Open lung biopsy in bone marrow transplant recipients has a poor diagnostic yield for a specific diagnosis

Beyond biomarkers: How enhanced CT imaging can improve the diagnostic-driven management of invasive mould disease

CT imaging remains an essential diagnostic test for identification, staging and management of invasive mould infection (IMI) in patients with hematological malignancies. Yet the limited specificity of standard CT imaging can drive excessive antifungal use in patients, especially when more definitive diagnosis cannot be established through microbiology or invasive diagnostic procedures. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is a complimentary, non-invasive approach to standard CT that allows for direct visualization of pulmonary arteries inside infiltrates for signs of angioinvasion, vessel destruction and vessel occlusion. Experience from several centers that are using CTPA as part of a standard diagnostic protocol for IMI suggests that a positive vessel occlusion sign (VOS) is the most sensitive and a specific sign of IMI in both neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. CTPA is particularly useful in patients who develop suspected breakthrough IMI during antifungal prophylaxis because, unlike serum and/or BAL galactomannan and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, the sensitivity is not reduced by antifungal therapy. A negative VOS may also largely rule-out the presence of IMI, supporting earlier discontinuation of empirical therapy. Future imaging protocols for IMI in patients with hematological malignancies will likely replace standard chest X-rays in favor of early low radiation dose CT exams for screening, with characterization of the lesions by CTPA and routine follow-up using functional/metabolic imaging such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) to assess treatment response. Hence, enhanced CT imaging techniques can improve the diagnostic-driven management of IMI management in high-risk patients with hematological malignancies.

Diagnostic Approach to Life-Threatening Pulmonary Infiltrates

Diagnosis of pulmonary disease is typically based upon consideration of presenting symptoms, physical examination, and pulmonary function testing in combination with classification of radiographic features, to guide diagnostic tests and initiate empiric treatment. When diagnostic efforts and/or empiric treatment fails, thoracic surgeons have traditionally been called upon to perform surgical biopsy of the lung to aid in the diagnosis of indeterminate, life-threatening pulmonary disease. Such biopsy has been requested specifically in the case of diffuse lung disease among patients receiving treatment for solid-organ or hematologic cancers, particularly when symptoms of respiratory failure progress and when noninvasive diagnostic tests and empiric treatments fail to halt progression. In such circumstances, radiologists, pulmonologists, and thoracic surgeons may be consulted and asked to provide tissue specimens that will allow rapid, accurate diagnosis leading to specific treatment. It is imperative that biopsy take place before respiratory failure supervenes [1], and that the specimens provided to clinical laboratories, pathologists, and microbiologists are comprehensive and properly preserved.

Bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to describe the diagnostic yield and complication rate of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung biopsy in the evaluation of pulmonary lesions in patients with cancer and recipients of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review and performed electronic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if patients had cancer or were recipients of HSCT, and if they underwent BAL or lung biopsy for the evaluation of pulmonary lesions. Only English language publications were included.

RESULTS

In all, 14,148 studies were screened; 72 studies of BAL and 31 of lung biopsy were included. The proportion of procedures leading to any diagnosis was similar by procedure type (0.53 v 0.54; P = .94) but an infectious diagnosis was more common with BAL compared with lung biopsy (0.49 v 0.34; P < .001). Lung biopsy more commonly led to a noninfectious diagnosis (0.43 v 0.07; P < .001) and was more likely to change how the patient was managed (0.48 v 0.31; P = .002) compared with BAL. However, complications were more common with lung biopsy (0.15 v 0.08; P = .006), and procedure-related mortality was four-fold higher for lung biopsy (0.0078) compared with BAL (0.0018).

CONCLUSION

BAL may be the preferred diagnostic modality for the evaluation of potentially infectious pulmonary lesions because of lower complication and mortality rates; thus, choice of procedure depends on clinical suspicion of infection. Guidelines to promote consistency in the approach to the evaluation of lung infiltrates may improve clinical care of patients.

How I manage pulmonary nodular lesions and nodular infiltrates in patients with hematologic malignancies or undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation

Pulmonary nodules and nodular infiltrates occur frequently during treatment of hematologic malignancies and after hematopoietic cell transplantation. In patients not receiving active immunosuppressive therapy, the most likely culprits are primary lung cancer, chronic infectious or inactive granulomata, or even the underlying hematologic disease itself (especially in patients with lymphoma). In patients receiving active therapy or who are otherwise highly immunosuppressed, there is a wider spectrum of etiologies with infection being most likely, especially by bacteria and fungi. Characterization of the pulmonary lesion by high-resolution CT imaging is a crucial first diagnostic step. Other noninvasive tests can often be useful, but invasive testing by bronchoscopic evaluation or acquisition of tissue by one of several biopsy techniques should be performed for those at risk for malignancy or invasive infection unless contraindicated. The choice of the optimal biopsy technique should be individualized, guided by location of the lesion, suspected etiology, skill and experience of the diagnostic team, procedural risk of complications, and patient status. Although presumptive therapy targeting the most likely etiology is justified in patients suspected of serious infection while evaluation proceeds, a structured evaluation to determine the specific etiology is recommended. Interdisciplinary teamwork is highly desirable to optimize diagnosis and therapy.

