Colchicine for alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver fibrosis or cirrhosis

Cytoskeleton Reorganization in EndMT-The Role in Cancer and Fibrotic Diseases

Chronic inflammation promotes endothelial plasticity, leading to the development of several diseases, including fibrosis and cancer in numerous organs. The basis of those processes is a phenomenon called the endothelial–mesenchymal transition (EndMT), which results in the delamination of tightly connected endothelial cells that acquire a mesenchymal phenotype. EndMT-derived cells, known as the myofibroblasts or cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), are characterized by the loss of cell–cell junctions, loss of endothelial markers, and gain in mesenchymal ones. As a result, the endothelium ceases its primary ability to maintain patent and functional capillaries and induce new blood vessels. At the same time, it acquires the migration and invasion potential typical of mesenchymal cells. The observed modulation of cell shape, increasedcell movement, and invasion abilities are connected with cytoskeleton reorganization. This paper focuses on the review of current knowledge about the molecular pathways involved in the modulation of each cytoskeleton element (microfilaments, microtubule, and intermediate filaments) during EndMT and their role as the potential targets for cancer and fibrosis treatment.

Hepatic Safety of Febuxostat Compared with Allopurinol in Gout Patients with Fatty Liver Disease

OBJECTIVE

Febuxostat has superior renal safety to allopurinol, but data on its hepatic safety are limited. Thus we compared the hepatotoxicity of febuxostat and allopurinol, and the clinical factors associated with hepatotoxicity, in patients with gout and fatty liver disease (FLD).

METHODS

We included gout patients treated with allopurinol or febuxostat who were diagnosed with fatty liver based on ultrasonography or computed tomography. Hepatotoxicity was defined as follows: (1) elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at least 3× the upper limit of normal, when the baseline AST/ALT was normal; or (2) doubling of the baseline AST/ALT, when the baseline AST/ALT was elevated. The factors associated with hepatotoxicity were evaluated by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 134 patients identified with gout and FLD, 32 (23.9%) received febuxostat and 102 (76.1%) received allopurinol. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, comorbidity, or disease severity between the groups; however, the incidence of hepatotoxicity was significantly lower in the febuxostat group (3/32, 9.4%) than in the allopurinol group (36/102, 35.3%, p = 0.005). Diabetes (HR 3.549, 95% CI 1.374-9.165, p = 0.009) and colchicine use (HR 11.518, 95% CI 5.515-24.054, p < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of hepatotoxicity, whereas febuxostat use was associated with a lower risk of hepatotoxicity (HR 0.282, 95% CI 0.086-0.926, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

In the 32 patients studied, febuxostat was well tolerated in patients with gout and FLD. However, the presence of diabetes and colchicine use may increase the risk of hepatotoxicity.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis 2015

The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology revised the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis in 2015. Eighty-three clinical questions were selected, and a literature search was performed for the clinical questions with use of the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases for the period between 1983 and June 2012. Manual searching of the latest important literature was added until August 2015. The guidelines were developed with use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. This digest version in English introduces selected clinical questions and statements related to the management of liver cirrhosis and its complications. Branched-chain amino acids relieve hypoalbuminemia and hepatic encephalopathy and improve quality of life. Nucleoside analogues and peginterferon plus ribavirin combination therapy improve the prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus related liver cirrhosis and hepatitis C related compensated liver cirrhosis, respectively, although the latter therapy may be replaced by direct-acting antivirals. For liver cirrhosis caused by primary biliary cirrhosis and active autoimmune hepatitis, urosodeoxycholic acid and steroid are recommended, respectively. The most adequate modalities for the management of variceal bleeding are the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices and the balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration following endoscopic obturation with cyanoacrylate for gastric varices. Beta-blockers are useful for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. The V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan is a useful add-on therapy in careful diuretic therapy for ascites. Albumin infusion is useful for the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory disturbance and renal failure. In addition to disaccharides, the nonabsorbable antibiotic rifaximin is useful for the management of encephalopathy. Anticoagulation therapy is proposed for patients with acute-onset or progressive portal vein thrombosis.

