Effects of low dose fluticasone/salmeterol combination on surrogate inflammatory markers in moderate persistent asthma

New Versus Old: The Impact of Changing Patterns of Inhaled Corticosteroid Prescribing and Dosing Regimens in Asthma Management

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapies are the mainstay of pharmacological management of asthma. They can be administered alone or in combination with a long-acting bronchodilator, depending on asthma severity, and may also be supplemented with short-acting bronchodilators for as-needed rescue medication. Adherence to asthma therapies is generally poor and characterized by underuse of ICS therapies and over-reliance on short-acting bronchodilators, which leads to poor clinical outcomes. This article reviews efficacy versus systemic activity profiles for various dosing regimens of budesonide (BUD) and fluticasone propionate (FP). We performed a structured literature review of BUD and FP regular daily dosing, and BUD/formoterol (FOR) as-needed dosing, to explore the relationship between various dosing patterns of ICS regimens and the risk–benefit profile in terms of the extent of bronchoprotection and cortisol suppression. In addition, we explored how adherence could potentially affect the risk–benefit profile, in patients with mild, moderate, and moderate-to-severe asthma. With a specific focus on BUD or FP-containing treatments, we found that regular daily ICS and ICS/long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) dosing had a greater degree of bronchoprotection than as-needed BUD/FOR dosing or BUD/FOR maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) dosing, and still maintained low systemic activity. We also found that the benefits of regular daily ICS dosing regimens were diminished when adherence was low (50%); the shorter duration of bronchoprotection observed was similar to that seen with typical as-needed BUD/FOR usage. These findings have implications for aiding clinicians with selecting the most suitable treatment option for asthma management, and subsequent implications for the advice clinicians give their patients.

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing therapies can be administered in a variety of ways depending on a patient’s asthma severity. Patients with mild asthma tend to experience symptom relief with as-needed or regular daily use of an ICS alone, whereas patients with more severe asthma may require regular daily use of an ICS plus a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) to experience sufficient asthma control. However, failure to correctly adhere to ICS-containing therapies or an over-reliance on short-acting bronchodilators for symptom relief hinders optimal asthma management, thus negatively affecting overall patient health and wellbeing. Understanding how different dosing regimens affect the degree of bronchoprotection (efficacy) and cortisol suppression (systemic activity) of ICS treatments would benefit physicians by helping them to prescribe the most appropriate treatment for their patient’s asthma. We performed a structured literature review of two ICS molecules—budesonide (BUD) (alone and combined with formoterol [FOR]) and fluticasone propionate (FP)—to explore the relationship between various ICS dosing regimens, and then used these findings to construct models for ICS risk–benefit profiles. Our models factored in different ICS dosing regimens—as-needed, regular daily dosing, and maintenance and reliever therapy (MART)—and various degrees of treatment adherence. We found that regular daily ICS and ICS/LABA dosing provided better bronchoprotection than as-needed BUD/FOR dosing or BUD/FOR MART dosing, but this benefit was diminished with low adherence. Regular daily dosing maintained low cortisol suppression, which indicated a fairly low risk of negative side effects. Our findings have subsequent implications for optimizing treatment in patients with asthma.

Oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma: current knowledge and future needs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the current use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) as a chronic treatment in patients with severe asthma and as a rescue treatment for patients presenting with acute exacerbations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Airways disease is responsible for the bulk of OCS use in the community and considerable OCS-associated morbidity. I speculate that the key mechanism leading to a beneficial effect in these situations is depletion of circulating eosinophils resulting in a reduced response to potentially inhaled corticosteroid unresponsive recruitment signals to the airway mucosa. This effect is shared by anti-IL-5 biological agents, which have emerged as highly effective OCS-sparing agents. Mitigation of the adverse effects of OCS might also result from a better appreciation of features associated with a response to OCS and targeted, biomarker-directed use.

SUMMARY

Longer term, there are real prospects that chronic and acute OCS use in asthma will be replaced by biological agents targeting eosinophilic airway inflammation more specifically and safely.

Concordant systemic and local eosinophilia relates to poorer disease control in patients with nasal polyps

Background

Eosinophilic inflammation is a major phenotype associated with poorly controlled disease in nasal polyp patients. The difference between systemic and local eosinophilia in relation to disease control is poorly understood.

