What safety measures need to be taken in oral food challenges in children?

The diagnostic value of APT for food allergy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of atopy patch test (APT) in the diagnosis of food allergy (FA) remains largely controversial. In our meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of APT for diagnosing FA in children.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for studies regarding the diagnostic value of APT for FA in children compared to oral food challenge (double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge and/or open food challenge). The last search was conducted on November 11, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened relevant studies and assessed the quality by QUADAS-2. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR (diagnostic odds ratio), PLR (positive likelihood ratio), NLR (negative likelihood ratio) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to different food allergens, atopic dermatitis, gastrointestinal symptoms, and age younger than 3 years.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 50.30% (95% CI 48.40%-52.30%), 86.60% (95% CI 85.30%-87.80%), 3.405 (95% CI 2.594-4.470), 0.545 (95% CI 0.469-0.634) and 7.528 (95% CI 5.507-11.206), respectively. However, for children with FA-related gastrointestinal symptoms, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 57.40% (95% CI 52.10%-62.50%) and 91.50% (95% CI 88.30%-94.10%) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that APT is specific but not sensitive for diagnosing FA in children, especially in children with FA-related gastrointestinal symptoms.

Wheat allergy: diagnosis and management

Triticum aestivum (bread wheat) is the most widely grown crop worldwide. In genetically predisposed individuals, wheat can cause specific immune responses. A food allergy to wheat is characterized by T helper type 2 activation which can result in immunoglobulin E (IgE) and non-IgE mediated reactions. IgE mediated reactions are immediate, are characterized by the presence of wheat-specific IgE antibodies, and can be life-threatening. Non-IgE mediated reactions are characterized by chronic eosinophilic and lymphocytic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract. IgE mediated responses to wheat can be related to wheat ingestion (food allergy) or wheat inhalation (respiratory allergy). A food allergy to wheat is more common in children and can be associated with a severe reaction such as anaphylaxis and wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis. An inhalation induced IgE mediated wheat allergy can cause baker’s asthma or rhinitis, which are common occupational diseases in workers who have significant repetitive exposure to wheat flour, such as bakers. Non-IgE mediated food allergy reactions to wheat are mainly eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) or eosinophilic gastritis (EG), which are both characterized by chronic eosinophilic inflammation. EG is a systemic disease, and is associated with severe inflammation that requires oral steroids to resolve. EoE is a less severe disease, which can lead to complications in feeding intolerance and fibrosis. In both EoE and EG, wheat allergy diagnosis is based on both an elimination diet preceded by a tissue biopsy obtained by esophagogastroduodenoscopy in order to show the effectiveness of the diet. Diagnosis of IgE mediated wheat allergy is based on the medical history, the detection of specific IgE to wheat, and oral food challenges. Currently, the main treatment of a wheat allergy is based on avoidance of wheat altogether. However, in the near future immunotherapy may represent a valid way to treat IgE mediated reactions to wheat.

Oral food challenge to wheat: a near-fatal anaphylaxis and review of 93 food challenges in children

Background

Wheat allergy is among the most common food allergy in children, but few publications are available assessing the risk of anaphylaxis due to wheat.

Methods

In this study, we report the case of near-fatal anaphylaxis to wheat in a patient undergoing an oral food challenge (OFC) after the ingestion of a low dose (256 mg) of wheat. Moreover, for the first time, we analyzed the risk of anaphylaxis during an OFC to wheat in 93 children, compared to other more commonly challenged foods such as milk, egg, peanuts, and soy in more than 1000 patients.

Results

This study, which includes a large number of OFCs to wheat, shows that wheat is an independent risk factor that is associated with anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine administration (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.4) and anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine administration to low dose antigen (OR = 8.02). Other risk factors for anaphylaxis, anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine administration, and anaphylaxis to low dose antigen was a history of a prior reaction not involving only the skin (OR = 1.8, 1.9 and 1.8 respectively). None of the clinical variables available prior to performing the OFC could predict which children among those undergoing OFCs to wheat would develop anaphylaxis or anaphylaxis for low dose antigen.

Conclusion

This study shows that wheat is an independent risk factor that is associated with anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine administration and anaphylaxis requiring epinephrine administration to low dose antigen.

Skin prick test and specific serum IgE in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected cow's milk and hen's egg allergy in children: does one replace the other?

BACKGROUND

The measurement of specific serum immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and the skin prick test (SPT) are accepted tools in the diagnostic work-up of suspected food allergy. Often only one of the methods is used to determine sensitization; however, it is still under debate whether these two methods can be used interchangeably.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the concordance of SPT and sIgE serum assays with regard to suspected food allergy.

