Volume Capnography in the Intensive Care Unit: Potential Clinical Applications

Volume capnography provides a noninvasive, continuous display of the fractional concentration or partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pco₂) versus exhaled volume. Derived measurements and calculations are influenced by changes in both ventilation and perfusion and are therefore useful for assessing both respiratory and cardiovascular function. This article provides an evidence-based review of several potential uses of volume capnography in the intensive care unit: 1) monitoring the effectiveness of ventilation by using end-tidal Pco₂ as a surrogate for arterial Pco₂, 2) assessing volume responsiveness, 3) measuring cardiac output, 4) determining prognosis in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome, 5) optimizing alveolar recruitment, and 6) excluding pulmonary embolism. Studies performed during the past few decades have clearly shown that volume capnography can provide important prognostic information in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and that end-tidal Pco₂ should not be used to estimate or even to monitor the direction of change in the arterial Pco₂ in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Unfortunately, few conclusions can be made from studies evaluating other potential applications. Of these, the most promising are the noninvasive measurement of cardiac output and optimization of alveolar recruitment in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and in mechanically ventilated, morbidly obese patients.

[Meta-analyses on measurement precision of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies in adults]

An ideal non-invasive monitoring system should provide accurate and reproducible measurements of clinically relevant variables that enables clinicians to guide therapy accordingly. The monitor should be rapid, easy to use, readily available at the bedside, operator-independent, cost-effective and should have a minimal risk and side effect profile for patients. An example is the introduction of pulse oximetry, which has become established for non-invasive monitoring of oxygenation worldwide. A corresponding non-invasive monitoring of hemodynamics and perfusion could optimize the anesthesiological treatment to the needs in individual cases. In recent years several non-invasive technologies to monitor hemodynamics in the perioperative setting have been introduced: suprasternal Doppler ultrasound, modified windkessel function, pulse wave transit time, radial artery tonometry, thoracic bioimpedance, endotracheal bioimpedance, bioreactance, and partial CO₂ rebreathing have been tested for monitoring cardiac output or stroke volume. The photoelectric finger blood volume clamp technique and respiratory variation of the plethysmography curve have been assessed for monitoring fluid responsiveness. In this manuscript meta-analyses of non-invasive monitoring technologies were performed when non-invasive monitoring technology and reference technology were comparable. The primary evaluation criterion for all studies screened was a Bland-Altman analysis. Experimental and pediatric studies were excluded, as were all studies without a non-invasive monitoring technique or studies without evaluation of cardiac output/stroke volume or fluid responsiveness. Most studies found an acceptable bias with wide limits of agreement. Thus, most non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies cannot be considered to be equivalent to the respective reference method. Studies testing the impact of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies as a trend evaluation on outcome, as well as studies evaluating alternatives to the finger for capturing the raw signals for hemodynamic assessment, and, finally, studies evaluating technologies based on a flow time measurement are current topics of clinical research.

Isocapnic hyperventilation shortens washout time for sevoflurane - an experimental in vivo study

BACKGROUND

Isocapnic hyperventilation (IHV) is a method that fastens weaning from inhalation anaesthesia by increasing airway concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) during hyperventilation (HV). In an animal model, we evaluated a technique of adding CO2 directly to the breathing circuit of a standard anaesthesia apparatus.

METHODS

Eight anaesthetised pigs weighing 28 ± 2 kg were intubated and mechanically ventilated. From a baseline ventilation of 5 l/min, HV was achieved by doubling minute volume and fresh gas flow. Respiratory rate was increased from 15 to 22/min. The CO2 absorber was disconnected and CO2 was delivered (DCO2 ) to the inspiratory limb of a standard breathing circuit via a mixing box. Time required to decrease end-tidal sevoflurane concentration from 2.7% to 0.2% was defined as washout time. Respiration and haemodynamics were monitored by blood gas analysis, spirometry, electric impedance tomography and pulse contour analysis.

RESULTS

A DCO2 of 261 ± 19 ml/min was necessary to achieve isocapnia during HV. The corresponding FICO2 -level remained stable at 3.1 ± 0.3%. During IHV, washout of sevoflurane was three times faster, 433 ± 135 s vs. 1387 ± 204 s (P < 0.001). Arterial CO2 tension and end-tidal CO2 , was 5.2 ± 0.4 kPa and 5.6 ± 0.4%, respectively, before IHV and 5.1 ± 0.3 kPa and 5.7 ± 0.3%, respectively, during IHV.