Translating an understanding of the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis to novel therapies

The response to injury is one of wound healing and fibrogenesis, which ultimately leads to fibrosis. The fibrogenic response to injury is a generalized one across virtually all organ systems. In the liver, the injury response, typically occurring over a prolonged period of time, leads to cirrhosis (although it should be pointed out that not all patients with liver injury develop cirrhosis). The fact that many different diseases result in cirrhosis suggests a common pathogenesis. The study of hepatic fibrogenesis over the past 2 decades has been remarkably active, leading to a considerable understanding of this process. It clearly has been shown that the hepatic stellate cell is a central component in the fibrogenic process. It also has been recognized that other effector cells are important in the fibrogenic process, including resident fibroblasts, bone marrow-derived cells, fibrocytes, and even perhaps cells derived from epithelial cells (ie, through epithelial to mesenchymal transition). A key aspect of the biology of fibrogenesis is that the fibrogenic process is dynamic; thus, even advanced fibrosis (or cirrhosis) is reversible. Together, an understanding of the cellular basis for liver fibrogenesis, along with multiple aspects of the basic pathogenesis of fibrosis, have highlighted many exciting potential therapeutic opportunities. Thus, although the most effective antifibrotic therapy is simply treatment of the underlying disease, in situations in which this is not possible, specific antifibrotic therapy is likely not only to become feasible, but will soon become a reality. This review highlights the mechanisms underlying fibrogenesis that may be translated into future antifibrotic therapies and to review the current state of clinical development.

Current status of novel antifibrotic therapies in patients with chronic liver disease

Fibrosis accumulation is a dynamic process resulting from a wound-healing response to acute or chronic liver injury of all causes. The cascade starts with hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis, which instigate inflammatory signaling by chemokines and cytokines, recruitment of immune cell populations, and activation of fibrogenic cells, culminating in the deposition of extracellular matrix. These key elements, along with pathways of transcriptional and epigenetic regulation, represent fertile therapeutic targets. New therapies include drugs specifically designed as antifibrotics, as well as drugs already available with well-established safety profiles, whose mechanism of action may also be antifibrotic. At the same time, the development of noninvasive fibrogenic markers, and techniques (e.g. fibroscan), as well as combined scoring systems incorporating serum and clinical features will allow improved assessment of therapy response. In aggregate, the advances in the elucidation of the biology of fibrosis, combined with improved technologies for assessment will provide a comprehensive framework for design of antifibrotics and their analysis in well-designed clinical trials. These efforts may ultimately yield success in halting the progression of, or reversing, liver fibrosis.

Colchicine in clinical medicine. A guide for internists

Colchicine (COL) has been used in medicine for a long time. It is well recognized as a valid therapy in acute flares of gouty arthritis, familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), Behçet's disease, and recurring pericarditis with effusion. It has also been used to treat many inflammatory disorders prone to fibrosis, mostly with disappointing therapeutic results. The pharmacotherapeutic mechanism of action of COL in diverse diseases is not fully understood, thought it is known that the drug accumulates preferentially in neutrophils, and this effect is useful in FMF. COL shows a large interindividual bioavailability. Furthermore, interactions with drugs interfering with CYP3A4 dependent enzymes and P-glycoprotein occur and are clinically important. The dosage of COL must be reduced in patients with relevant hepatic and/or renal dysfunction. However, when appropriately used and contraindications have been excluded, oral COL is a safe treatment.

Colchicine reduces procollagen III and increases pseudocholinesterase in chronic liver disease

AIM: To test whether colchicine would be an effective antifibrotic agent for treatment of chronic liver diseases in patients who could not be treated with α-interferon.

METHODS: Seventy-four patients (46 males, 28 females) aged 40-66 years (mean 53 ± 13 years) participated in the study. The patients were affected by chronic liver diseases with cirrhosis which was proven histologically (n = 58); by chronic active hepatitis C (n = 4), chronic active hepatitis B (n = 2), and chronic persistent hepatitis C (n = 6). In the four patients lacking histology, cirrhosis was diagnosed from anamnesis, serum laboratory tests, esophageal varices and ascites. Patients were assigned to colchicine (1 mg/d) or standard treatment as control in a randomized, double-blind trial, and followed for 4.4 years with clinical and laboratory evaluation.

