1
|
Wawrzaszek A, Hajra R, Gil A, Modzelewska R, Tsurutani BT, Wawrzaszek R. Geoelectric fields and geomagnetically induced currents during the April 23-24, 2023 geomagnetic storm. Sci Rep 2024; 14:25074. [PMID: 39443600 PMCID: PMC11499924 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76449-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
We present a study on the dynamical variations of geoelectric fields E during the intense geomagnetic storm of April 23-24, 2023. The storm is caused by the interplanetary counterpart of a coronal mass ejection erupted from the Sun in association with an M1.7 X-ray flare. The GeoElectric Dynamic Mapping (GEDMap) code is applied to develop spatial E maps using magnetometer data from 29 observatories distributed across northern Europe. The code has been applied during local nighttime and morningtime intense substorms which occurred during the storm main phase. The maps show intensifications and strong variability of the E-fields during the substorm events. In particular, the morningtime event is associated with a significant variability in the E-field direction. Using the computed E-fields, we determined geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) at the sub-auroral station Mäntsälä. The modeled GIC values exhibit significant correlation (correlation coefficients r = 0.73 - 0.76 ) with the observed values. The performed E-field mapping provides a basis for the further determination of GICs in selected locations not covered by magnetometers and can be useful in understanding the GIC variability during magnetic storms and substorms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Wawrzaszek
- Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN), Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Rajkumar Hajra
- CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People's Republic of China
| | - Agnieszka Gil
- Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN), Warsaw, Poland
- University of Siedlce, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Institute of Mathematics, Siedlce, Poland
| | - Renata Modzelewska
- University of Siedlce, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Institute of Mathematics, Siedlce, Poland
| | | | - Roman Wawrzaszek
- Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN), Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goetz C, Scharré L, Wedlund CS, Moeslinger A, Nilsson H, Odelstad E, Taylor MGGT, Volwerk M. Solar Wind Protons in the Diamagnetic Cavity at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH. SPACE PHYSICS 2023; 128:e2022JA031249. [PMID: 38440350 PMCID: PMC10909421 DOI: 10.1029/2022ja031249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
The plasma environment at a comet can be divided into different regions with distinct plasma characteristics. Two such regions are the solar wind ion cavity, which refers to the part of the outer coma that does not contain any solar wind ions anymore; and the diamagnetic cavity, which is the region of unmagnetized plasma in the innermost coma. From theory and previous observations, it was thought that under usual circumstances no solar wind ion should be observable near or inside of the diamagnetic cavity. For the first time, we report on five observations that show that protons near solar wind energies can also be found inside the diamagnetic cavity. We characterize these proton signatures, where and when they occur, and discuss possible mechanisms that could lead to protons penetrating the inner coma and traversing the diamagnetic cavity boundary. By understanding these observations, we hope to better understand the interaction region of the comet with the solar wind under nonstandard conditions. The protons detected inside the diamagnetic cavity have directions and energies consistent with protons of solar wind origin. The five events occur only at intermediate gas production rates and low cometocentric distances. Charge transfer reactions, high solar wind dynamic pressure and a neutral gas outburst can be ruled out as causes. We suggest that the anomalous appearance of protons in the diamagnetic cavity is due to a specific solar wind configuration where the solar wind velocity is parallel to the interplanetary magnetic field, thus inhibiting mass-loading and deflection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Goetz
- Department of Mathematics, Physics and Electrical EngineeringNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle‐upon‐TyneUK
- European Space Research and Technology CentreEuropean Space AgencyNoordwijkThe Netherlands
| | - Lucie Scharré
- Old CollegeUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Institute for Physics, Laboratory for Galaxy Evolution and Spectral ModellingEcole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Observatoire de SauvernyVersoixSwitzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Martin Volwerk
- Space Research InstituteAustrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Goetz C, Behar E, Beth A, Bodewits D, Bromley S, Burch J, Deca J, Divin A, Eriksson AI, Feldman PD, Galand M, Gunell H, Henri P, Heritier K, Jones GH, Mandt KE, Nilsson H, Noonan JW, Odelstad E, Parker JW, Rubin M, Simon Wedlund C, Stephenson P, Taylor MGGT, Vigren E, Vines SK, Volwerk M. The Plasma Environment of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS 2022; 218:65. [PMID: 36397966 PMCID: PMC9649581 DOI: 10.1007/s11214-022-00931-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The environment of a comet is a fascinating and unique laboratory to study plasma processes and the formation of structures such as shocks and discontinuities from electron scales to ion scales and above. The European Space Agency's Rosetta mission collected data for more than two years, from the rendezvous with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in August 2014 until the final touch-down of the