1
|
Dong C, Gao W, Ma N, Sun C, Zheng WP, Wang K, Shen ZY. Risks and treatment strategies for de novo hepatitis B virus infection from anti-HBc-positive donors in pediatric living donor liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2017; 21. [PMID: 27933716 DOI: 10.1111/petr.12854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and risk factors of de novo HBV infection in pediatric patients receiving living donor liver transplants (LDLT) from HBcAb-positive donors, and to explore its treatment strategies. The data of 101 pediatric recipients receiving LDLT in Tianjin First Central Hospital between September 2006 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The HBV markers were regularly tested before and after the surgery, including HBsAb, HBsAg, HBeAg, HBeAb, and HBcAb. The median follow-up period was 25.6 months, during which eight cases (7.92%) were diagnosed with de novo HBV infection. Forty-four (43.6%) of the children received HBcAb-positive allografts. The rate of de novo HBV in the children that received HBcAb+ livers vs those received HBcAb- livers was 15.9% (7/44) vs 1.7% (1/57) (P=.037). The rates of de novo HBV in the children who received HBcAb-positive allografts were significantly less than in those that received preventative therapy with HBIG and lamivudine treatment (2/31, 6.4%) vs those that did not (5/13, 38.5%) (P<.01). HBcAb-positive liver donors are strongly associated with de novo HBV in HBsAg-negative pediatric patients receiving LDLT. However, the incidence of de novo HBV infection is significantly less with the use of prophylactic treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong Dong
- First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.,Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei Gao
- First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.,Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Nan Ma
- First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.,Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Sun
- First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.,Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wei-Ping Zheng
- Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhong-Yang Shen
- First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.,Transplantation Surgery, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Q, Klenerman P, Semmo N. Significance of anti-HBc alone serological status in clinical practice. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:123-134. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(16)30076-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
3
|
Jr CSK, Koval CE, Duin DV, Morais AGD, Gonzalez BE, Avery RK, Mawhorter SD, Brizendine KD, Cober ED, Miranda C, Shrestha RK, Teixeira L, Mossad SB. Selecting suitable solid organ transplant donors: Reducing the risk of donor-transmitted infections. World J Transplant 2014; 4:43-56. [PMID: 25032095 PMCID: PMC4094952 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i2.43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2013] [Revised: 03/21/2014] [Accepted: 05/14/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Selection of the appropriate donor is essential to a successful allograft recipient outcome for solid organ transplantation. Multiple infectious diseases have been transmitted from the donor to the recipient via transplantation. Donor-transmitted infections cause increased morbidity and mortality to the recipient. In recent years, a series of high-profile transmissions of infections have occurred in organ recipients prompting increased attention on the process of improving the selection of an appropriate donor that balances the shortage of needed allografts with an approach that mitigates the risk of donor-transmitted infection to the recipient. Important advances focused on improving donor screening diagnostics, using previously excluded high-risk donors, and individualizing the selection of allografts to recipients based on their prior infection history are serving to increase the donor pool and improve outcomes after transplant. This article serves to review the relevant literature surrounding this topic and to provide a suggested approach to the selection of an appropriate solid organ transplant donor.
