Inhibitory effects of ketotifen on eotaxin-dependent activation of eosinophils: consequences for allergic eye diseases

Therapeutic Targets in Allergic Conjunctivitis

Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is a common condition resulting from exposure to allergens such as pollen, animal dander, or mold. It is typically mediated by allergen-induced crosslinking of immunoglobulin E attached to receptors on primed conjunctival mast cells, which results in mast cell degranulation and histamine release, as well as the release of lipid mediators, cytokines, and chemokines. The clinical result is conjunctival hyperemia, tearing, intense itching, and chemosis. Refractory and chronic cases can result in ocular surface complications that may be vision threatening. Patients who experience even mild forms of this disease report an impact on their quality of life. Current treatment options range from non-pharmacologic therapies to ocular and systemic options. However, to adequately control AC, the use of multiple agents is often required. As such, a precise understanding of the immune mechanisms responsible for this ocular surface inflammation is needed to support ongoing research for potential therapeutic targets such as chemokine receptors, cytokine receptors, non-receptor tyrosine kinases, and integrins. This review utilized several published articles regarding the current therapeutic options to treat AC, as well as the pathological and immune mechanisms relevant to AC. This review will also focus on cellular and molecular targets in AC, with particular emphasis on potential therapeutic agents that can attenuate the pathology and immune mechanisms driven by cells, receptors, and molecules that participate in the immunopathogenesis and immunopathology of AC.

A Review of Emerging Tear Proteomics Research on the Ocular Surface in Ocular Allergy

Ocular allergy is an immunoglobulin E-mediated Type I hypersensitivity reaction localised to the ocular surface and surrounding tissues. Primary signs and symptoms of ocular allergy include itching, redness, irritation and inflammation. Eye-rubbing caused by itching has been shown to alter ocular surface protein concentrations in conditions linked to ocular allergy such as keratoconus. In keratoconus, the cornea begins to thin and sag over time, leading to progressive vision loss and blindness in severe conditions. Due to the high incidence of ocular allergy sufferers rubbing their eyes in response to symptoms of itching, the protein landscape of the ocular surface may be significantly altered. Differential protein expression caused by long-term inflammation and eye-rubbing may lead to subsequent changes in ocular surface structure and function over time. This review aims to summarise and explore the findings of current ocular allergy proteome research conducted using techniques such as gel electrophoresis, mass spectrometry and lab-on-a-chip proteomics. Proteins of interest for this review include differentially expressed immunoglobulins, mucins, functional proteins, enzymes and proteins with previously uncharacterised roles in ocular allergy. Additionally, potential applications of this research are addressed in terms of diagnostics, drug development and future research prospects.

The spectrum of allergic ocular diseases

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the pathophysiologic mechanisms, differential diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of the various manifestations of ocular allergy, with an especial focus on immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated disease.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was performed to include articles, using the search terms ocular allergy and allergic conjunctivitis.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Recent and relevant human studies in the English language pertaining to our topic of study were selected. Animal studies pertaining to pathophysiology of ocular allergy were also reviewed. We focused on clinical trials, practice guidelines, reviews, and systematic reviews. In addition, case reports were reviewed if they described rare clinical presentations, disease mechanisms, or novel therapies.

RESULTS

Ocular allergy encompasses both IgE- and non-IgE-mediated disease, and the clinical severity may range from mild to sight-threatening inflammation. A comprehensive treatment regimen including education, lifestyle measures, topical therapies, and even systemic interventions may be necessary for the effective management of ocular allergies, tailored according to symptom severity.

CONCLUSION

Ocular allergy is frequently encountered by allergists and eye-care specialists, and despite progressively increasing incidence, it often remains underdiagnosed and, hence, untreated.

Emerging drugs for allergic conjunctivitis

INTRODUCTION

Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is a very common disease, especially in association with allergic rhinitis but may also occur in isolated presentation. The treatment of AC has long been based on antihistamines, cromones and topical corticosteroids, but none of these drugs completely abolishes the clinical expression of AC.