RESULTS: Survival at the end of the study was 94.6% in the colchicine group and 78.4% in the control group (P = 0.001). Serum N-terminal peptide of type III procollagen levels fell from 34.0 to 18.3 ng/mL (P = 0.0001), and pseudocholinesterase levels rose from 4.900 to 5.610 mU/mL (P = 0.0001) in the colchicine group, while no significant change was seen in controls. Best results were obtained in patients with chronic hepatitis C and in alcoholic cirrhotics.

CONCLUSION: Colchicine is an effective and safe antifibrotic drug for long-term treatment of chronic liver disease in which fibrosis progresses towards cirrhosis.

Antifibrosis: to reverse the irreversible

Fibrosis is a pathological process that includes scar formation and overproduction of extracellular matrix by the connective tissue as a response to tissue damage. The fibrotic process involves multiple organs and results in progressive life-threatening diseases. Today, we know more about the molecular mechanism that leads to fibrosis involving different type of cells, cytokines, chemokines, and tissue enzymes. Fibrosis was considered an irreversible process, at least clinically, and is still usually treated by anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents. No proven antifibrotic therapy has shown efficacy in ameliorating the clinical course of fibrotic diseases, but our current understanding led to the development of different drugs with promising results, like: mycophenolate mofetil, interferon, relaxin, and intravenous immunoglobulin. This review will provide a glance to this heavily investigated subject.

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to determine the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver parenchyma for determining the severity of liver fibrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study investigated 78 patients who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 1.5-T MRI and pathologic staging of liver fibrosis based on biopsy. DWI was performed with b values of 50 and 400 s/mm(2). ADCs of liver were measured using 2.0- to 3.0-cm(2) regions of interest in the right and left lobes of the liver; the mean ADC value was used for analysis. Pathologic METAVIR scores for liver fibrosis stage were used as a reference standard.

RESULTS

The mean ADC values for fibrosis pathologically staged using the METAVIR classification system as F0 (n = 11), F1 (n = 16), F2 (n = 10), F3 (n = 14), and F4 (n = 27) were 125.9, 105.0, 104.5, 103.2, and 99.1 x 10(-5) s/mm(2), respectively. The correlation between the ADC values and the degree of liver fibrosis was moderate (Spearman's test, rho = -0.36). There was a significant difference in ADC values between patients with nonfibrotic liver (F0) and those with cirrhotic liver (F4) (p = 0.008). The best cutoff ADC value to distinguish between these groups was 118 x 10(-5) s/mm(2). However, ADC values were not useful for differentiating viral hepatitis patients with F2 fibrosis or higher from those with a lower degree of fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.66) or for differentiating low-stage fibrosis in all patients from high-stage fibrosis in all patients (AUC = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

The ADCs in cirrhotic livers are significantly lower than those in nonfibrotic livers. However, ADC values measured using the current generation of scanners are not reliable enough to replace liver biopsy for staging hepatic fibrosis.

Antifibrogenic effects of tamoxifen in a rat model of periportal hepatic fibrosis

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

It has been reported that tamoxifen may affect hepatoma cell growth in vitro by suppressing transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta1) expression, suggesting that tamoxifen might also retard fibrogenesis. Thus, we examined whether tamoxifen might suppress TGF-beta1 expression and consequently inhibit the process of hepatic fibrosis in vivo.

METHODS

To induce periportal hepatic fibrosis, 50 male adult Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with 0.62 mmol/kg of allyl alcohol, intraperitoneally, twice a week for 8 weeks. Hepatic fibrosis scores, intrahepatic collagen levels and plasma TGF-beta1 expression levels were evaluated in three groups of 10 rats orally administered tamoxifen at 1, 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively, and in 20 controls. Messenger RNAs (mRNAs) encoding TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta receptors in liver tissue were semiquantified using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Hepatic fibrosis scores decreased progressively as the dose of tamoxifen increased, resulting in a significant change in rats treated with tamoxifen at 10 mg/kg compared with controls (P=0.018). Intrahepatic collagen content was significantly less in the group treated with tamoxifen at 10 mg/kg compared with the control (P=0.045). Plasma TGF-beta1 levels were also significantly lower in rats treated with tamoxifen at 10 mg/kg compared with controls (P=0.007). All three concentrations of tamoxifen tested decreased the expression levels of hepatic TGF-beta1 mRNA and type I TGF-beta receptor (TGF-beta RI) mRNA to similar extents.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamoxifen seems to inhibit the process of hepatic fibrosis dose-dependently by suppressing the transcription of TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta RI in an experimental model of periportal hepatic fibrosis.

