1
|
Gershman DJ, F-Viñas A, Dorelli JC, Boardsen SA, Avanov LA, Bellan PM, Schwartz SJ, Lavraud B, Coffey VN, Chandler MO, Saito Y, Paterson WR, Fuselier SA, Ergun RE, Strangeway RJ, Russell CT, Giles BL, Pollock CJ, Torbert RB, Burch JL. Wave-particle energy exchange directly observed in a kinetic Alfvén-branch wave. Nat Commun 2017; 8:14719. [PMID: 28361881 PMCID: PMC5380972 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Alfvén waves are fundamental plasma wave modes that permeate the universe. At small kinetic scales, they provide a critical mechanism for the transfer of energy between electromagnetic fields and charged particles. These waves are important not only in planetary magnetospheres, heliospheres and astrophysical systems but also in laboratory plasma experiments and fusion reactors. Through measurement of charged particles and electromagnetic fields with NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission, we utilize Earth's magnetosphere as a plasma physics laboratory. Here we confirm the conservative energy exchange between the electromagnetic field fluctuations and the charged particles that comprise an undamped kinetic Alfvén wave. Electrons confined between adjacent wave peaks may have contributed to saturation of damping effects via nonlinear particle trapping. The investigation of these detailed wave dynamics has been unexplored territory in experimental plasma physics and is only recently enabled by high-resolution MMS observations. Alfvén waves are fundamental plasma modes that provide a mechanism for the transfer of energy between particles and fields. Here the authors confirm experimentally the conservative energy exchange between Alfvén wave fields and plasma particles via high-resolution MMS observations of Earth's magnetosphere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Gershman
- Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.,NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
| | - Adolfo F-Viñas
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
| | - John C Dorelli
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
| | - Scott A Boardsen
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA.,Goddard Planetary Heliophysics Institute, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Maryland 21250, USA
| | - Levon A Avanov
- Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.,NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
| | - Paul M Bellan
- Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | | | - Benoit Lavraud
- Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse F-31400, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 5277, Toulouse F-31400, France
| | | | | | - Yoshifumi Saito
- JAXA Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan
| | | | | | - Robert E Ergun
- Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
| | - Robert J Strangeway
- Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
| | - Christopher T Russell
- Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
| | - Barbara L Giles
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
| | - Craig J Pollock
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
| | - Roy B Torbert
- Physics Department, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA.,Southwest Research Institute Durham, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA
| | - James L Burch
- Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Phan TD, Gosling JT, Davis MS, Skoug RM, Øieroset M, Lin RP, Lepping RP, McComas DJ, Smith CW, Reme H, Balogh A. A magnetic reconnection X-line extending more than 390 Earth radii in the solar wind. Nature 2006; 439:175-8. [PMID: 16407946 DOI: 10.1038/nature04393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2005] [Accepted: 10/31/2005] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic reconnection in a current sheet converts magnetic energy into particle energy, a process that is important in many laboratory, space and astrophysical contexts. It is not known at present whether reconnection is fundamentally a process that can occur over an extended region in space or whether it is patchy and unpredictable in nature. Frequent reports of small-scale flux ropes and flow channels associated with reconnection in the Earth's magnetosphere raise the possibility that reconnection is intrinsically patchy, with each reconnection X-line (the line along which oppositely directed magnetic field lines reconnect) extending at most a few Earth radii (R(E)), even though the associated current sheets span many tens or hundreds of R(E). Here we report three-spacecraft observations of accelerated flow associated with reconnection in a current sheet embedded in the solar wind flow, where the reconnection X-line extended at least 390R(E) (or 2.5 x 10(6) km). Observations of this and 27 similar events imply that reconnection is fundamentally a large-scale process. Patchy reconnection observed in the Earth's magnetosphere is therefore likely to be a geophysical effect associated with fluctuating boundary conditions, rather than a fundamental property of reconnection. Our observations also reveal, surprisingly, that reconnection can operate in a quasi-steady-state manner even when undriven by the external flow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T D Phan
