1
|
Carrier B, Beaty D, Meyer M, Blank J, Chou L, DasSarma S, Des Marais D, Eigenbrode J, Grefenstette N, Lanza N, Schuerger A, Schwendner P, Smith H, Stoker C, Tarnas J, Webster K, Bakermans C, Baxter B, Bell M, Benner S, Bolivar Torres H, Boston P, Bruner R, Clark B, DasSarma P, Engelhart A, Gallegos Z, Garvin Z, Gasda P, Green J, Harris R, Hoffman M, Kieft T, Koeppel A, Lee P, Li X, Lynch K, Mackelprang R, Mahaffy P, Matthies L, Nellessen M, Newsom H, Northup D, O'Connor B, Perl S, Quinn R, Rowe L, Sauterey B, Schneegurt M, Schulze-Makuch D, Scuderi L, Spilde M, Stamenković V, Torres Celis J, Viola D, Wade B, Walker C, Wiens R, Williams A, Williams J, Xu J. Mars Extant Life: What's Next? Conference Report. ASTROBIOLOGY 2020; 20:785-814. [PMID: 32466662 PMCID: PMC7307687 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2020.2237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
On November 5-8, 2019, the "Mars Extant Life: What's Next?" conference was convened in Carlsbad, New Mexico. The conference gathered a community of actively publishing experts in disciplines related to habitability and astrobiology. Primary conclusions are as follows: A significant subset of conference attendees concluded that there is a realistic possibility that Mars hosts indigenous microbial life. A powerful theme that permeated the conference is that the key to the search for martian extant life lies in identifying and exploring refugia ("oases"), where conditions are either permanently or episodically significantly more hospitable than average. Based on our existing knowledge of Mars, conference participants highlighted four potential martian refugium (not listed in priority order): Caves, Deep Subsurface, Ices, and Salts. The conference group did not attempt to reach a consensus prioritization of these candidate environments, but instead felt that a defensible prioritization would require a future competitive process. Within the context of these candidate environments, we identified a variety of geological search strategies that could narrow the search space. Additionally, we summarized a number of measurement techniques that could be used to detect evidence of extant life (if present). Again, it was not within the scope of the conference to prioritize these measurement techniques-that is best left for the competitive process. We specifically note that the number and sensitivity of detection methods that could be implemented if samples were returned to Earth greatly exceed the methodologies that could be used at Mars. Finally, important lessons to guide extant life search processes can be derived both from experiments carried out in terrestrial laboratories and analog field sites and from theoretical modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B.L. Carrier
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - D.W. Beaty
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | | | - J.G. Blank
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
- Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - L. Chou
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - S. DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | - N.L. Lanza
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
| | - A.C. Schuerger
- University of Florida/Space Life Sciences Laboratory, Kennedy Space Center, Florida, USA
| | - P. Schwendner
- University of Florida/Space Life Sciences Laboratory, Kennedy Space Center, Florida, USA
| | - H.D. Smith
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - C.R. Stoker
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - J.D. Tarnas
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - K.D. Webster
- Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - C. Bakermans
- Pennsylvania State University, Altoona, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - B.K. Baxter
- Westminster College, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - M.S. Bell
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - S.A. Benner
- Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Alachua, Florida, USA
| | - H.H. Bolivar Torres
- Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, Distrito Federal Mexico, Mexico
| | - P.J. Boston
- NASA Astrobiology Institute, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - R. Bruner
- Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - B.C. Clark
- Space Science Institute, Littleton, Colorado, USA
| | - P. DasSarma
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Z.E. Gallegos
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Z.K. Garvin
- Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - P.J. Gasda
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
| | - J.H. Green
- Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - R.L. Harris
- Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - M.E. Hoffman
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - T. Kieft
- New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - P.A. Lee
- College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - X. Li
- University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - K.L. Lynch
- Lunar and Planetary Institute/USRA, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - R. Mackelprang
