The use of contaminated donor organs in transplantation

Utility of deceased donor cultures in solid organ transplantation in preventing donor-derived bacterial and fungal infectious diseases transmission

Deceased donor and organ perfusion fluid cultures are obtained in order to inform recipient antimicrobial management and therefore reduce the risk of donor-derived bacterial and fungal infections. However, important heterogeneity exists in laboratory practice across organ procurement organizations and clinical management of culture results across transplant centers. While not standardized, the clinical approach to donors with positive bacterial and/or fungal cultures should be informed by the risk of donor-derived infection (DDI) and the consequence of organ non-utilization and account for potential unintended effects of antimicrobial use in the recipient. In this review, we summarize the literature on bacterial and fungal DDIs, describe the significance of positive cultures by anatomic site, and summarize current guidance on the management of positive cultures from donors or preservation fluids.

The impact of preservation fluid culture on graft site arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of culturing the graft preservation fluid (PF) is controversial and its impact on graft arteritis development remains unclear.

METHODS

Systematic literature search retrieving observational studies comparing solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with culture-positive PF versus culture-negative PF. The quality of included studies was independently assessed according to the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel random-effect models. Graft site arteritis within 180 days from transplant was selected as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty-one observational studies (N = 2208 positive PF vs. 4458 negative) were included. Among positive PF, 857 (38.8%) were classified as high-risk group pathogens and 1351 (61.2%) as low-risk pathogens. Low-risk and negative PF showed similar odds ratios. A significant higher risk of graft arteritis was found in SOT recipients with a PF yielding a high-risk pathogen (odds ratio [OR] 18.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.83-43.40) compared to low-risk and negative PF, with low heterogeneity (I² = 2.24%). Similar results were found considering separately high-risk bacteria (OR 12.02, 95%CI 4.88-29.60) and fungi (OR 71.00, 95%CI 28.07-179.56), with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%), and in the subgroup analyses of the liver (OR 16.78, 95%CI 2.95-95.47) and kidney (OR 19.90, 95%CI 4.78-82.79) recipients. However, data about diagnostic features of graft arteritis were very limited, indeed for only 11 of the 93 events histological or microbiological results were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results may support the performance of PF culturing and a preemptive diagnostic or therapeutic management upon isolation of high-risk pathogens. Further studies based on a reliable diagnosis of graft arteritis are needed.

Kidney Transplantation From Infected Donors With Particular Emphasis on Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: A Single-Center Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Prevention of sepsis-related organ dysfunction in septic donors is crucial. In this study, septic donors were followed-up based on donor Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2014 and 2020 at our center, 29 primary kidney transplant recipients received organs from 20 septic donors. All donors received either pathogen-specific or broad-spectrum antibiotics at least 48 hours before procurement, and all recipients received similar treatment posttransplant for an average of 7 to 14 days. Donor eligibility was determined according to the sum of donor-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores obtained from 6 parameters: Pao2/Fio2 ratio; platelet count; serum bilirubin, creatinine, and lactate levels; and presence of hypotension. The cut-off value for bacteremic donor acceptance was below 12 points.

RESULTS

Fever (≥38 °C) persisted in 5 donors in the last 24 hours before organ removal. However, in these 5 donors, the mean donor-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 6.5 ± 1.1, mean arterial pressure was >70 mm Hg, and serum lactate levels were <2 mmol/L. Fifteen donors had systemic inflammatory response syndrome scores of ≤2 with corresponding donor-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores of 7.9 ± 1.2; none had systemic inflammatory response syndrome scores >3, which would have indicated severe organ failure. In 28 recipients (97%), no donor-related infections were observed in the perioperative first month and afterwards.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of donors and recipients with a common protocol greatly reduced the risk of donor-induced infection transmission. In addition, we found the donor-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria to be a helpful tool in predicting organ failure in infected donors.

Brazilian guidelines for the management of brain-dead potential organ donors. The task force of the AMIB, ABTO, BRICNet, and the General Coordination of the National Transplant System

OBJECTIVE

To contribute to updating the recommendations for brain-dead potential organ donor management.