METHODS

In 395 children referred to our clinic with suspected cow's milk allergy and in 268 children with suspected hen's egg allergy specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) was measured, a SPT and an oral food challenge performed. A weal size ≥ 3 mm and sIgE ≥ 0.35 kU/L were considered positive. The weal size of the SPT and the level of food-specific IgE were tested for correlation for each allergen.

RESULTS

Of the 395 (23%) children orally challenged with cow's milk, 92 showed no corresponding results for SPT and sIgE as either positive or negative. For hen's egg, in 27 of 268 (10%) children differing test results for SPT and sIgE in serum were obtained. Moreover, regarding the quantitative values for sIgE and SPT in children with or without clinically relevant food allergy, sIgE and SPT correlated badly.

CONCLUSIONS

The concordance between SPT and sIgE is surprisingly low for cow's milk and hen's egg on an individual basis. Therefore, the tests should not be used interchangeably. Especially in children who receive a negative test result the alternative test should also be used. Furthermore, our data indicate again that oral food challenges are still the method of choice to diagnose food allergies.

Oral food challenge: safety, adherence to guidelines and predictive value of skin prick testing

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic gold standard of food allergy is the oral food challenge (OFC). Data on severe reactions and drug use during OFC are scarce. Our aims were (i) to investigate the prevalence and spectrum of reactions' severity during OFC and to assess drug use and epinephrine use in anaphylaxis due to OFC; (ii) to investigate the predictive value of the skin prick test wheal size for the outcome of OFCs.

METHODS

A retrospective charts review of children undergoing OFC at three Allergy Centres between January 2007 and December 2008 was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 544 OFCs were analysed. Most frequently involved foods were egg, milk and wheat. 254/526 (48.3%) were positive. 167 (65.7%) were defined mild reactions, 81 (31.9%) multiorgan reactions and 6 (2.4%) anaphylaxis. No patients had cardiovascular symptoms. Data on treatments were available in 98.8% OFCs. In half of them antihistamines were used vs. 10% cases in which steroids were preferred. Six children (2.4%) were treated with Epinephrine inhalation, 5 (2%) with beta-2 inhalation, 8 (3.1%) with steroid inhalation. One child was treated with IM Epinephrine + IV fluids. Skin prick tests predictive cut-off were 9 mm for albumen, 7 for yolk, 13 for fresh albumen, 10 for α-lactalbumin, seven for casein, eight for β-lactoglobulin, 20 for cow's milk and 10 for fresh cow's milk.

CONCLUSION

OFCs performed in controlled settings by expert Allergists are safe. Consideration needs to be given as to whether the Anaphylaxis' Guideline need to be modified when applied in treating patients undergoing OFC.

Tropomyosin IgE-positive results are a good predictor of shrimp allergy

BACKGROUND

Shrimp is a common cause of food allergy. Our aims were to determine the value of IgE antibodies in the diagnosis of shrimp allergy and to study red shrimp (Solenocera melantho) tropomyosin both as a new allergen and as a cross-reactive IgE-binding protein.

METHODS

We have studied 45 subjects. Skin prick test (SPT) was carried out in all subjects, and specific IgE (sIgE) to shrimp, recombinant and natural shrimp tropomyosins rPen a 1 and nPen m 1, recombinant Der p 10, and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus was assessed by fluoroimmunoassay and/or immunoblotting. Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges were carried out to confirm diagnosis of shrimp allergy. Also, in vitro inhibition tests were performed to evaluate cross-reactivity.

RESULTS

Shrimp allergy was confirmed in 18 shrimp-allergic patients. Skin prick test and IgE antibodies to shrimp were positive in all shrimp-allergic patients; sIgE to rPen a 1 was detected in 98% of these patients. Of the 18 shrimp-tolerant patients, 61% had positive SPT to shrimp, 55% were IgE-positive to shrimp, and 33% showed IgE antibodies to rPen a 1. Determination of IgE to rPen a 1 yielded a positive predictive value of 0.72 and a negative predictive value of 0.91.

CONCLUSION

IgE levels to rPen a 1 provided additional value to the diagnosis of shrimp allergy. Some allergens in mite extract are recognized by patients who are allergic to shrimp, though their clinical relevance remains unknown.