Current and future anti-fibrotic therapies for chronic liver disease

Chronic injury results in a wound healing response that eventually leads to fibrosis. The response is generalized, with features common among multiple organ systems. In the liver, various different types of injury lead to fibrogenesis, implying a common pathogenesis. Although several specific therapies for patients who have different liver diseases have been successfully developed, including antiviral therapies for those who have hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infection, specific and effective antifibrotic therapy remains elusive. Over the past 2 decades, great advances in the understanding of fibrosis have been made and multiple mechanisms underlying hepatic fibrogenesis uncovered. Elucidation of these mechanisms has been of fundamental importance in highlighting novel potential therapies. Preclinical studies have indicated several putative therapies that might abrogate fibrogenesis. This article emphasizes mechanisms underlying fibrogenesis and reviews available and future therapeutics.

Colchicine delays the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis virus-related liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant neoplasm associated with liver cirrhosis, with an annual incidence of 3% to 9%, which is one of the main causes of death in patients with cirrhosis. Viral hepatitis is associated with an increased risk of HCC, probably due to an inflammatory reaction. Colchicine is an antiinflammatory agent that inhibits the formation of intracellular microtubules, affecting mitosis and fibrogenesis. Diverse clinical studies have failed to demonstrate the benefit of colchicine over the progression of fibrosis in patients with liver cirrhosis; nevertheless, to the authors' knowledge there are no studies that evaluate its effect in the development of HCC.

METHODS

The effect of the administration of colchicine on the development of HCC was evaluated in 186 patients with hepatitis virus-related liver cirrhosis in a retrospective cohort study. The minimum follow-up time was 3 years (median, 84 months +/- 2.8 months). One hundred sixteen patients received treatment with colchicine. The characteristics of both groups were similar.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients who developed HCC was significantly smaller in the colchicine group when compared with the noncolchicine group (9% vs. 29%; P = .001). On multivariate analysis, an alpha-fetoprotein level > or = 5 ng/dL (P = .03), a platelet count < 100,000 at diagnosis (P = .05), alanine aminotransferase > or = 52 IU (P = .006), and a lack of treatment with colchicine (P = .0001) were found to be associated with an earlier development of HCC. The average time for the development of HCC was 222 months +/- 15 months and 150 months +/- 12 months in the patients who received and who did not receive colchicine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that treatment with colchicine prevents and delays the development of HCC in patients with hepatitis virus-related cirrhosis. The protective mechanisms of colchicine over the development of HCC could be related to antiinflammatory properties and inhibition of mitosis. Prospective studies to confirm this observation with a greater number of patients and long-term follow-up may be indicated.

New therapies in hepatitis C virus and chronic liver disease: antifibrotics

Fibrotic liver disease occurs after any of the various forms of injury to the liver. Fibrosis is a critical factor leading to hepatic dysfunction and portal hypertension and its complications. The fibrogenic cascade is complex but leads to accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins, followed by nodular fibrosis, tissue contraction, and alteration in blood flow. A critical concept emerging is that activation of effector cells, which produce extracellular matrix, underlies the fibrogenic process. The aggregate data has not only helped lead to an understanding of the pathophysiologic basis of hepatic fibrogenesis, but it has also provided an important context with which to base novel antifibrotic therapy.

