Non-heart-beating cadaver donor hepatectomy 'the operative procedure'

Transfusion has no effect on recurrence in hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The literature suggests that blood product transfusions have a negative impact on the survival of liver transplant patients. We investigated the impact of intraoperative blood product usage on the survival of liver transplantation patients being transplanted for hepatitis C-related end-stage liver disease. In addition, we analyzed a potentially more sensitive metric, namely disease recurrence and fibrosis progression, obtained from follow-up liver biopsies.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 194 consecutive patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) undergoing liver transplantation. To investigate the effect of red blood cell (RBC) or platelet transfusions on post-transplant HCV recurrence, hepatic biopsy data from 4 months and 1 year after transplantation were studied. In addition, survival data were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no effect of intraoperative RBC or platelet transfusion on either 1- or 5-year patient survival following liver transplantation. There was no difference in HCV disease recurrence or progression of hepatic fibrosis at 4 months or 1 year attributable either to RBC or to platelet transfusion.

CONCLUSION

This study was not able to confirm an effect on the survival of HCV-infected liver transplant patients related to intraoperative transfusion of RBCs or platelets. In addition, these transfusions had no effect on HCV recurrence or fibrosis progression. This is not to condone a liberal transfusion practice, but rather to reassure that when clinically indicated, transfusion does not have a significant impact on patient survival or disease recurrence in HCV-infected liver transplant patients.

Donation after Cardiac Death Has a Minimal Impact on Thoracic Organ Recovery

Background

Our organ procurement organization recently developed an aggressive donation after cardiac death program. Thoracic organs are rarely recovered from Non—Heart-beating donors. Therefore, there is concern that donation after cardiac death may affect the recovery of thoracic organs from donors not allowed to progress to brain death.

Objective

To evaluate the potential impact of donation after cardiac death on the recovery of thoracic organs.

Methods

On the assumption that prolongation of care on all cases would result in a diagnosis of brain death. By retrospective chart review, all donations after cardiac death were evaluated for thoracic organ potential using the same standards that were used to evaluate brain-dead donors.

Results

During the study period there were 34 of 44 (77%) Non—Heart-beating donors qualified to donate abdominal organs only. Ten of 44 Non—Heart-beating donors (24%) qualified to potentially donate thoracic organs; the families of 4 of 10 of these donors insisted on the immediate withdrawal of life support, leaving only 6 donors with thoracic organ potential. All 6 of these donors qualified as potential heart donors and 3 as potential lung donors.

Conclusions

A total of 97 organs were recovered and successfully transplanted from 44 Non—Heart-beating donors. If all the donors who qualified to donate thoracic organs progressed to brain death and if their thoracic organs were transplantable, then 6 additional hearts and 3 pairs of lungs may have been recovered. These data demonstrate that an aggressive donation after cardiac death program contributes significantly to the organ donor pool, with a minimal impact on potential thoracic organ recovery.

Livers Transplanted From Donors After Cardiac Death Occurring in the ICU or the Operating Room Have Excellent Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Increasing donor hospital cooperation with donation after cardiac death (DCD) requires the organ procurement organization (OPO) to use current withdrawal of life support (WLS) protocols. Hospital ICU nurses/physicians are comfortable performing the emotionally draining procedure of WLS in the ICU while OPOs are reluctant to accept these donors due to increased warm ischemia (WI). In our area, several hospitals will only allow WLS to occur in the ICU. This study compares liver outcomes from DCD donors where death occurred in the ICU (DCDICU) vs the OR (DCDOR).

METHODS

From March 2003 to June 2004, 34 DCD donors were recovered by our OPO. WLS occurred in the ICU for 26 donors (76%) and in the OR for 8 donors (24%). Thirteen of 26 DCDICU and 5 of 8 DCDOR livers were transplanted. Donor demographics, warm ischemic time, cold ischemic time, distance shipped, and recipient functions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighteen livers were transplanted both locally and at distant transplant centers. Results are outlined in the .

CONCLUSIONS

Although DCDICU donors averaged approximately 4 minutes longer WI than DCDOR donors, short-term results for both groups were equivalent. These findings support using DCDICU livers. DCDICU donors have the potential to significantly improve donor hospital cooperation.

Liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors: current status and future prospects

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for many patients with acute and chronic liver failure, but its application is limited by a shortage of donor organs. Donor organ shortage is the principal cause of increasing waiting lists, and a number of patients die while awaiting transplantation. Non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) livers are a potential means of expanding the donor pool. This is not a new concept. Prior to the recognition of brainstem death, organs were retrieved from deceased donors only after cardiac arrest. Given the preservation techniques available at that time, this restricted the use of extrarenal organs for transplantation. In conclusion, after establishment of brain death criteria, deceased donor organs were almost exclusively from heart-beating donors (HBDs). To increase organ availability, there is now a resurgence of interest in NHBD liver transplantation. This review explores the basis for this and considers some of the published results.

Use of older controlled non-heart-beating donors for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Use of liver grafts from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) warrants consideration so to expand the donor pool. Because the results of controlled NHBDs (CNHBDs) were acceptable, we have recently tried to expand the criteria to older CNHBDs. Here, we report our experience using liver grafts from older CNHBDs.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied our donor records from June 1994 through December 2001. CNHBDs were divided into two groups by age: older donors (O) were more than or equal to 55 years old, and younger donors (Y) were less than 55 years old. We compared donor and recipient demographics and peak laboratory values during the first postoperative week.

RESULTS

Twenty-five grafts from CNHBDs were transplanted in our center. Five livers were harvested from O (63+/-6 years) and 20 were from Y (32+/-15 years). No differences other than age in donor characteristics were noted between O and Y. Mean age of recipients was 50 years in both groups. Mean cold ischemic time (CIT) was 5.4 hours in O and 7.3 hours in Y (P<.05). Peak glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (U/L), glutamic pyruvic transaminase (U/L), bilirubin (mg/dL), and prothrombin time (sec) during the first postoperative week were 611, 500, 3.9, and 16 in O and 846, 593, 5.9, and 17 in Y. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The graft survival at 1 year was 80% in O and 70% in Y.

CONCLUSIONS

In our preliminary experience, recipients of liver grafts from older CNHBDs had an outcome equivalent to that of younger CNHBDs. With the strict evaluation of the donors and brief CIT, liver grafts from older CNHBDs may be used to expand the donor pool.