Usefulness of specific IgE antibodies to ω-5 gliadin in the diagnosis and follow-up of Japanese children with wheat allergy

BACKGROUND

Gliadins have been implicated in IgE-mediated allergy to ingested wheat. ω-5 gliadin seems to be a clinically relevant allergen component in children with immediate wheat allergy (WA), but contradictory results have been published.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies to recombinant ω-5 gliadin could be used as a marker for oral wheat challenge outcome in wheat-sensitized children and to study whether measurements of sIgE to ω-5 gliadin are useful in monitoring children with WA to assess whether the allergy is outgrown or persistent.

METHODS

Eighty-eight serum samples from children sensitized to wheat were collected consecutively. sIgE to ω-5 gliadin was related to a physician's diagnosis of WA.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven of 88 children sensitized to wheat were diagnosed as having WA. The geometric mean concentrations of sIgE to ω-5 gliadin were 2.04 kU(A)/L (range, <0.35-100 kU(A)/L) in children with WA and 0.40 kU(A)/L (range, <0.35-1.8 kU(A)/L) in children without WA. At follow-up, after being on a wheat-free diet for approximately 2 years, the sIgE titers to ω-5 gliadin were below 0.35 kU(A)/L (mean, 0.34 kU(A)/L; range, 0.34-2.3 kU(A)/L) in 10 of 15 children with outgrown WA. Conversely, in 12 of 14 children with persistent WA, the sIgE titers to ω-5 gliadin were still elevated (mean, 5.89 kU(A)/L; range, 0.34-16.3 kU(A)/L).

CONCLUSIONS

sIgE to ω-5 gliadin can be used as an accurate alternative to potentially dangerous wheat food challenges in monitoring WA.

Heredity of food allergies in an unselected child population: an epidemiological survey from Finland

The heredity of food allergies (FA) has not previously been addressed in a large unselected child population. Our target population comprised all children born from April 2001 to March 2006 resident in one province of South-East Finland (n c. 6000), as identified from the national population register. In a questionnaire survey conducted in 2005-2006, data were obtained on allergic manifestations (FA symptoms, atopic rash, allergic asthma, hay fever/pollen allergy, or animal allergy) in the biologic parents of 3800 children (64% of the total). Concurrently with the survey but independently of it, results of specific immunoglobulin E antibodies (sIgE), skin prick tests (SPT), and open food challenges (OFC) in the offspring were collected from patient records throughout the province. Up to the age of 4 yr, the incidences of any positive FA test, a positive SPT or sIgE for food items, and a positive OFC in these children were threefold higher if both parents reported having an allergic manifestation and twofold higher if either mother or father had such a manifestation when compared with children whose parents did not report any of these conditions. The estimated risk of any positive FA test increased by a factor of 1.3 (95% CI 1.2-1.4) for each additional allergic manifestation in the parents. Positive FA tests in the offspring were relatively strongly associated with the reports of allergic phenotypes and the number of these phenotypes in their biologic parents.

Oral food challenges in children

Many patients assume that allergic reactions against foods are responsible for triggering or worsening their allergic symptoms. Therefore, it is important to identify patients who would benefit from an elimination diet, while avoiding unnecessary dietary restrictions. The diagnosis of food allergy depends on the thorough review of the patients's medical history, results of supplemented trials of dietary elimination, and in vivo and in vitro tests for measuring specific IgE levels. However, in some cases the reliability of such procedures is suboptimal. Oral food challenges are procedures employed for making an accurate diagnosis of immediate and occasionally delayed adverse reactions to foods. The timing and type of the challenge, preparation of patients, foods to be tested, and dosing schedule should be determined on the basis of the patient's history, age, and experience. Although double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges(DBPCFC) are used to establish definitively if a food is the cause of adverse reactions, they are time-consuming, expensive and troublesome for physician and patients. In practice, An open challenge controlled by trained personnel is sufficient especially in infants and young children. The interpretation of the results and follow-up after a challenge are also important. Since theses challenges are relatively safe and informative, controlled oral food challenges could become the measure of choice in children.

