1
|
Lugaz N, Lee CO, Al-Haddad N, Lillis RJ, Jian LK, Curtis DW, Galvin AB, Whittlesey PL, Rahmati A, Zesta E, Moldwin M, Summerlin EJ, Larson DE, Courtade S, French R, Hunter R, Covitti F, Cosgrove D, Prall JD, Allen RC, Zhuang B, Winslow RM, Scolini C, Lynch BJ, Filwett RJ, Palmerio E, Farrugia CJ, Smith CW, Möstl C, Weiler E, Janvier M, Regnault F, Livi R, Nieves-Chinchilla T. The Need for Near-Earth Multi-Spacecraft Heliospheric Measurements and an Explorer Mission to Investigate Interplanetary Structures and Transients in the Near-Earth Heliosphere. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS 2024; 220:73. [PMID: 39308932 PMCID: PMC11415466 DOI: 10.1007/s11214-024-01108-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Based on decades of single-spacecraft measurements near 1 au as well as data from heliospheric and planetary missions, multi-spacecraft simultaneous measurements in the inner heliosphere on separations of 0.05-0.2 au are required to close existing gaps in our knowledge of solar wind structures, transients, and energetic particles, especially coronal mass ejections (CMEs), stream interaction regions (SIRs), high speed solar wind streams (HSS), and energetic storm particle (ESP) events. The Mission to Investigate Interplanetary Structures and Transients (MIIST) is a concept for a small multi-spacecraft mission to explore the near-Earth heliosphere on these critical scales. It is designed to advance two goals: (a) to determine the spatiotemporal variations and the variability of solar wind structures, transients, and energetic particle fluxes in near-Earth interplanetary (IP) space, and (b) to advance our fundamental knowledge necessary to improve space weather forecasting from in situ data. We present the scientific rationale for this proposed mission, the science requirements, payload, implementation, and concept of mission operation that address a key gap in our knowledge of IP structures and transients within the cost, launch, and schedule limitations of the NASA Heliophysics Small Explorers program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noé Lugaz
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
| | - Christina O. Lee
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Nada Al-Haddad
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
| | - Robert J. Lillis
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Lan K. Jian
- Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
| | - David W. Curtis
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Antoinette B. Galvin
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
| | | | - Ali Rahmati
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Eftyhia Zesta
- Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
| | - Mark Moldwin
- Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | - Errol J. Summerlin
- Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
| | - Davin E. Larson
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Sasha Courtade
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | | | | | | | - Daniel Cosgrove
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - J. D. Prall
- Rocket Lab USA, Inc., Long Beach, CA 90808 USA
| | | | - Bin Zhuang
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
| | - Réka M. Winslow
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
| | - Camilla Scolini
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
- Solar–Terrestrial Centre of Excellence, Royal Observatory of Belgium, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Benjamin J. Lynch
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
- Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
| | | | | | - Charles J. Farrugia
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
| | - Charles W. Smith
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
| | - Christian Möstl
- Austrian Space Weather Office, GeoSphere Austria, A-8020 Graz, Austria
| | - Eva Weiler
- Austrian Space Weather Office, GeoSphere Austria, A-8020 Graz, Austria
| | - Miho Janvier
- CNRS, Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91405 Orsay, France
| | - Florian Regnault
- Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
| | - Roberto Livi
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kistler LM, Asamura K, Kasahara S, Miyoshi Y, Mouikis CG, Keika K, Petrinec SM, Stevens ML, Hori T, Yokota S, Shinohara I. The variable source of the plasma sheet during a geomagnetic storm. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6143. [PMID: 37903790 PMCID: PMC10616164 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41735-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Both solar wind and ionospheric sources contribute to the magnetotail plasma sheet, but how their contribution changes during a geomagnetic storm is an open question. The source is critical because the plasma sheet properties control the enhancement and decay rate of the ring current, the main cause of the geomagnetic field perturbations that define a geomagnetic storm. Here we use the solar wind composition to track the source and show that the plasma sheet source changes from predominantly solar wind to predominantly ionospheric as a storm develops. Additionally, we find that the ionospheric plasma during the storm main phase is initially dominated by singly ionized hydrogen (H+), likely from the polar wind, a low energy outflow from the polar cap, and then transitions to the accelerated outflow from the dayside and nightside auroral regions, identified by singly ionized oxygen (O+). These results reveal how the access to the magnetotail of the different sources can change quickly, impacting the storm development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Kistler