AREAS COVERED

The development of new drugs for AC is analyzed highlighting the recent insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. The major aim of development of drugs for AC is to have agents able to prevent the inflammatory effects of the interaction between the allergen and the specific IgE antibodies on mast cell surface. This may be obtained by blocking the effects of histamine (the main mediator of early allergic response) by H1-receptor antagonists, inhibiting the release of soluble factors able to recruit inflammatory cells (that sustain prolonged inflammation) by mast-cell stabilizers, inhibiting the effects of single mediators, inducing tolerance to the allergen by specific immunotherapy or even acting on factors related to activation and differentiation of T lymphocytes such as the toll-like receptors.

EXPERT OPINION

AC is an underestimated disease for which there is a search of more effective treatments. The availability of the drugs under current evaluation will allow more refined therapeutic strategies to apply according to the characteristics and the clinical severity of AC.

Allergic conjunctivitis: a comprehensive review of the literature

Ocular allergy represents one of the most common conditions encountered by allergists and ophthalmologists. Allergic conjunctivitis is often underdiagnosed and consequently undertreated. Basic and clinical research has provided a better understanding of the cells, mediators, and immunologic events, which occur in ocular allergy. New pharmacological agents have improved the efficacy and safety of ocular allergy treatment. An understanding of the immunologic mechanisms, clinical features, differential diagnosis, and treatment of ocular allergy may be useful to all specialists who deal with these patients. The purpose of this review is to systematically review literature underlining all the forms classified as ocular allergy: seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, perennial allergic conjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, atopic keratocongiuntivitis, contact allergy, and giant papillary conjunctivitis.

Recent patents and emerging therapeutics in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis

Ocular allergy is an inflammatory response of the conjunctival mucosa that also affects the cornea and eyelids. Allergic conjunctivitis includes seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC), perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC), vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) and giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC). In general, allergic conditions involve mast cell degranulation that leads to release of inflammatory mediators and activation of enzymatic cascades generating pro-inflammatory mediators. In chronic ocular inflammatory disorders associated with mast cell activation such as VKC and AKC constant inflammatory response is observed due to predominance of inflammatory mediators such as eosinophils and Th2-generated cytokines. Antihistamines, mast-cell stabilizers, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents are commonly indicated for the treatment of acute and chronic allergic conjunctivitis. In recent years newer drug molecules have been introduced in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. This article reviews recent patents and emerging therapeutics in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Effect of Ketotifen Fumarate, Olopatadine, and Levocabastine on Ocular Active Anaphylaxis in the Guinea Pig and Ocular Immediate Hypersensitivity in the Albino Rat

PURPOSE

To study the effects of ketotifen fumarate, olopatadine, and levocabastine on ocular active anaphylaxis in guinea pigs and on ocular immediate hypersensitivity in albino rats.

METHODS

Clinical grading scores and Evans blue dye leakage to eyelids and to eyeballs were assessed in five treatment groups (n = 10): ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, olopatadine 0.1%, levocabastine 0.05%, negative control, and positive control.

RESULTS

At 20 minutes after challenge, edema scores for ketotifen-treated guinea pigs were statistically significantly lower than those for levocabastine or olopatadine. Active treatment significantly reduced vascular leakage in both models. Ketotifen significantly reduced vascular leakage in eyelids compared with the other drugs. In guinea pigs, vascular leakage in eyeballs was significantly reduced with ketotifen fumarate compared with olopatadine and levocabastine.

CONCLUSIONS

In the guinea pig model, ketotifen was more effective than olopatadine and levocabastine at reducing conjunctival edema and vascular permeability in eyelids and eyeballs. In the rat model, ketotifen was more effective at reducing vascular permeability in eyelids than olopatadine and levocabastine.

Formyl peptide receptor-like 2 is expressed and functional in plasmacytoid dendritic cells, tissue-specific macrophage subpopulations, and eosinophils

The formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is a key player in innate immunity and host defense mechanisms. In humans and other primates, a cluster of genes encodes two related receptors, FPR-like 1 and FPR-like 2 (FPRL1 and FPRL2). Despite their high sequence similarity, the three receptors respond to different sets of ligands and display a different expression pattern in leukocyte populations. Unlike FPR and FPRL1, FPRL2 is absent from neutrophils, and two endogenous peptide agonists, F2L and humanin, were recently described. In the present work, we investigated the detailed functional distribution of FPRL2 in leukocytes by quantitative PCR, flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and chemotaxis assays, with the aim of raising hypotheses regarding its potential functions in the human body. We describe that FPRL2 is highly expressed and functional in plasmacytoid dendritic cells and up-regulated upon their maturation. FPRL2 is also expressed in eosinophils, which are recruited but do not degranulate in response to F2L. FPRL2 is expressed and functional in macrophages differentiated from monocytes in vitro in different conditions. However, in vivo, only specific subsets of macrophages express the receptor, particularly in the lung, colon, and skin, three organs chronically exposed to pathogens and exogenous aggressions. This distribution and the demonstration of the production of the F2L peptide in mice underline the potential role of FPRL2 in innate immunity and possibly in immune regulation and allergic diseases.

