Influence of continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts

Considerations for Medication Management and Anticoagulation During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Providing safe and high-quality care to critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) includes adequate drug dosing and evaluation of patients' response to medications during therapy. Pharmacokinetic drug studies in acute kidney injury and CRRT are limited, considering the number of medications used in critical care. Therefore, it is important to understand the basic principles of drug clearance during CRRT by evaluating drug properties, CRRT modalities, and how they affect medication clearance. Few published studies have addressed drug disposition and clinical response during CRRT. Additionally, clotting in the CRRT circuit is a concern, so a few options for anticoagulation strategies are presented. This article reviews (1) the CRRT system and drug property factors that affect medication management, (2) the evidence available to guide drug dosing, and (3) anticoagulation strategies for critically ill patients receiving CRRT.

Presence and accuracy of drug dosage recommendations for continuous renal replacement therapy in tertiary drug information references

BACKGROUND

Clinicians commonly rely on tertiary drug information references to guide drug dosages for patients who are receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). It is unknown whether the dosage recommendations in these frequently used references reflect the most current evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the presence and accuracy of drug dosage recommendations for patients undergoing CRRT in 4 drug information references.

METHODS

Medications commonly prescribed during CRRT were identified from an institutional medication inventory database, and evidence-based dosage recommendations for this setting were developed from the primary and secondary literature. The American Hospital Formulary System-Drug Information (AHFS-DI), Micromedex 2.0 (specifically the DRUGDEX and Martindale databases), and the 5th edition of Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure (DPRF5) were assessed for the presence of drug dosage recommendations in the CRRT setting. The dosage recommendations in these tertiary references were compared with the recommendations derived from the primary and secondary literature to determine concordance.

RESULTS

Evidence-based drug dosage recommendations were developed for 33 medications administered in patients undergoing CRRT. The AHFS-DI provided no dosage recommendations specific to CRRT, whereas the DPRF5 provided recommendations for 27 (82%) of the medications and the Micromedex 2.0 application for 20 (61%) (13 [39%] in the DRUGDEX database and 16 [48%] in the Martindale database, with 9 medications covered by both). The dosage recommendations were in concordance with evidence-based recommendations for 12 (92%) of the 13 medications in the DRUGDEX database, 26 (96%) of the 27 in the DPRF5, and all 16 (100%) of those in the Martindale database.

CONCLUSIONS

One prominent tertiary drug information resource provided no drug dosage recommendations for patients undergoing CRRT. However, 2 of the databases in an Internet-based medical information application and the latest edition of a renal specialty drug information resource provided recommendations for a majority of the medications investigated. Most dosage recommendations were similar to those derived from the primary and secondary literature. The most recent edition of the DPRF is the preferred source of information when prescribing dosage regimens for patients receiving CRRT.

A prospective, open-label, observational clinical cohort study of the association between delayed renal allograft function, tacrolimus exposure, and CYP3A5 genotype in adult recipients

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor with a macrolide lactone structure, is currently used as a cornerstone immunosuppressive drug in solid organ transplantation. It is metabolized by hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/3A5 enzymes and is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (ABCB1). The disposition of tacrolimus might be influenced by severe renal allograft dysfunction (eg, in cases of delayed graft function [DGF]). New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a known adverse effect of tacrolimus therapy and has been associated with DGF.

OBJECTIVES

The impact of DGF on tacrolimus C(min) and dose requirements was evaluated in renal transplant recipients in the first postoperative week. The effects of the CYP3A5*3 A6986G polymorphism on initial mean tacrolimus C(min) and dose requirements in the presence and absence of DGF were assessed. This study also tested the hypothesis that if DGF influences early tacrolimus exposure, this would lead to a higher risk for NODAT (defined as the need for glucose-lowering medication for an uninterrupted period of ≥ 26 weeks).

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, observational clinical cohort study enrolled renal allograft recipients aged ≥ 18 years. Tacrolimus was administered as an oral loading dose of 0.2 mg/kg/d and adjusted to achieve a target mean daily tacrolimus C(min) between 12 and 15 ng/mL. C(min) values and oral dose requirements in the first postoperative week were compared between patients with and without DGF. Patients were genotyped for the CYP3A4*1B -290A>G, CYP3A5*3 A6986G, ABCB1 Exon26 C3435T, ABCB1 Exon21 G2677T, and ABCB1 Exon21 G2677A single nucleotide polymorphisms. NODAT that occurred within the first 12 weeks after transplantation was confirmed using an oral glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS

A total of 304 patients were enrolled (184 men, 120 women; mean [SD] age, 52.9 [14.1] years). Through day 3 after transplantation, mean (SD) 12-hour tacrolimus C(min) values were significantly higher in recipients experiencing DGF despite identical loading doses of 0.2 mg/kg. Mean tacrolimus dose requirements were significantly lower in patients with DGF during the first week. After recovery of DGF, mean tacrolimus dose requirements were not significantly different between recipients with and without DGF. In homozygous CYP3A5*3 carriers (n = 252), mean (SD) tacrolimus dose requirements remained significantly lower during DGF, while in CYP3A5*1 carriers with DGF (n = 52), lower mean dose requirements were observed only after postoperative day 4. The proportion of patients in whom NODAT developed was significantly greater in patients with DGF and tacrolimus C(min) >15 ng/mL on the first day after transplantation (27.2%) compared with recipients who remained free of DGF and had C(min) ≤15 ng/mL on day 1 (6.5%) (P = 0.016). On logistic regression analysis, greater recipient age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.044; 95% CI, 1.009-1.080), higher tacrolimus C(min) on day 1 (OR = 1.048; 95% CI, 1.017-1.080), and DGF (OR = 2.968; 95% CI, 1.107-7.959) were associated with an increased risk for NODAT.