Objective

To explore whether blood and polyp tissue eosinophil numbers are independent risk factors for poor disease control in patients with nasal polyp.

Methods

By using the electronic medical records database and manual evaluation, 183 nasal polyp patients who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery at least one year prior to the study with complete data of tissue specimens, baseline blood routine test, nasal endoscopy and sinus computed tomography, were identified and recruited to assess disease control based on the criteria of a European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012 (EPOS 2012). Multiple logistic regression model was used to determine the association between blood and tissue eosinophil numbers and risk of poor disease control by adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.

Results

We broke down the cohort into 4 groups according to blood (0.3 ​× ​10⁹/L) and tissue (10%) eosinophils. The patients without eosinophilic inflammation represented the largest group (41.5%). The group with concordant blood and tissue eosinophilia represented the second largest (31.2%), and the patients with isolated tissue (15.3%) or blood (12.0%) eosinophilia were relatively rare. Multiple logistic regression models found blood eosinophil count and tissue eosinophil percentage were independently associated with increased risk for poor disease control after adjustments for covariates related to poor treatment outcome. Furthermore, subjects with concordant blood and tissue eosinophilia had a higher risk for poor disease control than those with isolated blood or tissue eosinophilia.

Conclusion

Concordant blood and tissue eosinophilia relates to a higher likelihood of poor disease control than isolated blood or tissue eosinophilia after adjustment of potential confounders in nasal polyp patients.

Effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in real life on clinical outcomes, sputum cells and systemic inflammation in asthmatics: a retrospective cohort study in a secondary care centre

OBJECTIVES

The impact of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on eosinophilic inflammation in asthma is well established, but their effect in a real-life setting has not been extensively studied. Our purpose was to investigate the effect of ICS on airway and systemic inflammation as well as on clinical outcomes in patients with asthma from clinical practice.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a retrospective analysis on asthmatics from a secondary care centre in whom ICS were initiated/increased (n=101), stopped/decreased (n=60) or remained stable (n=63, used as a control group) between two visits with available sputum and blood cell counts.

RESULTS

The median time between both visits ranged from 1 to 2 years. Initiating or increasing ICS (median variation (IQR): 800 (400-1200) µg beclomethasone equivalent dose per day) reduced sputum eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (P<0.0001) and to a lesser extent blood eosinophils (P<0.0001), while withdrawing or decreasing ICS (median variation (IQR): 900 (500-1200) µg beclomethasone equivalentdose per day) resulted in increased sputum eosinophils (P=0.008). No change was found in patients with a stable dose. The effectiveness of ICS in improving asthma control, quality of life, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), bronchial hyper-responsiveness and exacerbation rate was only observed in the eosinophilic phenotype (sputum eosinophils ≥3%, n=79). In non-eosinophilic asthmatics, stepping-down ICS resulted in an improvement in asthma control and quality of life, without any significant change in FEV₁ (n=38).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the effectiveness of ICS on eosinophilic inflammation in real life and demonstrate that their clinical benefit seems to be restricted to eosinophilic asthmatics. Our data also support a try for stepping-down ICS in non-eosinophilic asthmatics.

Role of the fixed combination of fluticasone and salmeterol in adult Chinese patients with asthma and COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common airway disorders characterized by chronic airway inflammation and airflow obstruction, and are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the People's Republic of China. These two diseases pose a high economic burden on the family and the whole of society. Despite evidence-based Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines being available for the diagnosis and management of COPD and asthma, many of these patients are not properly diagnosed or managed in the People's Republic of China. The value of combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists has been established in the management of asthma and COPD globally. Combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists such as fluticasone and salmeterol, have been shown to be effective for improving symptoms, health status, and reducing exacerbations in both diseases. In this review, we discuss the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy from key studies, particularly in the People's Republic of China.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide in clinical trials: an overview