CONCLUSIONS

In this experimental in vivo model of isocapnic hyperventilation, the washout time of sevoflurane anaesthesia was one-third compared to normal ventilation. The method for isocapnic hyperventilation described can potentially be transferred to a clinical setting with the intention to decrease emergence time from inhalation anaesthesia.

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Pulmonary Carbon Dioxide Elimination for Noninvasive Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether the response of pulmonary elimination of CO2 (VCO2) to a sudden increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could predict fluid responsiveness and serve as a noninvasive surrogate for cardiac index (CI).

METHODS

Fifty-two patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery were included in this study. By using a constant-flow ventilation mode, we performed a PEEP challenge of 1-minute increase in PEEP from 5 to 10 cm H2O. At PEEP of 5 cm H2O, patients were preloaded with 500 mL IV saline solution after which a second PEEP challenge was performed. Patients in whom fluid administration increased CI by ≥15% from the individual baseline value were defined as volume responders. Beat-by-beat CI was derived from arterial pulse contour analysis, and breath-by-breath VCO2 data were collected during the protocol. The sensitivity and specificity of VCO2 for detecting the fluid responders according to CI was performed by the receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 52 patients were identified as fluid responders (40%). The PEEP maneuver before fluid administration decreased CI from 2.65 ± 0.34 to 2.21 ± 0.32 L/min/m (P = 0.0011) and VCO2 from 150 ± 23 to 123 ± 23 mL/min (P = 0.0036) in responders, whereas the changes in CI and VCO2 were not significant in nonresponders. The PEEP challenge after fluid administration induced no significant changes in CI and VCO2, in neither responders nor nonresponders. PEEP-induced decreases in CI and VCO2 before fluid administration were well correlated (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001) but not thereafter. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for a PEEP-induced decrease in ΔCI and ΔVCO2 was 0.99, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.96 to 0.99 for ΔCI and from 0.97 to 0.99 for ΔVCO2. During the PEEP challenge, a decrease in VCO2 by 11% predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.93) and a specificity of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

PEEP-induced changes in VCO2 predicted fluid responsiveness with accuracy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

A novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment in a porcine model of lung lavage

BACKGROUND

We have evaluated a new method for continuous monitoring of effective pulmonary blood flow (COEPBF ), i.e. cardiac output (CO) minus intra-pulmonary shunt, during mechanical ventilation. The method has shown good trending ability during severe hemodynamic challenges in a porcine model with intact lungs. In this study, we further evaluate the COEPBF method in a model of lung lavage.

METHODS

COEPBF was compared to a reference method for CO during hemodynamic and PEEP alterations, 5 and 12 cmH2 O, before and after repeated lung lavages in 10 anaesthetised pigs. Bland-Altman, four-quadrant and polar plot methodologies were used to determine agreement and trending ability.

RESULTS

After lung lavage at PEEP 5 cmH2 O, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure related to inspired fraction of oxygen significantly decreased. The mean difference (limits of agreement) between methods changed from 0.2 (-1.1 to 1.5) to -0.9 (-3.6 to 1.9) l/min and percentage error increased from 34% to 70%. Trending ability remained good according to the four-quadrant plot (concordance rate 94%), whereas mean angular bias increased from 4° to -16° when using the polar plot methodology.

CONCLUSION

Both agreement and precision of COEPBF were impaired in relation to CO when the shunt fraction was increased after lavage at PEEP 5 cmH2 O. However, trending ability remained good as assessed by the four-quadrant plot, whereas the mean polar angle, calculated by the polar plot, was wide.

Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients, using a new prolonged expiration-based technique