Collapse
|
4
|
Seem DL, Lee I, Umscheid CA, Kuehnert MJ. PHS guideline for reducing human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus transmission through organ transplantation. Public Health Rep 2013; 128:247-343. [PMID: 23814319 DOI: 10.1177/003335491312800403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie L Seem
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Office of Blood, Organ, and other Tissue Safety, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bohorquez HE, Cohen AJ, Girgrah N, Bruce DS, Carmody IC, Joshi S, Reichman TW, Therapondos G, Mason AL, Loss GE. Liver transplantation in hepatitis B core-negative recipients using livers from hepatitis B core-positive donors: a 13-year experience. Liver Transpl 2013; 19:611-8. [PMID: 23526668 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2012] [Accepted: 03/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of livers from hepatitis B surface antigen-negative (HBsAg- )/hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+ ) donors in liver transplantation (LT) for HBsAg(-) /HBcAb- recipients is still controversial because of a lack of standard antiviral prophylaxis and long-term follow-up. We present our 13-year experience with the use of HBcAb+ donor livers in HBcAb- recipients. Patients received prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin at the time of LT and then lamivudine daily. De novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) was defined as positive HBV DNA detection. Between January 1999 and December 2010, 1013 adult LT procedures were performed at our center. Sixty-four HBsAg- /HBcAb- patients (6.3%) received an HBsAg- /HBcAb+ liver. All donor sera were negative for HBcAb immunoglobulin M and HBV DNA. The mean follow-up was 48.8 ± 40.1 months (range = 1.2-148.8). Both the patient survival rates and the graft survival rates were 92.2% and 69.2% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. No graft losses or deaths were related to de novo HBV. Nine of the 64 patients (14.1%) developed de novo HBV. The mean time from LT to de novo HBV was 21.4 ± 26.1 months (range = 10.8-92.8 months). De novo HBV was successfully treated with adefovir or tenofovir. In conclusion, HBcAb+ allografts can be safely used in HBcAb- recipients without increased mortality or graft loss. Lifelong prophylaxis, continuous surveillance, and compliance are imperative for success. Should a de novo infection occur, our experience suggests that a variety of treatments can be employed to salvage the graft and obtain serum HBV DNA clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Humberto E Bohorquez
- Multi-Organ Transplant Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hepatitis B-positive donors in renal transplantation: increasing the deceased donor pool. Transplantation 2012; 94:205-10. [PMID: 22430067 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31824e3db4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
It is reasonable to transplant HbsAg-positive kidneys into recipients who are themselves hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) positive with appropriate antiviral treatment after transplantation. Although there are limited data regarding the hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission risk following transplantation of kidneys from HbsAg-positive donors into HBV-immune recipients, current literature suggests that the risk of chronic infection in the recipient can be prevented by using antiviral agents or by boosting protective anti-HBs titers. The risk of chronic HBV infection following transplantation of kidneys from HbsAg-positive donors for HBV-naive recipients is high but can be minimized by administering lifelong antiviral therapy. Such a policy could be considered in an urgent situation. The most cost-effective antiviral prophylaxis strategy is lifelong lamivudine. Kidneys from HBsAg neg/anti-HBcore pos recipients are associated with a low rate of chronic HBV infection in the recipient and therefore can no longer be regarded as marginal donors. Booster vaccination to achieve protective HBV immunity or lifelong lamivudine therapy should prevent posttransplant HBV infection. Hence, we believe that strategies allowing transplantation of kidneys from donors with HBV can be undertaken safely with careful selection and matching of donors and recipients increasing access to kidney transplantation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Scuderi V, Ceriello A, Santaniello W, Aragiusto G, Romano M, Migliaccio C, Calise F. Hepatitis B prophylaxis in hepatitis B-negative recipients transplanted with donor grafts positive for hepatitis B core antibodies. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:271-3. [PMID: 21335203 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Use of grafts from hepatitis B (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb(+)) individuals is a routine transplant practice. Herein, we have reported the results of 20 HBV-negative patients transplanted with a HBcAb-positive liver grafts in order to access the efficacy of HBV prophylaxis using immunoglobulin (IE) and antiviral drugs. METHODS From January 2004 to December 2009, we performed 168 liver transplantations including 38 HBcAb-positive grafts (22.6%) in 18 cases of HBV-positive recipients and 20 HBV-negative recipients. Histological data obtained from these last 20 grafts during retrieval showed an Ishak 1 score in three and no fibrosis in the other cases. HBV prophylaxis included infusion of 10,000 UI IG during the anhepatic phase and every 24 hours for the first 7 days irrespective of the antibody titer as well as lamivudin (100 mg) administered daily. Once discharged, outpatient management provided modulated IG infusions according to when the antibody titer was lower than 400 UI. RESULTS No patient displayed an HBV infection. The overall survival was 80%. Two patients died within the first month after transplantation due to septic complications; one patient succumbed at 24 months after transplantation because of a lymphoproliferative malignancy and another died due to an aggressive hepatitis C virus recurrence at 6 months post transplant. CONCLUSION By using appropriate anti-HBV prophylaxis, HBcAb-positive grafts can be used safely for HBcAb-negative recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Scuderi
- Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brock GN, Mostajabi F, Ferguson N, Carrubba CJ, Eng M, Buell JF, Marvin MR. Prophylaxis against de novo hepatitis B for liver transplantation utilizing hep B core (+) donors: does hepatitis B immunoglobulin provide a survival advantage? Transpl Int 2011; 24:570-81. [PMID: 21401727 DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01236.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Donor liver allografts with positive serology for hepatitis B core antibody [HBc (+)] have been increasingly used for liver transplantation. However, the optimal prophylactic regimen to prevent development of de novo hepatitis B has not been determined. To evaluate this, we screened United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) registry data for adult recipients of HBc (+) organs who were HBsAg (-), and evaluated the effects of using prophylactic anti-viral therapies (HBIG and lamivudine) on patient and graft survival. Out of a total cohort of 958 patients transplanted since 2004, 61 received HBIG alone, 116 received lamivudine alone, 66 both, 509 neither and 206 were missing this information. Based on several multivariable Cox regression models, patients receiving HBIG therapy-only were observed to have a statistically significant (approximately 70%) reduction in risk of mortality compared with patients receiving lamivudine-only therapy [HR=0.29, 95% CI (0.10, 0.86), P=0.026], and a nonstatistically significant reduction in risk of graft failure. However, no graft failures were attributed to de novo hepatitis B, suggesting that any improved graft/patient survival possibly associated with HBIG therapy occurs independently of de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) reduction. While this study cannot prove that HBIG therapy is protective for graft and patient survival after liver transplantation, these findings do highlight the need to further examine and study prophylactic use in recipients of HBc (+) donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy N Brock
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Current use of hepatitis B immune globulin for prevention of de novo hepatitis B in recipients receiving anti-HBc-positive livers. Hepatol Int 2011; 5:635-43. [PMID: 21484133 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-010-9250-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2010] [Accepted: 12/31/2010] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Livers from donors positive for antibody against anti-HBc can potentially transmit de novo hepatitis B (DNH) to their recipients. Despite a good outcome, prophylaxis is usually offered to such recipients. There is no consensus on the standard prophylactic regimen and hence prophylaxis varies among different transplant centres. Nonetheless, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is considered the mainstay of such prophylaxis, either alone or in combination with an oral antiviral treatment. We aim to provide a concise review of the current use of HBIG in prevention of DNH. We also address a few important questions regarding HBIG use.
Collapse
|
10
|
Palmore TN, Shah NL, Loomba R, Borg BB, Lopatin U, Feld JJ, Khokhar F, Lutchman G, Kleiner DE, Young NS, Childs R, Barrett AJ, Liang TJ, Hoofnagle JH, Heller T. Reactivation of hepatitis B with reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen after chemotherapy and immunosuppression. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7:1130-7. [PMID: 19577007 PMCID: PMC2779698 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2009] [Revised: 06/05/2009] [Accepted: 06/20/2009] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS HBV infection may reactivate in the setting of immunosuppression, although the frequency and consequences of HBV reactivation are not well known. We report 6 patients who experienced loss of serologic markers of hepatitis B immunity and reappearance of HBsAg in the serum as a result of a variety of acquired immune deficiencies. METHODS Between 2000 and 2005, six patients with reactivation of hepatitis B were seen in consultation by the Liver Diseases Branch at the Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health. The course and outcome of these 6 patients were reviewed. RESULTS All 6 patients developed reappearance of HBsAg and evidence of active liver disease after stem cell transplantation (n = 4), immunosuppressive therapy (n = 1), or change in human immunodeficiency virus antiretroviral regimen (n = 1), despite having antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) or antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) without HBsAg before. All 6 patients developed chronic hepatitis B, 2 patients transmitted hepatitis B to their spouses, and 1 patient developed cirrhosis. The diagnosis of hepatitis B reactivation was frequently missed or delayed and often required interruption of the therapy for the underlying condition. None of the patients received antiviral prophylaxis against HBV reactivation. CONCLUSIONS Serologic evidence of recovery from hepatitis B infection does not preclude its reactivation after immunosuppression. Screening for serologic evidence of hepatitis B and prophylaxis of those with positive results by using nucleoside analogue antiviral therapy should be provided to individuals in whom immunosuppressive therapy is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara N. Palmore