- University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
- Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
| | - K Asamura
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Japan
| | | | | | - C G Mouikis
- University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
| | - K Keika
- University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S M Petrinec
- Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - M L Stevens
- Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - T Hori
- Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - S Yokota
- Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
| | - I Shinohara
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
DuBois AM, Crabtree C, Ganguli G, Malaspina DM, Amatucci WE. MMS Observations of a Compressed Current Sheet: Importance of the Ambipolar Electric Field. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2022; 129:105101. [PMID: 36112445 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.105101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Spacecraft data reveal a nonuniform ambipolar electric field transverse to the magnetic field in a thin current sheet in Earth's magnetotail that leads to intense E×B velocity shear and nongyrotropic particle distributions. The E×B drift far exceeds the diamagnetic drift and thus drives observed lower hybrid waves. The shear-driven waves are localized to the magnetic field reversal region and are therefore ideally suited for the anomalous dissipation necessary for reconnection. It also reveals substructures embedded in the current density, indicating a compressed current sheet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami M DuBois
- U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Plasma Physics Division, Washington, D.C. 20375-5346, USA
| | - Chris Crabtree
- U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Plasma Physics Division, Washington, D.C. 20375-5346, USA
| | - Gurudas Ganguli
- U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Plasma Physics Division, Washington, D.C. 20375-5346, USA
| | - David M Malaspina
- Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences Department, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80303-7814, USA
- Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80303-7814, USA
| | - William E Amatucci
- U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Plasma Physics Division, Washington, D.C. 20375-5346, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koller F, Temmer M, Preisser L, Plaschke F, Geyer P, Jian LK, Roberts OW, Hietala H, LaMoury AT. Magnetosheath Jet Occurrence Rate in Relation to CMEs and SIRs. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH. SPACE PHYSICS 2022; 127:e2021JA030124. [PMID: 35866074 PMCID: PMC9286365 DOI: 10.1029/2021ja030124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Magnetosheath jets constitute a significant coupling effect between the solar wind (SW) and the magnetosphere of the Earth. In order to investigate the effects and forecasting of these jets, we present the first-ever statistical study of the jet production during large-scale SW structures like coronal mass ejections (CMEs), stream interaction regions (SIRs) and high speed streams (HSSs). Magnetosheath data from Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) spacecraft between January 2008 and December 2020 serve as measurement source for jet detection. Two different jet definitions were used to rule out statistical biases induced by our jet detection method. For the CME and SIR + HSS lists, we used lists provided by literature and expanded on incomplete lists using OMNI data to cover the time range of May 1996 to December 2020. We find that the number and total time of observed jets decrease when CME-sheaths hit the Earth. The number of jets is lower throughout the passing of the CME-magnetic ejecta (ME) and recovers quickly afterward. On the other hand, the number of jets increases during SIR and HSS phases. We discuss a few possibilities to explain these statistical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luis Preisser
- Space Research InstituteAustrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
| | - Ferdinand Plaschke
- Institut für Geophysik und extraterrestrische PhysikTU BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
| | - Paul Geyer
- Institute of PhysicsUniversity of GrazGrazAustria
- Hvar Observatory, Faculty of GeodesyUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
| | - Lan K. Jian
- Heliophysics Science DivisionNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltMDUSA
| | - Owen W. Roberts
- Space Research InstituteAustrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
| | - Heli Hietala