METHOD

A group of 27 experts, including intensivists, transplant coordinators, transplant surgeons, and epidemiologists, joined a task force formed by the General Coordination Office of the National Transplant System/Brazilian Ministry of Health (CGSNT-MS), the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine (AMIB), the Brazilian Association of Organ Transplantation (ABTO), and the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet). The questions were developed within the scope of the 2011 Brazilian Guidelines for Management of Adult Potential Multiple-Organ Deceased Donors. The topics were divided into mechanical ventilation, hemodynamic support, endocrine-metabolic management, infection, body temperature, blood transfusion, and use of checklists. The outcomes considered for decision-making were cardiac arrest, number of organs recovered or transplanted per donor, and graft function/survival. Rapid systematic reviews were conducted, and the quality of evidence of the recommendations was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Two expert panels were held in November 2016 and February 2017 to classify the recommendations. A systematic review update was performed in June 2020, and the recommendations were reviewed through a Delphi process with the panelists between June and July 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 19 recommendations were drawn from the expert panel. Of these, 7 were classified as strong (lung-protective ventilation strategy, vasopressors and combining arginine vasopressin to control blood pressure, antidiuretic hormones to control polyuria, serum potassium and magnesium control, and antibiotic use), 11 as weak (alveolar recruitment maneuvers, low-dose dopamine, low-dose corticosteroids, thyroid hormones, glycemic and serum sodium control, nutritional support, body temperature control or hypothermia, red blood cell transfusion, and goal-directed protocols), and 1 was considered a good clinical practice (volemic expansion).

CONCLUSION

Despite the agreement among panel members on most recommendations, the grade of recommendation was mostly weak. The observed lack of robust evidence on the topic highlights the importance of the present guideline to improve the management of brain-dead potential organ donors.

The role of preemptive antimicrobial therapy in kidney recipients of urine-only positive donor cultures

BACKGROUND

The use of preemptive antimicrobial therapy for recipients of donors with microbial growth on pre-transplant urine cultures remains poorly studied.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of kidney transplant recipients of allografts from deceased donors with urine-only (ie, in absence of donor bacteremia) positive cultures (September 2011 to August 2015). Transplant outcomes, including donor-derived infections (DDI) within the first three months post transplant, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 970 kidney transplants performed during the study period, urine cultures were obtained from all donors, and of these, 27 (2.8%) yielded growth. Twenty-nine (73%) recipients were treated preemptively after transplantation. All of the recipients of donors with urine cultures positive for Enterococcus, Pseudomonas, or Candida spp. received therapy whereas only one of seven recipients with urine cultures positive for Escherichia coli was treated (P < .0001). All E coli isolates were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), which was given to all patients for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis. Infection within 3 months was evident in 16 (40%) patients: 10 out of 29 (35%) in the preemptive group and 6 out of 11 (55%) in the not-treatment group (P = .29). Evidence of DDI occurred in two recipients, one in each group. There were no differences in one-year graft and patient survival between groups.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive antibiotic therapy did not seem to impact transmission events and transplant outcomes in this small cohort. Low transmission rates might have been influenced by administration of PCP prophylaxis and universal preemptive therapy for positive donor urine cultures with virulent organisms. Larger studies are needed.

Outcome of pediatric heart transplantation in blood culture positive donors in the United States

Active donor infection at the time of organ procurement poses a potential infection risk and may increase post-transplant morbidity and mortality in recipients. Our hypothesis was that pediatric heart transplant recipients from blood culture positive donors (BCPD) would have increased morbidity and mortality compared to non-blood culture positive donors (NBCPD). A retrospective analysis of pediatric heart transplant recipients using the organ procurement and transplant network (OPTN) between 1987 and 2015 was conducted. Recipient as well as donor data were analyzed. Propensity score matching with 1:2 ratios was performed for recipient variables. Post-transplant morbidity and mortality were compared for recipients of BCPD and NBCPD. Among 9618 heart transplant recipients, 450 (4.7%) were from culture positive donors. Recipients of BCPD had longer duration of listing as Status 1; diagnosis of congenital heart disease or restrictive cardiomyopathy and required support (IV inotropes, Inhaled NO and LVAD) prior to transplant. Post-transplant survival between the 2 groups was not different. Propensity-matched recipients had similar length of stay; stroke rate; need for dialysis; pacemaker implantation and treated rejection episodes in the first year post-transplant. Careful acceptance of BCPD may have the potential to increase availability of donor hearts in the pediatric population.

The development and current status of Intensive Care Unit management of prospective organ donors

Introduction:

Despite continuous advances in transplant medicine, there is a persistent worldwide shortage of organs available for donation. There is a growing body of research that supports that optimal management of deceased organ donors in Intensive Care Unit can substantially increase the availability of organs for transplant and improve outcomes in transplant recipients.

Methods:

A systematic literature review was performed, comprising a comprehensive search of the PubMed database for relevant terms, as well as individual assessment of references included in large original investigations, and comprehensive society guidelines.