The gold standard methods to measure cardiac output (CO) are invasive and expose the patient to high risks of various complications. The aim of this study is to assess an innovative non-invasive method for CO monitoring in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery and its agreement with values obtained by thermodilution technique. Continuous monitoring of respiratory gas concentrations and airflow allows the estimation of CO through a newly developed algorithm derived from a modified version of the Fick equation. It consists of two phases: the first involves measurements during steady breathing state, and the second starts when a sudden perturbation into the carbon dioxide elimination process is introduced by a prolonged expiration. This prospective clinical study involved thirty-five adult patients, undergone cardiac surgery. The measurements were performed in curarized and haemodynamically stable patients, during the post-surgery recovery in intensive care unit. The study protocol, which lasted 1 h for each patient, consisted of 20 measurements obtained by prolonged expiration-based method and 10 by thermodilution. The estimation of CO using the proposed method (COK) agreed with the thermodilution (COT) as demonstrated by: a low mean bias between COK and COT considering all patients (i.e., -0.11 L min(-1)); a best fitting line having slope = 0.98, r = 0.81, p < 0.0001; the lower and upper limits of agreement were -0.77 and +0.54 L min(-1), respectively. COK shows a mean percentage error of 34 %. In stable mechanically ventilated patients, undergone cardiac surgery, the proposed method is reliable if compared to the thermodilution. Considering the non-invasivity of the technique, further evaluations of its performances are encouraged.

Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization

The monitoring of the cardiac output (CO) and other hemodynamic parameters, traditionally performed with the thermodilution method via a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), is now increasingly done with the aid of less invasive and much easier to use devices. When used within the context of a hemodynamic optimization protocol, they can positively influence the outcome in both surgical and non-surgical patient populations. While these monitoring tools have simplified the hemodynamic calculations, they are subject to limitations and can lead to erroneous results if not used properly. In this article we will review the commercially available minimally invasive CO monitoring devices, explore their technical characteristics and describe the limitations that should be taken into consideration when clinical decisions are made.

Pulmonary carbon dioxide elimination for cardiac output monitoring in peri-operative and critical care patients: history and current status

Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output as a central component of advanced haemodynamic monitoring has been increasingly recognised as a potential means of improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery. Methods based upon pulmonary carbon dioxide elimination are among the oldest techniques in this field, with comparable accuracy and precision to other techniques. Modern adaptations of these techniques suitable for use in the perioperative and critical are environment are based on the differential Fick approach, and include the partial carbon dioxide rebreathing method. The accuracy and precision of this approach to cardiac output measurement has been shown to be similar to other minimally invasive techniques. This paper reviews the underlying principles and evolution of the method, and future directions including recent adaptations designed to deliver continuous breath-by-breath monitoring of cardiac output.

Emerging technologies

Hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients has been considered part of the standard of care in managing patients with shock and/or acute lung injury, but outcome benefit, particularly in pediatric patients, has been questioned. There is difficulty in validating the reliability of monitoring devices, especially since this validation requires comparison to the pulmonary artery catheter, which has its own problems as a measurement tool. Interpretation of the available evidence reveals advantages and disadvantages of the available hemodynamic monitoring devices.

Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output

Many methods of cardiac output measurement have been developed, but the number of methods useful for human pharmacological studies is limited. The 'holy grail' for the measurement of cardiac output would be a method that is accurate, precise, operator independent, fast responding, non-invasive, continuous, easy to use, cheap and safe. This method does not exist today. In this review on cardiac output methods used in pharmacology, the Fick principle, indicator dilution techniques, arterial pulse contour analysis, ultrasound and bio-impedance are reviewed.

Cardiac output monitoring: is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare?

As a principal determinant of oxygen delivery and of blood pressure, cardiac output (CO) represents an important hemodynamic variable. Its accurate measurement, therefore, is important to the clinician caring for critically ill patients in a variety of care environments. Though the first clinical measurement of CO occurred 70 years ago, it was the introduction of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with thermodilution-based determination of CO in the 1970s that set the stage for practical and widespread clinical measurement of CO. Although the usefulness and accuracy of this technique have justified its consideration as a "practical" gold standard in CO measurement, its drawbacks have driven the search for newer, less invasive measurement techniques. The last decade has seen the introduction of several such devices into the clinical arena. This article will serve to give a brief review of the history of CO measurement, to provide a discussion of the measurement of accuracy as it relates to CO measurement, and to discuss some of the newer methods and devices for CO measurement and how they have fared against a "practical" gold standard.

Noninvasive monitoring cardiac output using partial CO(2) rebreathing

This article reviews use of partial carbon dioxide rebreathing devices to determine cardiac output and their application for hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU and operating room. The primary focus is on the NICO monitoring device. Compared with conventional cardiac output methods, these techniques are noninvasive, easily automated, and provide real-time and continuous cardiac output monitoring. The advantages and limitations of each technique are different discussed.

