1
|
Krämer E, Koller F, Suni J, LaMoury AT, Pöppelwerth A, Glebe G, Mohammed-Amin T, Raptis S, Vuorinen L, Weiss S, Xirogiannopoulou N, Archer M, Blanco-Cano X, Gunell H, Hietala H, Karlsson T, Plaschke F, Preisser L, Roberts O, Simon Wedlund C, Temmer M, Vörös Z. Jets Downstream of Collisionless Shocks: Recent Discoveries and Challenges. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS 2024; 221:4. [PMID: 39735479 PMCID: PMC11680644 DOI: 10.1007/s11214-024-01129-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 12/31/2024]
Abstract
Plasma flows with enhanced dynamic pressure, known as magnetosheath jets, are often found downstream of collisionless shocks. As they propagate through the magnetosheath, they interact with the surrounding plasma, shaping its properties, and potentially becoming geoeffective upon reaching the magnetopause. In recent years (since 2016), new research has produced vital results that have significantly enhanced our understanding on many aspects of jets. In this review, we summarise and discuss these findings. Spacecraft and ground-based observations, as well as global and local simulations, have contributed greatly to our understanding of the causes and effects of magnetosheath jets. First, we discuss recent findings on jet occurrence and formation, including in other planetary environments. New insights into jet properties and evolution are then examined using observations and simulations. Finally, we review the impact of jets upon interaction with the magnetopause and subsequent consequences for the magnetosphere-ionosphere system. We conclude with an outlook and assessment on future challenges. This includes an overview on future space missions that may prove crucial in tackling the outstanding open questions on jets in the terrestrial magnetosheath as well as other planetary and shock environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Krämer
- Department of Physics, Umeå University, Linnaeus väg 24, Umeå, 90736 Umeå Sweden
| | - Florian Koller
- Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, Graz, 8010 Austria
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS UK
| | - Jonas Suni
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Pietari Kalmin katu 5, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Adrian T. LaMoury
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | - Adrian Pöppelwerth
- Institute of Geophysics and Extraterrestrial Physics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Universitätsplatz 2, Braunschweig, 38106 Germany
| | - Georg Glebe
- Institute of Geophysics and Extraterrestrial Physics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Universitätsplatz 2, Braunschweig, 38106 Germany
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, 30332 GA USA
| | - Tara Mohammed-Amin
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Space and Plasma Physics, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Teknikringen 31, Stockholm, 100 44 Sweden
| | - Savvas Raptis
- Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, 11000 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, 20723 MD USA
| | - Laura Vuorinen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS UK
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, Turku, 20014 Finland
| | - Stefan Weiss
- Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, Graz, 8010 Austria
| | - Niki Xirogiannopoulou
- Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V Holešovičkách 2, Prague, 180 00 Czech Republic
| | - Martin Archer
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | - Xóchitl Blanco-Cano
- Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito de la Investigación Científica s/n, México City, 04150 CDMX Mexico
| | - Herbert Gunell
- Department of Physics, Umeå University, Linnaeus väg 24, Umeå, 90736 Umeå Sweden
| | - Heli Hietala
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS UK
| | - Tomas Karlsson
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Space and Plasma Physics, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Teknikringen 31, Stockholm, 100 44 Sweden
| | - Ferdinand Plaschke
- Institute of Geophysics and Extraterrestrial Physics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Universitätsplatz 2, Braunschweig, 38106 Germany
| | - Luis Preisser
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstraße 6, Graz, 8042 Austria
| | - Owen Roberts
- Department of Physics, Aberystwyth University, Physical Sciences Building, Aberystwyth, SY23 3BZ UK
| | - Cyril Simon Wedlund
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstraße 6, Graz, 8042 Austria
| | - Manuela Temmer
- Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, Graz, 8010 Austria
| | - Zoltán Vörös
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstraße 6, Graz, 8042 Austria
- Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, HUN-REN, Csatkai E. u. 6-8., Sopron, 9400 Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Q, Barabash S, Holmstrom M, Wang XD, Futaana Y, Fowler CM, Ramstad R, Nilsson H. Mars's induced magnetosphere can degenerate. Nature 2024; 634:45-47. [PMID: 39294383 PMCID: PMC11446820 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07959-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024]
Abstract
The interaction between planets and stellar winds can lead to atmospheric loss and is, thus, important for the evolution of planetary atmospheres1. The planets in our Solar System typically interact with the solar wind, whose velocity is at a large angle to the embedded stellar magnetic field. For planets without an intrinsic magnetic field, this interaction creates an induced magnetosphere and a bow shock in front of the planet2. However, when the angle between the solar wind velocity and the solar wind magnetic field (cone angle) is small, the interaction is very different3. Here we show that when the cone angle is small at Mars, the induced magnetosphere degenerates. There is no shock on the dayside, only weak flank shocks. A cross-flow plume appears and the ambipolar field drives planetary ions upstream. Hybrid simulations with a 4° cone angle show agreement with observations by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution mission4 and Mars Express5. Degenerate, induced magnetospheres are complex and not yet explored objects. It remains to be studied what the secondary effects are on processes like atmospheric loss through ion escape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Zhang
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden.
- Department of Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | - Christopher M Fowler
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Robin Ramstad
- Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Hans Nilsson
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden
- Department of Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dimmock AP, Hietala H, Zou Y. Compiling Magnetosheath Statistical Data Sets Under Specific Solar Wind Conditions: Lessons Learnt From the Dayside Kinetic Southward IMF GEM Challenge. EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE (HOBOKEN, N.J.) 2020; 7:e2020EA001095. [PMID: 32715028 PMCID: PMC7375150 DOI: 10.1029/2020ea001095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The Geospace Environmental Modelling (GEM) community offers a framework for collaborations between modelers, observers, and theoreticians in the form of regular challenges. In many cases, these challenges involve model-data comparisons to provide wider context to observations or validate model results. To perform meaningful comparisons, a statistical approach is often adopted, which requires the extraction of a large number of measurements from a specific region. However, in complex regions such as the magnetosheath, compiling these data can be difficult. Here, we provide the statistical context of compiling statistical data for the southward IMF GEM challenge initiated by the "Dayside Kinetic Processes in Global Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction" focus group. It is shown that matching very specific upstream conditions can severely impact the statistical data if limits are imposed on several solar wind parameters. We suggest that future studies that wish to compare simulations and/or single events to statistical data should carefully consider at an early stage the availability of data in context with the upstream criteria. We also demonstrate the importance of how specific IMF conditions are defined, the chosen spacecraft, the region of interest, and how regions are identified automatically. The lessons learnt in this study are of wide context to many future studies as well as GEM challenges. The results also highlight the issue where a global statistical perspective has to be balanced with its relevance to more-extreme, less-frequent individual events, which is typically the case in the field of space weather.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - H. Hietala
- Blackett LaboratoryImperial College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
- Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Y. Zou
- Department of Space ScienceThe University of Alabama in HuntsvilleHuntsvilleALUSA
| |
Collapse
|