Treatment of femoral pseudoaneurysms. Percutaneous US-guided thrombin injection versus US-guided compression

Influence of anatomical factors on the efficacy of treating femoral pseudoaneurysms with ultrasound-guided compression technique: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Femoral pseudoaneursysm treatment is still controversial.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomic features related to femoral pseudoaneurysm (FPA) closure failure for ultrasound-guided compression (USGC).

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, cohort study. FPA patients admitted to the radiology department for USGC were included in the study. Age, sex, duration of FPA, thrombosis, ratio of thrombosis to FPA diameter, feeding artery, tortiosity, connection properties, length and width of the neck, volume, and fistula-to-common femoral artery (CFA) speed ratio were reported during color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) scanning.

RESULTS

The study was completed with 192 patients. FPA compression therapy was successful in 155 patients and failed in 37 patients. FPA without a narrow connection (p < 0.001), FPA without existing thrombosis (p < 0.001), a lower thrombosis ratio (p < 0.001), a longer duration of FPA (p = 0.035), a shorter neck length, a wider neck width (p < 0.001), and a higher fistula-to-CFA speed rate (p < 0.001) were related to FPA closure failure with USGC. ROC analysis of the fistula-to-CFA speed ratio showed that a ratio of 1.01 had 47% sensitivity and 63% specificity for USGC treatment failure (AUC, 0.72; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Failure of FPA closure with USGC is closely related to anatomic features of FPA. Evaluating the anatomical features of FPA before deciding the treatment method can be beneficial for patients and clinicians.

Comparison of three different treatment methods for traumatic and Iatrogenic peripheral artery pseudoaneurysms

Objective

To compare the efficacy of open surgery (OS), endovascular interventions (EIs), and ultrasound‐guided thrombin injection (UGTI) for the treatment of peripheral arterial pseudoaneurysms (PAs).

Methods

From January 1, 2001, to February 10, 2021, 38 patients diagnosed with traumatic and iatrogenic PAs treated with OS, EI, and UGTI were retrospectively analyzed. There were 18 females and 20 males, with an age of 56.47 ± 14.08 years (range,17–87 years). Anesthesia modality, operation duration, blood transfusion, duration of hospital stay, primary and secondary success rates, and complication rate were used to evaluate the surgical outcomes.

Results

There were 11 cases under regional anesthesia and 4 under general anesthesia in OS group, 9 under regional anesthesia and 1 under general anesthesia in EI group, and no regional or general anesthesia was required in UGTI group. There was no significant differences between any two groups (χ² = 39.80, p < 0.05). The blood tranfusion amount (units) were 3.6 ± 6.0, 0.8 ± 2.5, 0.0 ± 0.0 for OS, EI, and UGTI groups, respectively, with significant difference between OS and UGTI groups (F = 3.03, p < 0.05). The operation duration (minutes) of OS, EI, and UGTI groups were 80.0 ± 41.9, 56.0 ± 8.4, and 22.7 ± 5.3, respectively, with significant difference between any two groups (F = 15.69, p < 0.05). The duration of hospital stay (days) were 47.7 ± 39.0, 31.5 ± 17.6, and 16.3 ± 9.5, repectively, with significant difference between any two groups (F = 47.73, p < 0.05). The primary clinical success rates were 80% (12/15), 90% (9/10), and 92.3% (12/13) in OS,EI, and UGTI groups, respectively, with no significant difference between any two groups (χ² = 0.34, p > 0.05). The secondary clinical success rates were 100% for all three groups. The overall complication rates of OS, EI, and UGTI groups were 20% (3/15), 10% (1/10), and 7.7% (1/13), respectively, with no significant difference between any two groups (χ² = 1.00, p > 0.05). The infection rates were 13.3% (2/15), 10% (1/10), and 0% (0/13) in OS, EI, and UGTI groups respectively, with no significant difference between any two groups (χ² = 1.80, p > 0.05). The reintervention rates were 6.7% (1/15), 0% (0/10), 7.7% (1/13) in OS, EI, and UGTI groups, respectively, with no significant difference between two groups (χ² = 0.95, p > 0.05). Neuralgia was relieved in all patients.

Conclusions

OS, EI, and UGTI are efficacious and safe options for the treatment of appropriate patients with traumatic and iatrogenic PAs. UGTI would be considered as a first‐line therapy for this condotion.