Monitoring in resuscitation: comparison of cardiac output measurement between pulmonary artery catheter and NICO

AIM

The cardiac output and coronary perfusion pressure generated from chest compressions during resuscitation manoeuvres can predict effectiveness and successful outcome. Until now, there is no good method for haemodynamic monitoring during resuscitation. Noninvasive partial carbon dioxide rebreathing system (NICO, Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA) is a relatively new non-invasive alternative to thermodilution for measuring cardiac output. The accuracy of the NICO system has not been evaluated during resuscitation. The aim of this study is to compare thermodilution cardiac output method with NICO system and to assess the utility of NICO during resuscitation.

METHODS AND DESIGN

Experimental study in 24 Yorkshire pigs. Paired measurements of cardiac output were determined during resuscitation (before ventricular fibrillation and after 5, 15, 30 and 45 min of resuscitation) in the supine position. The average of 3 consecutive thermodilution cardiac output measurements (10 ml 20 degrees C saline) was compared with the corresponding NICO measurement.

RESULTS

Bland and Altman plot and Lin's concordance coefficient showed a high correlation between NICO and thermodilution cardiac output measurements although NICO has a tendency to underestimate cardiac output when compared to thermodilution at normal values of cardiac output.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high degree of agreement between cardiac output measurements obtained with NICO and thermodilution cardiac output during resuscitation. The present study suggests that the NICO system may be useful to measure cardiac output generated during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Improved accuracy of cardiac output estimation by the partial CO2 rebreathing method

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the accuracy of the NICO monitor equipped with the newer software. Additionally, the effects of the increased dead space produced by the NICO monitor on ventilatory settings were investigated.

METHODS

Forty-two patients undergoing elective aortic reconstruction participated in this prospective, observational study at a university hospital. Cardiac output was continuously monitored using both the NICO monitor and continuous cardiac output (CCO) measured by a pulmonary artery catheter. A NICO monitor equipped with ver. 4.2 software was used for the first 21 patients while a NICO monitor equipped with ver. 5.0 software was used for the rest of the patients. Cardiac output measured by bolus thermodilution (BCO) at 30 min intervals was used as a reference.

RESULTS

The bias +/- precision of the NICO monitor was 0.18 +/- 0.88 l/min with ver. 4.2 software (n = 182) and 0.18 +/- 0.83 l/min with 5.0 software (n = 194). The accuracy of the NICO monitor is comparable to CCO, whose bias +/- precision against BCO is 0.19 +/- 0.81 l/min (n = 376). At the same level of CO(2) production and minute ventilation, PaCO(2) was lower in the patients monitored by NICO with ver. 5.0 software than patients with ver. 4.2 software.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the improved performance of the NICO monitor with updated software. The performance of the NICO monitor with ver. 4.2 or later software is similar to CCO. However, the cardiac output measurement did not fulfill the criteria of interchangeability to the cardiac output measurement by bolus thermodilution. Updates to ver. 5.0 attenuated the effects of rebreathing introduced by the NICO monitor without compromising the accuracy of the cardiac output measurement.

Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement using a Fast Mixing Box to Measure Carbon Dioxide Elimination

This study investigated the accuracy of a new technique for measuring cardiac output using the derivative Fick principle based on the ratio of change in the partial pressures of end-tidal and mixed expired carbon dioxide produced by short periods of partial rebreathing.

A prospective clinical study involving 24 patients following cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass grafting or valvular surgery was undertaken in the intensive care unit of a university-affiliated hospital.

Haemodynamic measurements were performed after admission to the intensive care unit. Cardiac output was measured simultaneously by bolus pulmonary artery thermodilution and by a noninvasive carbon dioxide partial rebreathing technique.

Cardiac output measurement using the new technique demonstrated a significant but consistent underestimate, with a bias of -0.60 ± 0.87 l/min.

This new adaptation of the partial rebreathing technique is reliable in measuring cardiac output in postoperative patients. Reasons for the consistent discrepancy between thermodilution and partial rebreathing techniques are discussed.

Nichtinvasives erweitertes hämodynamisches Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Cardiac output and the cardiac index (CI) are not routinely monitored during major abdominal surgery for economic as well as medical reasons. This practice, however, might be changed by the application of newer non-invasive technologies like the partial CO(2) rebreathing method based on the inverse Fick's principle. In this prospective randomized study we investigated the impact of a non-invasive monitoring of CI on the incidence of hemodynamic instability and interventions by the attending anesthesiologist during major abdominal surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Additionally to routine hemodynamic monitoring we measured CI using the partial CO(2) rebreathing method in 28 patients (9 female, 19 male) undergoing major abdominal surgery. In group I the anesthesiologists were aware of the results of the extended hemodynamic monitoring and in group II the attending anesthesiologist was blinded to the information obtained by these measurements of CI.