Results:

In addition to overall adherence to catastrophic brain injury guidelines, optimization of physiologic state in accordance with established donor management goals (DMGs), and establishment of system-wide processes for ensuring early referral to organ procurement organizations (OPOs), several specific critical care management strategies have been associated with improved rates and outcomes of renal transplantation from deceased donors. These include vasoactive medication selection, maintenance of euvolemia, avoidance of hydroxyethyl starch, glycemic control, targeted temperature management, and blood transfusions if indicated.

Conclusions:

Management of deceased organ donors should focus first on maintaining adequate perfusion to all organ systems through adherence to standard critical care guidelines, early referral to OPOs, and family support. Furthermore, several specific DMGs and strategies have been recently shown to improve both the rates and outcomes of organ transplantation.

Initial Poor Function and Primary Nonfunction in Deceased-Donor Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Maintaining Short Cold Ischemic Time

BACKGROUND

Nations with emerging deceased-donor liver transplantation programs, such as India, face problems associated with poor donor maintenance. Cold ischemic time (CIT) is typically maintained short by matching donor organ recovery and recipient hepatectomy to achieve maximum favorable outcome. We analyzed different extended criteria donor factors including donor acidosis, which may act as a surrogate marker of poor donor maintenance, to quantify the risk of primary nonfunction (PNF) or initial poor function (IPF).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective outcome analysis of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing deceased-donor liver transplantation over 2 years to determine the impact of different extended criteria donor factors on IPF and PNF.

RESULTS

From March 2013 to February 2015, a total of 84 patients underwent deceased-donor liver transplantation. None developed PNF. Thirteen (15.5%) patients developed IPF. Graft macrosteatosis and donor acidosis were only related to IPF ( P = .002 and P = .032, respectively). Cold ischemic time was maintained short (81 cases ≤8 hours, maximum 11 hours) in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Poor donor maintenance as evidenced by donor acidosis and graft macrosteatosis had significant impact in developing IPF when CIT is kept short. Similar study with larger sample size is required to establish extended criteria cutoff values.

Variables during Care of Adult Donors That Can Influence Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation

Publications that relate characteristics of donors to renal function of recipients are reviewed. Most publications report retrospective observations that relate outcomes to donor variables that cannot be altered during donor care. Factors that can be altered in adult donors in an effort to improve recipients' outcomes include urine output and creatinine level. Increasing urine output to more than 100 mL/h, at least during the hour before explantation, and returning the creatinine level to match its serum concentration when the patient was admitted can improve outcomes. Ways of accomplishing those goals during donor care are discussed, with emphasis on support of renal blood flow.

Management of the Potential Organ Donor in the ICU: Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/Association of Organ Procurement Organizations Consensus Statement

This document was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations. Under the auspices of these societies, a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional task force was convened, incorporating expertise in critical care medicine, organ donor management, and transplantation. Members of the task force were divided into 13 subcommittees, each focused on one of the following general or organ-specific areas: death determination using neurologic criteria, donation after circulatory death determination, authorization process, general contraindications to donation, hemodynamic management, endocrine dysfunction and hormone replacement therapy, pediatric donor management, cardiac donation, lung donation, liver donation, kidney donation, small bowel donation, and pancreas donation. Subcommittees were charged with generating a series of management-related questions related to their topic. For each question, subcommittees provided a summary of relevant literature and specific recommendations. The specific recommendations were approved by all members of the task force and then assembled into a complete document. Because the available literature was overwhelmingly comprised of observational studies and case series, representing low-quality evidence, a decision was made that the document would assume the form of a consensus statement rather than a formally graded guideline. The goal of this document is to provide critical care practitioners with essential information and practical recommendations related to management of the potential organ donor, based on the available literature and expert consensus.

Candida arteritis in kidney transplant recipients: case report and review of the literature