Interferon gamma-1b for the treatment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection

Given that the complications of hepatitis C are due to fibrosis, we hypothesized that the antifibrotic effects of interferon gamma on stellate cells would lead to beneficial effects in patients with hepatitis C. Thus, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of interferon gamma-1b in patients with hepatitis C. A cohort of 20 patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed or were intolerant to previous interferon-alpha-based regimens received 200 mug of interferon gamma-1b subcutaneously three times weekly for 24 weeks. Liver biopsy was performed prior to and at the end of treatment. Biopsies were evaluated by a single blinded pathologist using the Knodell system modified by Ishak, and fibrosis was also quantitated by morphometric analysis. The study population was 75% male and 70% Caucasian. Mean age was 47.9 +/- 7.5 years. Eighteen of 20 patients completed therapy. One patient discontinued therapy because of constitutional symptoms. One patient discontinued therapy because of elevated aminotransferases greater than twice baseline. No serious adverse events occurred. Morphometric analysis revealed that six patients (30%) had >1% absolute reduction in fibrosis score. Four of 20 (20%) patients had improvement in Ishak fibrosis scores after treatment. In conclusion, interferon gamma therapy is safe and well tolerated in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Although we did not detect an overall reduction in fibrosis, interferon gamma-1b treatment led to a reduction in fibrosis in selected patients. These data provide a basis for further study of interferon gamma-1b in patients with chronic fibrosing liver disease.

Colchicine in experimental alkaline burns of the rat esophagus: an old drug, a new indication?

AIM

An experimental study was performed to investigate the efficacy of colchicine in the prevention of fibrosis in the alkaline burn of the esophagus in rats.

METHOD

A standard esophageal alkaline burn was produced by the application of 37.5% NaOH for a period of 90 s to the distal esophagus followed by a water rinse. The experiments were conducted twice with two different dosages of colchicine. In the first experiment, colchicine 1 mg/kg (i.p.) was applied once, on the first day. Group A (n:8), the sham laparotomy group; group B (n:8), the untreated group (positive control group); Group C (n:16), where the standard esophageal burn was induced and colchicine applied at a dose of 1 mg/kg i.p. in 1 ml volume, and group D (n:14), where the rats did not have any operation, but were treated with colchicine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) as in group C. In the second experiment, colchicine was applied at repeated doses of 100 microg/kg (i.p.) on the first, 7th, 14th, and 21st days. Twenty-five rats were divided into groups. Group AA (n:8), the sham laparotomy group; group BB (n:9), the untreated group (positive control group); and group CC (n:8), where the standard esophageal burn was induced and colchicine was applied at repeated doses. All the rats were killed on the 28th day and evaluated for esophageal tissue hydroxyproline content and histopathologic damage score.

RESULTS

Colchicine treatment at a dose of 1 mg/kg significantly reduced the quantity of hydroxyproline in the esophageal tissue in groups C and D compared with the positive control group B (P < 0.05). However, it is associated with a mortality rate of 60%. Colchicine at repeated doses of 100 microg/kg showed no significant effect in group CC compared to the untreated group BB and in the quantity tissue of hydroxyproline content (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

At non-toxic doses, colchicine was not effective in the treatment of alkaline esophageal burn in rats. Colchicine-like molecules with less adverse effects or colchicine itself in titrated doses may be hopeful in preventing the development of fibrosis in the alkaline burns of the esophagus.

Colchicine for alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver fibrosis and cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Alcohol and hepatotropic viruses cause the majority of liver cirrhosis cases in the Western World. Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic medication. Several randomised clinical trials have addressed the question whether colchicine has any efficacy in patients with alcoholic or non-alcoholic fibrosis and cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of colchicine in patients with alcoholic or non-alcoholic fibrosis or cirrhosis, excluding primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and full text searches were combined (September 2004). Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status comparing per oral colchicine with placebo or no intervention for patients with fibrosis or cirrhosis induced by either alcohol, virus, or unknown factors (cryptogenic).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The statistical package (RevMan Analyses) provided by The Cochrane Collaboration was used. The methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated.

MAIN RESULTS

We could include fifteen randomised clinical trials in which 1714 patients were randomised. We found no significant effects of colchicine on mortality (relative risks (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.16), liver-related mortality (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.33), complications (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.38), liver biochemistry, liver histology, and alcohol consumption (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.39). Colchicine was associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse events (RR 4.35, 95% CI 2.16 to 8.77).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Colchicine should not be used for alcoholic, viral, or cryptogenic liver fibrosis or liver cirrhosis outside randomised clinical trials.