Caffeic acid phenethyl ester attenuates allergic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in murine model of ovalbumin-induced asthma

Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) is a biologically active ingredient of propolis, which has several interesting biological properties, including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory; however, its anti-allergic effects are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to determine whether treatment with CAPE results in significant inhibition of asthmatic reactions in a mouse model. Mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA) had the following typical asthmatic reactions: an increase in the number of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid; a marked influx of inflammatory cells into the lung around blood vessels and airways, and airway luminal narrowing; the development of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR); the presence of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and Th2 cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-5, in the BAL fluid; and the presence of allergen-specific IgE in the serum. Five successive intraperitoneal administrations of CAPE before the last airway OVA challenge resulted in significant inhibition of characteristic asthmatic reactions. We determined that increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by inhalation of OVA was diminished via the administration of CAPE in BAL fluid, as well as nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) DNA binding activity. These findings indicate that oxidative stress may have a crucial function in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma, and that CAPE may be useful as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of bronchial asthma.

Pharmacotherapy of allergic eye disease

Allergic eye disease is a term that refers to a number of disease processes that affect about one-fifth of the world's population. Although the more advanced forms of the disease can be sight threatening, the most disabling effects are due to the clinical manifestations, and hence quality of life, with some patients having seasonal exacerbations of their symptoms, whereas others have symptoms that are present throughout the year. Recent increased understanding of the cellular and mediator mechanisms that are involved in the various disease manifestations has greatly facilitated the development of more effective treatment options. Newer topical medications are being used that have multiple actions, such as an antihistaminic effect coupled with mast-cell stabilisation, and which require reduced daily dosing due to their longer duration of action. With greater research into newer therapies and more effective modes of delivery, improved healthcare outcomes with a lower economic burden will be achieved for patients with allergic eye disease.

Ocular anti-allergic compounds selectively inhibit human mast cell cytokines in vitro and conjunctival cell infiltration in vivo

BACKGROUND

Conjunctival mast cells (MCs) are important effector cells in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, via histamine and cytokine secretion. Several new anti-allergic eye drops stabilize MCs and block histamine receptors, but their anti-inflammatory effects are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Anti-allergic drugs were compared for their anti-inflammatory effects in an in vitro model of human MC activation and in an experimental murine model of allergic conjunctivitis.

METHODS

Human cord blood stem cell-derived (CBMC) and conjunctival biopsy-derived MCs were stimulated via FcepsilonRI, degranulation and histamine release were assayed at 1 h and cytokine secretion at 24 h using multiplex arrays. Mice sensitized to short ragweed pollen were given anti-allergics topically before allergen challenge, and conjunctival immuno-staining was performed at 24 h.

RESULTS

After a 1 h stimulation, 80% of the CBMC had degranulated and secreted histamine (27.9+/-4.7 ng/10(6) cells; P<0.05). Pre-treatment by all drugs significantly reduced histamine and TNF-alpha, whereas IL-5, IL-8, IL-10 and TNF-beta profiles were differentially decreased. For conjunctival biopsy-derived cultures (n=11), FcepsilonR1 stimulation increased histamine, TNF-alpha, TNF-beta, IL-5 and IL-8 levels and the production of IL-5, IL-6 (P<0.05), histamine and IL-8 (P<0.01) was inhibited by epinastine. In vivo, epinastine and olopatadine pre-treatment significantly reduced the clinical scores and eosinophil numbers (n=6; P<0.05) while epinastine also reduced neutrophils (P<0.02).