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David E. Kleiner
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| | - Neal S. Young
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| | - Richard Childs
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| | - A. John Barrett
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| | - T. Jake Liang
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| | - Jay H. Hoofnagle
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| | - Theo Heller
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Prieto M. Antibody to hepatitis B core antigen-positive grafts: not perfect but no longer marginal. Liver Transpl 2009; 15:1164-8. [PMID: 19790162 DOI: 10.1002/lt.21814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
12
|
Verna EC, Brown RS. Hepatitis C and liver transplantation: enhancing outcomes and should patients be retransplanted. Clin Liver Dis 2008; 12:637-59, ix-x. [PMID: 18625432 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2008.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis C (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Safe expansion of the donor pool with improved rates of deceased donation and more widespread use of living and extended criteria donation are likely to decrease wait list mortality. In addition, improved antiviral treatments and a better understanding of the delicate balance between under- and over-immunosuppression in this population are needed. Finally, when recurrent advanced fibrosis occurs, the criteria for patient selection for retransplantation remain widely debated. This article reviews the literature on these topics and the work being done in each area to maximize outcomes in patients receiving transplants for HCV-related cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Verna
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Takemura N, Sugawara Y, Tamura S, Makuuchi M. Liver transplantation using hepatitis B core antibody-positive grafts: review and university of Tokyo experience. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52:2472-7. [PMID: 17805972 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-9656-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2006] [Accepted: 10/15/2006] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Hepatitis B surface antigen-negative and hepatitis B core antibody-positive grafts were considered unsuitable for transplantation. The number of potential recipients for liver transplantation now exceeds that of potential donor organs, which has led us to reevaluate the feasibility of these grafts. Several strategies involving prophylactic administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and/or lamivudine to transplant recipients have been proposed. At the University of Tokyo, we have continued to use hepatitis B immunoglobulin monoprophylaxis with zero recurrence. In this article we report our experience with the use of hepatitis B surface antigen-negative/hepatitis B core antibody-positive grafts with hepatitis B immunoglobulin monotherapy. We conducted a review of the literature regarding the feasibility of these grafts to reconfirm optimal prophylactic strategies for preventing de novo hepatitis B virus infection in transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Takemura
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gallegos-Orozco JF, Vargas HE. Should antihepatitis B virus core positive or antihepatitis C virus core positive subjects be accepted as organ donors for liver transplantation? J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41:66-74. [PMID: 17198068 DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225636.60404.bf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Since the introduction of liver transplantation as a routine surgical procedure for the treatment of end-stage liver disease, there has been an increasing gap between the number of available grafts and the number of patients on the waiting list. This has led transplant centers to expand the donor pool by different means. One of them has been the introduction of living donor liver transplantation. Other strategies include using less than optimal allografts from deceased donors, the so-called marginal donors, which include the use of grafts from older subjects, livers with moderate amounts of steatosis, or from donors with markers of past or current infection with hepatitis viruses who have absent or minimal liver biochemical or histologic injury. In this review, we will focus on the current use of allografts from donors with antihepatitis B core antibody and/or antibodies against hepatitis C virus in cadaveric and living donor liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan F Gallegos-Orozco