spacecraft end of September 2016. This escort phase spanned a large arc of the comet's orbit around the Sun, including its perihelion and corresponding to heliocentric distances between 3.8 AU and 1.24 AU. The length of the active mission together with this span in heliocentric and cometocentric distances make the Rosetta data set unique and much richer than sets obtained with previous cometary probes. Here, we review the results from the Rosetta mission that pertain to the plasma environment. We detail all known sources and losses of the plasma and typical processes within it. The findings from in-situ plasma measurements are complemented by remote observations of emissions from the plasma. Overviews of the methods and instruments used in the study are given as well as a short review of the Rosetta mission. The long duration of the Rosetta mission provides the opportunity to better understand how the importance of these processes changes depending on parameters like the outgassing rate and the solar wind conditions. We discuss how the shape and existence of large scale structures depend on these parameters and how the plasma within different regions of the plasma environment can be characterised. We end with a non-exhaustive list of still open questions, as well as suggestions on how to answer them in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Goetz
- ESTEC, European Space Agency, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands
- Department of Mathematics, Physics and Electrical Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Etienne Behar
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 812, 981 28 Kiruna, Sweden
- Lagrange, OCA, UCA, CNRS, Nice, France
| | - Arnaud Beth
- Department of Physics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Dennis Bodewits
- Physics Department, Leach Science Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36832 USA
| | - Steve Bromley
- Physics Department, Leach Science Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36832 USA
| | - Jim Burch
- Southwest Research Institute, P.O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio, TX 78228-0510 USA
| | - Jan Deca
- Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, 3665 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
| | - Andrey Divin
- Earth Physics Department, St. Petersburg State University, Ulianovskaya, 1, St Petersburg, 198504 Russia
| | | | - Paul D. Feldman
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
| | - Marina Galand
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | - Herbert Gunell
- Department of Physics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Pierre Henri
- Lagrange, OCA, UCA, CNRS, Nice, France
- LPC2E, CNRS, Orléans, France
| | - Kevin Heritier
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | - Geraint H. Jones
- UCL Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, RH5 6NT UK
- The Centre for Planetary Sciences at UCL/Birkbeck, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | | | - Hans Nilsson
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 812, 981 28 Kiruna, Sweden
| | - John W. Noonan
- Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
| | - Elias Odelstad
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 537, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Martin Rubin
- Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cyril Simon Wedlund
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstr. 6, 8042 Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Stephenson
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | | | - Erik Vigren
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 537, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sarah K. Vines
- Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723 USA
| | - Martin Volwerk
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstr. 6, 8042 Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang J, Temmer M, Gopalswamy N, Malandraki O, Nitta NV, Patsourakos S, Shen F, Vršnak B, Wang Y, Webb D, Desai MI, Dissauer K, Dresing N, Dumbović M, Feng X, Heinemann SG, Laurenza M, Lugaz N, Zhuang B. Earth-affecting solar transients: a review of progresses in solar cycle 24. PROGRESS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE 2021; 8:56. [PMID: 34722120 PMCID: PMC8550066 DOI: 10.1186/s40645-021-00426-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This review article summarizes the advancement in the studies of Earth-affecting solar transients in the last decade that encompasses most of solar cycle 24. It is a part of the effort of the International Study of Earth-affecting Solar Transients (ISEST) project, sponsored by the SCOSTEP/VarSITI program (2014-2018). The Sun-Earth is an integrated physical system in which the space environment of the Earth sustains continuous influence from mass, magnetic field, and radiation energy output of the Sun in varying timescales from minutes to millennium. This article addresses short timescale events, from minutes to days that directly cause transient disturbances in the Earth's space environment and generate intense adverse effects on advanced technological systems of human society. Such transient events largely fall into the following four types: (1) solar flares, (2) coronal mass ejections (CMEs) including their interplanetary counterparts ICMEs, (3) solar energetic particle (SEP) events, and (4) stream interaction regions (SIRs) including corotating interaction regions (CIRs). In the last decade, the unprecedented multi-viewpoint observations of the Sun from space, enabled by STEREO Ahead/Behind spacecraft in combination with a suite of observatories along the Sun-Earth lines, have provided much more accurate and global measurements of the size, speed, propagation direction, and morphology of CMEs in both 3D and over a large volume in the heliosphere. Many CMEs, fast ones, in particular, can be