RESULTS

Groups did not differ with regard to the baseline hemodynamic parameters. We obtained 923 measurements in both groups and 95 situations of hemodynamic instability (CI<2.5 l/minxm(2)) were detected in group I compared to 147 situations in group II (p<0.05). There were significantly more hemodynamic interventions in group I than in group II (p<0.0001). The cardiac index remained higher in group I in comparison to group II (p<0.0001). Measurement of CI was the only method to detect situations of hemodynamic instability in our setting.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of hemodynamic instability was significantly reduced during major abdominal surgery when anesthesiologists were aware of the measurement results of extended hemodynamic monitoring.

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit

This article reviews the clinically available devices that have been approved for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. In addition this article reviews some of the surrogate markers that can be used to assess adequacy of cardiac output.

Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In an effort to provide high-quality intensive care without increasing morbidity and possibly decreasing mortality, noninvasive means of monitoring hemodynamics have been developed. Recently, commercially available monitoring techniques have been afforded the intensivist for just this purpose. This review will discuss the various means available, their limitations and recent literature describing their clinical use in comparison with pulmonary artery catheterization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Each method has been tested clinically, some more so than others. The general consensus is that each method correlates well with pulmonary artery catheterization. Each method, however, has limitations. Users must be familiar with the limitations and aware of which method is most appropriate for their patients. In general, the derived data provided by the noninvasive methods parallel those of pulmonary artery catheterization, with the exclusion of some commonly used variables (i.e. mixed venous oxygen, wedge pressure). Some novel variables derived from the new techniques can provide analogous information to that gathered from the pulmonary artery catheter.

SUMMARY

In summary, the methods commercially available today to measure hemodynamics in a noninvasive fashion offer good correlation to the traditional data derived from pulmonary artery catheterization. Pulmonary artery catheterization is considered, by most, to be the standard by which to compare other methods and will most likely remain so. This is due to a long history of reliance and clinical familiarity with its use. Additional clinical studies will need to be performed in a heterogeneous population of patients (trauma, burn, sepsis etc.) to enable better determination of reliability and limitations in various clinical scenarios. Overcoming the clinician's personal preference to rely on traditional pressure-derived data will also be a large obstacle to overcome.

Evaluation of partial carbon dioxide rebreathing cardiac output measurement during thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing (NICO; Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc, Wallingford, CT) is a relatively new alternative to thermodilution (TDCO) for measurement of cardiac output. This study compares the 2 methods during thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational study.

SETTING

A tertiary hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve adult patients undergoing elective thoracotomy and one-lung ventilation in the lateral decubitus position.

INTERVENTIONS

Paired measurements of cardiac output were performed during (1) 2-lung ventilation in the supine position (postinduction of anesthesia), (2) 10 minutes after initiation of one-lung ventilation in the lateral decubitus position with the nondependent chest open, and (3) after 30 minutes on one-lung ventilation. An average of 3 consecutive (10 mL 20 degrees C saline) TDCO measurements made during end-expiration was compared with corresponding NICO measurements.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The NICO showed a tendency to underestimate cardiac output compared with TDCO at all measurement times. Overall, bias was -0.29 L/min and limits of agreement -1.69 to 1.43 L/min.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a moderate agreement between cardiac output measurements obtained with the NICO and TDCO. The present data suggest that the NICO technique may be useful during thoracic surgery.

Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measured by use of partial carbon dioxide rebreathing or the lithium dilution method in anesthetized foals

OBJECTIVE

To compare cardiac output (CO) measured by use of the partial carbon dioxide rebreathing method (NICO) or lithium dilution method (LiDCO) in anesthetized foals.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Data reported in 2 other studies for 18 neonatal foals that weighed 32 to 61 kg.

PROCEDURES

Foals were anesthetized and instrumented to measure direct blood pressure, heart rate, arterial blood gases, end-tidal isoflurane and carbon dioxide concentrations, and CO. Various COs were achieved by administration of dobutamine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, phenylephrine, and isoflurane to allow comparisons between LiDCO and NICO methods. Measurements were obtained in duplicate or triplicate. We allowed 2 minutes between measurements for LiDCO and 3 minutes for NICO after achieving a stable hemodynamic plane for at least 10 to 15 minutes at each CO.

