movements, exceeding some obligatory minimum interval. Participants might cope with these demands on timing by installing a slow, broadly tuned rhythm of activation, serving as an internal trigger for executing movements in time. The BP might reflect the rising phase of this activation, culminating at the movement. If so (i) not only should BP amplitudes become larger, but BPs should also have their onsets earlier before movements when longer minimum intervals are required between movements (Experiment 1). Further, (ii) BP amplitudes should covary with demands on internal timing: decrease when internal timing is less necessary and increase in the other case. Variation of timing demands was realized by requiring participants to count vs. not to count the seconds between movements (Experiment 1) and by regular vs. irregular vs. no ticking of a clock (Experiment 2). Prediction (i) was confirmed while prediction (ii) was not. Thus, BP onsets did vary in accordance with the temporal constraints about when the movements should be performed, suggesting some relation to timing mechanisms, but we could not provide evidence for the notion that the process reflected by BPs is this timing mechanism.

The Bilateral Origin of Movement-Related Potentials Preceding Unilateral Actions

Abstract It is as yet unclear why a unilateral self-paced movement in human and nonhuman primates is preceded by a bilateral Bereitschaftspotential (BP) or readiness potential (RP). The RP consists of an early symmetrical part (termed BP1 or RP), presumably of supplementary motor area (SMA) origin, and a later contralaterally dominant part (termed BP2 or NS'), to which the primary motor cortex (M1) is thought to contribute. Apart from the SMA there are other motor areas in the mesial cortex, which might provide additional sources for these slow waves. Although bilateral intracortical sources of the RP are found in the premotor cortex ( Sasaki & Gemba, 1991 ), they play nearly any role in most discussions on the RP. Recently the very existence of the ipsilateral RP over MI has been doubted. RP recordings of two patients with an intracerebral electrode in the ventro-intermedius nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus are shown, suggesting that the ipsilateral RP is not the consequence of volume conduction or signal transmission via the corpus callosum. Rather they point to a subcortical source, from where the ipsilateral cortex is activated. Anatomical and recent RP recordings from Vim and subthalamic nucleus seem to support this interpretation.