clearly characterized as a two-front (shock front plus ejecta front) and three-part (bright ejecta front, dark cavity, and bright core) structure. Drag-based kinematic models of CMEs are developed to interpret CME propagation in the heliosphere and are applied to predict their arrival times at 1 AU in an efficient manner. Several advanced MHD models have been developed to simulate realistic CME events from the initiation on the Sun until their arrival at 1 AU. Much progress has been made on detailed kinematic and dynamic behaviors of CMEs, including non-radial motion, rotation and deformation of CMEs, CME-CME interaction, and stealth CMEs and problematic ICMEs. The knowledge about SEPs has also been significantly improved. An outlook of how to address critical issues related to Earth-affecting solar transients concludes this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, George Mason University, 4400 University Dr., MSN 3F3, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
| | | | | | - Olga Malandraki
- National Observatory of Athens, Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and Remote Sensing, Penteli, Athens Greece
| | - Nariaki V. Nitta
- Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, Palo Alto, CA USA
| | | | - Fang Shen
- SIGMA Weather Group, State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190 China
| | - Bojan Vršnak
- Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kaciceva 26, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Yuming Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026 PR China
| | - David Webb
- ISR, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave., Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
| | - Mihir I. Desai
- Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonia, TX 78023 USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
| | - Karin Dissauer
- Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- NorthWest Research Association, Boulder, CO USA
| | - Nina Dresing
- Institut fuer Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Mateja Dumbović
- Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kaciceva 26, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Xueshang Feng
- SIGMA Weather Group, State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190 China
| | - Stephan G. Heinemann
- Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Monica Laurenza
- INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, I-00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Noé Lugaz
- Space Science Center and Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH USA
| | - Bin Zhuang
- Space Science Center and Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amerstorfer T, Hinterreiter J, Reiss MA, Möstl C, Davies JA, Bailey RL, Weiss AJ, Dumbović M, Bauer M, Amerstorfer UV, Harrison RA. Evaluation of CME Arrival Prediction Using Ensemble Modeling Based on Heliospheric Imaging Observations. SPACE WEATHER : THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS 2021; 19:e2020SW002553. [PMID: 34853569 PMCID: PMC8607470 DOI: 10.1029/2020sw002553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
In this study, we evaluate a coronal mass ejection (CME) arrival prediction tool that utilizes the wide-angle observations made by STEREO's heliospheric imagers (HI). The unsurpassable advantage of these imagers is the possibility to observe the evolution and propagation of a CME from close to the Sun out to 1 AU and beyond. We believe that by exploiting this capability, instead of relying on coronagraph observations only, it is possible to improve today's CME arrival time predictions. The ELlipse Evolution model based on HI observations (ELEvoHI) assumes that the CME frontal shape within the ecliptic plane is an ellipse and allows the CME to adjust to the ambient solar wind speed; that is, it is drag based. ELEvoHI is used to perform ensemble simulations by varying the CME frontal shape within given boundary conditions that are consistent with the observations made by HI. In this work, we evaluate different setups of the model by performing hindcasts for 15 well-defined isolated CMEs that occurred when STEREO was near L4/5, between the end of 2008 and the beginning of 2011. In this way, we find a mean absolute error of between 6.2 ± 7.9 and 9.9 ± 13 hr depending on the model setup used. ELEvoHI is specified for using data from future space weather missions carrying HIs located at L5 or L1. It can also be used with near-real-time STEREO-A HI beacon data to provide CME arrival predictions during the next ∼7 years when STEREO-A is observing the Sun-Earth space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jürgen Hinterreiter
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
- Institute of PhysicsUniversity of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Martin A. Reiss
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
- Institute of GeodesyGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
| | - Christian Möstl
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
- Institute of GeodesyGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
| | | | - Rachel L. Bailey
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
- Conrad Observatory, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und GeodynamikViennaAustria
| | - Andreas J. Weiss
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
- Institute of PhysicsUniversity of GrazGrazAustria
- Institute of GeodesyGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
| | - Mateja Dumbović
- Hvar Observatory, Faculty of GeodesyUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
| | - Maike Bauer
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of SciencesGrazAustria