RESULTS

217 comparisons were made. Correlation (r = 0.77) was good between the 2 methods for all determinations. Mean +/- SD measurements of cardiac index for all comparisons with the LiDCO and NICO methods were 138 +/- 62 mL/kg/min (range, 40 to 381 mL/kg/min) and 154 +/- 55 mL/kg/min (range, 54 to 358 mL/kg/min), respectively. Mean difference (bias) between LiDCO and NICO measurements was -17.3 mL/kg/min with a precision (1.96 x SD) of 114 mL/kg/min (range, -131.3 to 96.7). Mean of the differences of LiDCO and NICO measurements was 4.37 + (0.87 x NICO value).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The NICO method is a viable, noninvasive method for determination of CO in neonatal foals with normal respiratory function. It compares well with the more invasive LiDCO method.

Cardiac output measurements in off-pump coronary surgery: comparison between NICO and the Swan-Ganz catheter

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective study was to compare continuous cardiac output measurements of the non-invasive cardiac output system (NICO) with the pulmonary artery catheter during off-pump coronary bypass surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients enrolled for off-pump coronary surgery received both a pulmonary artery catheter and a non-invasive cardiac output system for measurement of cardiac output. Data were compared by the Bland-Altman method to calculate the degree of agreement and to analyse if a significant difference existed between the two methods of cardiac output measurements.

RESULTS

Perioperatively, the non-invasive cardiac output underestimated cardiac output, but postoperatively overestimated it. The limits of agreement were larger during surgery compared to the postoperative period (-3.1; +2.5 vs. -1.4; +2.2 L min(-1)). Perioperatively, cardiac output measured with the pulmonary artery catheter varied from 0.5 to 7.5 L min(-1) (mean 3.6 L min(-1)) and with the non-invasive cardiac output from 0.5 to 8.4 L min(-1) (mean 3.9 L min(-1)). Postoperatively, these were 2.5-7.7 L min(-1) (mean 4.5 L min(-1)) and 2.3-8.4 L min(-1) (mean 4.9 L min(-1)), respectively.

CONCLUSION

During off-pump cardiac surgery, the non-invasive cardiac output reliably measures cardiac output and does it more rapidly than a pulmonary artery catheter and may be more useful in order to detect rapid haemodynamic changes.

CO2 rebreathing model in COPD: blood-to-gas equilibration

Rebreathing in a closed system can be used to estimate mixed venous PCO2 (PvCO2) and cardiac output, but these estimates are affected by VA/Q heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to validate a mathematical model of CO2 exchange during CO2 rebreathing in 29 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with baseline arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) ranging from 28 to 60 mmHg. Rebreathing increased end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) by 20 mmHg over 2.2 min. This model employed baseline values for inspired (bag) PCO2, estimated PvCO2, distribution of ventilation and blood flow in one high VA/Q and one low VA/Q compartment, the ventilation increase and conservation of mass equations to simulate time courses of PICO2, PETCO2, PvCO2, and PaCO2. Measured PICO2 and PETCO2 during rebreathing differed by an average (SEM) of 1.4 (0.4) mmHg from simulated values. By end of rebreathing, predicted PvCO2 was lower than measured and predicted PaCO2, indicating gas to blood CO2 flux. Estimates of the ventilatory response to CO2, quantified as the slope (S) of the ventilation increase versus PETCO2, were inversely related to gas-to-blood PCO2 disequilibria due to VA/Q heterogeneity and buffer capacity (BC), but not airflow limitation. S may be corrected for these artifacts to restore S as a more valid noninvasive index of central CO2 responsiveness. We conclude that a rebreathing model incorporating baseline VA/Q heterogeneity and BC can simulate gas and blood PCO2 in patients with COPD, where VA/Q variations are large and variable.

Sources of error in partial rebreathing pulmonary blood flow measurements in lungs with emphysema and pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Studies of the accuracy of partial rebreathing measurements of pulmonary blood flow (PBF) in patients with abnormal lungs have not fully explained the sources of error.

METHODS

We used computer models of emphysema and pulmonary embolism incorporating both ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) and ventilation-volume (V/V) heterogeneity to investigate systematic errors in partial rebreathing PBF measurements. We studied (i) errors produced under usual conditions, (ii) effects of recirculation, (iii) effects of alveolar-proximal airway and alveolar-capillary PCO2 and VCO2 differences, (iv) effects of alveolar V/Q inhomogeneity and (v) effects of rebreathing time.

