1
|
Boggi U, Vistoli F, Andres A, Arbogast HP, Badet L, Baronti W, Bartlett ST, Benedetti E, Branchereau J, Burke GW, Buron F, Caldara R, Cardillo M, Casanova D, Cipriani F, Cooper M, Cupisti A, Davide J, Drachenberg C, de Koning EJP, Ettorre GM, Fernandez Cruz L, Fridell JA, Friend PJ, Furian L, Gaber OA, Gruessner AC, Gruessner RW, Gunton JE, Han D, Iacopi S, Kauffmann EF, Kaufman D, Kenmochi T, Khambalia HA, Lai Q, Langer RM, Maffi P, Marselli L, Menichetti F, Miccoli M, Mittal S, Morelon E, Napoli N, Neri F, Oberholzer J, Odorico JS, Öllinger R, Oniscu G, Orlando G, Ortenzi M, Perosa M, Perrone VG, Pleass H, Redfield RR, Ricci C, Rigotti P, Paul Robertson R, Ross LF, Rossi M, Saudek F, Scalea JR, Schenker P, Secchi A, Socci C, Sousa Silva D, Squifflet JP, Stock PG, Stratta RJ, Terrenzio C, Uva P, Watson CJ, White SA, Marchetti P, Kandaswamy R, Berney T. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant 2021; 21 Suppl 3:17-59. [PMID: 34245223 PMCID: PMC8518376 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Collapse
|
2
|
Stratta RJ, Farney AC, Rogers J, Orlando G. Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 10:117-32. [PMID: 24236648 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2014.853616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of General Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC27157, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thorban S, Schwarznau A, Hüser N, Stangl M. Efficacy of conventional immunosuppressive therapy in related and unrelated living renal transplantation. Clin Transplant 2006; 20:284-8. [PMID: 16824142 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00479.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The application of antibody induction therapy in adult living-related kidney transplantation remains under discussion. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of living-related (LRT) and unrelated renal transplant recipients (LURT) using standardized immunosuppressive protocols. From October 2000 to October 2004, 72 adult LRT (TX) were performed at our institution. Thirty-nine LRT (group A) and 33 LURT (group B) recipients received a standardized immunosuppressive therapy consisting of tacrolimus (Tac), steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) without antibody induction therapy. This prolective analysis included immediate graft function, rejection rate and loss of the transplanted organ. The incidence of post-operative good graft function (>90%) was similar for both groups, as well as the rejection rate showed 57.8% for patients of group A and 58.8% for patients of group B (p < 0.5). However, the number of rejections (>1 rejection) was significantly higher in group B (11.8%) compared to patients in group A (4.4%). No difference concerning loss of transplanted kidney was observed for both groups. Conventional Tac, MMF and steroid-based immunosuppression therapy is equivalent in efficacy of therapy in living-related and unrelated renal transplants. In our opinion, induction therapy in patients without immunologic risk factors has no favourable effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Thorban
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Technische University, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Campbell AL, Goldberg CL, Magid MS, Gondolesi G, Rumbo C, Herold BC. First case of toxoplasmosis following small bowel transplantation and systematic review of tissue-invasive toxoplasmosis following noncardiac solid organ transplantation. Transplantation 2006; 81:408-17. [PMID: 16477228 DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000188183.49025.d5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Toxoplasmosis prophylaxis is standard following heart and heart lung transplantation, when an increased risk of allograft transmitted Toxoplasma is well-recognized. In contrast, prophylaxis and routine serologic evaluation of donors and recipients for Toxoplasma in noncardiac solid organ transplantation (SOT) is not recommended. We report the first case of disseminated toxoplasmosis following small bowel transplantation, presumably transmitted via the transplanted intestine and systematically review reported cases of toxoplasmosis in noncardiac SOT recipients to determine if current guidelines should be reconsidered. METHODS Systematic MEDLINE review was performed for tissue invasive toxoplasmosis in noncardiac SOT recipients and analysis of clinical features, serologic status, and treatment regimens with respect to mortality. RESULTS Fifty-two cases of toxoplasmosis in noncardiac SOT recipients were identified. Eighty-six percent developed disease within 90 days of transplantation. Presentation was nonspecific and consisted of fever (77%), respiratory distress (29%), neurologic manifestations (29%), and bone marrow suppression (26%). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that localized disease (odds ratio [OR]=37.36, 95% CI 1.85-754.85), treatment received (OR=1.814, 95% CI 1.193-3.480) and donor and recipient serostatus (OR=1.39, 95% CI 1.068-1.815) were predictors of survival. High-risk recipients (donor seropositive/recipient seronegative) developed disease earlier (16 days vs. 31 days P=0.002) and were less likely to survive (OR=0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.69) than standard-risk recipients. CONCLUSIONS Toxoplasmosis is recognized following noncardiac SOT. Reduction of morbidity and mortality necessitates knowledge of donor and recipient Toxoplasma serostatus, prophylaxis, early diagnosis, and treatment. The findings support a reconsideration of pretransplantation evaluation and prophylaxis strategies in SOT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew L Campbell
- Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bogetti D, Sankary HN, Jarzembowski TM, Manzelli A, Knight PS, Thielke J, Chejfec G, Cotler S, Oberholzer J, Testa G, Benedetti E. Thymoglobulin induction protects liver allografts from ischemia/reperfusion injury. Clin Transplant 2005; 19:507-11. [PMID: 16008596 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00375.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interventions that minimize hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) can expand the donor organ pool. Thymoglobulin (TG) induction therapy has been shown to ameliorate delayed graft function and possibly decrease IRI in cadaver renal transplants recipients. This controlled randomized trial was designated to assess the ability of TG to protect against IRI in liver transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-two cadaveric liver transplant recipients were randomized to receive either TG (1.5 mg/kg/dose) during the anhepatic period and QOD x2 doses or no TG. No differences in recipients' demographics were present and donor characteristics were similar in terms of age, cause of death, and cold ischemia time. Maintenance immunosupression consisted of Tacrolimus (or Cyclosporine) and steroids for both groups. Donor biopsies were obtained during organ procurement, cold storage and 1 h after re-vascularization. Post-operative liver function tests were monitored. Early graft function, length of stay, patient and graft survival rates, incidence of primary non-function and rate of rejection were assessed. RESULTS Patient and graft survival at 3 months was 100%. There was no incidence of primary graft non-function and no need for re-transplantation. The incidence of acute rejection was similar between the two groups. Patients in the TG group had significant decreases in alanine aminotransferase test at day 1 compared to the control group (p = 0.02). There were also near significant decreases of total bilirubin at day 5 and shorter length of hospitalization. Liver biopsy (at procurement, when cold, and post-reperfusion) of TG group demonstrated a trend for increased central ballooning. CONCLUSION The TG allowed for more compromised liver grafts to be transplanted with less clinical evidence of IRI and improved function. Further studies on the degree of apoptosis in the liver biopsy post-reperfusion are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Bogetti
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bogetti D, Jarzembowski TM, Sankary HN, Manzelli A, Knight PS, Chejfec G, Cotler S, Oberholzer J, Testa G, Benedetti E. Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury can be modulated with thymoglobulin induction therapy. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:404-6. [PMID: 15808659 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thymoglobulin induction therapy has been shown to ameliorate delayed graft function and possibly decrease ischemia reperfusion injury in cadaver renal transplant recipients. This controlled randomized trial was designed to assess whether thymoglobulin also protects liver transplant recipients from ischemia reperfusion injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-two cadaver liver transplant recipients were randomized to receive either thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg per dose) during the anhepatic period and two doses every other day or no thymoglobulin. No differences in recipient or donor demographics were present. Maintenance immunosupression consisted of tacrolimus (or cyclosporine) and steroids for both groups. Donor biopsies were obtained during organ procurement, cold storage, and 1 hour after revascularization. Postoperative liver function tests were monitored. Early graft function, length of stay, patient and graft survival rates, incidence of primary nonfunction, and rate of rejection were assessed. RESULTS Patient and graft survival at 3 months was 100%. There was no incidence of primary graft nonfunction and no need for retransplantation. The incidence of acute rejection was similar between the two groups. Although donor livers randomized to thymoglobulin had less optimal preimplantation biopsies, these recipients had significant decreases in ALT at day 1 compared to the control group (P = .02), near significant decreases of total bilirubin at day 5, and shorter length of hospitalization. CONCLUSION Thymoglobulin allowed for more compromised liver grafts to be transplanted with less clinical evidence of ischemia reperfusion injury and improved function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Bogetti
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|