Outcomes of Radial Forearm Free Flap Closure With Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Primary Closure

BACKGROUND

This study compares patient-reported functional and aesthetic outcomes of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) versus hatchet flap closure of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site.

METHODS

Patients with RFFF (2015-2020) were retrospectively identified. Those willing to participate in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) filled out Patient-Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ).

RESULTS

198 patients met our inclusion criteria and 81 participated in PRO. There was a higher rate of tendon exposure in STSG versus hatchet flap (11 vs. 1, p = 0.0019), but a lower rate of skin necrosis (5 vs. 16, p = 0.0190) and epidermolysis (1 vs. 12, p = 0.0028). Scar quality in STSG was superior to hatchet flap in all domains of POSAS. MHOQ scores were similar between both groups with no statistical difference in overall scores (p = 0.2165).

CONCLUSIONS

STSG appeared to have less compromise in activities of daily living, better satisfaction and improved scar quality than hatchet flap, but a higher rate of tendon exposure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Comparison of the outcomes of split thickness skin graft versus thickness skin graft for closure of the radial forearm free flap donor site: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site closure is traditionally performed with split thickness skin grafts (STSG), which can be associated with poor aesthetics, wrist stiffness, paresthesia, reduced strength, and tendon exposure. Full thickness skin grafts (FTSG) are potentially beneficial as they provide a more durable coverage, and the skin graft donor site can be closed primarily, which is more aesthetic. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the outcomes of STSG versus FTSG for closure of the RFFF donor site.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The primary objective was to answer: do subjects undergoing RFFF harvest, utilizing FTSG to close the RFFF donor site, compared to STSG, achieve superior aesthetics at the RFFF donor site? Included papers compared FTSG and STSG with statistical data. Means were compared with t-test and proportions with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 1851 studies. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the search resulted in eight studies, with 366 total skin grafts, 197 STSG and 169 FTSG. Six studies evaluated aesthetics utilizing a Likert scale, with the scaled average aesthetic score for FTSG being 7.9/10 compared to 6.9/10 for STSG (p < .001). Tendon exposure was measured in five studies, with a rate of 13.1% for STSG versus 10.6% for FTSG (p = .555). No significant difference in function was observed, however, methods to quantify function were heterogeneous.

CONCLUSION

FTSG compared to STSG, resulted in statistically significant improved aesthetics, with comparable rates of tendon exposure and function.

Coverage of radial forearm free flap donor site defect using another free flap

BACKGROUND

Donor site defects following the radial forearm flap (RFF) harvest have been usually covered with skin grafting, which often lead to suboptimal outcomes and donor morbidities, including delayed healing and scar contractures. The present report aimed to evaluate the outcomes of using another free flap, the domino flap, for coverage of donor site defects following RFFF harvest.

METHODS

Five patients (two males and three females) who underwent coverage of donor defects of RFFF using another free flap between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed. Their mean age was 74 years and the mean dimension of the defect of the RFF donor site was 8.7 × 5.6 cm. Four patients used an anterolateral thigh flap and one used a superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap.

RESULTS

The mean size of the domino flaps were 12.2 × 5.8 cm. Distal stumps of radial vessels adopting retrograde flow were used as recipients in four cases, and proximal ones adopting anterograde in one. The donor site of the domino flaps was primarily closed. All patients recovered well without any postoperative complications. Aesthetically pleasing outcomes with no functional impairment related to scar contractures were observed in the donor site of RFF during the mean follow-up of 15.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of another free flap for coverage of RFFF donor defects may provide rapid wound healing and satisfactory outcomes, and may be considered an alternative option in cases with large-sized defects that are expected to take a long time to achieve complete healing with skin grafting.

The arterialised saphenous venous flow-through flap for managing the radial forearm free flap donor site

BACKGROUND

The radial forearm fasciocutaneous flap (RFFF) is a workhorse flap, however concerns with donor site morbidity include tendon exposure, delayed wound healing, impaired sensitivity, and poor cosmesis, have seen it fall out of favor. We present a method of using an arterialised saphenous flow through flap to reconstruct the RFFF donor site.

METHOD

A cohort study of six patients (five male, one female; mean age 59 [range 19-90]) who had their RFFF donor site reconstructed with an arterialised saphenous flow through flap is presented. The use of multiple peripheral efferent venous anastomoses, flap rotation 180 degrees prior to inset, and the ligation of intra-flap connecting veins were three modifications employed. Primary outcomes include complication rates. Secondary outcomes were patient reported outcome measures via the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and patency and flow through the flap.

RESULTS

In all six cases, there was flap survival. RFFF dimensions ranging from lengths of 6-15 cm (mean 11.5 cm) and widths of 4-6 cm (mean 5.3 cm), with an average flap area of 58 cm² (range 24-90). There were no total flap losses, one partial superficial flap loss and one minor donor site delayed healing, over a mean follow-up of 6 months (4-24 months). The average overall patient satisfaction was 91 on Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Pain was well tolerated with a low average pain score of 15.

CONCLUSION

The modified arterialised saphenous flow through flap is a useful option for reconstructing the soft tissue defect and reconstituting the radial artery after RFFF harvest.

A Novel design for Local Full-Thickness Skin Graft: Optimizing donor sites of Radial Forearm Free Flap

OBJECTIVE

Donor site deformities remain the primary issues after radial forearm free flap (RFFF) translocations. This study introduced a local full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) from an adjacent cutaneous area to manage RFFF donor sites and evaluated the aesthetic and functional outcomes postoperatively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study among patients undergoing ablative surgery for head and neck tumors followed by defect reconstruction using a RFFF. The RFFF donor site defects were covered by local FTSGs from the adjacent skins whose harvesting was assisted by a forearm model or traditional FTSGs from abdomen. The color matching degree, surgical scars, ranges of wrist movement, and grip strengths in donor forearms were assessed in two groups at twelve months after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing local FTSGs recovery exhibited better color matching than those repaired by traditional FTSGs from the abdomen. In forearm model, the local FTSGs width should be less than 22% of the forearm circumference located 5 cm away from the center of Fossia cubitalis. All the local FTSGs transplanted with this technique showed primary or secondary healing.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated using this innovatively designed local FTSGs to close RFFF donor sites was more advantageous than traditional methods.