Multi-organ procurement is a risk factor for contamination of preservation fluid with intestinal flora including fungi (e.g., Candida). Transmission of fungal species to the graft vessel can cause mycotic arteritis. This is a very rare but life-threatening complication of renal transplantation. We present 2 cases of renal transplant recipients from the same multi-organ donor. Both recipients suffered from severe hemorrhages from renal graft anastomosis and renal artery pseudoaneurysm due to Candida albicans arteritis (CAA). The culture of the preservation fluid revealed growth of Escherichia coli, but neither preservation fluid nor multiple routine blood cultures performed before hemorrhagic complications revealed fungal growth (media non-selective for fungal growth were applied). The first recipient suffered from sudden severe hemorrhage in the area of graft anastomosis on day 10 post surgery (without any preceding clinical or radiological symptoms). This led to urgent surgery and graftectomy, which was complicated by cardio-respiratory arrest with resuscitation in the operating room; despite resuscitation, irreversible brain damage, and subsequent death occurred in the intensive care unit (ICU) 2 weeks later (on day 24 after transplantation). The second patient underwent urgent vascular surgery on day 22 (after transplantation), because of hemorrhage from a pseudoaneurysm of the graft artery. She required repeated vascular operations, extended antimicrobial and antifungal therapy, and ICU monitoring and, despite these interventions, she died on day 80 after transplantation as a result of Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Arteritis of the renal artery in both patients was caused by C. albicans. This was confirmed by histopathology: infiltration of renal artery with budding yeast forming pseudohyphae (Case 1), and the presence of C. albicans in the culture of the renal artery and surrounding tissue (Case 2). We conclude that organ preservation solution should be cultured with use of media selective for fungal growth. As soon as the positive culture is detected, appropriate measures protecting patients against CAA should be undertaken.

Infected donors in renal transplantation: expanding the donor pool

INTRODUCTION

The shortage of suitable organ donors is now the most important limiting factor in the field of transplantation and more expanded criteria have been accepted to overcome this problem.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the outcome of patients who received an organ from an infected donor and to compare them with patients who received organs from noninfected donors.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent transplantation in our unit between January 2008 and June 2011 was performed. The definition of infected donor included: (1) documented bacteremia at the time of transplantation; and (2) organ-related infection, either with or without isolation from biological products (urine, liquor, and bronchial secretions).

RESULTS

Nineteen of 77 transplant recipients (24.7%) received organs from infected donors. There were 9 cases of pneumonia, 4 cases of meningitis with bacteremia, 5 cases of urinary tract infection, 1 case of bacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus, and 1 case of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt infection. All these recipients were prescribed antibiotic prophylaxis for 10.9 ± 3.2 days, according to the antibiotic administered to the donor. Significant differences between both groups were not observed concerning demographics features, graft thrombosis, arterial disruption, delayed graft function, rejection episodes, and renal graft and patient survivals at 12 months. The recipients of infected donor kidneys were mostly treated with basiliximab for induction therapy. There was a trend toward fewer infectious complications among patients who received organs from infected donors (21.1% vs 44.8%; P = .065) and shorter hospital stay durations (median, 11 vs 17.5 days; P = .041).

DISCUSSION

Kidney transplantation using organs from infected donors did not seem to be associated with a greater risk of complications. Antibiotic therapy initiated in the donor and continued in the recipient may explain these results, perhaps by reducing infectious complications that necessarily prolong the hospital stay.

Contamination of preservation fluid in kidney transplantation: single-center analysis

INTRODUCTION

Contamination of preservation fluid is common, with a reported incidence of 2.2% to 28.0%, and may be a major cause of early morbidity after transplantation. Herein, we report our experience with routine examination of preservation fluid collected just before implantation, focusing on the rate of contamination and the clinical consequences to recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 62 samples of preservation fluid for microbial and fungal contamination.

RESULTS

Twenty-four samples (38.7%) were contaminated with at least 1 organism. Bacterial contamination alone was observed in 18 samples; all patients received prophylactic treatment with intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam, 4.5 g/d for 10 days, without clinical sequelae. Six samples were contaminated with Candida species; all patients received prophylactic treatment with fluconazole, 100 mg/d for 3 months. One patient developed reversible acute renal failure due to ureteral obstruction by fungus balls at 30 days after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Contamination of preservation fluid occurs frequently after kidney transplantation. Bacterial contamination evolved without symptoms in most patients treated with prophylactic antibiotic therapy. Fungal contamination may be potentially life-threatening. However, graft nephrectomy is not mandatory if the involved Candida species is identified correctly and appropriate antifungal therapy is rapidly prescribed.

Incidence and clinical relevance of bacterial contamination in preservation solution for liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative infection is considered one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. We prospectively studied the incidence and significance of infections in preservation solutions for liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2007 to March 2008, we cultured the University of Wisconsin preservation solution for 60 consecutive liver transplantations. Fluid samples were obtained at the beginning and at the end of the back table procedure. Our posttransplant infection prophylactic protocol consisted of ampicillin and cefotaxime for 48 hours.