Endovascular Management of a Large Femoral Pseudoaneurysm: A Case Report and Literary Review

Femoral artery pseudoaneurysms have an increased incidence over the past few years due to the rise in percutaneous catheterization and so have the potential treatment options. Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection has been strongly studied, and data have shown its efficacy, safety, and superiority to ultrasound-guided compression therapy as well as open surgical repair; however, a less well-studied approach that appears to be burgeoning is endovascular stent repair. Many small studies and case reports have shown this option to be not only effective but also safe and might be the treatment option of choice in patients who are deemed high risk for surgical intervention or with complicated anatomical considerations at the site of injury. In this case report, we describe a 71-year-old man with an expanding right groin hematoma which was discovered to be a right superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm with a venous fistula connection to the common femoral vein. Due to the patient’s venous fistula component, high surgical risk from substantial comorbidities, and large pseudoaneurysm size with a wide pseudoaneurysm neck, thrombin injection, compression therapy, and open surgical repair were ruled out as potential treatments; therefore, endovascular stent repair was performed. The procedure was successful, as was the patient’s postoperative period. This case report and literary review can support and further validate the usage of endovascular stent repair to treat femoral artery pseudoaneurysms.

A Possible Allergic Reaction Case to Thrombin Injected into Pseudoaneurysm After Radiofrequency Ablation

BACKGROUND Radiofrequency ablation is a minimally invasive treatment for arrhythmias, including frequent ventricular premature. As a complication of radiofrequency ablation, pseudoaneurysm can be treated conservatively or by ultrasound-guided thrombin injection. CASE REPORT We report a case that a possible allergic reaction to thrombin injected into pseudoaneurysm after radiofrequency ablation. CONCLUSIONS We hope that the report of successful management of the allergic reaction in this case may be of help to other doctors; we also emphasize the importance of checking the patient's history of allergies to thrombin when considering treating pseudoaneurysm with thrombin injection.

Recurrence of Thrombin-Injected Pseudoaneurysms Under Ultrasound Guidance: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection has become standard treatment for extremity pseudoaneurysms. Our specific aims were to determine the procedural success rate, the procedural complication rate, and the factors associated with pseudoaneurysm recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 262 consecutive cases of ultrasound-guided thrombin repair of pseudoaneurysms were identified between January 1, 2006, and March 20, 2016. The procedural and follow-up ultrasound studies were reviewed. Outcomes of interest included procedural success (defined as complete thrombosis at the time of injection and on a follow-up examination), incomplete pseudoaneurysm thrombosis, and postprocedural recurrence. Postprocedural pseudoaneurysm recurrences were compared to procedural successes with regard to patient demographics, pseudoaneurysm characteristics, amount of thrombin injected, and periprocedural laboratory values.

RESULTS

Procedural success occurred in 85.7% of cases. Complications occurred in 3.0% of cases. The mean patient age ± SD was 72.3 ± 11.3 years. The median amount of thrombin injected was 500 U (interquartile range, 400 U). The median follow-up time was 1 day (interquartile range, 0 days). A pseudoaneurysm size of 2 cm or larger and thrombocytopenia were significant independent predictors of pseudoaneurysm recurrence (P = .003 and .03, respectively). The odds ratios for pseudoaneurysm recurrence were 2.29 for pseudoaneurysm size of 2 cm or larger (P = .03) and 1.04 for thrombocytopenia (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombin injection of pseudoaneurysms is an off-label procedure with few complications and a high success rate. Follow-up imaging is recommended in all pseudoaneurysms that are 2 cm or larger and in patients with thrombocytopenia.

[Treatment of post-catheterization pseudoaneurysms by ultrasound-guided thrombin injection: A single-center experience and practical guideline]

Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for iatrogenic post-catheterization pseudoaneurysms, but still is underused in France. We report our single-center experience and propose a technical guideline for ultrasound-guided thrombin injection. Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection should be considered to be the first-line treatment of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms.

Treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysms

BACKGROUND

Femoral pseudoaneurysms may complicate up to 8% of vascular interventional procedures. Small pseudoaneurysms can spontaneously clot, but sometimes definitive treatment is needed. Surgery has traditionally been considered the 'gold standard' treatment, although it is not without risk in patients with severe cardiovascular disease. Less invasive treatment options such as Duplex ultrasound-guided compression and percutaneous thrombin injection are available, however, evidence of their efficacy is limited. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different treatments for femoral pseudoaneurysms resulting from endovascular procedures, specifically assessing less invasive treatment options such as blind manual or mechanical compression, ultrasound-guided compression, or percutaneous thrombin injection.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched October 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 9).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two treatments for femoral pseudoaneurysms following vascular interventional procedures were considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four studies were included in the analyses comparing: manual compression versus ultrasound-guided compression; ultrasound-guided application of a mechanical device (FemoStop) versus blind application; and ultrasound-guided compression versus percutaneous thrombin injection (two studies). There were no studies with a surgical intervention arm. Data were extracted independently by both authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Compression (manual or FemoStop) was effective in achieving pseudoaneurysm thrombosis although ultrasound-guided application failed to confer any benefit (risk ratio (RR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.04).Percutaneous thrombin injection was more effective than a single session of ultrasound-guided compression in achieving primary pseudoaneurysm thrombosis within individual RCTs but merged data failed to show statistical significance (RR 2.81; 95% CI 0.44 to 18.13). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups and no complications were reported apart from one deep vein thrombosis in the compression group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limited evidence base appears to support the use of thrombin injection as an effective treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysm. A pragmatic approach may be to use compression (blind or ultrasound-guided) as first-line treatment, reserving thrombin injection for those in whom the compression procedure fails.

Treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysms

BACKGROUND

Femoral pseudoaneurysms may complicate up to 8% of vascular interventional procedures. Small pseudoaneurysms can spontaneously clot, but sometimes definitive treatment is needed. Surgery has traditionally been considered the 'gold standard' treatment, although it is not without risk in patients with severe cardiovascular disease. Less invasive treatment options such as Duplex ultrasound-guided compression and percutaneous thrombin injection are available, however, evidence of their efficacy is limited. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different treatments for femoral pseudoaneurysms resulting from endovascular procedures, specifically assessing less invasive treatment options such as blind manual or mechanical compression, ultrasound-guided compression, or percutaneous thrombin injection.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register (last searched December 2008) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4). Additional searches were also made of the bibliographies of papers found through the electronic searches, and by handsearching relevant journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two treatments for femoral pseudoaneurysms following vascular interventional procedures were considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four studies were included in the analyses comparing: manual compression versus ultrasound-guided compression; ultrasound-guided application of a mechanical device (FemoStop) versus blind application; and ultrasound-guided compression versus percutaneous thrombin injection (two studies). There were no studies with a surgical intervention arm. Data were extracted independently by both authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Compression (manual or FemoStop) was effective in achieving pseudoaneurysm thrombosis although ultrasound-guided application failed to confer any benefit (risk ratio (RR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.04).Percutaneous thrombin injection was more effective than a single session of ultrasound-guided compression in achieving primary pseudoaneurysm thrombosis within individual RCTs but merged data failed to show statistical significance (RR 2.81; 95% CI 0.44 to 18.13). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups and no complications were reported apart from one deep vein thrombosis in the compression group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limited evidence base appears to support the use of thrombin injection as an effective treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysm. A pragmatic approach may be to use compression (blind or ultrasound-guided) as first-line treatment, reserving thrombin injection for those in whom the compression procedure fails.

Postcatheterization femoral artery pseudoaneurysms: therapeutic options. A case-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Postcatheterization femoral artery pseudoaneurysm is a troublesome complication following percutaneous canulations of the femoral artery. Both diagnostic and therapeutic options in the management of these pseudoaneurysms have changed dramatically, with surgery being required only rarely. We aimed to perform a comprehensive review of our experience, techniques and results in treating postcatheterization femoral artery pseudoaneurysms.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients presenting with local complications following invasive percutaneous femoral artery canulations over a five-year period was performed. Physical examination with color Doppler ultrasound analysis identified 29 femoral artery pseudoaneurysms. Surgery, duplex-guided compression, and thrombin injection were the main therapeutic options.

RESULTS

Fourteen cases of femoral artery pseudoaneurysms were treated by duplex-guided compression obliteration with a 78.5% success rate. Four patients had spontaneous thrombosis of their pseudoaneurysms. Five patients underwent percutaneous thrombin injection. Six patients had conventional surgery. Three cases failed duplex-guided compression: one closed with thrombin injection, and two were repaired surgically. Follow-up US showed no recurrent pseudoaneurysms for patients who underwent successful duplex-guided compression.

CONCLUSION

Despite the voluminous data in the literature of treating postcatheterization femoral artery pseudoaneurysms by thrombin guided injection, as a quick and effective method of therapy, with infrequent failures and complications, our study confirms the clinical usefulness of duplex-guided compression in the management of these pseudoaneurysms. The possibility of spontaneous thrombosis of small pseudoaneurysms is emphasized.