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hasegawa H, Fujimoto M, Phan TD, Rème H, Balogh A, Dunlop MW, Hashimoto C, Tandokoro R. Transport of solar wind into Earth's magnetosphere through rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz vortices. Nature 2004; 430:755-8. [PMID: 15306802 DOI: 10.1038/nature02799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 492] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2004] [Accepted: 06/29/2004] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Establishing the mechanisms by which the solar wind enters Earth's magnetosphere is one of the biggest goals of magnetospheric physics, as it forms the basis of space weather phenomena such as magnetic storms and aurorae. It is generally believed that magnetic reconnection is the dominant process, especially during southward solar-wind magnetic field conditions when the solar-wind and geomagnetic fields are antiparallel at the low-latitude magnetopause. But the plasma content in the outer magnetosphere increases during northward solar-wind magnetic field conditions, contrary to expectation if reconnection is dominant. Here we show that during northward solar-wind magnetic field conditions-in the absence of active reconnection at low latitudes-there is a solar-wind transport mechanism associated with the nonlinear phase of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. This can supply plasma sources for various space weather phenomena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Hasegawa
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-8000, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Frey HU, Phan TD, Fuselier SA, Mende SB. Continuous magnetic reconnection at Earth's magnetopause. Nature 2003; 426:533-7. [PMID: 14654835 DOI: 10.1038/nature02084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2003] [Accepted: 09/23/2003] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The most important process that allows solar-wind plasma to cross the magnetopause and enter Earth's magnetosphere is the merging between solar-wind and terrestrial magnetic fields of opposite sense-magnetic reconnection. It is at present not known whether reconnection can happen in a continuous fashion or whether it is always intermittent. Solar flares and magnetospheric substorms--two phenomena believed to be initiated by reconnection--are highly burst-like occurrences, raising the possibility that the reconnection process is intrinsically intermittent, storing and releasing magnetic energy in an explosive and uncontrolled manner. Here we show that reconnection at Earth's high-latitude magnetopause is driven directly by the solar wind, and can be continuous and even quasi-steady over an extended period of time. The dayside proton auroral spot in the ionosphere--the remote signature of high-latitude magnetopause reconnection--is present continuously for many hours. We infer that reconnection is not intrinsically intermittent; its steadiness depends on the way that the process is driven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H U Frey
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-7450, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oieroset M, Phan TD, Fujimoto M, Lin RP, Lepping RP. In situ detection of collisionless reconnection in the Earth's magnetotail. Nature 2001; 412:414-7. [PMID: 11473310 DOI: 10.1038/35086520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 411] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic reconnection is the process by which magnetic field lines of opposite polarity reconfigure to a lower-energy state, with the release of magnetic energy to the surroundings. Reconnection at the Earth's dayside magnetopause and in the magnetotail allows the solar wind into the magnetosphere. It begins in a small 'diffusion region', where a kink in the newly reconnected lines produces jets of plasma away from the region. Although plasma jets from reconnection have previously been reported, the physical processes that underlie jet formation have remained poorly understood because of the scarcity of in situ observations of the minuscule diffusion region. Theoretically, both resistive and collisionless processes can initiate reconnection, but which process dominates in the magnetosphere is still debated. Here we report the serendipitous encounter of the Wind spacecraft with an active reconnection diffusion region, in which are detected key processes predicted by models of collisionless reconnection. The data therefore demonstrate that collisionless reconnection occurs in the magnetotail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Oieroset
- Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Extended magnetic reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause from detection of bi-directional jets. Nature 2000; 404:848-50. [PMID: 10786785 DOI: 10.1038/35009050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic reconnection is a process that converts magnetic energy into bi-directional plasma jets; it is believed to be the dominant process by which solar-wind energy enters the Earth's magnetosphere. This energy is subsequently dissipated by magnetic storms and aurorae. Previous single-spacecraft observations revealed only single jets at the magnetopause--while the existence of a counter-streaming jet was implicitly assumed, no experimental confirmation was available. Here we report in situ two-spacecraft observations of bi-directional jets at the magnetopause, finding evidence for a stable and extended reconnection line; the latter implies substantial entry of the solar wind into the magnetosphere. We conclude that reconnection is determined by large-scale interactions between the solar wind and the magnetosphere, rather than by local conditions at the magnetopause.
Collapse
|