RESULTS

In the pulmonary embolism model the systematic error is only acceptable (<10%) when the simulated PBF is low (2-3 litre min(-1)). In the emphysema model PBF is underestimated by more than 20% at all cardiac outputs studied. Four sources of systematic errors were found. (i) Alveolar-proximal airway PCO2 gradients and flux differences between the proximal airway and alveolar compartments contribute most to the systematic error. (ii) V/Q inhomogeneity causes PCO2 gradients between the alveolar compartments and pulmonary capillary blood, and between pulmonary capillary compartments. (iii) Rebreathing times are inadequate in the presence of V/V mismatch. (iv) The apparent effect of venous blood recirculation is small in emphysema but significant in pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that PBF cannot be measured accurately by partial rebreathing in lungs with emphysema or embolism. Systematic errors are caused mainly by errors in end-tidal PCO2 values.

Evaluation of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor in mechanically ventilated children

OBJECTIVE

To compare measurements of cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) obtained by a recently developed noninvasive continuous cardiac output system, NICO (CONICO), and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (COTTE) in mechanically ventilated children.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective study in a university-affiliated tertiary pediatric intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

A total of 21 mechanically ventilated children, weighing >15 kg, in stable respiratory and hemodynamic condition.

MEASUREMENTS

Sets of three successive measurements of CO with the NICO system and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography were obtained. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the agreement between the two methods.

RESULTS

The mean +/- sd CO values were 4.06 +/- 1.43 L/min for CONICO and 4.67 +/- 1.78 L/min for COTTE. Bias +/- sd between the two methods was -0.61 +/- 0.94 L/min. The variability of the difference between the two methods increased as the magnitude of the CO measurement increased. Similar results were obtained for cardiac index: 4.01 +/- 1.40 L.min.m for CINICO and 4.59 +/- 1.48 L.min.m for CITTE. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a nonuniform relationship between CI difference and the magnitude (y = -0.299 - 0.0655 x mean). The variability of the differences did not increase as the magnitude of the CO measurement increased (sd of estimate was 0.827 L.min.m). With both CONICO and CINICO, each measurement was highly repeatable, with coefficient of variation of only 2.88% +/- 2.31%. Repeatability with Doppler echocardiography was 7.02% +/- 4.33%.

CONCLUSIONS

The NICO system is a new device that measures CO easily and automatically in mechanically ventilated children weighing >15 kg. CO values obtained with this technique were in agreement with those obtained with Doppler echocardiography in children in respiratory and hemodynamic stable condition. The NICO system needs further investigation in children in unstable respiratory and hemodynamic condition.

What is the meaning of standard venous admixture formula results in septic patients?

The standard venous admixture formula is widely used in the bedside assessment of intrapulmonary shunt in intensive care units. The intrapulmonary shunt fraction calculated by the standard venous admixture formula is affected by the systemic oxygen extraction ratio and thus reflects both systemic and intrapulmonary shunts, especially in septic patients with decreased oxygen extraction ratios. The standard venous admixture formula may cause misestimation of the intrapulmonary shunt fraction, especially in septic patients. Inert gas rebreathing techniques and simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution and oxygen consumption by indirect calorimetry may be useful in septic patients.

[Interest of prehospital use of cardiac output monitoring with partial CO2 rebreathing technique: a case report]

We report the case of a 68-year-old man with severe hypoxemic pneumopathy having cardiac output monitoring with the NICO system in prehospital medicine. This monitoring permitted the diagnosis of a compressive pneumothorax during the transfer to the intensive care unit. This ease of use technique based on partial carbon dioxide rebreathing, allows non-invasive, continuous and reliable cardiac output monitoring. We discuss the interest of this device in prehospital medicine.

Noninvasive techniques for measurements of cardiac output

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Measuring stroke volume or cardiac output is of paramount importance for the management of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit, or 'high risk' surgical patients in the operating room. The new noninvasive techniques are gaining acceptance among intensivists and anesthesiologists who have been trained almost exclusively in the pulmonary artery catheter and the thermodilution technique.