[Lung surgery in haematological patients: useful? hazardous?]

Respiratory complications are frequent in haematological patients. Lung surgery, either for diagnosis or treatment, is considered useful but hazardous in these patients. We performed a reappraisal study of this purpose; retrospective study in a university centre, located in the Paris area, France. We analysed the entire records of all the haematological patients admitted in the Thoracic Surgery department from October 2001 to January 2009, among 400 haematological patients with pulmonary complications admitted to the Respiratory Diseases department. Seventeen patients (male: n=13, mean age 47 ± 15 years) underwent lung surgery. Underlying haematological disease was acute (n=7) or chronic (n=5) leukaemia, lymphoma (n=4), and eight have had stem cell transplantation. Thirteen patients had been exposed to a cytotoxic chemotherapy with known pulmonary toxicity. Respiratory diseases have been evolving for 112 days (10-663 days), and 14 patients received previously antibiotic and/or antifungal therapy. One patient was neutropenic and three had thrombopenia. Five patients underwent curative surgery for a residual pulmonary nodule after medical treatment of invasive aspergillosis, and 12 had a diagnostic procedure (open lung biopsy by video-assisted thoracoscopy [n=2]; thoracotomy [n=8]). Surgery permitted a final diagnosis in all 12 cases: non-specific infiltrative pneumonia (n=4), pulmonary graft versus host disease (n=3), granulomatous pneumocystosis (n=1), invasive aspergillosis (n=1), bronchial carcinoma (n=1), EBV-related lymphoproliferation (n=1), and tuberculosis (n=1). Therapeutic regimens were modified according to the surgical results in ten cases (84%). All patients were extubated at the end of surgery. Post-operative complications were: prolonged air leaks (n=3), pneumonia (n=1), parenchymal hematoma (n=1), acute coronary syndrome (n=1). Seven patients were admitted in the Intensive Care Unit, and five had non-invasive ventilation. Three patients died from respiratory failure: NSIP (n=2), pneumocystosis (n=1). Lung surgery for selected haematological patients has two indications: (1) curative surgery, for a residual pulmonary nodule after medical treatment of invasive aspergillosis; (2) diagnostic procedure, leading frequently to modifications of therapeutic regimens, with low rate of complications, in highly selected patients.

Invasive diagnostic procedures for pulmonary infiltrates in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

To evaluate the role of BAL, CTB, and OLB in the management of pulmonary infiltrates in pediatric HSCT recipients, we conducted a retrospective review of clinical records of pediatric HSCT recipients. Data were analyzed using Chi-square for dichotomous and anova for continuous variables. Logistic regression was used to adjust confounding variables for diagnostic yield. Forty patients underwent 44 separate procedures. Infections were the prevailing cause of infiltrates with a positive diagnostic yield (96%). CTB and OLB were performed more often in patients with focal infiltrates compared with BAL (100%, 71% vs. 22%; p < 0.01). Adverse events were not significantly different across the three procedures. OLB more often yielded information that led to change in medical management (71% vs. 0%, 34%; p < 0.05) compared with CTB and BAL. Patients who had a positive diagnostic yield had no apparent survival advantage when compared with those in whom a procedure yielded no information. Logistic regression demonstrated that focal infiltrate was the only independently predictive variable for identifying a cause of pulmonary infiltrate. In conclusion, all three invasive diagnostic procedures were safe. Having a focal infiltrate was independently and significantly associated with having a positive diagnostic yield.

Evaluation of persistent pulmonary infiltrates in pediatric oncology patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), computed-tomography-guided biopsy (CTB), and open lung biopsy (OLB) in the management of persistent pulmonary infiltrates in pediatric oncology patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review of clinical records of pediatric oncology patients who underwent BAL, CTB, and OLB over a 7-year period. Data was compared across the three procedures using chi-square analysis. Logistic regression was used to adjust potential confounding variables for diagnostic yield.

RESULTS

There were 113 consecutive patients who underwent 140 separate procedures during their hospitalization. Thirty (26%) patients had a previous BMT. BALs were more likely to occur as the first line of investigation (98% vs. 47%, 45%; P < 0.01) and in patients with diffuse infiltrates (64% vs. 6%, 26%; P < 0.01) when compared to CTB and OLB, respectively. OLBs were performed less frequently in neutropenic patients (26% vs. 53%, 54%; P < 0.05), more often led to change in management directly because of procedure (61% vs. 12%, 33%; P < 0.01), and had higher diagnostic yield (61% vs. 24%, 36%; P < 0.01) when compared to CTB and BAL, respectively. Diagnostic yield of OLB was significantly higher regardless of diffuse or focal nature of infiltrate. Major adverse events after a procedure were not significantly different across the three procedures. Logistic regression demonstrated that having an OLB was independently associated with identifying the cause of pulmonary infiltrate.

CONCLUSION

OLB appears to be safe, has the best diagnostic yield, and leads to change in management more often than CTB or BAL in pediatric oncology patients with persistent pulmonary infiltrates.