RESULTS

Cultures were positive in 59 patients (98.4%). Seventy-five percent of the isolates were superficial saprophytic flora (SSF; Staphylococcus coagulase negative, Streptococcus viridans, and Corynebacterium), nevertheless in 15 cases (25.1%) we isolated high virulence pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). There were neither anaerobic nor fungal isolates. Sixteen patients (36%) from the group with SSF developed postoperative fever, including 12 with negative posttransplant cultures, while 4 patients showed positive cultures for various microorganisms distinct from those isolated from the preservation solution. Five patients (30%) with high virulence pathogens in the preservation solution developed posttransplant fever, although no pathogen was isolated.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive cultures of preservation fluids were observed in 98% of patients, although most of them (75%) were SSF. Microorganisms isolated from posttransplant cultures did not match the ones obtained from the preservation solution. Our results did not support routine culturing of the preservation solution provided that one administrator an adequate posttransplant antibiotic prophylactic regimen.

Use of hearts transplanted from donors with severe sepsis and infectious deaths

BACKGROUND

The reluctance to use organs from donors who have died from severe infections is based on the potential transmission of an infectious agent to the recipient and on the uncertainty about allograft function in the setting of severe donor sepsis.

METHODS

From 1999 to 2007, donor hospital records were reviewed which focused on microbiology cultures and sensitivity results; type and duration of antimicrobial therapy; hemodynamic data, results of echocardiogram, and imaging studies. Preliminary positive and negative results from pre-harvest blood, respiratory, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid cultures were verified with the procurement agency. The harvesting surgeon performed gross inspection of donor valvular structures.

RESULTS

Nine donor hearts were transplanted from patients who expired from community onset infections with severe septic shock, meningitis, and/or pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 4), Streptococcus milleri (n = 2), Neisseria meningitidis (n = 2), and unidentified gram- positive cocci (n = 1). Four donors had probable infection-induced intracranial hemorrhage, and all donors were vasopressor-dependent before organ procurement. No evidence of donor-transmitted infection, sepsis, or rejection was observed, and long-term function remained excellent; allograft dysfunction in three patients resolved after transplant. Our series of nine donors represents approximately 1.3% of successfully transplanted cardiac allografts during the respective period of review.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients succumbing to severe infections (meningitis, pneumonia, and septic shock) should not be arbitrarily excluded for possible heart donation. Assessing the suitability of donors with severe infections requires flawless communication between the donor and transplant facility, including a comprehensive evaluation of donor infection and pathogen(s), severity of sepsis, adequacy of antimicrobial treatment, and the degree of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction.

Evidence that graft-site candidiasis after kidney transplantation is acquired during organ recovery: a multicenter study in France

BACKGROUND

Infections of renal grafts with Candida species can induce life-threatening complications in the recipient.

METHODS

A 9-year retrospective study involving all of the transplant centers in France was designed to determine the incidence, origin, characteristics, and outcome of graft-site candidiasis that occurred after kidney transplantation. Yeasts cultured from preservation or drainage solutions and graft specimens were recorded.

RESULTS

Among 18,617 kidney grafts, 18 recipients corresponding to 12 donors developed culture-confirmed graft-site candidiasis (incidence, 1 case per 1000 grafts) a median of 25 days after the graft procedure. Clinical presentations included 14 cases of renal arteritis (13 were complicated by aneurysm), 1 urinoma, 2 graft site abscesses, and 1 surgical site infection. Candida albicans was involved in 13 cases. A unique C. albicans genotype or a single rare Candida species was involved in each episode. Together with the clinical history, these findings demonstrate that organ contamination followed by transmission to the recipient occurred during recovery. Therapeutic management varied from simple monitoring in 1 case to a combination of surgery (nephrectomy in 9 cases and arterial bypass in 9 cases) and antifungal therapy (14 cases). Overall, 3 of 18 kidney transplant recipients died, and 9 had their graft surgically removed.

CONCLUSION

Graft-transmitted candidiasis that ends most often in fungal arteritis is associated with high morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation and is related to organ contamination during recovery in the donor.

Postoperative infectious complications of abdominal solid organ transplantation

There is a rapidly growing population of immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. These patients are at risk of a large variety of infections that have significant consequences on mortality, graft dysfunction, and graft loss. The diagnosis and treatment of these infections are facilitated by an understanding of the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative risk factors; the typical pathogens; and their characteristic time of presentation. On the basis of these factors, we put forth an algorithm for diagnosing and treating suspected infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

Donor infection and transmission to the recipient of a solid allograft

Transmission of infection from donor to recipient is a potential complication of transplantation. More data on this issue are needed to expand the insufficient donor pool. This study evaluates the incidence of donor nonviral infection, transmission from infected donors and the effect of donor infection on 30-day recipient survival. Data from 211 infected donors contributing to 292 (8.8%) of 3322 consecutive transplant procedures within RESITRA (Spanish Research Network for the Study of Infection in Transplantation) were prospectively compiled and analyzed. Lung was the most likely transplanted organ carried out with an infected donor and Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated microorganism. In more than a half of donors, the lung was the site of infection. Donor-to-host transmission was documented in 5 patients out of 292 (1.71%), 2 of whom died of the acquired infection (40%). Nonetheless, there was no difference in 30-day patient survival when comparing transplant procedures performed with organs from infected or uninfected donors. In conclusion, donor infection is not an infrequent event, but transmission to the recipient is quite low. Hence, with careful microbiological surveillance and treatment, the number of organs available for transplantation may be increased.