SKARP - A population-based cohort study of childhood food-associated symptoms perceived by parents and food allergies diagnosed by physicians: Design, methods and participation

Background: Few epidemiological studies exist on food-associated symptoms and allergies in large unselected child populations. Aims: To describe the design, methods and participation rate of the South Karelian Allergy Research Project (SKARP), a population-based epidemiological study on food-associated symptoms and physician-diagnosed food allergies. Methods: The study population of 5,973 children born between 2001 and 2006 and resident in the province of South Karelia, Finland, was identified from the nationwide population register. The parents received a questionnaire to be returned at their child’s annual visit to the child health clinic, where supplementary interviews were performed. Results of allergy tests (skin prick tests, immunoglobulin E antibodies and open food challenges) performed on participants and non-participants were collected from the relevant health care units in the area. Results: Participation rates in the questionnaire study were 54% (644/1,194) among the parents of neonates and 69% (3308/4,779) among those of the children aged 1 to 4 years. Cooperation with the child health clinics and mailing of a reminder questionnaire improved participation by 8 and 10 percentage points, respectively. The final participation rate seemed to be unaffected by whether the child had or had not been tested for suspected allergy. Conclusions: A reasonably good participation rate and almost complete coverage of allergy tests were achieved thanks to successful cooperation with the child health clinics and test laboratories. This baseline study forms a representative database to estimate the occurrence of food-associated symptoms, physician-diagnosed food allergies and allergy testing in the general population.

Adequacy and tolerance to ass's milk in an Italian cohort of children with cow's milk allergy

BACKGROUND

The therapy for cow's milk proteins allergy (CMPA) consists in eliminating cow's milk proteins (CMP) from the child's diet. Ass's milk (AM) has been recently considered as substitute of CMP. This prospective study investigated tolerance and nutritional adequacy of AM in children with CMPA from Southern Italy.

METHODS

Thirty children (aged 6 months to 11 years) with suspected CMPA were enrolled. They underwent skin prick tests and bouble-blind, placebo controlled food challenge to CMP. After confirming the diagnosis of CMPA, patients received fresh AM in a open challenge. Specific serum CMP and AM IgE, and biochemical parameters in blood were also assessed. Auxological evaluations were performed in all subjects at entry (T0) and after 4-6 months (T1) of AM intake.

RESULTS

Twenty-five children resulted elegible for the study, and 24 out of 25 subjects (96%) tolerated AM at the food challenge. Auxological data resulted improved by the end of the study in all patients, while blood biochemical parameters did not vary during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the high rate of AM tolerability in children with moderate symptoms of CMPA. Moreover, we found that AM seems to have nutritional adequacy in subjects with a varied diet.

Patch test in the diagnosis of food allergy

Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) are the gold standard method for diagnosing food allergies. However, due to the difficulty of their performance on routine clinic, there is a need for laboratory tools in order to minimise the frequency of DBPCFC. Atopy patch test (APT) represents a promising manner of diagnosing delayed-type allergic reactions. The APT may identify patients with food allergies with negative specific IgE. However, the clinical relevance of positive APT reactions is still to be proven by standardised outcome definitions.

Ass's milk in children with atopic dermatitis and cow's milk allergy: crossover comparison with goat's milk

Cow milk allergy is a common disease of infancy, often associated with atopic dermatitis (AD). Avoidance of cow milk (CM) implies the use of alternative dietary supports such as mammalian milks. In this study, we assessed the tolerability and clinical effect of ass's milk (AM), when compared with the largely used goat's milk (GM) in a single-blind, controlled, randomized crossover. Twenty-eight children with AD and ascertained allergy to CM were enrolled. The children were randomized to AM or GM for 6 months, then switched to the other milk for further 3 months. The SCORAD index (SI) and a visual analog scale (VAS) were evaluated blindly. After termination of the study, food challenges with GM and AM were performed. An SDS-PAGE analysis of different milks was performed. Two children from the GM group dropped out after randomization and 26 completed the study. Ass milk invariantly led to a significant improvement of SI and VAS of symptoms (p < 0.03 vs. baseline and inter-group), whereas GM had no measurable clinical effect. At the end of the study 23 of 26 children had a positive food challenge with GM and one of 26 with AM. Ass's milk had a protein profile closer to human milk than GM. Ass milk is better tolerated and more effective than GM in reducing symptoms of AD. It may represent a better substitute of CM than the currently used GM.

Diagnosis of food allergy in children: toward a standardization of food challenge

Adverse reactions to food represent a common complaint in childhood; however, only a small proportion of children have proven clinically relevant food allergy. The foods most commonly involved in food allergy are cow's milk, hen's eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, seeds, soy, wheat, fish, and crustaceans. The diagnostic workup of suspected food allergy includes the patient's history, skin prick testing, the measurement of food-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies, and, more recently, the atopy patch test. Because none of these parameters can accurately predict tolerance, the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy is still the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Although numerous efforts have been made to standardize the procedure, there is a need for improvement. This review presents the current status of the indication and performance of controlled oral food challenges in children with suspected food-related symptoms. It covers aspects of indications and contraindications, blinding, diet before the challenge, the practical performance, the handling of medication, the interpretation of test results, suitable locations for testing, safety considerations, and the procedure after a period of avoidance. Efforts to standardize oral food challenges to achieve the best possible decision on a diet are important to avoid an unnecessary diet that may be harmful to the child.