CONCLUSION

Differential effects on MC cytokine inhibition were observed, with epinastine inhibiting MC secretion of IL-5, IL-8, IL-10 and conjunctival neutrophil infiltration. The anti-allergic drugs have anti-histamine and mast-cell stabilizing properties but might differ in clinical improvement depending on the individual and the cytokines involved.

Suppressive effects of ketotifen on Th1- and Th2-related chemokines of monocytes

Ketotifen is a mast cell stabilizer and useful in younger children with allergic diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis. Macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC) is a T-helper cell type 2 (Th2)-related chemokine involved in recruitment of Th2 cells toward allergen-challenged inflammation. However, the Th1-related chemokines, interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10)/CXCL10, and the monokine induced by interferon-gamma (MIG)/CXCL9 are also important in allergen-induced asthma in animal models. We investigated the effects of ketotifen on the expression of Th1- and Th2-related chemokines of human monocytes in vitro and ex vivo. Ketotifen (5-50 microM) significantly down-regulated lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced MDC, MIG and IP-10 (p < 0.05, each comparison) in THP-1 cells and human primary monocytes in a dose-dependent manner. SB203580 [p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor] suppressed LPS-induced MDC and IP-10 expression, and PD98059 (ERK-MAPK inhibitor) could only suppress LPS-induced IP-10, but not MDC expression. LPS-induced pp38 and p-ERK expression of THP-1 monocytic cells was suppressed by ketotifen. These data demonstrate that ketotifen is effective in down-regulating LPS-induced MDC, MIG and IP-10, which play important roles in the pathogenesis of airway inflammation. The suppressive effect on MDC and IP-10 may, at least in part, involve the down-regulation of LPS-induced p38 and ERK-MAPK expression.

Pharmacology of ocular allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the pharmacology of current drug development directed towards ocular allergy. Increased worldwide prevalence of ocular allergy has stimulated expansion of management strategies towards physiologic and immunologic drug targets.

RECENT FINDINGS

Present drug targets are located in the conjunctival mucosal surface at the initial site of allergen exposure. Pharmacologic intervention attends to early and late phase reactions. Targets generating a response include mast cells, IgE, released preformed mediator histamine, and newly formed mediators, such as prostaglandins, leukotrienes and cytokines. Methods to simulate allergy and measure efficacy of drugs are the conjunctival allergen challenge and the conjunctival provocation test. Pharmacologic outcome is measured via cytologic biomarkers and clinical signs/symptoms of redness, itching, lid swelling and chemosis. Endpoint instruments such as the Ocular Allergy Index and Eye Allergy Patient Impact Questionnaire have emerged from the field of pharmacoeconomics.

SUMMARY

Important pharmacologic properties of targets have been revealed. First, histamine is more specifically antagonized by second generation antihistamines. Second, newly formed mediators and downstream responders (prostaglandins, leukotrienes, interleukins, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, tumor necrosis factor, vascular cell adhesion molecule, eosinophils and neutrophils) are more selectively antagonized by dual/multiple-action agents.

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate protects toluene diisocyanate-induced airway inflammation in a murine model of asthma

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), a major form of tea catechin, has anti-allergic properties. To elucidate the anti-allergic mechanisms of EGCG, we investigated its regulation of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9) expression in toluene diisocyanate (TDI)-inhalation lung tissues as well as TNF-alpha and Th2 cytokine (IL-5) production in BAL fluid. Compared with untreated asthmatic mice those administrated with EGCG had significantly reduced asthmatic reaction. Also, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation by TDI inhalation was diminished by administration of EGCG in BAL fluid. These results suggest that EGCG regulates inflammatory cell migration possibly by suppressing MMP-9 production and ROS generation, and indicate that EGCG may be useful as an adjuvant therapy for bronchial asthma.