Successful solid organ transplantation from septicemic cadaveric donors: case report

Systemic donor infections especially with gram-negative organisms are regarded as an absolute contraindication to cadaveric organ donation for transplantation. This is largely due to fear of transmitting the pathogenic organisms to the immunosuppressed recipient. However, due to the current shortage of organs available for transplantation, clinicians are faced with the option to use organs from infected donors. Between 1996 to January 2006, we collected 44 solid organs. Two out of nine donors had microorganisms from blood cultured. Case 1 was of 23-year old woman whose cause of brain death was intracerebral bleeding due to a traffic accident. The donor had stayed 9 days in the intensive care unit prior to brain death. Two kidneys, two livers (split), and or heart were used. Klebsiella was the organism on blood culture. Case 2 was of 35-year-old man; cause of brain death was cerebral hematoma due to traffic accident. The donor had stayed 6 days prior to brain death onset. The liver and two kidneys were used. Acinetobacter baumannii was yielded upon blood culture. All donors were treated with appropriate antibiotics for at least 48 hours prior to organ procurement with consequent negative blood cultures, while the recipients received the same culture-specific antibiotics for 10 days following transplantation. One donor (case 1) heart and both donor corneas were not used due to infection. All patients are alive with excellent graft function at a median of 90 days following transplantation. In conclusion, our results suggested that bacteremic donors with severe sepsis under proper treatment can be considered for transplantation.

Characterization of the Organ Donor With Bacteremia

INTRODUCTION

The presence of bloodstream infection in the donor is a common finding that could be transmitted to the recipient. To safely expand the donor pool, we examined its relevance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We described the clinical characteristics of organ donors grafted in our center between 1997 and 2006 who had bacteremia detected in blood cultures obtained during organ procurement.

RESULTS

Among 1353 organ donors, 75 were non-heart-beating donors type II and the others brain-dead donors. Only 186 donors (14%) showed bacteremia during retrieval. This mean age was 49.8 years (range 12 to 86 years, SD 18) including 63% men. Causes of death were cerebrovascular accident in 60%; craneoencephalic trauma, 25%; and other causes, 15%. The average length of the intensive care unit stay was 3 days (interquartile range: 2 to 7 days). Twenty-nine percent of donors presented previous infectious complications (90% from respiratory origin). The most prevalent pathogen isolated in blood cultures was coagulase negative Staphylococci (46,2%), followed by S aureus (15%), Streptococcus group viridans (9.1%), enterobacteria (9%), Enterococcus faecalis (7.5%) and gram-negative bacilli nonfermentative (6.2%). In 3.1%, the bloodstream infections were polymicrobial. The bronchial aspiration cultures were positive in 50% of cases and the urine culture in 8,6%. In 17% of donors the isolated microorganism was coincident between blood and bronchial cultures. Pseudomonas spp and S aureus were more common than the others (P = .004 and P = .058, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bacteremia in our cohort was 14%. The respiratory tract was the most common clinical focus. Pseudomonas spp or S aureus isolated in bronchial cultures are risk factors to develop bacteremia. According to these findings, it is important to start specific antibiotics against those microorganisms in the donor and the recipients.

Successful organ transplantation from donors with Acinetobacter baumannii septic shock

Donor bacteremia with severe sepsis, especially due to gram-negative organisms, has been considered a contraindication to transplantation. Over a 6-month period we prospectively collected standardized data on all brain-dead, heart-beating organ donors with gram negative bacteremia and septic shock and the recipients of their organs in hospitals throughout Israel. Donors were treated with appropriate antibiotics for at least 48 hr prior to organ retrieval while recipients received 7 days of culture-specific antibiotics following transplantation. In total, 12 organs were transplanted (5 kidneys, 2 livers, 3 lungs and 2 hearts) from 3 donors with Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia and septic shock. All patients were alive with good graft function 60 days following transplantation, apart from one of the heart recipients who died of primary nonfunction on the second postoperative day. Two recipients developed postoperative infections, none with Acinetobacter sp. (one Pseudomonas sp. urinary tract infection, one Klebsiella sp. central venous catheter sepsis).