CONCLUSION

In this open-label, observational study, DGF was associated with higher initial mean tacrolimus C(min) values and lower daily dose requirements predominantly in CYP3A5 nonexpressers.

Tacrolimus dosage requirements in living donor liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts

AIM: To investigate the tacrolimus dosage requirements and blood concentrations in adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT) recipients with small-for-size (SFS) grafts.

METHODS: During January 2007 and October 2008, a total of 54 cases of AALDLT with an observation period of 6 mo were enrolled in this study. The 54 patients were divided into two groups according to graft-recipient body weight ratio (GRBW): SFS grafts group (Group S, GRBW < 0.8%, n = 8) and non-SFS grafts group (Group N, GRBW ≥ 0.8%, n = 46). Tacrolimus 12-hour blood levels and doses were recorded during weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 and months 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in group S and group N. Meanwhile, acute rejection rates, liver and renal function test results, and the number of potentially interacting medications were determined at each interval in the two groups. A comparison of tacrolimus dosage requirements and blood levels were made weekly in the first month post-surgery, and monthly from months 2 to 6.

RESULTS: There were no differences in the demographic characteristics, acute rejection rates, liver and renal function test results, or the number of potentially interacting medications administered between the two groups. The tacrolimus dosage requirements in group S were significantly lower than group N at 2 wk (2.8 ± 0.4 mg/d vs 3.6 ± 0.7 mg/d, P = 0.006), 3 wk (2.9 ± 0.7 mg/d vs 3.9 ± 0.8 mg/d, P = 0.008), 4 wk (2.9 ± 0.8 mg/d vs 3.9 ± 1.0 mg/d, P = 0.023) and 2 mo (2.8 ± 0.7 mg/d vs 3.8 ± 1.1 mg/d, P = 0.033). Tacrolimus 12-h trough concentrations were similar between the two groups at all times except for 2 wk post-transplantation, when the concentrations were significantly greater in group S recipients than in group N recipients (11.3 ± 4.8 ng/mL vs 7.0 ± 3.8 ng/mL, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION: SFS grafts recipients have significantly decreased tacrolimus dosage requirements compared with non-SFS grafts recipients in AALDLT during the first 2 mo post-surgery.

A nomogram for predicting the optimal oral dosage of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients with small-for-size grafts

No optimal tacrolimus dosage regimen suitable for clinical use in liver transplant recipients has yet been established. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting the optimal dosage and pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in living donor liver transplantation, and a nomogram for optimal tacrolimus dosage in the immediate postoperative period for recipients with small-for-size grafts was constructed. Twenty-four liver transplant patients (nine males and 15 females) and 24 donors (10 males and 14 females) were enrolled in this study. Two studies were performed. In study 1, the effect of the actual ratio of graft volume to standard liver volume (GV/SV ratio) on the elimination half-life (T1/2) of tacrolimus in the immediate postoperative period was analysed, and a nomogram for estimating the optimal oral dose of tacrolimus required to reach a target concentration was established. In study 2, the effect of donor age on the recovery of hepatic function with ability of the graft to eliminate tacrolimus was analysed. In the immediate postoperative period, T1/2 of tacrolimus showed great variability between patients, with values ranging from 16.3 to 110.9 h. Graft size (GV/SV ratio) is important and could influence intraindividual variations in the optimal dosage and T1/2 of tacrolimus. The recovered T1/2 ratio (T1/2 ratio=T1/2 1-10 d/T1/2 30-40 d), this ratio being related to the recovery of hepatic function with ability of the graft to eliminate tacrolimus, showed great variability between patients, with values ranging from 1.08 to 4.21 (mean+/-SD, 1.95+/-0.81). Age of the donor is a major factor affecting the recovered ratio of the graft to metabolize tacrolimus. The nomogram that we have constructed, based on graft size (GV/SV ratio), will easily provide optimal dose for each patient with small-for-size graft in the early postoperative period.

Peritoneal Dialysis Alters Tolbutamide Pharmacokinetics in Rats with Experimental Acute Renal Failure

The plasma concentration profile of the antidiabetic agent tolbutamide was investigated in glycerol-induced acute renal failure (ARF) rats receiving or not receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) to assess the impact of performing dialysis on tolbutamide pharmacokinetics. It was revealed that the plasma concentration of tolbutamide was decreased by 23.4% by performing PD in ARF rats, while it was not changed by PD in normal rats. The decrease in the plasma concentration of tolbutamide was nearly proportional to the increase in its volume of distribution. To clarify the mechanisms responsible for the decreased tolbutamide concentration caused by PD, the plasma protein binding of tolbutamide was examined in normal and ARF rats. The plasma unbound fraction of tolbutamide was higher in ARF rats than in normal rats, and the dissociation constants were 3.5+/-0.7 and 5.5+/-0.2 microg in normal and ARF rats, respectively. These results indicated that the unbound fraction of tolbutamide was increased in ARF rats because of its protein binding being suppressed. It is therefore likely that since a measurable amount of tolbutamide can distribute in peritoneal dialysate in ARF rats, but not in normal rats, the plasma concentration of tolbutamide was decreased by performing PD only in ARF rats. These findings suggest that diabetes medication with tolbutamide should be carefully performed in patients receiving dialysis treatment.