Cyclosporin A monitoring and AUC determination--where do we go?

A time-to-event model for acute rejections in paediatric renal transplant recipients treated with ciclosporin A

AIMS

Ciclosporin A (CsA) dosing in immunosuppression after paediatric kidney transplantation remains challenging, and appropriate target CsA exposures (AUCs) are controversial. This study aimed to develop a time-to-first-acute rejection (AR) model and to explore predictive factors for therapy outcome.

METHODS

Patient records at the Children's Hospital in Helsinki, Finland, were analysed. A parametric survival model in NONMEM was used to describe the time to first AR. The influences of AUC and other covariates were explored using stepwise covariate modelling, bootstrap-stepwise covariate modelling and cross-validated stepwise covariate modelling. The clinical relevance of the effects was assessed with the time at which 90% of the patients were AR free (t90).

RESULTS

Data from 87 patients (0.7-19.8 years old, 54 experiencing an AR) were analysed. The baseline hazard was described with a function changing in steps over time. No statistically significant covariate effects were identified, a finding substantiated by all methods used. Thus, within the observed AUC range (90% interval 1.13-8.40 h mg l⁻¹), a rise in AUC was not found to increase protection from AR. Dialysis time, sex and baseline weight were potential covariates, but the predicted clinical relevance of their effects was low. For the strongest covariate, dialysis time, median t90 was 5.8 days (90% confidence interval 5.1-6.8) for long dialysis times (90th percentile) and 7.4 days (6.4-11.7) for short dialysis times (10th percentile).

CONCLUSIONS

A survival model with discrete time-varying hazards described the data. Within the observed range, AUC was not identified as a covariate. This feedback on clinical practice may help to avoid unnecessarily high CsA dosing in children.

Limited sampling strategy for cyclosporine (Neoral) area under the curve monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Cyclosporine (CSA; Neoral) is one of the most common immunosuppressants used in pediatric renal transplantation. Research in adult renal transplant recipients has shown that 2-h post-dose concentration (C2) monitoring and limited sampling strategies (LSSs) are better at predicting drug exposure and outcome than trough concentrations (C0). While C0 monitoring is the usual practice in pediatric renal transplant patients, area under the curve (AUC) monitoring has been shown to be superior in terms of predictive ability and outcomes. However, AUC monitoring is impractical and inconvenient in a clinic setting because it involves many blood samples. An LSS provides a reliable alternative. The purpose of this study was to prospectively define an LSS (AUC(0-12)) for CSA monitoring and to test its predictive performance. As well, an LSS (AUC(0-4)) for CSA was developed and its predictive performance tested. Blood samples for CSA concentrations were collected in 29 stable pediatric renal transplant patients prior to (t = 0) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h following a steady-state morning CSA dose. AUC was calculated by the trapezoidal method; LSSs for AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-4) were determined using multiple regression analysis in 14 patients; and the LSSs' predictive performance was tested in 15 additional patients. Both LSSs require two blood samples. For the LSS (AUC(0-12)), blood samples are required immediately before the dose and 2 h post-dose: AUC(0-12) = 12.45 C0 + 2.17 C2 + 723.16 (r2 = 0.909). For the LSS (AUC(0-4)), blood samples are required at one and 2 h post-dose, AUC(0-4) = 1.17 C1 + 1.85 C2 - 41.00 (r2 = 0.971). The LSSs demonstrated low bias and high precision for both AUC(0-12) and AUC(0-4). Our two-concentration LSSs are accurate and precise predictors that are more clinically useful for our patient population than other LSSs that have been developed for pediatric renal transplant patients. Our study template provides a guide for other centers to develop accurate and precise LSSs specific to their own patient population.

Cyclosporine A monitoring--how to account for twice and three times daily dosing

Cyclosporine A (CsA) dose-interval pharmacokinetic profiles, performed 1-4 years post-transplantation, were collected from 74 renal transplanted children. Forty patients were on three times daily dosing (t.i.d.) and 34 on twice daily dosing (b.i.d.). Regression models for prediction of area under the curve (AUC) using 1-3 concentration time points as independent variables were developed. With similar weight-adjusted single doses (mg kg(-1)) of CsA, t.i.d. dosing resulted in a trough-concentration (C0) similar to that from b.i.d. dosing, but a 30% lower 2 h post-dose concentration (C2). For b.i.d. dosing the relationship between C0 and AUC was poor (r2=0.23) and the prediction error was large (5.8+/-33.5%). For t.i.d. dosing the relationship was better (r2=0.79), but prediction error was still large (4.5+/-24.9%). For C2 relationships were similar to those for the b.i.d. (r2=0.59) and t.i.d. (r2=0.63) groups, but explained modestly the variations of AUC (prediction error=2.6+/-16.8% b.i.d., 4.8+/-23.2% t.i.d.). Both C0 and C2 are useful monitoring methods when CsA is administered t.i.d. If the aim is similar specified daily drug exposure, the target C2 should be roughly 30% smaller in t.i.d. dosing than in b.i.d. dosing and the target C0 could be similar. The prediction error of AUC can be large in individual patients when using single time-point determinations, however. The use of multiple time points reduces the variation, but is less feasible.

Mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in stable pediatric renal transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is given to children in fixed doses based either on body weight or body surface area. There are data indicating mycophenolic acid (MPA) blood levels should be monitored in the early period of transplantation. However, there is little information regarding MPA pharmacokinetics (PK) in stable pediatric recipients. We evaluated MPA-PK in 20 stable renal transplant children (11.7+/-1.9 years) under long-term (46+/-31 months) MMF (26.1+/-7 mg/kg per day or 785+/-183 mg/m(2) per day) therapy plus prednisone and cyclosporin A (n=16), tacrolimus (n=3), or MMF/prednisone (n=1). Total MPA levels were measured using the EMIT-MPA assay at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 h after an oral dose of MMF. The level at 12 h was considered equal to the trough level for AUC(0-12) calculation. Mean C(0), C(max), AUC (0-12), and T(max )were 3.46+/-1.32, 13.5+/-0.58 microg/ml, 63.2+/-24.4 microg x h/ml, and 1.3+/-0.6 h, respectively. Six (30%) children were considered to have an adequate exposure (36-54 microg x h/ml) to MPA, 11 (55%) showed an AUC(0-12 )>54 microg.h/ml, and 3 (15%) showed an AUC(0-12 )<36 microg x h/ml. A C(max )>/=10 microg/ml was seen in 13 (65%) children. MMF dose did not correlate with AUC(0-12) or C(max). The combination of variables C(0), C(1), and C(4 )provided an equation to predict exposure (r(2)=0.75) where AUC(0-12)=12.62+(7.78 x C(0))+(0.90 x C(1))+(1.30 x C(2)) (P<0.001). The use of MMF without monitoring MPA blood levels may cause unnecessary overexposure to the drug in stable pediatric recipients.