Donors with positive blood culture: could they transmit infections to the recipients?

A retrospective analysis of data from January 1996 to June 2004 was performed to evaluate the transmission of bacterial infections from organ donors to recipients. Donors were classified according to blood culture results: group 1 with negative blood culture (n = 216), and group 2 with positive blood cultures (n = 52). The age, cause of death, temperature, leukocytes, and number of organs procured were similar in both groups. Donors of group 2 had significantly more days in the intensive care unit (ICU): group 1 (3.14 +/- 3) versus group 2 (4.39 +/- 3.38 days P = .038). Fifty-one percent of group 1 and 52% of group 2 received antibiotic treatment, in most cases because of the suspected presence of a respiratory infection. In 22 donors the organisms that yielded in the blood culture were considered potentially pathogenic/contaminants (subgroup 2A) and in 30 donors the organisms were considered pathogenic (subgroup 2B). The demographic profiles of these two subgroups were similar. During the first month after transplantation, kidney and liver recipients were closely monitored. Recipients received wide-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis. Ten of 61 renal recipients developed infectious diseases. In nine cases (four in subgroup 2A and five in subgroup 2B) there were urinary infections. One recipient of subgroup 2B developed prostatitis. Six of 34 hepatic recipients developed infectious diseases. Four of the six cases (four in group 2A and five in group 2B) developed catheter infections and two cases of peritoneal infections. We could not find any case where a bacterial blood isolate from a donor matched a positive culture in the corresponding recipient. A longer stay of a donor in the ICU resulted in the more pronounced growth of organisms in blood cultures, as expected. In our experience, organs obtained from a donor with a positive blood culture may be transplanted safely, probably due to the low virulence of the organisms as well as the polymicrobial therapy routinely given to the recipients.

Clinical outcome of cadaveric renal allografts contaminated before transplantation

This analysis was performed to define the incidence of pretransplant microbial contamination of donor kidneys, and to assess the resultant morbidity including infections requiring therapy, and graft loss. Case records of all 638 renal allograft recipients patients transplanted in our centre during the period June 1990 to October 2000 were studied. All the recipients were given a single dose of intravenous antibiotics at the time of induction of anaesthesia. A total of 775 microbiology reports on perfusion fluid, kidney swabs and ureteric tissue were retrieved. Fifty-eight of 638 (9.1%) patients were transplanted with a graft that showed preoperative contamination. 18 of these 58 patients (31%) subsequently required antibiotic treatment. Thirty of 32 patients who received kidney contaminated with skin flora had a benign course (i.e. no unexplained, no positive blood cultures or graft infection). By contrast, seven of nine recipients with grafts whose perfusion fluid yielded lactose fermenting coliforms (LFCs) required antibiotics and three of nine of them suffered graft loss as a result. Two of these patients had bacteraemia caused by LFC, and one died. Three of five patients with positive cultures due to yeast required treatment with antifungals. None of the four patients who had graft contaminated by Staphylococcus aureus became infected. One-year 49/58 (85%) of these patients survived with functioning graft. Overall 1-year patient survival was 53/55 (92%). These data suggest that contamination of renal allografts by LFCs or yeasts need to be treated preemptively before the onset of clinical manifestations. By contrast, contamination with skin contaminants does not pose a risk to the graft.

Successful liver and kidney transplantation from cadaveric donors with left-sided bacterial endocarditis

Bacterial infections are frequent in cadaveric organ donors and can be transmitted to the transplantation recipient, which could have devastating consequences for the recipients if adequate preventive measures are not adopted. From the 355 consecutive brain dead cadaveric organ donors procured at our center in the last four years, 2000-2003, four of them (1.1%) had bacterial endocarditis as cause of death. The bacteria responsible for the endocarditis were Staphylococcus epidermidis, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus hominis and Streptococcus viridans, respectively. We performed five kidney and two liver transplantations on seven recipients. All donors and recipients received antibiotic treatment against the germ causing the respective endocarditis. Infection by the bacteria responsible for the endocarditis in the respective donors was not transmitted to any of the recipients. Six of the seven recipients were alive with normal-functioning grafts after between 13 and 24 months' follow-up. Transplantectomy was performed on one kidney recipient due to thrombosis of the renal vein of the graft not related to the endocarditis. Liver and kidney transplantation from donors dying from bacterial endocarditis can be performed without causing the transmission of infection to the recipient or the dysfunction of the graft.