True and false aneurysms of the femoral artery

True aneurysms of the femoral artery are uncommon. They are most often identified in elderly males and are frequently associated with aneurysms at other locations. Femoral artery aneurysms that are symptomatic or larger than 2.5 cm should be repaired in order to prevent limb-threatening complications, such as rupture, thrombosis, or embolization. Open repair is the standard method of treatment and should be preceded by evaluation for coexisting aortoiliac or popliteal aneurysms, assessment of superficial femoral artery patency, and determination of the point of origin of the deep femoral artery relative to the aneurysm sac. Femoral artery pseudoaneurysms are most often seen in the setting of previous femoral artery catheterization but may also be associated with trauma, anastomotic leakage, or infection. The majority of femoral pseudoaneurysms less than 3 cm in diameter will spontaneously thrombose and may be observed with serial duplex ultrasound exams in asymptomatic patients. Symptomatic pseudoaneurysms, pseudoaneurysms with a diameter greater than 3 cm, and those found in patients who are anticoagulated should usually be treated. Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection is our preferred method for treating femoral pseudoaneurysm because of its low risk, high success rate, and efficacy in the setting of anticoagulation. Ultrasound-guided compression is an alternative method that may be considered when thrombin products are contraindicated. Open pseudoaneurysm repair should be undertaken in the setting of infection, rapid expansion, or if less-invasive methods are not technically feasible.

Surgery versus non-surgical treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysms

BACKGROUND

Femoral pseudoaneurysms may complicate up to 8% of vascular interventional procedures. Small pseudoaneurysms can spontaneously clot, while others need definitive treatment. Surgery is considered the gold-standard treatment, although is not without risk in patients with severe cardiovascular disease. Less invasive treatment options, such as Duplex ultrasound-guided compression and percutaneous thrombin injection are available, however, evidence of their efficacy is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different treatments for femoral pseudoaneurysms resulting from endovascular procedures, specifically assessing less invasive treatment options such as ultrasound-guided compression or percutaneous thrombin injection.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Review Group's Specialised Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005 (last searched October 12, 2005). Additional searches were also made of bibliographies of papers found through these searches and by handsearching relevant journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing two treatments for femoral pseudoaneurysms following vascular interventional procedures were considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two studies were included in the analysis: ultrasound-guided application of a mechanical device (FemoStop) versus blind application; ultrasound-guided compression versus percutaneous thrombin injection. Data were extracted independently by both authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Mechanical compression with a FemoStop was effective in achieving thrombosis of the pseudoaneurysm although ultrasound-guided application of this failed to confer any benefit (relative risk (RR) 1.07; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.75 to 1.53, P = 0.7). Percutaneous thrombin injection was more effective than ultrasound-guided compression in achieving thrombosis of a pseudoaneurysm (RR 7.50; 95% CI 2.06 to 27.25, P = 0.002 at 24 hours after treatment; RR 2.50; 95% CI 1.35 to 4.65, P = 0.004 at 48 hours after treatment). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups and no complications were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limited evidence base appears to support the use of thrombin injection as an effective treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysm. A pragmatic approach may be to use ultrasound-guided compression as first-line treatment, reserving thrombin injection for those in whom the procedure fails.

Prospective randomized study comparing ultrasound-guided thrombin injection to compression in the treatment of femoral pseudoaneurysms

PURPOSE

To compare in a randomized prospective study the treatment of femoral pseudoaneurysms with ultrasound-guided thrombin injection versus ultrasound-guided compression.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (22 men; mean age 67+/-8 years, range 53-82) with iatrogenic femoral pseudoaneurysms were randomized to treatment with either ultrasound-guided compression (n=15) or injection of bovine thrombin (n=15). The primary outcome measure was thrombosis of the pseudoaneurysm within 24 hours. Secondary outcome measures were complications and hospitalization time (LOS).

RESULTS

Thrombosis within 24 hours was achieved in 15 (100%) patients given thrombin versus 2 (13%) in the compression group (p<0.001). Of 13 pseudoaneurysms failing the initial compression treatment, 7 were retreated, 4 successfully. Thus, only 6 (40%) lesions were thrombosed within 48 hours after 1 or 2 compression sessions. The other 9 cases were successfully treated with thrombin injection. LOS was 2.8+/-1.5 days and 3.5+/-2.4 days in the thrombin and compression groups, respectively (p>0.05). No complications were noted in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection induces a fast, effective, and safe thrombosis of postcatheterization pseudoaneurysms. The technique is clearly superior to compression treatment and is recommended as the therapy of choice.