A novel 12-hour versus 24-hour magnesium sulfate regimen in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia in Ghana (MOPEP Study): A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We compared the efficacy of a 12-h versus 24-h regimen of intramuscular magnesium sulfate in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia.

METHODS

This is an open-labeled parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in Accra, Ghana from November 2018 to November 2020. Participants were adult pregnant women admitted to the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) with a diagnosis of antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum eclampsia or preeclampsia with severe features, having received no more than a loading dose of magnesium sulfate prior to admission at KBTH. Participants in the standard 24-h group received a loading dose of magnesium sulfate 4 g intravenous and 10 g intramuscular (5 g in each buttock) followed by six, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 24 h. Participants in the 12-h intervention group received the same loading dose followed by three, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 12 h. The primary outcome was occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned magnesium sulfate regimen. Secondary outcomes were magnesium sulfate toxicity, magnesium sulfate side effects, maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, duration of inpatient admission, duration of urethral catheterization), maternal complications (pulmonary edema, acute kidney injury, intensive care unit admission, death), and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1176 total participants, we found no difference in occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned regimen in the 24-h group (n = 5, 0.9%) versus the 12-h group (n = 2, 0.3%), P = 0.29; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08, 2.04), or in occurrence of seizure any time after enrollment (n = 9, 1.5% vs. n = 5, 0.9%, P = 0.28, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-1.64). Participants in the 12-h group had a shorter duration of inpatient admission (9.4 ± 8.8 vs. 7.7 ± 6.5 days, P = 0.0009) and urethral catheterization (2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3 days, P < 0.0001). Rates of side effects from magnesium sulfate were lower in the 12-h group: pain at the injection site (94.8% (n = 548) vs. 91.5% (n = 540), P = 0.03), inflammation (62.2% (n = 358) vs. 40.0% (n = 237), P < 0.0001), and bleeding or bruising at the injection site (25.1% (n = 144) vs. 14.4% (n = 85), P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 24 h, 12 h of intramuscular magnesium sulfate showed similar rates of seizures, with fewer side effects and shorter inpatient admission.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospective registration was with Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201811515303983): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=4690.

Efficacy of Magnesium Sulfate on Maternal Mortality in Eclampsia

Eclampsia is a common complication of preeclampsia patients and can be life-threatening for both the mother and the fetus. Hence, timely intervention and appropriate management of this detrimental condition are extremely crucial. Eclampsia is described as the occurrence of generalized convulsions in patients with preeclampsia. Magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄) is the drug of choice for treating and preventing eclampsia. This review aims to study and analyze the available literature on the pathogenesis of eclampsia, the pharmacology of MgSO₄, and its effectiveness in the management of eclampsia. Other proposed treatments and their comparative study with MgSO₄ are also discussed. Additionally, we examine the data regarding the impact of eclampsia, its public health burden, and the cost-effectiveness of MgSO₄. One of the major drawbacks associated with the use of MgSO₄ in low-income countries has been the cost of treatment and the lack of resources. We have analyzed the trials that have proposed alternate treatment regimens which could shape new guidelines to resolve these issues. For this review, we extensively studied abstract and full-text articles from multiple databases. This article discusses the pathophysiology of eclampsia, the pharmacology of MgSO₄, the issues surrounding eclampsia management, and how MgSO₄ benefits these patients.

Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in High-Risk Pregnancy: A Prospective Cohort Study in Obstetric Intensive Care

PURPOSE

To estimate the cumulative incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in women with high-risk pregnancy hospitalized in an obstetric intensive care unit, then to describe the medicines involved and to identify major risk factors.

METHODS

From June 2016 to December 2017, patients admitted to the ICU with high-risk pregnancy were considered eligible in this observational, longitudinal, prospective study. Patients were investigated daily for the occurrence of ADRs through pharmaceutical anamnesis, active search in medical records and questioning of the health team. Suspected ADRs were classified according to Naranjo's algorithm. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify risk factors of ADR.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 607 high-risk pregnancies from 851 women admitted to the ICU, of whom 244 admitted for non-obstetric conditions, with an ICU stay less than 24 h or readmitted to the ICU were excluded. The mean age was 27.0 ± 7.5 years-old, mean gestational age was 33.8 ± 6.3 weeks. ADR were observed in 165 women (27.2%). No severe ADR was observed and 29.7% were of moderate severity. The most often implicated medicine was magnesium sulphate (25.2%) with 44.5% of patients administered that substance experiencing ADRs consisting of somnolence (68.6%), absent patellar reflex (21.6%) and hypotension (9.8%). Risk factors of ADR were blood pressure (adjusted odds-ratio (aOR) 1.02), haemoglobin level (aOR 1.21) and body temperature (aOR 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs affect about one third of high-risk pregnancies, mainly due to magnesium sulphate administrations. High blood pressure, lower body temperature, and high haemoglobin concentration on admission were associated with an increased risk of ADR.

Alternative regimens of magnesium sulfate for treatment of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review of non-randomized studies

INTRODUCTION

The optimal dosing regimen of magnesium sulfate for treating preeclampsia and eclampsia is unclear. Evidence from the Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was inconclusive due to lack of relevant data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To complement the evidence from the Cochrane review, we assessed available data from non-randomized studies on the comparative efficacy and safety of alternative magnesium sulfate regimens for the management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Sources included Medline, EMBASE, Popline, CINAHL, Global Health Library, African Index Medicus, Biological abstract, BIOSIS and reference lists of eligible studies. We selected non-randomized study designs including quasi-RCTs, cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies that compared magnesium sulfate regimens in women with preeclampsia or eclampsia.

RESULTS

Of 6178 citations identified, 248 were reviewed in full text and five studies of low to very low quality were included. Compared with standard regimens, lower-dose regimens appeared equally as good in terms of preventing seizures [odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-2.28, 899 women, four studies], maternal morbidity (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.32-0.71, 796 women, three studies), and fetal and/or neonatal mortality (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.38-2.00, 800 women, four studies). Comparison of loading dose only with maintenance dose regimens showed no differences in seizure rates (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.22-4.50, 146 women, two studies), maternal morbidity (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.15-1.93, 146 women, two studies), maternal mortality (OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.05-7.50, 146 women, two studies), and fetal and/or neonatal mortality (OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.23-1.03, 146 women, two studies).

CONCLUSION

Lower-dose and loading dose-only regimens could be as safe and efficacious as standard regimens; however, this evidence comes from low to very low quality studies and further high quality studies are needed.