- Institute of PhysicsUniversity of GrazGrazAustria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kilpua E, Koskinen HEJ, Pulkkinen TI. Coronal mass ejections and their sheath regions in interplanetary space. LIVING REVIEWS IN SOLAR PHYSICS 2017; 14:5. [PMID: 31997985 PMCID: PMC6956910 DOI: 10.1007/s41116-017-0009-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) are large-scale heliospheric transients that originate from the Sun. When an ICME is sufficiently faster than the preceding solar wind, a shock wave develops ahead of the ICME. The turbulent region between the shock and the ICME is called the sheath region. ICMEs and their sheaths and shocks are all interesting structures from the fundamental plasma physics viewpoint. They are also key drivers of space weather disturbances in the heliosphere and planetary environments. ICME-driven shock waves can accelerate charged particles to high energies. Sheaths and ICMEs drive practically all intense geospace storms at the Earth, and they can also affect dramatically the planetary radiation environments and atmospheres. This review focuses on the current understanding of observational signatures and properties of ICMEs and the associated sheath regions based on five decades of studies. In addition, we discuss modelling of ICMEs and many fundamental outstanding questions on their origin, evolution and effects, largely due to the limitations of single spacecraft observations of these macro-scale structures. We also present current understanding of space weather consequences of these large-scale solar wind structures, including effects at the other Solar System planets and exoplanets. We specially emphasize the different origin, properties and consequences of the sheaths and ICMEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Kilpua
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hannu E. J. Koskinen
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Finnish Meteorological Institute, Espoo, Finland
| | - Tuija I. Pulkkinen
- Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
SCALING RELATIONS IN CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS AND ENERGETIC PROTON EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH SOLAR SUPERFLARES. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/833/1/l8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
8
|
Lugaz N, Farrugia CJ, Winslow RM, Al-Haddad N, Kilpua EKJ, Riley P. Factors Affecting the Geo-effectiveness of Shocks and Sheaths at 1 AU. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH. SPACE PHYSICS 2016; 121:10861-10879. [PMID: 29629250 PMCID: PMC5882492 DOI: 10.1002/2016ja023100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
We identify all fast-mode forward shocks, whose sheath regions resulted in a moderate (56 cases) or intense (38 cases) geomagnetic storm during 18.5 years from January 1997 to June 2015. We study their main properties, interplanetary causes and geo-effects. We find that half (49/94) such shocks are associated with interacting coronal mass ejections (CMEs), as they are either shocks propagating into a preceding CME (35 cases) or a shock propagating into the sheath region of a preceding shock (14 cases). About half (22/45) of the shocks driven by isolated transients and which have geo-effective sheaths compress pre-existing southward Bz . Most of the remaining sheaths appear to have planar structures with southward magnetic fields, including some with planar structures consistent with field line draping ahead of the magnetic ejecta. A typical (median) geo-effective shock-sheath structure drives a geomagnetic storm with peak Dst of -88 nT, pushes the subsolar magnetopause location to 6.3 RE, i.e. below geosynchronous orbit and is associated with substorms with a peak AL-index of -1350 nT. There are some important differences between sheaths associated with CME-CME interaction (stronger storms) and those associated with isolated CMEs (stronger compression of the magnetosphere). We detail six case studies of different types of geo-effective shock-sheaths, as well as two events for which there was no geomagnetic storm but other magnetospheric effects. Finally, we discuss our results in terms of space weather forecasting, and potential effects on Earth's radiation belts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Lugaz
- Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
- Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
| | - C. J. Farrugia
- Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
- Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
| | - R. M. Winslow
- Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
| | - N. Al-Haddad
- Department of Physics, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
- Institute for Astrophysics and Computational Sciences, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA
| | - E. K. J. Kilpua
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P. Riley
- Predictive Sciences Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu YD, Hu H, Wang R, Yang Z, Zhu B, Liu YA, Luhmann JG, Richardson JD. PLASMA AND MAGNETIC FIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLAR CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS IN RELATION TO GEOMAGNETIC STORM INTENSITY AND VARIABILITY. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/809/2/l34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
10
|
The Solar Sources of Geoeffective Structures. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1029/gm125p0123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register]
|
11
|
|
12
|
|
13
|
Hoeksema JT, Zhao X. Prediction of magnetic orientation in driver gas associated −Bzevents. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1029/91ja02702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
14
|
Ilie R, Liemohn MW, Kozyra J, Borovsky J. An investigation of the magnetosphere–ionosphere response to real and idealized co-rotating interaction region events through global magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci 2010. [DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2010.0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigates the role of interplanetary magnetic field (IMF)
