1
|
Equinoctial Asymmetry in Solar Quiet Fields along the 120° E Meridian Chain. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/app11199150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Equinoctial asymmetry of the range of the solar quiet day variation (Sq) of the horizontal geomagnetic field (H) has been found in some low latitude geomagnetic observatories. This study conducted an investigation of its latitude distribution and the relationship with the solar cycle by using the H field measurements from six observatories along the 120° E meridian chain in the years 1957–2013. Results illustrate a significant equinoctial asymmetry of the SqH range at all observatories. Three main features were identified. First, the signature of the equinoctial asymmetry of the SqH range is opposite for observatories located at the northern and southern sides of the Northern Hemisphere Sq current focus. It shows larger values around spring than autumn equinox at southern observatories, and the converse is seen at northern observatories. Second, the asymmetry increases with the distance from the Sq current focus, suggesting the stronger sensitivity of the distant observatories than observatories around the focus. The result of linear fitting presents a positive dependence of the asymmetry coefficient on geographic latitude, with a reversal of the asymmetry occurring at 28.1° N near the focus of the average Sq current. Third, there is no obvious dependence of the equinoctial asymmetry of the SqH range on solar activity, suggesting a possible cause from some regional factors related to the ionospheric dynamo process.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wescott EM, DeWitt RN, Akasofu SI. TheSqvariation at geomagnetically conjugate areas. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1029/jz068i024p06377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
3
|
|
4
|
Matsushita S, Maeda H. On the geomagnetic solar quiet daily variation field during the IGY. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1029/jz070i011p02535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
5
|
Reddy CA, Devasia CV. Height and latitude structure of electric fields and currents due to local east-west winds in the equatorial electrojet. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1981. [DOI: 10.1029/ja086ia07p05751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
6
|
|
7
|
Hutton R. Sq currents in the American equatorial zone during the IGY—II Day to day variability. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1967. [DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(67)90234-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
Chapman S, Rao K. The H and Z variations along and near the equatorial electrojet in India, Africa and the Pacific. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1965. [DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(65)90020-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
|