1
|
Ohtani S, Motoba T, Gjerloev JW, Frey HU, Mann IR, Chi PJ, Korth H. New Insights Into the Substorm Initiation Sequence From the Spatio-Temporal Development of Auroral Electrojets. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH. SPACE PHYSICS 2022; 127:e2021JA030114. [PMID: 35864908 PMCID: PMC9286795 DOI: 10.1029/2021ja030114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In the present study we examine three substorm events, Events 1-3, focusing on the spatio-temporal development of auroral electrojets (AEJs) before auroral breakup. In Events 1 and 2, auroral breakup was preceded by the equatorward motion of an auroral form, and the ground magnetic field changed northward and southward in the west and east of the expected equatorward flow, respectively. Provided that these magnetic disturbances were caused by local ionospheric Hall currents, this feature suggests that the equatorward flow turned both eastward and westward as it reached the equatorward part of the auroral oval. The auroral breakup took place at the eastward-turning and westward-turning branches in Events 1 and 2, respectively, and after the auroral breakup, the westward AEJ enhanced only on the same side of the flow demarcation meridian. The zonal flow divergence is considered as an ionospheric manifestation of the braking of an earthward flow burst in the near-Earth plasma sheet and subsequent dawnward and duskward turning. Therefore, in Events 1 and 2, the auroral breakup presumably mapped to the dawnward and duskward flow branches, respectively. Moreover, for Event 3, we do not find any pre-onset auroral or magnetic features that can be associated with an equatorward flow. These findings suggest that the braking of a pre-onset earthward flow burst itself is not the direct cause of substorm onset, and therefore, the wedge current system that forms at substorm onset is distinct from the one that is considered to form as a consequence of the flow braking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ohtani
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryLaurelMDUSA
| | - T. Motoba
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryLaurelMDUSA
| | - J. W. Gjerloev
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryLaurelMDUSA
| | - H. U. Frey
- Space Sciences LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCAUSA
| | | | - P. J. Chi
- Department of Earth and Space SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - H. Korth
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryLaurelMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sitnov M, Birn J, Ferdousi B, Gordeev E, Khotyaintsev Y, Merkin V, Motoba T, Otto A, Panov E, Pritchett P, Pucci F, Raeder J, Runov A, Sergeev V, Velli M, Zhou X. Explosive Magnetotail Activity. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS 2019; 215:31. [PMID: 31178609 PMCID: PMC6528807 DOI: 10.1007/s11214-019-0599-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Modes and manifestations of the explosive activity in the Earth's magnetotail, as well as its onset mechanisms and key pre-onset conditions are reviewed. Two mechanisms for the generation of the pre-onset current sheet are discussed, namely magnetic flux addition to the tail lobes, or other high-latitude perturbations, and magnetic flux evacuation from the near-Earth tail associated with dayside reconnection. Reconnection onset may require stretching and thinning of the sheet down to electron scales. It may also start in thicker sheets in regions with a tailward gradient of the equatorial magnetic field B z ; in this case it begins as an ideal-MHD instability followed by the generation of bursty bulk flows and dipolarization fronts. Indeed, remote sensing and global MHD modeling show the formation of tail regions with increased B z , prone to magnetic reconnection, ballooning/interchange and flapping instabilities. While interchange instability may also develop in such thicker sheets, it may grow more slowly compared to tearing and cause secondary reconnection locally in the dawn-dusk direction. Post-onset transients include bursty flows and dipolarization fronts, micro-instabilities of lower-hybrid-drift and whistler waves, as well as damped global flux tube oscillations in the near-Earth region. They convert the stretched tail magnetic field energy into bulk plasma acceleration and collisionless heating, excitation of a broad spectrum of plasma waves, and collisional dissipation in the ionosphere. Collisionless heating involves ion reflection from fronts, Fermi, betatron as well as other, non-adiabatic, mechanisms. Ionospheric manifestations of some of these magnetotail phenomena are discussed. Explosive plasma phenomena observed in the laboratory, the solar corona and solar wind are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhail Sitnov
- The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD USA
| | | | | | - Evgeny Gordeev
- Earth’s Physics Department, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Viacheslav Merkin
- The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD USA
| | - Tetsuo Motoba
- The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD USA
| | | | - Evgeny Panov
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria
| | - Philip Pritchett
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Fulvia Pucci
- National Institute for Fusion Science, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Toki, 509-5292 Japan
- Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ USA
| | - Joachim Raeder
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH USA
| | - Andrei Runov
- Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Victor Sergeev
- Earth’s Physics Department, Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Marco Velli
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
| | - Xuzhi Zhou
- School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871 China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knight HK, Galkin IA, Reinisch BW, Zhang Y. Auroral ionospheric E region parameters obtained from satellite-based far ultraviolet and ground-based ionosonde observations: 1. Data, methods, and comparisons. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH. SPACE PHYSICS 2018; 123:6065-6089. [PMID: 30167352 PMCID: PMC6110125 DOI: 10.1029/2017ja024822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
A large number (~1000) of coincident auroral far ultraviolet (FUV) and ground-based ionosonde observations are compared. This is the largest study to date of coincident satellite-based FUV and ground-based observations of the auroral E region. FUV radiance values from the NASA Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) Global Ultraviolet Imager (GUVI) and the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) F16 and F18 Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager (SSUSI) are included in the study. A method is described for deriving auroral ionospheric E region maximum electron density (NmE) and height of maximum electron density (hmE) from N2 Lyman-Birge-Hopfield (LBH) radiances given in two channels using lookup tables generated with the Boltzmann 3-Constituent (B3C) auroral particle transport and optical emission model. Our rules for scaling (i.e., extracting ionospheric parameters from) ionograms to obtain auroral NmE and hmE are also described. Statistical and visual comparison methods establish statistical consistency and agreement between the two methods for observing auroral NmE, but not auroral hmE. It is expected that auroral non-uniformity will cause the two NmE methods to give inconsistent results, but we have not attempted to quantify this effect in terms of more basic principles, and our results show that the two types of NmE observations are well correlated and statistically symmetrical, meaning that there is no overall bias and no scale-dependent bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H K Knight
- Computational Physics, Inc., Springfield, VA
| | - I A Galkin
- University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA
| | | | - Y Zhang
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD
| |
Collapse
|