RECENT FINDINGS

The present review focuses on the recent publications related to esophageal Doppler, Fick principle applied to carbon dioxide associated with partial rebreathing, and pulse contour analysis. Recent validation studies have confirmed the previous findings: all three methods provide reliable estimations of cardiac output and its variations. There is not a single method standing out and ruling out the others. Many investigators are now using one of the 'noninvasive' monitors to measure cardiac output in clinical or experimental studies.

SUMMARY

By making cardiac output easily measurable in various settings, these techniques should all contribute to improve hemodynamic management in critically ill or high-risk surgical patients.

The Relationship Between Cardiac Output Measured by the Thermodilution Method and That Measured by the Carbon Dioxide Rebreathing Technique During Laparoscopic Surgery

Carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopic surgery may interfere with the accuracy of the cardiac output value measured by the NICO2 system. The authors simultaneously measured cardiac output by the thermodilution method and by the carbon dioxide rebreathing technique during laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a patient with a nonfunctional adrenal tumor. There was a strong correlation between the cardiac output values measured by the two methods. This case report suggests that the carbon dioxide rebreathing technique can be used to monitor cardiac output during laparoscopic surgery.

Comparison between cardiac output values measured by thermodilution and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing in patients with acute lung injury

CONTEXT

Thermodilution, which is considered to be a standard technique for measuring the cardiac output in critically ill patients, is not free from relevant risks. There is a need to find alternative, noninvasive, automatic, simple and accurate methods for monitoring cardiac output at the bedside.

OBJECTIVE

To compare cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing in patients with acute lung injury at two levels of severity (lung injury score, LIS: below 2.5, group A; and above 2.5, group B).

TYPE OF STUDY

Comparative, prospective and controlled study.

SETTING

Intensive Care Units of two university hospitals.

METHODS

Cardiac output was measured by thermodilution and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing. Twenty patients with acute lung failure (PaO2/FiO2 < 300) who were under mechanical ventilation and from whom 294 measurements were taken: 164 measurements in group A (n = 11) and 130 in group B (n = 9), ranging from 14 to 15 determinations per patient.

RESULTS

There was a poor positive correlation between the methods studied for the patients from groups A (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) and B (r = 0.47, p < 0.001). The application of the Bland-Altman test made it possible to expose the lack of agreement between the methods (group A: -0.9 +/- 2.71 l/min; 95% CI = -1.14 to -0.48; and group B: -1.75 +/- 2.05 l/min; 95% CI = -2.11 to -1.4). The comparison of the results (Student t and Mann-Whitney tests) within each group and between the groups showed significant difference (p = 0.000, p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Errors in estimating CaCO2 (arterial CO2 content) from ETCO2 (end-tidal CO2) and situations of hyperdynamic circulation associated with dead space and/or increased shunt possibly explain our results.

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions of this study, the results obtained allow us to conclude that, in patients with acute lung injury, the cardiac output determined by partial rebreathing of CO2 differs from the measurements obtained by thermodilution. This difference becomes greater, the more critical the lung injury is.

A comparative evaluation of thermodilution and partial CO2 rebreathing techniques for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients during assisted ventilation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and clinical value of partial noninvasive CO2 (NICO2) rebreathing technique for measuring cardiac output compared with standard thermodilution in a group of intensive care nonpostoperative patients.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Clinical investigation in a university hospital ICU.

PATIENTS

Twelve mechanically ventilated patients with high (n=6) and low (n=6) pulmonary shunt fractions.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six paired measurements of cardiac output were carried out with NICO2 and thermodilution in patients ventilated in pressure-support mode and sedated with a sufentanil continuous infusion to obtain a Ramsay score value of 2. The mean cardiac output was: thermodilution 7.27+/-2.42 l/min; NICO2 6.10+/-1.66 l/min; r2 was 0.62 and bias -1.2 l/min+/-1.5. Mean values of cardiac output were similar in the low shunt group (Qs/Qt < 20), with r2=0.90 and a bias of 0.01 l/min+/-0.4; conversely, in the high pulmonary shunt group (Qs/Q > 35%) the mean was 9.32+/-1.23 l/min with thermodilution and a mean NICO2CO value was 6.97+/-1.53 l/min, with r2 of 0.38 and a bias of -2.3 l+/-1.2 min.

CONCLUSIONS

The partial CO2 rebreathing technique is reliable in measuring cardiac output in nonpostoperative critically ill patients affected by diseases causing low levels of pulmonary shunt, but underestimates it in patients with shunt higher than 35%.