Oral food challenges in children in Italy

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological surveys identify a 900,000-strong potential paediatric population who may self-report with food allergy in Italy. As the reference test is the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge for diagnosis, we carried out a nation-wide questionnaire survey of hospital-based paediatric allergy centres between 1 January and 30 June 2003.

METHODS

All registered centres received a 27-point questionnaire polling logistics and protocols of oral food challenge. Items polled included medical facilities and personnel, selection of patients, foods tested, blinding, placebo use, evaluation criteria, number of tests and positive outcome rates in 2002.

RESULTS

Two hundred and two of 456 responders (44.3%) carried out food challenges (a ratio of one centre to 37,400 children in the general population). 11,728 challenges were performed in 2002 (an average of 58 procedures per centre; range: 1-500) and 3350 procedures were claimed positive (28.6%). Cow's milk was tested by all centres, egg by 77.2%, beef by 19.8% and cereals, peanuts, fish or fruit collectively by 37.6%. Twenty-nine of 202 centres performed blinded tests, 18 of which under double-blinded conditions. In cow's milk challenges, placebos included lyophilized cow's milk capsules, soy formula, extensive whey hydrolysate or extensive casein hydrolysate.

CONCLUSION

Our survey reveals great differences in challenge test criteria, facilities and procedures and that many centres perform relatively few procedures. This argues in favour of greater rationalization in the allocation of tertiary-level resources before procedure standardization can be contemplated in the diagnostic workup of food allergy.

Controlled oral food challenges in children--when indicated, when superfluous?

The diagnostic work-up of suspected food allergy includes the skin prick test (SPT), the measurement of food specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies using serologic assays, and more recently the atopy patch test (APT). For specific serum IgE and the SPT, decision points have been established for some foods allowing prediction of clinical relevance in selected cases. The APT may be helpful, especially when considered in combination with defined levels of specific IgE. Controlled oral food challenges still remain the gold standard in the diagnostic work-up of children with suspected food allergy. Most food allergic children will lose their allergy over time. As there is no laboratory parameter, which can accurately predict when clinical tolerance has been developed, controlled oral food challenges are the measure of choice. In this article, the current knowledge of predictors for the outcome of oral food challenges is reviewed and proposals for the daily practical work-up in the case of suspected food related clinical symptoms are presented.

A laboratory method for purification of major cow's milk allergens

Food allergy is responsible for the most frequent allergic reactions in children under 1 year of age. Diagnostic tests such as skin test or specific IgE assay usually need highly purified preparations of allergenic proteins. The aim of the present study was to purify three main cow's milk proteins: casein, alpha-lactalbumin, and beta-lactoglobulin as allergenic extracts for first time in Iran.

IgE antibodies to omega-5 gliadin in children with wheat-induced anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Wheat can cause severe immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated systemic reactions including anaphylaxis but knowledge on relevant wheat allergens at the molecular level is scanty.

METHODS

Seven children (aged from 6 months to 13 years) experiencing from 2 to 10 anaphylactic reactions in a year after eating food-containing wheat were examined. Purified omega-5 gliadin was used as an allergen in IgE enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and in skin prick testing (SPT). Wheat CAP radioallergosorbent test (RAST) and SPT were also examined.

RESULTS

All seven anaphylactic children, but none of 15 control subjects had IgE antibodies to omega-5 gliadin in ELISA. Five of the six tested anaphylactic children showed positive SPT to omega-5 and crude gliadin, and all seven had positive wheat CAP RAST and SPT. One child was challenged with wheat, which caused anaphylaxis. After adherence to a wheat-free diet four children remained symptomless and three experienced one to two anaphylactic reactions.

CONCLUSION

The present results show that wheat omega-5 gliadin is a major sensitizing allergen in children with wheat-induced anaphylaxis. They also suggest that omega-5 gliadin IgE ELISA could be used as a diagnostic test for this severe allergy.

Food allergy and non-allergic food hypersensitivity in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown a 10-fold discrepancy of self-reported food-induced symptoms and physician-diagnosed food hypersensitivity. Little information is available on the prevalence of food hypersensitivity in unselected paediatric populations. No data were available for German children.