Designing clinical trials in asthma it is crucial to find the perfect primary endpoint for showing bioequivalence, especially when the investigational medicinal product is not a bronchodilator, but a substance, which suppresses the inflammatory process, e.g. inhalative corticosteroids (ICS). In the past, lung function parameters were used as the primary endpoint, which entails a long study duration and hundreds of patients. The measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is established as a non-invasive marker for eosinophilic inflammation, and several guidelines focus on that diagnosis. FeNO is a surrogate measure of eosinophilic inflammation and at the same time, eosinophilic airway inflammation is usually steroid responsive. Thus, FeNO should be a part of the clinical management of asthma in ambulatory settings in conjunction with other conventional methods of asthma assessment. Furthermore, FeNO should be used to determine the presence or absence of eosinophilic airway inflammation, to determine the likelihood of steroid responsiveness, to measure response to steroid therapy, and level of inflammation control. In addition, FeNO is a useful tool to monitor patient ICS treatment adherence and allergen exposure. FeNO may be used to predict steroid responsiveness and as a measure to determine the optimal treatment of airway inflammation. FeNO has all characteristics of a good marker for bioequivalence measurements in the market approval process of generic ICS products. With a reliable study design in terms of patient population, concomitant medication, equipment and other factors, which can influence the measurement, efficient clinical trials can be performed, with a relatively short treatment time of 2-4 weeks and 50-100 patients.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels and blood eosinophil counts independently associate with wheeze and asthma events in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey subjects

BACKGROUND

Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) and blood eosinophil count (B-Eos) values, markers of local and systemic eosinophilic inflammation, respectively, are increased in asthmatic patients. Little is known about the relation of these markers to reported wheeze and asthma events in a random population sample.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the individual and independent values of B-Eos and Feno in relation to wheeze, asthma diagnosis, and asthma events in a cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Feno and B-Eos values were measured in 12,408 subjects aged 6 to 80 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008 and 2009-2010. Current wheeze and asthma diagnosis, as well as asthma attacks and asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits within the last 12 months, were assessed by means of questionnaires.

RESULTS

Intermediate or high Feno values and intermediate or high B-Eos values were independently associated with having asthma, wheeze, and asthma attacks. However, only intermediate and high B-Eos values were independently associated with asthma-related ED visits. High Feno (≥ 50 ppb) and B-Eos (≥ 500 cells/mm(3)) values rendered an adjusted odds ratio of 4.5 of having wheeze, 5.1 of having asthma, 5.4 for asthma attacks, and 2.9 for asthma-related ED visits compared with normal Feno (<25 ppb) and B-Eos (<300 cells/mm(3)) values.

CONCLUSIONS

Exhaled nitric oxide and B-Eos values offered independent information in relation to the prevalence of wheeze, asthma diagnosis, and asthma events in this random population sample. The clinical importance of these findings in asthmatic patients with regard to phenotyping and individualized treatment, considering both local and systemic eosinophilic inflammation, needs to be determined.

Asthma biomarkers in sputum

Studies have shown that induced sputum can provide information regarding the cellular and molecular processes involved in asthma and other obstructive pulmonary diseases, and can aid in the diagnosis of asthma and in distinguishing asthma from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients who present with evidence for fixed airflow obstruction. Sputum eosinophils are associated with both asthma severity and level of asthma control. By effectively treating sputum eosinophilia, the number of asthma exacerbations can be significantly reduced compared with managing asthma based on symptoms and lung function.

The role of measuring airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammatory biomarkers in asthma

Asthma is characterized by inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness, which results in episodic airflow obstruction. It is diagnosed once a compatible clinical history plus objective evidence of diurnal variability in peak expiratory flow or significant reversibility to inhaled bronchodilator is documented. In accordance with current guidelines, measures of airway calibre and symptoms allow patients and clinicians to assess the degree of asthma control and titrate pharmacotherapy. However, these parameters fail to reflect the extent of underlying endobronchial inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness, which in turn suggests that additional measures of asthma control may be of benefit. This evidence-based review highlights ways by which inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness can be assessed and how they may provide additional useful information in the diagnosis and management of asthmatic patients.

Airway and systemic effects of soluble and suspension formulations of nebulized budesonide in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

Using cyclodextrin with budesonide enables it to be formulated in a solution for nebulization.

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effects of a Captisol-enabled budesonide solution (CBIS), 60 microg twice daily, delivered via a nebulizer (eFlow), compared with a conventional budesonide suspension (Pulmicort Respules), 250 microg twice daily, delivered via another nebulizer (LC Plus), using fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) and overnight urinary cortisol to creatinine ratio as the primary outcomes for efficacy and systemic bioactivity.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 12 children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma (aged 5-12 years). Measurements were performed after a 2-week steroid washout at baseline and at the end of each 2-week randomized treatment.