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prakoso E, Strasser SI, Koorey DJ, Verran D, McCaughan GW. Long-term lamivudine monotherapy prevents development of hepatitis B virus infection in hepatitis B surface-antigen negative liver transplant recipients from hepatitis B core-antibody-positive donors. Clin Transplant 2006; 20:369-73. [PMID: 16824156 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00495.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation from hepatitis B core-antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors to hepatitis B surface-antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients has been associated with a risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in the absence of antiviral prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of long-term lamivudine monotherapy to prevent development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative recipients of liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS From 315 cadaveric adult liver transplantations performed at our unit between July 1999 and March 2005, 18 recipients (5.7%) received liver allografts from HBcAb-positive donors, 13 of whom were HBsAg-negative pre-transplantation. The recipients consisted of four females and 14 males, age range 28-65 yr (median 49.5 yr). Post-transplantation, HBsAg-negative recipients were administered lamivudine 100 mg daily long term. HBsAg-positive recipients were administered low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine according to our usual protocol. Standard post-transplantation immunosuppression was given. Recipients were followed up regularly (range 2-69 months, median 21 months) for development of de novo HBV infection. RESULTS Ten HBsAg-negative recipients received long-term lamivudine. One patient (HBcAb and HBsAb positive pre-transplant) did not receive lamivudine and, in two patients, lamivudine was discontinued following urgent re-transplantation for primary graft non-function. All 13 of the HBsAg-negative recipients were still alive, with no evidence of HBV infection at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION Long-term lamivudine monotherapy was effective in preventing development of HBV infection in HBsAg-negative liver transplant recipients from HBcAb-positive donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Prakoso
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Suehiro T, Shimada M, Kishikawa K, Shimura T, Soejima Y, Yoshizumi T, Hashimoto K, Mochida Y, Maehara Y, Kuwano H. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donor graft using hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Int 2005; 25:1169-74. [PMID: 16343068 DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01165.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic grafts from hepatitis B surface antigen-negative and anti-core antibody (HBcAb)-positive donors have been shown to transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Recently, it has been reported that combined hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine therapy is effective in the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In this report, we assessed the efficacy of combined HBIG and lamivudine therapy in preventing HBV transmission by graft with HBcAb-positive donors. METHODS We studied 22 patients who had undergone LDLT with allografts from HBcAb-positive living donors at Gunma University Hospital and Kyushu University Hospital. Long-term combined HBIG and lamivudine therapy were administrated to all recipients. Serum samples from the donor and recipient were tested for HBcAb, HBV DNA, and hepatitis B surface antibody. Liver biopsies from grafts were tested for HBV DNA. RESULTS All recipients were HBcAb negative before LDLT. All of the donor livers were HBV DNA positive at the time of LDLT. All of the recipients had HBsAb titers greater than 300 mIU/ml 4 weeks after LDLT, and remained 100 mIU/ml thereafter. None of the recipients have become infected with HBV with a follow-up of 25-86 months. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative combined HBIG and lamivudine therapy can prevent HBV infection in recipients who receive liver grafts from HBcAb-positive donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taketoshi Suehiro
- Department of General Surgical Science and the 21 Century COE Program, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Fernando Gallegos-Orozco
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Loss GE, Mason AL, Nair S, Blazek J, Farr G, Guo L, Cohen AJ, Eason JD. Does lamivudine prophylaxis eradicate persistent HBV DNA from allografts derived from anti-HBc-positive donors? Liver Transpl 2003; 9:1258-64. [PMID: 14625825 DOI: 10.1016/j.lts.2003.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Transplantation of livers from anti-hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive donors into anti-HBc-negative recipients is associated with a high rate of viral transmission. We report a prophylaxis regimen based on virologic evaluation of the donor. Liver and serum from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative, anti-HBc-positive donors were evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA. All anti-HBc-negative recipients were given a single dose of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) during the anhepatic phase of transplantation and were placed on maintenance lamivudine monotherapy. Recipients were followed up longitudinally monitoring intrahepatic HBV DNA as well as serologic HBsAg and HBV DNA by PCR. Between January 1999 and August 2001, 14 anti-HBc-negative recipients received liver transplants from