Ketotifen induced inhibition of histamine release in a non-IgE model of middle ear effusion

The inhibitory effects of ketotifen, a histamine H1-receptor antagonist and mast cell stabilizer, were examined on a non-IgE experimental model of middle ear effusion. Thirty rats were divided into three groups. Group A (n = 9) was subjected to mechanical stimulation of the external auditory canal (EAC); group B (n = 11) was pre-treated with intraperitoneal administration of 0.2 mg ketotifen, 90 min before mechanical stimulation of the EAC; and group C (n = 10), the control group, was neither exposed to mechanical stimulation nor given ketotifen. Thirty minutes after completion of the experiment, the eardrums were inspected, histamine levels were determined by a fluorometric assay, and the pars flaccida underwent histological assessment. An attic effusion was observed in group A; a similar phenomenon but to a lesser extent was also seen in group B. Statistical analysis confirmed that the mean histamine concentration of the rinsing fluid obtained from group A was significantly higher than that of group C (p = 0.004) or group B (p = 0.008). No significant difference was found between the mean histamine concentration of groups C and group B (p = 0.311). Histological assessment revealed that the thickness of the pars flaccida of group A was considerably greater than that of groups C and B and was characterized by marked edema. Furthermore, the pars flaccida mast cell population was significantly depleted compared with groups C and B. The data indicate that mechanical stimulation of the EAC triggered the pars flaccida mast cells to degranulate in a non-mediated IgE fashion and that histamine is implicated in most of these histological changes. It is concluded that administration of ketotifen before mechanical stimulation of the EAC had a stabilizing effect and abolished mast cell degranulation, therefore, may be considered as a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of middle ear disease in the pediatric population.

Efficacy and tolerability of newer antihistamines in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis

Treatment for allergic conjunctivitis has markedly expanded in recent years, providing opportunities for more focused therapy, but often leaving both physicians and patients confused over the variety of options. As monotherapy, oral antihistamines are an excellent choice when attempting to control multiple early-phase, and some late-phase, allergic symptoms in the eyes, nose and pharynx. Unfortunately, despite their efficacy in relief of allergic symptoms, systemic antihistamines may result in unwanted adverse effects, such as drowsiness and dry mouth. Newer second-generation antihistamines (cetirizine, fexofenadine, loratadine and desloratadine) are preferred over older first-generation antihistamines in order to avoid the sedative and anticholinergic effects that are associated with first-generation agents. When the allergic symptom or complaint, such as ocular pruritus, is isolated, focused therapy with topical (ophthalmic) antihistamines is often efficacious and clearly superior to systemic antihistamines, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with an oral or intranasal agent. Topical antihistaminic agents not only provide faster and superior relief than systemic antihistamines, but they may also possess a longer duration of action than other classes including vasoconstrictors, pure mast cell stabilisers, NSAIDs and corticosteroids. Many antihistamines have anti-inflammatory properties as well. Some of this anti-inflammatory effect seen with 'pure' antihistamines (levocabastine and emedastine) may be directly attributed to the blocking of the histamine receptor that has been shown to downregulate intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression and, in turn, limit chemotaxis of inflammatory cells. Some topical multiple-action histamine H(1)-receptor antagonists (olopatadine, ketotifen, azelastine and epinastine) have been shown to prevent activation of neutrophils, eosinophils and macrophages, or inhibit release of leukotrienes, platelet-activating factors and other inflammatory mediators. Topical vasoconstrictor agents provide rapid relief, especially for redness; however, the relief is often short-lived, and overuse of vasoconstrictors may lead to rebound hyperaemia and irritation. Another class of topical agents, mast cell stabilisers (sodium cromoglicate [cromolyn sodium], nedocromil and lodoxamide), may be considered; however, they generally have a much slower onset of action. The efficacy of mast cell stabilisers may be attributed to anti-inflammatory properties in addition to mast cell stabilisation. In the class of topical NSAIDs, ketorolac has been promoted for ocular itching but has been found to be inferior for relief of allergic conjunctivitis when compared with olopatadine and emedastine. Lastly, topical corticosteroids may be considered for severe seasonal ocular allergy symptoms, although long-term use should be avoided because of risks of ocular adverse effects, including glaucoma and cataract formation.

Heterogeneity of expression of IgA receptors by human, mouse, and rat eosinophils

IgA is the most abundant class of Abs at mucosal surfaces where eosinophils carry out many of their effector functions. Most of the known IgA-mediated functions require interactions with IgA receptors, six of which have been identified in humans. These include the IgA FcR FcalphaRI/CD89 and the receptor for the secretory component, already identified on human eosinophils, the polymeric IgR, the Fcalpha/muR, asialoglycoprotein (ASGP)-R, and transferrin (Tf)R/CD71. In rodents, the existence of IgA receptors on mouse and rat eosinophils remains unclear. We have compared the expression and function of IgA receptors by human, rat, and mouse eosinophils. Our results show that human eosinophils express functional polymeric IgR, ASGP-R, and TfR, in addition to CD89 and the receptor for the secretory component, and that IgA receptors are expressed by rodent eosinophils. Indeed, mouse eosinophils expressed only TfR, whereas rat eosinophils expressed ASGP-R and CD89 mRNA. These results provide a molecular basis for the differences observed between human, rat, and mouse regarding IgA-mediated immunity.