RESULTS

The nebulization time was shorter (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-5.63 minutes; P = .03) with CBIS (mean, 1.77 minutes) than with Pulmicort Respules (mean, 5.01 minutes). The reduction in FE(NO) with CBIS from pooled baseline was 2.45-fold (95% CI, 1.87-3.21; P < .001); and with Pulmicort Respules, 3.18-fold (95% CI, 2.26-4.47; P < .001). No statistically significant changes from pooled baseline in lung function and overnight urinary cortisol to creatinine ratio were observed with either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The nebulization time was shorter with CBIS compared with Pulmicort Respules. Both formulations exhibited similar anti-inflammatory activity in terms of reducing FE(NO), with no detectable difference between them when used in a putative microgram nominal dose ratio of 1:4. Neither formulation produced significant adrenal suppression.

Relationship between airway inflammation and remodeling in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Despite a number of important differences in the pathogenesis, course and prognosis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), these two entities also have common features with airway inflammation being one of them. Airway remodeling is a characteristic feature of asthma, but data on the bronchial wall thickening in COPD patients are still scarce.

AIM

To assess the relation between the inflammatory cell count in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and thickness of bronchial walls assessed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in asthma and COPD patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted in 9 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (M/F 4/5, mean age 35 +/- 10 years) and 11 patients with mild-to-moderate COPD (M/F 7/4, mean age 57 +/- 9 years). In all subjects lung function tests and HRCT scanning of the chest were performed. External (D) and internal (L) diameters of the airways were assessed at five selected lung levels. The lumen area (A(L)), wall area (WA), wall thickness (WT) and bronchial wall thickness (WT/D ratio) were calculated. Eight patients with asthma and 8 patients with COPD underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Total and differential cell counts were assessed in the BAL fluid.

RESULTS

Mean FEV(1)% pred was 80 +/- 19%, and 73 +/- 20% in asthma and COPD patients, respectively (NS). No significant differences in the total and differential cell counts in BALF were found in patients with asthma and COPD. There were no significant differences in the airway diameter or airway wall thickness. The mean inner airway diameter was 1.4 +/- 0.3 and 1.2 +/- 0.3 mm and the mean lumen area was 1.8 +/- 0.7 and 1.6 +/- 0.7 mm(2) in asthma and COPD, respectively (NS). Negative correlations between the eosinophil count in BALF and inner airway diameter (r=-0.7, P<0.05) and lumen area (r=-0.7, P<0.05) were found in asthmatics. There was no significant relationship between the BALF cell count and airway wall thickness in COPD patients. -

CONCLUSIONS

In mild-to-moderate asthma and COPD the airway diameter and thickness are similar. In asthmatics, the airway diameter might be associated with eosinophil count in BAL fluid.

The predictive value of eosinophil cationic protein and lactate dehydrogenase in asthma: a comparative study of serum versus sputum

BACKGROUND

: Serum and sputum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels are correlated with asthma disease severity.

OBJECTIVE

: To establish a diagnostic accuracy of ECP and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in serum (indirectly) and sputum (directly) as inflammatory markers in asthma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

: In a cross sectional study, 76 asthmatic patients with exacerbation were enrolled in the study. ECP was determined using enzyme linked immuno-assay.

RESULTS

: Asthmatic patients compared with control subjects, had a significant higher levels of ECP and LDH in sputum. Both sputum and serum ECP and LDH were reduced significantly with prednisolone treatment. FEV1 was inversely correlated with sputum ECP, serum ECP, and sputum LDH. A significant positive correlation was noted between sputum ECP and sputum LDH. Serum LDH does not demonstrate any significant correlations with other variables. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve showed that sputum ECP (0.92) was a significantly an accurate marker more than serum ECP (0.81), sputum (0.80) LDH, and serum (0.65) LDH. Furthermore, the area under curve was lower for serum ECP (0.81) than that for sputum ECP (0.92). However, serum ECP (0.81) was more accurate marker than serum LDH (0.65).

CONCLUSION

: Serum and sputum ECP as eosinophilic inflammatory markers are associated with poor asthma control. Sputum ECP and LDH were significantly an accurate markers more than serum ECP and LDH.