anti-HBc-positive donors. All donor serum was negative for HBV DNA. In total, nine of 14 (64%) livers had detectable HBV DNA; 1 patient was initially PCR-negative and low levels of HBV DNA were detected in a posttransplantation liver biopsy. Mean follow-up was 33 months (range, 22 to 51), and patient and graft survival were each 93%. One case of de novo hepatitis B occurred in a patient noncompliant with lamivudine, although all other serial serum HBsAg assay results were negative. Single-dose HBIG followed by maintenance lamivudine monotherapy prevented de novo hepatitis B in compliant patients. For the cohort of compliant patients that were initially HBV DNA-positive, 7 of 8 (88%) now have undetectable virus in the hepatic allograft by PCR analysis. Nevertheless, there is no evidence to suggest that viral eradication occurs. Accordingly, all patients are maintained on continued lamivudine prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George E Loss
- Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Ochsner Multi-Organ Transplant Center, Ochsner Clinic Foundation Hospital, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Saab S, Chang AJ, Comulada S, Geevarghese SK, Anselmo RDM, Durazo F, Han S, Farmer DG, Yersiz H, Goldstein LI, Ghobrial RM, Busuttil RW. Outcomes of hepatitis C- and hepatitis B core antibody-positive grafts in orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003; 9:1053-61. [PMID: 14526400 DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The use of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)- and hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV+) liver grafts for transplantation in selected populations has not affected patient and graft survival. We reexamined the clinical outcomes of using these HBcAb+ and HCV+ grafts at our institution, in addition to studying recipients of combined HBcAb+/HCV+ grafts. We identified 377 patients who underwent transplantation for either hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C, or received both HBcAb+ and HCV+ grafts. Patient and graft survival at 5 years posttransplantation was 73% and 71%, respectively, in the HBcAb+ grafts compared with 81% and 75% in the HBcAb- grafts (P =.65; P =.94). For HCV+ grafts, patient and graft survival at 5 years posttransplantation was 89% and 73%, respectively, compared with 69% and 59% in the HCV- grafts; (P =.22; P =.77). The 5-year patient and graft survival rate in those who received combined HBcAb+/HCV+ grafts was 74% and 69%, respectively, and there was no statistical difference compared with the HBcAb+ and HCV+ grafts (P =.76; P =.90). The 5-year patient and graft survival rate in patients who received dual HBV prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine was 88% and 84%, respectively, which was significantly higher than for patients who received single prophylaxis or no prophylaxis (P <.01; P =.02). Our study supports previous observations that patient and graft survival is not affected with the use of HBcAb+ and HCV+ grafts, and that dual prophylaxis with HBIg and lamivudine offers substantial survival benefits. Furthermore, the use of combined HBcAb+/HCV+ grafts did not impact patient or graft survival. This provides a potential new pool of donor livers that can be used for transplantation in select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sammy Saab
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Dumont-UCLA Liver Transplant Center, University of California Los Angeles, 90095, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fábrega E, García-Suarez C, Guerra A, Orive A, Casafont F, Crespo J, Pons-Romero F. Liver transplantation with allografts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors: a new approach. Liver Transpl 2003; 9:916-20. [PMID: 12942452 DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The enduring shortfall of organ donors has inspired the widespread utilization of hepatic allografts from donors with hepatitis B core antibodies in spite of the potential risk of transmitting hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection to the recipient. Here we report a protocol of naive recipients receiving livers from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors. From November, 1999 to March, 2002, 77 liver transplantations were performed in 73 patients at our institution, 7 of whom received livers from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors. All recipients received 10,000 U/d of intravenous HBIg for 7 days and 100 mg/d of lamivudine until we could obtain the HBV-DNA from the donor samples (serum and liver tissue). If the results of the HBV-DNA from the donor samples were positive, the patient would continue with prophylaxis and if they were negative we would finish the combined prophylaxis. After transplantation, HBV serologic markers and HBV-DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in serum and lymphocytes were tested in the recipients on the seventh, fifteenth, thirtieth, and ninetieth days as well as every 3 months after transplantation. All seven donor organs were negative for HBV-DNA in serum and liver tissue. Thus, we stopped the combined prophylaxis in all recipients (range, 7 to 10 days). None of the 7 patients developed de novo HBV infection over the 3-year study period (range, 9 to 36 months). Our approach is reasonably safe, and it appears to be very effective in the prevention of de novo HBV infection after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Fábrega
