De Clercq M, Vander Laenen F. The use of test instruments in forensic report writing - Explorative research in Flanders.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2019;
66:101454. [PMID:
31706392 DOI:
10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101454]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Forensic psychiatric reports have a profound impact on the life of a defendant, on society and on the mental health system. Good-quality reports are essential but are often criticized for their lack of thorough substantiation. The use of multiple methods to obtain information, test instruments (psychological and/or risk) and third-party information are recommended.
STUDY PURPOSE
To explore the use of test instruments and third-party information, as part of a multi-method approach, in forensic psychiatric evaluations. We examined 151 court-ordered expert reports in Flanders (Belgium).
RESULTS
A psychological test instrument was used in 61% of the cases, and a risk taxation instrument in 19% of the cases. Third-party information was used in 43% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS
A multi-method approach is not common practice in forensic psychiatric evaluations. The use of validated test instruments and third-party information can be improved. The quality of forensic reports could be improved by the establishment of a forensic observation centre and the use of a standardized approach.
Collapse