Sputum neurokinin A in Egyptian asthmatic children and adolescents: relation to exacerbation severity

BACKGROUND

Neurogenic inflammation may participate in the development and progression of bronchial asthma. The molecular mechanisms underlying neurogenic inflammation are orchestrated by a large number of neuropeptides including tachykinins such as neurokinin A (NKA) and substance P. Tachykinins are secreted from sensory airway nerves and inflammatory cells after allergens exposure. In clinical practice, assessment of airway inflammation is difficult. Therefore, detection of biological markers of airway inflammation in sputum might offer help for proper monitoring of asthma severity.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We aimed to measure sputum NKA in relation to acute asthma exacerbations of varying severity.

METHODS

Sputum NKA was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 24 children and adolescents during and after acute asthma exacerbation and 24 healthy matched controls.

RESULTS

Sputum NKA was significantly higher in asthmatic patients during acute exacerbation than controls [217.5 (284) vs 10 (7) ng/ml, P < 0.001]. When patients with acute asthma exacerbation were followed-up till remission, sputum NKA levels decreased significantly, but they remained significantly higher than controls. Sputum NKA levels were significantly higher in severe than moderate and in moderate than mild exacerbations, and was negatively correlated to peak expiratory flow rate (r = -0.9, P < 0.001). Sputum NKA had significant positive correlations to eosinophil counts in blood and sputum (r = 0.6, P < 0.001 and r = 0.7, P < 0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Sputum NKA is up-regulated during acute asthma exacerbation and it positively correlates to its severity. Thus, NKA may aid in objective classification of the exacerbation severity. In addition, NKA may be a target for new asthma therapy.

Asthma biomarkers in sputum

Several inflammatory cells are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma. Among these, the eosinophil appears to be a major effector cell. This review focuses primarily on the clinical utility of sputum eosinophil counts in asthma. Several studies have shown sputum eosinophils to be associated with both asthma severity and level of asthma control. In addition, the presence of sputum eosinophilia is strongly predictive of a favorable response to glucocorticoid therapy. Conversely, the absence of sputum eosinophilia is predictive of a poor response to glucocorticoid therapy. Sputum eosinophilia also predicts asthma relapse in subjects who have their inhaled glucocorticoid reduced or withdrawn. Lastly, inhaled glucocorticoid therapy can be titrated to keep the sputum eosinophil count at or below 2%.

Non-invasive measurement of airway inflammation in asthma

Assessing the severity and control of a patient's asthma is of great importance to ensure that pharmacotherapy is optimized. Measures such as lung function, symptoms, and reliever use have traditionally been used as objective means of undertaking this assessment, but until now the level of airway inflammation has not been quantified. As asthma is primarily an inflammatory disorder, it would be desirable to include a measure of this process when evaluating disease control. The following article outlines methods of non-invasively measuring asthmatic airway inflammation and highlights their potential role in clinical practice.

Short polystyrene monolith-fritted micro-liquid chromatography columns for rapid isocratic analysis of pharmaceuticals direct from plasma

The manufacture of micro-HPLC columns with combined stationary phases, a body of 3.5-microm XTerra-C18 particles, and poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) (PS-DVB) frits is described in detail. The efficiency of the columns was assessed by rapid separation of neutral and acid compound mixtures. Direct analysis of some pharmaceuticals in plasma resulted in lower limits of detection (LOD) for salmeterol xinofate of 12.5 nanograms on-column.

Nitrogen washout slope in poorly controlled asthma

Short-term control of asthma is often lacking even though forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) remains above normal value. Small airways are a potential key site of persistent inflammation and structural modification. Noninvasive assessment of small airways was found to be difficult, but the computerized single breath nitrogen washout test (SBNT) has been recently successfully reintroduced with this aim. Twenty-four asthmatics (13 females) of various severity but with normal FEV1 were compared with 24 healthy volunteers (13 females) and studied at steady-state after bronchodilatation (400 microg salbutamol). Spirometric values, plethysmographic data, phase III (slope of phase III of the SBNT, dN2) and IV [closing volume (CV), with closing capacity (CC) = CV + residual volume (RV)] of the SBNT were checked. Asthma severity, recent control, exacerbation rate, and therapy requirements were assessed on the basis of validated questionnaires (ACQ) and international guidelines. Patients were prospectively pooled into two equal groups according to their exacerbation rate. The reproducibility of the measurements obtained on 2 following days was assessed. All plethysmographic values, except total lung capacity (TLC), differentiated asthmatic patients from controls. The CC/TLC [124 (117-148) vs 117 (112-123), P = 0.04] and dN2 [110 (99-190) vs 94 (75-111), P = 0.02] were increased in asthma. The dN2 was significantly increased in patients with frequent exacerbations [100 (83-105) vs 195 (141-212), P = 0.0005]. A correlation was obtained between dN2 and recent asthma control (rho: 0.62; P = 0.003), number of exacerbations (rho: 0.71, P = 0.0008), and RV/TLC (rho: 0.49, P = 0.026). This study demonstrated that ventilation inequalities assessed by dN2 represent an important indicator of poor asthma control and high exacerbation rate in high symptom perceivers. New therapies focused on small airways should now be developed.