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Faculty of Medicine, Santander, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
López-Navidad A, Caballero F. Extended criteria for organ acceptance. Strategies for achieving organ safety and for increasing organ pool. Clin Transplant 2003; 17:308-24. [PMID: 12868987 DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2003.00119.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The terms extended donor or expanded donor mean changes in donor acceptability criteria. In almost all cases, the negative connotations of these terms cannot be justified. Factors considered to affect donor or organ acceptability have changed with time, after showing that they did not negatively affect graft or patient survival per se or when the adequate measures had been adopted. There is no age limit to be an organ donor. Kidney and liver transplantation from donors older than 65 years can have excellent graft and patient actuarial survival and graft function. Using these donors can be from an epidemiological point of view the most important factor to esablish the final number of cadaveric liver and kidney transplantations. Organs with broad structural parenchyma lesion with preserved functional reserve and organs with reversible functional impairment can be safely transplanted. Bacterial and fungal donor infection with the adequate antibiotic treatment of donor and/or recipient prevents infection in the latter. The organs, including the liver, from donors with infection by the hepatitis B and C viruses can be safely transplanted to recipients with infection by the same viruses, respectively. Poisoned donors and non-heart-beating donors, grafts from transplant recipients, reuse of grafts, domino transplant and splitting of one liver for two recipients can be an important and safe source of organs for transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio López-Navidad
- Department of Organ & Tissue Procurement for Transplantation, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yu AS, Keeffe EB. Nucleoside analogues and other antivirals for treatment of hepatitis B in the peritransplant period. Clin Liver Dis 2003; 7:551-72. [PMID: 14509526 DOI: 10.1016/s1089-3261(03)00044-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Chronic HBV infection is a common cause of advanced liver disease that is associated with substantial mortality. Furthermore, chronic hepatitis B was historically a controversial indication for liver transplantation because of a low post-transplant survival, with graft infection being the major contributor to adverse outcomes. The initial use of hepatitis B immune globulin as prophylaxis, followed later by combined therapy with lamivudine, markedly reduced viral recurrence and improved the survival of patients transplanted for acute or chronic hepatitis B with liver failure. Lamivudine alone can also be used for long-term prophylaxis against de novo HBV infection that can be transmitted by organs from donors positive for anti-HBc or anti-HBs. When used in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B with cirrhosis, lamivudine has been shown to improve clinical manifestations, prolong pretransplant survival, and defer, or even obviate, the need for transplantation. Despite prophylaxis, viral mutations with breakthrough reinfection may occur and lead to liver failure. The recently approved adefovir dipivoxil, which is active against lamivudine-resistant mutation, and other nucleoside analogs that are in various phases of development, offer hope as rescue therapy for viral recurrence. Other therapeutic alternatives in the future may include gene therapy and immune interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy S Yu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Andreone P, Lorenzini S, Gramenzi A, Biselli M, Cursaro C, Bernardi M. Prophylaxis and treatment of hepatis B virus infection after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2003; 35:1022-4. [PMID: 12947844 DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00254-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P Andreone
- Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti, 9-40138 Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The transmission of hepatitis B virus infection through hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive liver grafts in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative recipients has been established. The mandatory use of immunosuppression in transplant patients favors reactivation of latent virus that may be present in grafts from HBsAg-negative anti-HBc-positive donors. With the persistent organ donor scarcity, the use of these grafts cannot be avoided, especially in urgent cases and in areas where the prevalence of the hepatitis B virus is high, as in Asia. The recognition of posttransplant de novo hepatitis B from core antibody-positive liver donors has, therefore, led to modifications in graft allocation policies and the introduction of strategies for prophylaxis. The risk of developing this type of new-onset hepatitis B virus infection in liver transplant recipients and the various approaches to minimize this risk are reviewed. The peculiar implications of using core antibody-positive grafts in the context of living donor liver transplantation in Asia are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa H de Villa
- Liver Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung University, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical Center, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|