Treatment of alcoholic hepatitis

Cirrhosis and its sequelae are responsible for close to 2% of all causes of death in the United States. Some studies have suggested that the costs of liver disease may account for as much as 1% of all health care spending, with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) representing a major portion. It accounts for between 40% to 50% of all deaths due to cirrhosis, with an accompanying rate of progression of up to 60% in patients with pure alcoholic fatty liver over 10 years, and a 5-year survival rate as low as 35% if patients continue to drink. A subset of patients with ALD will develop an acute, virulent form of injury, acute alcoholic hepatitis, which has a substantially worse prognosis. Despite enormous progress in understanding the physiology of this disease, much remains unknown, and therefore, a consensus regarding effective therapy for ALD is lacking. Conventional therapy is still based largely on abstinence from alcohol, as well as general supportive and symptomatic care. Unfortunately, hepatocellular damage may progress despite these measures. Multiple treatment interventions for both the short- and long-term morbidity and mortality of this disease have been proposed, but strong disagreement exists among experts regarding the value of any of the proposed specific therapeutic interventions.

Antifibrotic therapy in chronic liver disease

The response to injury is one of wound healing and, subsequently, fibrosis. This response is generalized, occurring in diverse organ systems. Injury and wounding in the liver ultimately lead to cirrhosis in many patients (although not all patients), and are the result of many different diseases. The fact that various diseases result in cirrhosis suggests a common pathogenesis. Study over the past 2 decades has shed considerable light on the pathogenesis of fibrosis and cirrhosis. A growing body of literature indicates that the hepatic stellate cell is a central component in the fibrogenic process. Stellate cells undergo a transformation during injury that has been termed activation. Activation is complex and multifaceted, but one of its most prominent features is the synthesis of large amounts of extracellular matrix, resulting in deposition of scar or fibrous tissue. The fibrogenic process is dynamic; it is noteworthy that even advanced fibrosis (or cirrhosis) is reversible. The best antifibrotic therapy is treatment of the underlying disease. For example, eradication of hepatitis B or C virus can lead to the reversal of fibrosis. In situations in which treating the underlying process is not possible, specific antifibrotic therapy is desirable. A number of specific antifibrotic therapies have been tried, but have been met with poor or mediocre success. However, elucidation of the mechanisms responsible for fibrogenesis, with particular emphasis on stellate cell biology, has highlighted many putative novel therapies. This article emphasizes mechanisms underlying fibrogenesis, and reviews current antifibrotic therapies as well as potential future approaches.

Effects of colchicine on liver functions of cirrhotic rats: beneficial effects result from stellate cell inactivation and inhibition of TGF beta1 expression

Liver cirrhosis (LC) is a chronic disease with high mortality rate and its pathophysiology includes hepatic parenchymal cell destruction, connective tissue formation, and nodular regeneration. Colchicine has been used in liver diseases as an anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic drug. However, there is controversy over the beneficial effects of colchicine in LC treatment. In the present study, we injected rats with multiple doses of dimethylnitrosamine for 4 weeks and used rats with severe LC to determine whether colchicine treatment improved liver functions and resolved cirrhotic nodules. Colchicine (30-150microg/kg per day, i.p., for 4 weeks) failed to significantly increase the survival rate of LC rats. Animals were subjected to blood biochemical, liver histopathological and immunochemical analyses. The plasma albumin level, decreased in cirrhotic rats, was restored by colchicine treatment along with reduction of ascites. Colchicine decreased the accumulated extracellular matrix and the multiple fibrotic nodules formed in cirrhotic liver, and eliminated alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA)-positive cells. In activated stellate cells, colchicine inhibited alpha-SMA and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGFbeta1) expression. The results of the present study showed that colchicine resolves cirrhotic nodules and accumulated fibers in the liver of LC rats, but failed to significantly improve the survival rate of LC animals, and that the beneficial effects of colchicine in cirrhotic animals result from stellate cell inactivation and inhibition of TGFbeta1 expression.