Exhaled nitric oxide predicts airway hyper-responsiveness to hypertonic saline in children that wheeze

BACKGROUND

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) has shown good validity for the assessment of airway inflammation in asthmatic children. In large-scale epidemiological studies, this method would be preferred above airway challenge tests, because it is a quick and easy applicable tool.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to assess the discriminatory capacity of eNO, and prechallenge FEV1 for airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) in 8-13-year old schoolchildren.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parents completed the ISAAC questionnaire, and children were tested for atopy, AHR to hypertonic (4.5%) saline (HS), and eNO. Diagnostic value was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curves (ROC), and calculation of positive and negative predicted values at different cut-off points for eNO and prechallenge FEV1.

RESULTS

Areas under the ROC-curves of AHR were 0.65 for eNO and 0.62 for FEV1. Values increased to 0.71 and respectively 0.75 for a combined occurrence of AHR and current wheeze. Highest sensitivity and specificity were obtained at a cut-off value of 43 ppb for eNO and 103% predicted for FEV1. At these cut-off values, the positive predictive values for the presence of AHR in symptomatic children were respectively 83% (eNO) and 33% (FEV1), and negative predictive values in asymptomatic children were, respectively, 90 (eNO) and 80% (FEV1).

CONCLUSION

Exhaled nitric oxide is a valid screening tool for AHR to HS in children that present with current wheeze, and it outperforms FEV1 as a predictor of AHR.

Adding salmeterol to an inhaled corticosteroid reduces allergen-induced serum IL-5 and peripheral blood eosinophils

BACKGROUND

Adding a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to inhaled corticosteroids results in better symptomatic asthma control than increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

Investigating whether adding the long-acting beta(2)-agonist salmeterol to the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate has an effect on allergen-induced allergic inflammation in asthma.

METHODS

Bronchial allergen challenges were performed in 26 patients with allergic asthma, pretreating them with a single dose of either fluticasone/salmeterol (100/50 microg) or fluticasone alone (100 microg), in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over design. Sputum and serum markers of bronchial inflammation were measured after allergen challenge, as well as lung function parameters. Primary outcomes were sputum eosinophil numbers and eosinophil cationic protein.

RESULTS

Asthmatic responses after allergen challenge were significantly reduced after pretreatment with fluticasone/salmeterol relative to fluticasone alone. Sputum inflammatory markers after allergen challenge were not significantly affected by fluticasone/salmeterol pretreatment. By contrast, serum IL-5 was significantly reduced (geometric mean serum IL-5 [SEM]: 0.5 [0.3] vs 1.1 [0.3] pg/mL 1 hour and 0.6 [0.3] vs 1.1 [0.3] pg/mL 6 hours after challenge with fluticasone/salmeterol vs fluticasone alone pretreatment, respectively; P values < .05). Also, peripheral blood eosinophils were significantly reduced (geometric mean number x 10(6)/L [SEM]: 172 [0.1] vs 237 [0.1] at 6 hours and 271 [0.1] vs 351 [0.1] at 24 hours with fluticasone/salmeterol vs fluticasone alone pretreatment, respectively; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Adding salmeterol to fluticasone reduces allergen-induced serum IL-5 and peripheral blood eosinophils. This phenomenon may contribute to the improved clinical outcomes that result from adding a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to inhaled corticosteroids.