B
z
fluctuations periodicity in the transfer of solar wind mass and energy to the magnetosphere during the co-rotating interaction region/high-speed stream event of 10 November 2003 through global modelling simulations using the space weather modelling framework. To do so, we used both solar wind observations and a variety of idealized inputs as upstream boundary conditions, describing different solar wind configurations for which relative contribution of the peak-to-noise ratio in the input
B
z
power spectrum to the periodicity transfer is examined. Fast Fourier transforms of both input to and the response of the magnetosphere reveal that the transfer of IMF
B
z
periodicity to the magnetosphere is unaltered by other solar wind parameters, although the size of the peak-to-noise ratio of the input signal is the controlling factor that determines this transfer. The global magnetosphere simulation suggests that a threshold amount of power (peak-to-noise ratio) of approximately 10 in the input signal is needed for the magnetosphere to react to the periodicity in the input
B
z
, while for the cross-polar cap potential, the threshold amount is significantly smaller.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Ilie
- Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - M. W. Liemohn
- Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - J. Kozyra
- Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - J. Borovsky
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Farrugia CJ, Jordanova VK, Thomsen MF, Lu G, Cowley SWH, Ogilvie KW. A two-ejecta event associated with a two-step geomagnetic storm. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006. [DOI: 10.1029/2006ja011893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
16
|
Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD, Gonzalez ALC, Guarnieri FL, Gopalswamy N, Grande M, Kamide Y, Kasahara Y, Lu G, Mann I, McPherron R, Soraas F, Vasyliunas V. Corotating solar wind streams and recurrent geomagnetic activity: A review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006. [DOI: 10.1029/2005ja011273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 288] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
17
|
Vichare G. Some characteristics of intense geomagnetic storms and their energy budget. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1029/2004ja010418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
18
|
Plasma structures inside boundary layers of magnetic clouds. CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE 2004. [DOI: 10.1007/bf03183727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
19
|
Srivastava N. Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms during 1996–2002. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004. [DOI: 10.1029/2003ja010175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
20
|
|
21
|
Huttunen KEJ, Koskinen HEJ, Pulkkinen TI, Pulkkinen A, Palmroth M, Reeves EGD, Singer HJ. April 2000 magnetic storm: Solar wind driver and magnetospheric response. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2002. [DOI: 10.1029/2001ja009154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K. Emilia J. Huttunen
- Department of Physical Sciences, Theoretical Physics Division; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - Hannu E. J. Koskinen
- Department of Physical Sciences, Theoretical Physics Division; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
- Geophysical Research; Finnish Meteorological Institute; Helsinki Finland
| | - Tuija I. Pulkkinen
- Geophysical Research; Finnish Meteorological Institute; Helsinki Finland
| | - Antti Pulkkinen
- Geophysical Research; Finnish Meteorological Institute; Helsinki Finland
| | - Minna Palmroth
- Geophysical Research; Finnish Meteorological Institute; Helsinki Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wu CC. Effects of magnetic clouds on the occurrence of geomagnetic storms: The first 4 years of Wind. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2002. [DOI: 10.1029/2001ja000161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
23
|
Huttunen KEJ. Variability of magnetospheric storms driven by different solar wind perturbations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2002. [DOI: 10.1029/2001ja900171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
24
|
Wang YM. A statistical study on the geoeffectiveness of Earth-directed coronal mass ejections from March 1997 to December 2000. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2002. [DOI: 10.1029/2002ja009244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
25
|
Burlaga LF, Skoug RM, Smith CW, Webb DF, Zurbuchen TH, Reinard A. Fast ejecta during the ascending phase of solar cycle 23: ACE observations, 1998-1999. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2001. [DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
26
|
Webb DF, Cliver EW, Crooker NU, St. Cyr OC, Thompson BJ. Relationship of halo coronal mass ejections, magnetic clouds, and magnetic storms. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2000. [DOI: 10.1029/1999ja000275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 256] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
27
|
Landi R, Moreno G, Storini M, Antalová A. Coronal mass ejections, flares, and geomagnetic storms. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1998. [DOI: 10.1029/98ja01818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
28
|
Kamide Y, Baumjohann W, Daglis IA, Gonzalez WD, Grande M, Joselyn JA, McPherron RL, Phillips JL, Reeves EGD, Rostoker G, Sharma AS, Singer HJ, Tsurutani BT, Vasyliunas VM. Current understanding of magnetic storms: Storm-substorm relationships. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1998. [DOI: 10.1029/98ja01426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
