Acquired Factor VIII autoantibody: four cases demonstrating the heterogenous nature of this condition and problems involved in diagnosis and treatment

Acquired haemophilia in cancer: A systematic and critical literature review

AIM

There is a paucity of data on the clinical presentation and management of cancer patients with acquired haemophilia (AH), we here report a systematic literature review on acquired haemophilia in the context of cancer.

METHODS

Treatment outcomes of AH were defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or no response (NR), based on inhibitor eradication, coagulation factor VIII levels and bleeding control. Reported deaths were either related to cancer or bleeding.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 cases were collected and analyzed according to classification of cancer and efficacy of treatments for inhibitor and malignancy. The mean age was 68 years for both males (range 37-86 years) and females (range 43-89 years), 39 patients were female subjects and 66 were males. A solid cancer was diagnosed in 60 subjects, while 45 patients suffered a haematological malignancy. Solid cancers affected mainly males; however, the incidence of solid tumours vs haematological malignancies was not statistically significant (P = .09). Not all patients were treated for their underlying cancer, bleeding and/or inhibitor, in two cases outcome is unavailable. CR was reported in 62.1% (64/103) cases, PR in 9.7% (10/103) cases, NR with or without death was reported in 28.1% (29/103) cases.

CONCLUSION

CR was best achieved when successful and complete elimination of autoantibodies occurred contemporaneously with the successful treatment of the underlying malignancy. In some cases, recurrent autoantibodies were harbingers of relapsed cancer. Type of cancer, inhibitor titer, treatments administered for bleeding control and inhibitor eradication did not significantly affect clinical outcome of analyzed cases.

Systematic review of the presentation of coagulation factor VIII inhibitors in rheumatic diseases: A potential cause of life-threatening hemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive review regarding the clinical presentation of acquired factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors, also known as "acquired hemophilia," in patients with rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

A systematic MEDLINE search was conducted to identify English-language articles published from 1993 through January 10, 2012, providing details regarding the clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, and management of a patient(s) with newly or previously diagnosed autoimmune disease coexistent with an acquired FVIII inhibitor.

RESULTS

In total, 49 patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the review; the greatest percentage (24.5%) had systemic lupus erythematosus, followed by rheumatoid arthritis (16%). The majority (78%) presented with spontaneous mucocutaneous or muscular bleeding. Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was identified in all of the 45 patients for whom results were provided. Five patients presented with an asymptomatic prolonged aPTT, which was attributed to a lupus anticoagulant in two patients, only one of whom actually had a coexisting lupus anticoagulant. Invasive procedures led to serious bleeding in both of these patients, one of whom died as a result. The majority (59%) of patients experienced complete or partial remission of their inhibitors, most (96%) after systemic eradicative therapy. A total of three (6%) patients died as a direct result of FVIII inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although acquired FVIII inhibitors are rare in patients with autoimmune diseases, prompt diagnosis is essential to avoid extensive bleeding, which could be life threatening. Treatment requires eradication of the factor inhibitors. Rheumatologists must be able to distinguish acquired FVIII inhibitors from lupus anticoagulants.

Postoperative paraneoplastic factor VIII auto-antibodies in patients with solid tumours

Paraneoplastic FVIII antibodies may occur concurrent with the diagnosis or at various times after diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Between 2002 and 2009, we observed two patients with acquired haemophilia A due to an FVIII auto-antibody, which appeared 4 and 5 months after uncomplicated cancer surgery. We aimed to evaluate if such an association of cancer surgery and FVIII antibody formation has been observed previously. We retrieved all published case reports of cancer-associated FVIII auto-antibodies from PubMed for the period 1950-2010. The search in the literature revealed 13 patients in whom a FVIII inhibitor developed after uncomplicated surgery for cancer and a bleeding-free time interval of up to 6 months; 11/15 patients had abdominal cancers (five colon cancer, four pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer and choledochus carcinoma one each). The median time period between surgery and antibody detection was 3 months (1 week-6 months). In most cases, the antibody titre was low (median: 14 BU mL⁻¹, range: 1.7-64 BU mL⁻¹). Immunosuppressive treatment was successful in most of the cases - nine of the treated patients reached a sustained CR of the antibody after a median time of 3 months. Postoperative paraneoplastic FVIII inhibitors may be regarded as a special, not yet recognized subgroup of acquired FVIII antibodies. They share some characteristics with postpartum FVIII inhibitors with regard to the latency period between the triggering event and the appearance of the antibody, and between the usually low antibody titres and their good response to immunosuppressive treatment.

Acquired haemophilia: dynamic whole blood coagulation utilized to guide haemostatic therapy

Acquired haemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder caused by autoimmune antibodies interacting with factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX. Anticipating a high degree of heterogeneity amongst cases, we recently initiated systematic recording of whole blood (WB) coagulation dynamic profiles using our recently developed thrombelastographic method employing very small amounts of tissue factor for activation. Six newly diagnosed patients with acquired haemophilia A in our University Hospital were investigated with the purpose to characterize the WB clotting phenotypes in each patient, as well as inspecting the ex vivo and in vivo response to supplementation with various haemostatic agents. Our results show a striking heterogeneity in patients WB clotting profiles, each patient having a particular pattern and an individual type of response to bypassing agents. Profiles in some of patients resembled severe haemophilia A, even if there was a measurable residual FVIII:C activity while others were more similar moderate-to-mild haemophilia. In one case the profile was very close to normal. Each patient seemed to respond individually to bypassing agents. WB clotting profiles assisted us in selecting an optimal treatment modality in each case and whenever possible, we compared the clinical effects of the treatment selected with the appearance of the WB clotting pattern. In one patient, the ex vivo response to FVIII looked promising, and a approximately 200 IU kg-1 per 24 h high-dose programme nearly normalized the clotting profile in 2-week time. Our preliminary small series of data should be concluded with caution. However, it seems that WB clotting profile studies at baseline, with ex vivo addition of haemostasis promoting agents, and during treatment may hold the potential to predict the success of treatment.