1
|
Validation of Sentinel-3 SLSTR Land Surface Temperature Retrieved by the Operational Product and Comparison with Explicitly Emissivity-Dependent Algorithms. REMOTE SENSING 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/rs13112228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Land surface temperature (LST) is an essential climate variable (ECV) for monitoring the Earth climate system. To ensure accurate retrieval from satellite data, it is important to validate satellite derived LSTs and ensure that they are within the required accuracy and precision thresholds. An emissivity-dependent split-window algorithm with viewing angle dependence and two dual-angle algorithms are proposed for the Sentinel-3 SLSTR sensor. Furthermore, these algorithms are validated together with the Sentinel-3 SLSTR operational LST product as well as several emissivity-dependent split-window algorithms with in-situ data from a rice paddy site. The LST retrieval algorithms were validated over three different land covers: flooded soil, bare soil, and full vegetation cover. Ground measurements were performed with a wide band thermal infrared radiometer at a permanent station. The coefficients of the proposed split-window algorithm were estimated using the Cloudless Land Atmosphere Radiosounding (CLAR) database: for the three surface types an overall systematic uncertainty (median) of −0.4 K and a precision (robust standard deviation) 1.1 K were obtained. For the Sentinel-3A SLSTR operational LST product, a systematic uncertainty of 1.3 K and a precision of 1.3 K were obtained. A first evaluation of the Sentinel-3B SLSTR operational LST product was also performed: systematic uncertainty was 1.5 K and precision 1.2 K. The results obtained over the three land covers found at the rice paddy site show that the emissivity-dependent split-window algorithms, i.e., the ones proposed here as well as previously proposed algorithms without angular dependence, provide more accurate and precise LSTs than the current version of the operational SLSTR product.
Collapse
|
2
|
Multisensor Thermal Infrared and Microwave Land Surface Temperature Algorithm Intercomparison. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12244164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
To ensure optimal and consistent algorithm usage within climate studies utilizing satellite-derived Land Surface Temperature (LST) datasets, an algorithm intercomparison exercise was undertaken to assess the various operational and scientific LST retrieval algorithms in use. This study was focused on several LST products including single-sensor products for AATSR, Terra-MODIS, SEVIRI, SSM/I and SSMIS; a Climate Date Record (CDR), which is a combined dataset drawing from AATSR, SLSTR and MODIS; and finally a merged low Earth orbit/geostationary product using data from AATSR, MODIS and SEVIRI. Therefore, the analysis included 14 algorithms: seven thermal infrared algorithms and seven microwave algorithms. The thermal infrared algorithms include five split-window coefficient-based algorithms, one optimal estimation algorithm and one single-channel inversion algorithm, with the microwave focusing on linear regression and neural network methods. The algorithm intercomparison assessed the performance of the retrieval algorithms for all sensors using a benchmark database. This approach was chosen due to the lack of sufficient in situ validation sites globally and the bias this limited set engendered on the training of particular algorithms. A simulated approach has the ability to test all parameters in a consistent, fair manner at a global scale. The benchmark database was constructed from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Re-analysis 5 (ERA5) atmospheric data, Combined ASTER and MODIS Emissivity for Land (CAMEL) infrared emissivity data, and Tool to Estimate Land Surface Emissivities at Microwave frequencies (TELSEM) emissivity data for the period of 2013–2015. The best-performing algorithms had biases of under 0.2 K and standard deviations of approximately 0.7 K. These results were consistent across multiple sensors. Areas of improvement, such as coefficient banding, were found for all algorithms as well as lines for further inquiry that could improve the global and regional performance.
Collapse
|
3
|
Improvement of Split-Window Algorithm for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from Sentinel-3A SLSTR Data Over Barren Surfaces Using ASTER GED Product. REMOTE SENSING 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/rs11243025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Land surface temperature (LST) is a key variable influencing the energy balance between the land surface and the atmosphere. In this work, a split-window algorithm was used to calculate LST from Sentinel-3A Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) thermal infrared data. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis atmospheric profiles combined with the radiation transport model MODerate resolution atmospheric TRANsmission version 5.2 (MODTRAN 5.2) were utilized to obtain atmospheric water vapor content (WVC). The ASTER Global Emissivity Database Version 3 (ASTER GED v3) product was utilized to estimate surface emissivity in order to improve the accuracy of LST estimation over barren surfaces. Using a simulation database, the coefficients of the algorithm were fitted and the performance of the algorithm was evaluated. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) values of the differences between the estimated LST and the actual LST of the MODTRAN radiative transfer simulation at each WVC subrange of 0–6.5 g/cm2 were less than 1.0 K. To validate the retrieval accuracy, ground-based LST measurements were collected at two relatively homogeneous desert study sites in Dalad Banner and Wuhai, Inner Mongolia, China. The bias between the retrieved LST and the in situ LST was about 0.2 K and the RMSE was about 1.3 K at the Dalad Banner site, whereas they were approximately -0.4 and 1.0 K at the Wuhai site. As a reference, the retrieved LST was compared with the operational SLSTR LST product in this study. The bias between the SLSTR LST product and the in situ LST was approximately 1 K and the RMSE was approximately 2 K at the Dalad Banner site, whereas they were approximately 1.1 and 1.4 K at the Wuhai site. The results demonstrate that the split-window algorithm combined with improved emissivity estimation based on the ASTER GED product can distinctly obtain better accuracy of LST over barren surfaces.
Collapse
|
4
|
Validation and Analysis of Long-Term AATSR Land Surface Temperature Product in the Heihe River Basin, China. REMOTE SENSING 2017. [DOI: 10.3390/rs9020152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
5
|
Coll C, Wan Z, Galve JM. Temperature-based and radiance-based validations of the V5 MODIS land surface temperature product. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.1029/2009jd012038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
6
|
Trigo IF, Monteiro IT, Olesen F, Kabsch E. An assessment of remotely sensed land surface temperature. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1029/2008jd010035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|