OBJECTIVE

To study the perception of food-induced symptoms in the paediatric population, to investigate the allergens accused, to objectify patients' reports, and to identify subgroups at risk of having food-induced allergy (FA) or non-allergic food hypersensitivity (NAFH) reactions.

METHODS

This paper presents the data of the paediatric group (0-17 years) of a representative, randomly sampled, cross-sectional population-based survey studying 13 300 inhabitants of the German capital city Berlin regarding food-related symptoms. Instruments included mailed questionnaires, structured telephone interviews, physical examination, skin-prick tests, specific serum IgE and standardized, controlled and blinded oral food challenges.

RESULTS

Two thousand three hundred and fifty-four individuals were contacted by mailed questionnaire, 739 (31.4%) responses could be fully evaluated. Four hundred and fifty-five (61.5%) participants reported symptoms related to food ingestion, 284 (38.4%) affirmed reproducible symptoms in the standardized telephone interview. One hundred and eighty-four (24.8%) individuals were fully examined. Reproducible symptoms to food were found in 31 (4.2%) children and adolescents: 26 (3.5%) showed symptoms of FA and five (0.7%) of NAFH. The oral allergy syndrome was most often observed. Foods most commonly identified by oral challenges were apple, hazelnut, soy, kiwi, carrot and wheat.

CONCLUSION

The perception of food-related symptoms is common among children and adolescents from the general population. Self-reports could be confirmed in around one out of 10 individuals, still resulting in 4.2% of proven clinical symptoms. However, most reactions were mild and mainly because of pollen-associated FA, while NAFH reactions were less common. Severe IgE-mediated FA was observed in individuals with pre-existing atopic disease, who should be fully investigated for clinically relevant FA.

Role of oral food challenges in the diagnostic work-up of food allergy in atopic eczema dermatitis syndrome

The diagnosis of food allergy in infants and children is still a challenging task for the pediatrician. While immediate-type allergic reactions to foods can be diagnosed quite easily, late-phase reactions, e.g. in atopic dermatitis, often represent a diagnostic challenge. Once classical diagnostic procedures such as history, skin prick tests, atopy patch test, and specific immunoglobulin E in serum have been exhausted, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges represent the state of the art. After an oligo-allergenic diet, suspected foods or placebo are given in a titrated manner until a clear clinical reaction or the highest dose. The observation period should be 48 h in the case of atopic dermatitis. Constant clinical monitoring is mandatory. Dietetic recommendations are given for 12 months. The effort involved in such a procedure is justified because it can help to avoid clinically relevant food allergens in some cases and in others can prevent children from being exposed unnecessarily to diets that may be harmful to them.

Dietary prevention of allergic diseases in infants and small children. Part II. Evaluation of methods in allergy prevention studies and sensitization markers. Definitions and diagnostic criteria of allergic diseases

The role of primary prevention of allergic disease has been a matter of debate for the last 40 years. In order to shed some light into this issue a group of experts of the Section of Pediatrics EAACI critically reviewed the existing literature on the subject. The design of observational and interventional studies was evaluated with relevance to the important factors influencing outcome of studies on allergy development/prevention. in this analysis the statements of evidence as defined by WHO were applied. Best evidence of recommendations are those fulfilling the criteria for statements category 1 and 2 and grade of recommendations A and B as proposed by WHO. This survey include target group for dietary prevention and methods and diagnostic criteria of atopic dermatitis, asthma and food allergy for prevention studies.

Wheat allergy: clinical and laboratory findings

BACKGROUND

Food allergy affects 6-8% of infants and wheat allergy is one of the common food allergies among children. The clinical and laboratory manifestations of wheat allergy were evaluated in this study.

METHODS

Thirty-two children (< or =12 years old) with suspected wheat allergy were evaluated for wheat allergy. The patients underwent wheat skin prick test (SPT), measurement of wheat-specific IgE and wheat challenge test. The patients with a convincing history of anaphylaxis following ingestion of wheat or with a positive challenge test, and those with a history of immediate hypersensitivity reaction following ingestion of wheat in addition to a positive wheat SPT and/or positive wheat-specific IgE were considered wheat allergic. Then, the laboratory and clinical manifestations of their disease were studied.

RESULTS

Among patients with suspected wheat allergy, 24 patients with definite wheat allergy were identified. Anaphylaxis was a dominant clinical feature, accounting for 54.1% of acute symptoms. Chronic allergy symptoms like asthma and eczema were noted in 50% of the patients. Wheat-specific IgE was higher in patients with anaphylaxis (p<0.02) and the risk of anaphylaxis was 14.4 times more in patients with wheat-specific IgE equal to or more than 3+.