CD28 and secretory immunoglobulin A-dependent activation of eosinophils: inhibition of mediator release by the anti-allergic drug, suplatast tosilate

BACKGROUND

Eosinophils are major effector cells in allergic diseases. After their recruitment to sites of inflammation, they contribute to the pathophysiology of the disease by releasing granule proteins and cytokines. Suplatast tosilate (IPD-1151T), a new anti-allergic agent, has shown beneficial effect in the treatment of asthma, associated with reduced bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophil infiltration and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) release in serum and sputum.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether suplatast tosilate could exert direct effects on human eosinophil activation.

METHODS

Eosinophils from hypereosinophilic patients or normal donors were purified by Percoll gradient and the magnetic cell separation system. Chemotaxis was studied using the Boyden chamber technique using three chemoattractants, formyl-methionine-leucine-phenylalanine (fMLP), IL-5 and eotaxin. Oxidative metabolism was determined by a luminol-dependent chemiluminescence assay after activation with eotaxin or secretory IgA (sIgA). The release of ECP and eosinophil derived neurotoxin (EDN) was measured by radioimmunoassay and cytokine production was determined by ELISA following activation with sIgA or anti-CD28.

RESULTS

The chemotactic response to fMLP, IL-5 and eotaxin was significantly inhibited by IPD-1151T. Suplatast tosilate was partially inhibiting the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by eotaxin and sIgA. Activation by sIgA and CD28 ligation resulted in the release of ECP and EDN, which was inhibited by IPD-1151T. Upon activation by anti-CD28, only IL-13 production was inhibited by IPD-1151T, whereas release of IL-2 and IFN-gamma was not affected. IL-10 release induced by sIgA was also inhibited by IPD-1151T. Additionally, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6, which was secreted following anti-CD28 and sIgA stimulation, was strongly inhibited by IPD-1151T.

CONCLUSION

Through inhibition of chemotaxis, IPD-1151T might limit the number of eosinophils at the inflammation site. Furthermore, it could reduce the pathological potential of eosinophils by inhibiting the release of ROS and cationic proteins, main inflammatory mediators produced by eosinophils. Moreover, the inhibition of immunoregulatory cytokines released by eosinophils could locally modify the immune response.

Efficacy and safety of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% in the conjunctival antigen challenge model of ocular allergic conjunctivitis

PURPOSE

To determine the duration of action of ketotifen 0.025% eye drops vs placebo taken as single or multiple doses in an allergen challenge model.

DESIGN

Two randomized, multicenter, double-masked, contralateral placebo-controlled studies, one a single-dose and one a multiple-dose study.

METHODS

Two conjunctival provocation tests (CPTs) were initially conducted to confirm reproducibility of subject responses in both studies. Subjects in study 1 (n = 87) received single doses of ketotifen in one eye and placebo in the other 15 minutes, 6 hours, and 8 hours before CPT. Subjects in study 2 (n = 85) received ketotifen or placebo once 8 hours before CPT. Single-dose efficacy results were used to further qualify a subject as a responder. Responders were re-randomized to a 4-week twice daily dosing regimen with a CPT 8 hours after the final dose. In both studies, ocular symptoms were assessed at three time points 3 to 15 minutes after challenge. There were no significant differences in adverse events between groups.

RESULTS

For both studies, ocular itching and vascular injection were significantly reduced (P <.003) at all time points after instillation of ketotifen, with a maximum reduction at 7 minutes postchallenge. In study 2, chemosis, tearing, and lid swelling were also assessed and were significantly reduced (P <.008) after instillation of ketotifen.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketotifen 0.025% eye drops were safe and statistically effective in preventing ocular itching, injection, and other signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis at 15 minutes, 6 hours, and 8 hours after a single dose and at 8 hours after the final dose of a 4-week twice daily regimen.