Kidney transplants from infected donors: our experience

Organ procurement from infected donors may transmit a disease to the recipient that could cause a graft loss and/or recipient morbidity. Retrospectively, all kidney transplants from infected donors at our center in the last 4 years were reviewed. A donor was considered infected in the presence of at least one positive culture before procurement. From January 1999 to 2003, 23 of 160 donors (14.5%) were infected: in 10 donors a positive blood culture; in 3, a urine culture; and in 13, a bronchial culture. In a further 12 (7%) donors, only the preservation solution was contaminated. Organisms isolated were: Staphylococcus coagulase.neg. (n = 7); Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 3); Staphylococcus aureus (n = 6); Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 3); Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4); Acinetobacter (n = 1); Candida albicans (n = 13); Aspergillus (n = 1); and Escherichia coli (n = 1). All except 2 kidneys were transplanted with positivity in all cultures. All recipients received general, nonspecific, antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis until the antibiotic and antifungal spectrum was ready. Patient and graft survival rates at 6 months were 94% and 93%, respectively. Two deaths occurred due to bacterial arteritis (P aeruginosa), and 2 acute graft losses due to fungal arteritis. Kidneys from infected donors seem suitable for transplants. Only grafts infected by vasculotropic agents (S aureus, P aeruginosa, and C albicans) should be discarded.

Impact of donor infections on outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation

Infection occurs when microbial agents enter the host, either through airborne transmission or by direct contact of a substance carrying the infectious agent with the host. Human body fluids, solid organs, or other tissues often are ideal vectors to support microbial agents and can transmit infections efficiently from donor to recipient. In the case of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, the main consequence of such a transmission is infection of the recipient. However, in the case of solid-organ transplantation, and particularly for liver transplantation, donor infections are not only transmitted to the recipient, the donor infection also may affect the donated liver's preservability and subsequent function in the recipient irrespective of the systemic consequences of the infection. In addition, solid organ recipients of infected organs are less able to respond to the infectious agent because of their immunosuppressive treatment. Thus, transmission of infections from organ donor to liver recipient represents serious potential risks that must be weighed against a candidate's mortality risk without the transplant. However, the ever-increasing gap between the number of donors and those waiting for liver grafts makes consideration of every potential donor, regardless of the infection status, essential to minimize waiting list mortality. In this review, we will focus on assessing the risk of transmission of bacterial, fungal, viral, and parasitic infectious agents from cadaveric liver donors to recipients and the effect such a transmission has on liver function, morbidity, and mortality. We will also discuss risk-benefit deliberations for using organs from infected donors for certain types of recipients. These issues are critically important to maximize the use of donated organs but also minimize recipient morbidity and graft dysfunction.

Cardiac Transplantation: Pre-transplant Infectious Diseases Evaluation and Post-transplant Prophylaxis

Screening of recipients and donors of cardiac allografts for infectious pathogens, and the use of appropriate immunization and antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies, remain important for the control of infection following heart transplantation. However, the risk of infectious complications in a particular patient must often be weighed against the risk of delaying or denying allograft transplantation. In addition, the ongoing degree of immunosuppression and its contribution to the risk for infectious complications should also be considered to guide the length of prophylactic antimicrobial therapy and provide optimal patient care.

Expanded criteria donors: attempts to increase the renal transplant donor pool

There is a growing disparity between the demand for and the supply of kidneys for transplantation. The demographics of the donor pool are also changing. The average potential cadaveric organ donor is now more likely to be older, at greater risk for co-morbid conditions such as hypertension or viral infections, and more likely to die from cerebrovascular disease. These factors have led to an expansion of the criteria that defines the suitable organ donor. Expanded criteria donors are defined as the following: (1) at the upper and lower extremes in age; (2) having a history of hypertension or diabetes; (3) hemodynamically unstable; (4) non-heartbeating (cardiopulmonary death rather than brain death); (5) seropositive for hepatitis B or C; (6) having systemic infections; (7) having displayed high-risk social behavior for HIV infection; (8) having a history of malignancy; (9) having abnormal organ function; or (10) with renal anatomic anomalies or injuries. Use of kidneys from these "expanded criteria donors" is a two-edged sword. While they provide more organs for transplantation, the risk of suboptimal recipient outcome is increased. A rational approach to the use of each of these types of kidneys and proper selection of recipients is essential to obtain acceptable results. The article reviews the factors that have contributed to the successful transplantation of kidneys procured from expanded criteria organ donors and how these organs can be allocated most efficaciously to the appropriate recipients.