- The Blackett LaboratoryImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nitta NV, Mulligan T, Kilpua EKJ, Lynch BJ, Mierla M, O’Kane J, Pagano P, Palmerio E, Pomoell J, Richardson IG, Rodriguez L, Rouillard AP, Sinha S, Srivastava N, Talpeanu DC, Yardley SL, Zhukov AN. Understanding the Origins of Problem Geomagnetic Storms Associated with "Stealth" Coronal Mass Ejections. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS 2021; 217:82. [PMID: 34789949 PMCID: PMC8566663 DOI: 10.1007/s11214-021-00857-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Geomagnetic storms are an important aspect of space weather and can result in significant impacts on space- and ground-based assets. The majority of strong storms are associated with the passage of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) in the near-Earth environment. In many cases, these ICMEs can be traced back unambiguously to a specific coronal mass ejection (CME) and solar activity on the frontside of the Sun. Hence, predicting the arrival of ICMEs at Earth from routine observations of CMEs and solar activity currently makes a major contribution to the forecasting of geomagnetic storms. However, it is clear that some ICMEs, which may also cause enhanced geomagnetic activity, cannot be traced back to an observed CME, or, if the CME is identified, its origin may be elusive or ambiguous in coronal images. Such CMEs have been termed "stealth CMEs". In this review, we focus on these "problem" geomagnetic storms in the sense that the solar/CME precursors are enigmatic and stealthy. We start by reviewing evidence for stealth CMEs discussed in past studies. We then identify several moderate to strong geomagnetic storms (minimum Dst < - 50 nT) in solar cycle 24 for which the related solar sources and/or CMEs are unclear and apparently stealthy. We discuss the solar and in situ circumstances of these events and identify several scenarios that may account for their elusive solar signatures. These range from observational limitations (e.g., a coronagraph near Earth may not detect an incoming CME if it is diffuse and not wide enough) to the possibility that there is a class of mass ejections from the Sun that have only weak or hard-to-observe coronal signatures. In particular, some of these sources are only clearly revealed by considering the evolution of coronal structures over longer time intervals than is usually considered. We also review a variety of numerical modelling approaches that attempt to advance our understanding of the origins and consequences of stealthy solar eruptions with geoeffective potential. Specifically, we discuss magnetofrictional modelling of the energisation of stealth CME source regions and magnetohydrodynamic modelling of the physical processes that generate stealth CME or CME-like eruptions, typically from higher altitudes in the solar corona than CMEs from active regions or extended filament channels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nariaki V. Nitta
- Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
| | - Tamitha Mulligan
- Space Sciences Department, The Aerospace Corporation, Los Angeles, CA 94305 USA
| | | | - Benjamin J. Lynch
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Marilena Mierla
- Solar–Terrestrial Centre of Excellence—SIDC, Royal Observatory of Belgium, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Geodynamics of the Romanian Academy, 020032 Bucharest-37, Romania
| | - Jennifer O’Kane
- Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6NT UK
| | - Paolo Pagano
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS UK
- Dipartimento di Fisica & Chimica, Università di Palermo, I-90134 Palermo, Italy
- INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, I-90134 Palermo, Italy
| | - Erika Palmerio
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
- Cooperative Programs for the Advancement of Earth System Science, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301 USA
| | - Jens Pomoell
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ian G. Richardson
- Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA
- Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
| | - Luciano Rodriguez
- Solar–Terrestrial Centre of Excellence—SIDC, Royal Observatory of Belgium, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexis P. Rouillard
- IRAP, Université Toulouse III—Paul Sabatier, CNRS, CNES, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Suvadip Sinha
- Centre of Excellence in Space Sciences India, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Kolkata, Mohanpur, 741246 India
| | - Nandita Srivastava
- Centre of Excellence in Space Sciences India, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Kolkata, Mohanpur, 741246 India
- Udaipur Solar Observatory, Physical Research Laboratory, Udaipur, 313001 India
| | - Dana-Camelia Talpeanu
- Solar–Terrestrial Centre of Excellence—SIDC, Royal Observatory of Belgium, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
- Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics (CmPA), KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephanie L. Yardley
- Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6NT UK
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS UK
| | - Andrei N. Zhukov
- Solar–Terrestrial Centre of Excellence—SIDC, Royal Observatory of Belgium, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
- Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|