CONCLUSIONS

Anaphylaxis had occurred in a remarkable number of patients repeatedly, which demonstrates the severity of the reactions, poor knowledge of the disease and probable existence of more patients with mild reactions. Regarding the higher level of wheat-specific IgE in patients with anaphylaxis, wheat-specific IgE could be used to predict the severity of symptoms.

Thresholds of clinical reactivity to milk, egg, peanut and sesame in immunoglobulin E-dependent allergies: evaluation by double-blind or single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenges

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of food anaphylaxis due to masked allergens has increased within the last 10 years. Contamination of manufactured products by food allergens is a key concern for food industries.

OBJECTIVE

To determine quantities eliciting reactions in patients who have an IgE-dependent food allergy, thanks to standardized oral provocation tests. To evaluate the subsequent levels of sensitivity required for the detection tests of allergens for egg, peanut, milk and sesame.

METHODS

Prick-in-prick tests, Cap system RAST, and single or double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (SBPCFC or DBPCFC) were performed. The doses of natural food were gradually increased from 5 to 5000 mg for solid food and from 1 to 30 mL for peanut oil, sunflower oil, soy oil and sesame oil.

RESULTS

Data from 125 positive oral challenges to egg, 103 to peanut, 59 to milk and 12 to sesame seeds were analysed. Haemodynamic modifications were observed in 2%, 3%, 1.7%, and 8% of the oral challenges (OCs) to egg, peanut, milk and sesame, respectively. Respiratory symptoms were observed in 12%, 20%, 10% and 42% of egg, peanut milk and sesame allergies, respectively. A cumulative reactive dose inferior or equal to 65 mg of solid food or 0.8 mL of milk characterized 16%, 18%, 5% and 8% of egg, peanut, milk and sesame allergies, respectively. 0.8% of egg allergies, 3.9% of peanut allergies, and 1.7% of milk allergies reacted to 10 mg or less of solid food or to 0.1 mL for milk. The lowest reactive threshold has been observed at less than 2 mg of egg; 5 mg of peanut, 0.1 mL of milk and 30 mg of sesame seed. Ten out of 29 OC with peanut oil, two out of two OC with soy oil and three out of six OC with sunflower oil were positive. Five out six OC with sesame oil were positive: 1 and 5 mL induced an anaphylactic shock.

CONCLUSION

The risk of asthma and anaphylactic shock to sesame and peanut is confirmed. Minimal reactive quantities show that, in order to guarantee a 95% safety for patients who are allergic to egg, peanut and milk, and on the basis of consumption of 100 g of food, the detection tests should ensure a sensitivity of 10 p.p.m. for egg, 24 p.p.m. for peanut and 30 p.p.m. for milk proteins. Oil allergies being considered, the limit of sensitivity should fall to 5 p.p.m.

Predictors of positive food challenge outcome in non-IgE-mediated reactions to food in children with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is frequently associated with food allergy. In general, clinically manifested food allergy is regarded as IgE mediated. However, there are some children with food allergy for whom IgE hypersensitivity cannot be proven.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the percentage of children with positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) results but without any proof of IgE sensitization and to characterize this subgroup of children.

METHODS

Two hundred eight DBPCFCs were performed in 139 children (median age, 13 months) with atopic dermatitis and suspected food-related clinical symptoms. All children were subjected to skin prick tests (SPTs), determination of specific IgE, and atopy patch tests.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven (53%) of 208 oral food challenge results were assessed as positive. Positive challenge results were separated into 2 groups according to IgE positivity: negative SPT and negative specific IgE results in serum (group A, n = 12) and positive SPT, specific IgE, or both results in serum (group B, n = 99). The atopy patch test results; the distribution of early, late, or both clinical reactions; the age of the children; and the total IgE levels all showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. However, wheat challenge results were more often positive among the apparently non-IgE-sensitized children, and hen's egg challenge results were more often positive in the sensitized group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Around 10% of positive DBPCFC results are not IgE mediated. Therefore not the proof of specific IgE but the suspicion of food-related symptoms should be the indication to perform oral food challenges, especially in the case of wheat. Otherwise, some children will not receive diagnoses for food allergy and be denied the benefits of a specific diet.