29
|
Kamide Y, Yokoyama N, Gonzalez W, Tsurutani BT, Daglis IA, Brekke A, Masuda S. Two-step development of geomagnetic storms. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1998. [DOI: 10.1029/97ja03337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 193] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
30
|
Jordanova VK, Farrugia CJ, Janoo L, Quinn JM, Torbert RB, Ogilvie KW, Lepping RP, Steinberg JT, McComas DJ, Belian RD. October 1995 magnetic cloud and accompanying storm activity: Ring current evolution. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1998. [DOI: 10.1029/97ja02367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
31
|
Farrugia CJ, Burlaga LF, Lepping RP. Magnetic clouds and the quiet-storm effect at Earth. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1997. [DOI: 10.1029/gm098p0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
|
32
|
Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD. The Interplanetary causes of magnetic storms: A review. MAGNETIC STORMS 1997. [DOI: 10.1029/gm098p0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 231] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
|
33
|
Magnetic storms: Current understanding and outstanding questions. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1997. [DOI: 10.1029/gm098p0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register]
|
34
|
Chen J. Theory of prominence eruption and propagation: Interplanetary consequences. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1996. [DOI: 10.1029/96ja02644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 268] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
35
|
Wu CC, Dryer M, Smith Z, Wu S, Lyn L. Recipe for predicting the IMF Bz polarity's change of direction following solar disturbances and at the onset of geomagnetic storms. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1996. [DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(96)00010-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
36
|
McAllister AH, Dryer M, Mclntosh P, Singer H, Weiss L. A large polar crown coronal mass ejection and a “problem” goemagnetic storm: April 14-23, 1994. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1996. [DOI: 10.1029/96ja00510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
37
|
Tsurutani B, Gonzalez W. The future of geomagnetic storm predictions: implications from recent solar and interplanetary observations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1995. [DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(95)00138-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
38
|
Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD. The causes of geomagnetic storms during solar maximum. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1994. [DOI: 10.1029/94eo00468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
39
|
Gonzalez WD, Joselyn JA, Kamide Y, Kroehl HW, Rostoker G, Tsurutani BT, Vasyliunas VM. What is a geomagnetic storm? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1994. [DOI: 10.1029/93ja02867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1470] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
40
|
Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD. On the solar and interplanetary causes of geomagnetic storms*. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1993. [DOI: 10.1063/1.860700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
41
|
|
42
|
Zhao X. Interaction of fast steady flow with slow transient flow: A new cause of shock pair and interplanetaryBzevent. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1992. [DOI: 10.1029/92ja01535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
43
|
Gosling JT, McComas DJ, Phillips JL, Bame SJ. Geomagnetic activity associated with earth passage of interplanetary shock disturbances and coronal mass ejections. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1991. [DOI: 10.1029/91ja00316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 492] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
44
|
|
45
|
Lepping RP, Burlaga LF, Tsurutani BT, Ogilvie KW, Lazarus AJ, Evans DS, Klein LW. The interaction of a very large interplanetary magnetic cloud with the magnetosphere and with cosmic rays. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1991. [DOI: 10.1029/91ja00670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
46
|
Venkatesan D, Ananth AG, Graumann H, Pillai S. Relationship between solar and geomagnetic activity. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1991. [DOI: 10.1029/90ja02322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
47
|
Wilson RM. On the behavior of theDstgeomagnetic index in the vicinity of magnetic cloud passages at Earth. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1990. [DOI: 10.1029/ja095ia01p00215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
48
|
Tsurutani BT, Gould T, Goldstein BE, Gonzalez WD, Sugiura M. Interplanetary Alfvén waves and auroral (substorm) activity: IMP 8. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1990. [DOI: 10.1029/ja095ia03p02241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
49
|
Gonzalez WD, Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez ALC, Smith EJ, Tang F, Akasofu SI. Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling during intense magnetic storms (1978-1979). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1989. [DOI: 10.1029/ja094ia07p08835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 225] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
50
|
Tang F, Tsurutani BT, Gonzalez WD, Akasofu SI, Smith EJ. Solar sources of interplanetary southwardBzevents responsible for major magnetic storms (1978-1979). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1989. [DOI: 10.1029/ja094ia04p03535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|