Long-acting beta-agonists: anti-inflammatory properties and synergy with corticosteroids in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Contemporary asthma management calls for combination inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) for patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma. This combination has consistently shown superior clinical efficacy compared with monotherapy with higher doses of ICS. It is unclear whether ICS and LABA act additively because of their complementary mechanisms of action, or whether they act synergistically based on possible favorable interactions between them. The purpose of this review is to summarize research findings on the anti-inflammatory activity of LABA published since October 2002 and to speculate on how these findings will affect future asthma management recommendations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination ICS plus LABA consistently demonstrates superiority over ICS monotherapy in clinical outcomes such as pulmonary function, symptoms, and exacerbation rates, and is consistent with definitive data published before the review period. However, investigations into possible effects of LABA on inflammatory mediators are preliminary. Positive effects of LABA on some serum and bronchial inflammatory measures have been observed, but the clinical importance of these findings has not been established.

SUMMARY

Current asthma treatment recommendations are based on clinical trials demonstrating improved clinical outcomes of combination ICS plus LABA over ICS alone. Whether LABA possesses clinically important benefits beyond bronchodilation remains to be established. Distinguishing anti-inflammatory activity of LABA will help define optimal long-term treatment regimens for asthma that not only improve pulmonary function, symptoms, and exacerbation rates but also protect against airway remodeling.

Biochemical interaction between effects of beclomethasone dipropionate and salbutamol or formoterol in sputum cells from mild to moderate asthmatics

BACKGROUND

Several in vitro studies demonstrate that corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2) agonists may have a complementary and synergistic mode of action on the inflammatory processes in asthma.

METHODS

Sputum was induced in 20 mild to moderate asthmatic patients and the induced sputum cells (ISC) were cultured with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 10(-7) M, salbutamol 10(-8) M and formoterol 10(-8) M either alone or in combination, BDP plus salbutamol and BDP plus formoterol, for 24 h. We measured the levels of growth macrophages-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), released on activation normal T cells expressed and activated (RANTES) and interleukin-8 (IL-8), in the supernatant of stimulated cells by ELISA. Furthermore, we assessed nuclear translocation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and the expression of beta(2) receptor in ISC by immunofluorescence and RT-PCR, respectively.

RESULTS

The release of GM-CSF, RANTES and IL-8 in ISC was significantly reduced by BDP plus salbutamol or formoterol as compared with either drug alone (P < 0.0001). beta(2) receptor expression was increased after 30 min of incubation with BDP and continued to increase over a time period of 4 h (P < 0.0001). Furthermore after 30 min of incubation, nuclear translocation of GR was greater with BDP plus salbutamol or formoterol than with any of the drugs alone (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The present ex vivo study demonstrates a complementary mode of action between BDP and salbutamol or formoterol leading to an enhanced anti-inflammatory activity.

Alveolar and airway sites of nitric oxide inflammation in treated asthma

The goal of this study was to identify airway and alveolar site(s) of inflammation using exhaled nitric oxide (NO) as a marker in treated patients with asthma, including response to oral corticosteroids, and correlate these sites with expiratory airflow limitation. In 53 (24 male) patients with asthma, age 43 +/- 23 years (mean +/- SD) and all on inhaled corticosteroids, post 180 microg aerosolized albuterol, FEV(1) was 74 +/- 23% predicted and FEV(1)/FVC was 68 +/- 11%. Exhaled NO at 100 ml/second was 27 +/- 23 ppb (p < 0.001 compared with normal, 12 +/- 15 ppb). Bronchial NO maximal flux was 2.4 +/- 3.1 nl/second (p < 0.001 compared with normal, 0.85 +/- 0.55). Alveolar NO concentration was 7.0 +/- 7.4 ppb (p = 0.01 compared with the normal value, 3.2 +/- 2.0 ppb). There was no significant correlation between FEV(1) % predicted or lung elastic recoil and NO bronchial flux or alveolar concentration. However, there was a weak but significant correlation between NO bronchial flux and alveolar concentration (Spearman r = 0.50, p < 0.001). In 10 subjects with asthma on inhaled corticosteroids, 5 days of 30 mg prednisone resulted in isolated significant decreases in NO alveolar concentration, from 13 +/- 10 to 4 +/- 4 ppb (p = 0.002). Despite treatment, including inhaled corticosteroids, patients with asthma may have ongoing separate airway and alveolar sites of NO inflammation, the latter responsive to oral corticosteroids.