Wheat omega-5 gliadin is a major allergen in children with immediate allergy to ingested wheat

BACKGROUND

Sensitization to wheat by ingestion can lead to food allergy symptoms and wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Sensitization by inhalation causes bakers' asthma and rhinitis. Wheat allergens have been characterized at the molecular level in bakers' asthma and in wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis, in which omega-5 gliadin (Tri a 19) is a major allergen. However, little information is available regarding allergens responsible for hypersensitivity reactions to ingested wheat in children.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether children with allergy to ingested wheat have IgE antibodies to omega-5 gliadin.

METHODS

Sera were obtained from 40 children (mean age, 2.5 years; range, 0.7-8.2 years) with suspected wheat allergy who presented with atopic dermatitis and/or gastrointestinal and/or respiratory symptoms. Wheat allergy was diagnosed with open or double-blinded, placebo-controlled oral wheat challenge. Wheat omega-5 gliadin was purified by reversed-phase chromatography, and serum IgE antibodies to omega-5 gliadin were measured by means of ELISA. In vivo reactivity was studied by skin prick testing. Control sera were obtained from 22 children with no evidence of food allergies.

RESULTS

In oral wheat challenge, 19 children (48%) reacted with immediate and 8 children (20%) with delayed hypersensitivity symptoms. Sixteen (84%) of the children with immediate symptoms had IgE antibodies to purified omega-5 gliadin in ELISA. In contrast, IgE antibodies to omega-5 gliadin were not detected in any of the children with delayed or negative challenge test results or in the control children. The diagnostic specificity and positive predictive value of omega-5 gliadin ELISA were each 100% for immediate challenge reactions. Skin prick testing with omega-5 gliadin was positive in 6 of 7 children with immediate challenge symptoms and negative in 2 children with delayed challenge symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that omega-5 gliadin is a significant allergen in young children with immediate allergic reactions to ingested wheat. IgE testing with omega-5 gliadin could be used to reduce the need for oral wheat challenges in children.

The prevalence of allergy to egg: a population-based study in young children

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of adverse reactions to egg, as population-based prevalence estimates based on objective diagnostic procedures are lacking.

METHODS

The parents of 2721 children in a population-based birth cohort completed questionnaires on the occurrence of any reaction to food at 12, 18, and 24 months of age. Children with parentally reported reactions to eggs at the age of 2 years were selected for further examination. A stepwise diagnostic procedure was developed that included diet trials at home, skin prick tests, and open and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. The mean age of the children at the time of the examination was 2.5 years (CI 2.5-2.6). A sample of children without perceived reactions to egg was also selected for assessment of unrecognized reactions.

RESULTS

The estimated point prevalence of allergy to egg in children aged 2(1/2) years was 1.6% (CI 1.3-2.0%), with an upper estimate of the cumulative incidence by this age calculated roughly at 2.6% (CI 1.6-3.6). Almost all reactions were IgE mediated. In general, two-thirds of the parentally perceived reactions were verified. However, the positive predictive value of a parentally perceived reaction depended on the number of times it had been reported, and increased from 50% to 100%, for reactions reported one and three times, respectively. Unrecognized reactions were infrequent.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that allergy to egg is frequent in a child population.

Atopy patch tests, together with determination of specific IgE levels, reduce the need for oral food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is commonly associated with food allergy. In addition to skin prick tests (SPTs) and measurements of specific IgE levels, the atopy patch test (APT) has recently been introduced into the diagnostic procedure for food allergy.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate whether a combination of allergologic tests could improve the prognostic value of the individual tests for positive food challenge results. We hypothesized that the combination of a positive APT result plus proof of specific IgE, a positive SPT result, or both would render double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges unnecessary.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-three double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges were performed in 98 children (median age, 13 months) with atopic dermatitis. All children were subjected to SPTs, APTs, and determination of specific IgE. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Ninety-five (55%) of 173 oral provocations were assessed as positive. For evaluating suspected cow's milk (CM) allergy, the APT was the best single predictive test (positive predictive value [PPV], 95%), and the combination of a positive APT result with evidence of specific IgE or an APT result together with a positive skin prick test response optimized the PPV to 100%. For hen's egg (HE) allergy, the APT was also the best single predictive test (PPV, 94%). The combination of 2 or more tests did not exceed the APT's predictive value. In both CM and HE challenges, the predictability of oral challenges depended on the level of specific IgE. For wheat allergy, the APT proved to be the most reliable test, and the PPV of 94% could not be improved by a combination with other allergologic tests.

CONCLUSION

The combination of positive APT results and measurement of levels of specific IgE (CM, > or = 0.35 kU/L; HE, > or = 17.5 kU/L) makes double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges superfluous for suspected CM and HE allergy.