- California State University Northridge, Northridge, California, USA
| | - P.R. Mahaffy
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - L.H. Matthies
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | | | - H.E. Newsom
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - D.E. Northup
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - S.M. Perl
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - R.C. Quinn
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - L.A. Rowe
- Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | | | - L.A. Scuderi
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - M.N. Spilde
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - V. Stamenković
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - J.A. Torres Celis
- Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Coyoacan, Distrito Federal Mexico, Mexico
| | - D. Viola
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - B.D. Wade
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - C.J. Walker
- Delaware State University, Dover, Delaware, USA
| | - R.C. Wiens
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - J.M. Williams
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - J. Xu
- University of Texas, El Paso, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lasne J, Noblet A, Szopa C, Navarro-González R, Cabane M, Poch O, Stalport F, François P, Atreya SK, Coll P. Oxidants at the Surface of Mars: A Review in Light of Recent Exploration Results. ASTROBIOLOGY 2016; 16:977-996. [PMID: 27925795 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2016.1502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
In 1976, the Viking landers carried out the most comprehensive search for organics and microbial life in the martian regolith. Their results indicate that Mars' surface is lifeless and, surprisingly, depleted in organics at part-per-billion levels. Several biology experiments on the Viking landers gave controversial results that have since been explained by the presence of oxidizing agents on the surface of Mars. These oxidants may degrade abiotic or biological organics, resulting in their nondetection in the regolith. As several exploration missions currently focus on the detection of organics on Mars (or will do so in the near future), knowledge of the oxidative state of the surface is fundamental. It will allow for determination of the capability of organics to survive on a geological timescale, the most favorable places to seek them, and the best methods to process the samples collected at the surface. With this aim, we review the main oxidants assumed to be present on Mars, their possible formation pathways, and those laboratory studies in which their reactivity with organics under Mars-like conditions has been evaluated. Among the oxidants assumed to be present on Mars, only four have been detected so far: perchlorate ions (ClO4-) in salts, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the atmosphere, and clays and metal oxides composing surface minerals. Clays have been suggested as catalysts for the oxidation of organics but are treated as oxidants in the following to keep the structure of this article straightforward. This work provides an insight into the oxidizing potential of the surface of Mars and an estimate of the stability of organic matter in an oxidizing environment. Key Words: Mars surface-Astrobiology-Oxidant-Chemical reactions. Astrobiology 16, 977-996.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lasne
- 1 LISA, Universités Paris-Est Créteil and Paris Diderot, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace , CNRS UMR 7583, Créteil, France
| | - A Noblet
- 1 LISA, Universités Paris-Est Créteil and Paris Diderot, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace , CNRS UMR 7583, Créteil, France
| | - C Szopa
- 2 LATMOS, UPMC Université Paris 06, Université Versailles St Quentin , CNRS, Guyancourt, France
| | - R Navarro-González
- 3 Laboratorio de Química de Plasmas y Estudios Planetarios, Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , Ciudad de México, México
| | - M Cabane
- 2 LATMOS, UPMC Université Paris 06, Université Versailles St Quentin , CNRS, Guyancourt, France
| | - O Poch
- 1 LISA, Universités Paris-Est Créteil and Paris Diderot, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace , CNRS UMR 7583, Créteil, France
- 4 NCCR PlanetS, Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bern , Bern, Switzerland
| | - F Stalport
- 1 LISA, Universités Paris-Est Créteil and Paris Diderot, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace , CNRS UMR 7583, Créteil, France
| | - P François
- 1 LISA, Universités Paris-Est Créteil and Paris Diderot, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace , CNRS UMR 7583, Créteil, France
- 5 IC2MP, Equipe Eau Géochimie Santé, Université de Poitiers , CNRS UMR 7285, Poitiers, France
| | - S K Atreya
- 6 Department of Climate and Space Sciences, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - P Coll
- 1 LISA, Universités Paris-Est Créteil and Paris Diderot, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace , CNRS UMR 7583, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|