Beta-phenylethylamines and the isoquinoline alkaloids

This review covers beta-phenylethylamines and isoquinoline alkaloids and compounds derived from them, including further products of oxidation, condensation with formaldehyde and rearrangement, some of which do not contain an isoquinoline system, together with naphthylisoquinoline alkaloids, which have a different biogenetic origin. The occurrence of the alkaloids, with the structures of new bases, together with their reactions, syntheses and biological activities are reported. The literature from July 2001 to June 2002 is reviewed, with 581 references cited.

Anabolic-androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Alcohol is one of the most common causes of liver disease in the Western World today. Randomised clinical trials have examined the effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids for patients with alcoholic liver disease based on the results of randomised clinical trials.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and full text searches were combined (all searched December 2001). Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic steatosis, alcoholic fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and/or alcoholic cirrhosis were included. Interventions encompassed anabolic-androgenic steroids at any dose or duration versus placebo or no intervention. The trials could be double blind, single blind, or unblinded. The trials could be unpublished or published and no language limitations were applied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method. The statistical package (RevMan and MetaView) provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used. The methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by components of methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Combining the results of five randomised clinical trials randomising 499 patients with alcoholic hepatitis and/or cirrhosis demonstrated no significant effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids on mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.28), liver related mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.15), complications of liver disease (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.10), and liver histology. Further, anabolic-androgenic steroids did not significantly affect a number of other outcome measures. Anabolic-androgenic steroids were not associated with a significantly increased risk of non-serious adverse events but with the seldom occurrence of serious adverse events (RR 4.54, 95% CI 0.57 to 36.30).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant beneficial effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids on any clinically important outcomes (mortality, liver related mortality, liver complications, and histology) of patients with alcoholic liver disease.

Anabolic-androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease: a Cochrane review

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease.

METHODS

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and full text searches were combined. Only randomized clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic liver disease were included. Interventions encompassed anabolic-androgenic steroids at any dose or duration versus placebos or no intervention. The statistical package (RevMan and MetaView) provided by The Cochrane Collaboration was used.

RESULTS

Five randomized clinical trials (including mainly men with alcoholic hepatitis and/or cirrhosis) were identified. Only one trial was assessed as adequate regarding all methodological quality components. Anabolic-androgenic steroids versus placebos or no intervention demonstrated no significant effects on mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.72-1.28), liver-related mortality (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.60-1.15), complications to the liver disease (RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.74-2.10), liver histology, and a number of other outcome measures. Anabolic-androgenic steroids were not associated with a significantly increased risk of nonserious adverse events, but with the seldom occurrence of serious adverse events (RR = 4.54,95% CI = 0.57-36.30).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant beneficial effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids on any clinically important outcomes of patients with alcoholic liver disease.

Treatment of alcoholic hepatitis

Alcoholic hepatitis is a common disease with an overall 1-year mortality of 20%. Although the classical treatment for alcoholic hepatitis is abstinence, in some individuals abstinence alone is inadequate to promote survival and recovery. This is particularly true of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, who are identified by jaundice, coagulopathy and neutrophilia. Within the last two decades, several agents have been examined as treatments for alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis. They have targeted several key processes in the pathophysiology of alcoholic liver disease, including hypermetabolism, inflammation, cytokine dysregulation and oxidant stress. The compounds that offer the greatest survival benefit to patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis are corticosteroids. Several groups have reported excellent results with corticosteroids, but positive results are not uniform, and there remains some controversy over their efficacy. Even if corticosteroids are beneficial for alcoholic hepatitis, they are not recommended for all patients at risk. Consequently, other agents are being tested that have broader applicability to individuals with contraindications to steroids. In this regard, pentoxifylline shows some promise, as does enteral feeding with medium chain triglycerides. Independent efforts are also being directed toward treatment of chronic alcoholic liver disease and alcoholic cirrhosis. Anti-oxidants have received the greatest attention; drugs such as S-adenosyl-methionine may be of benefit. This and others are under active study.

Lack of effect of colchicine in alcoholic cirrhosis: final results of a double blind randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Colchicine, an inhibitor of collagen synthesis, has been suggested as potentially beneficial in cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE

This long-term, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy of colchicine in alcoholic cirrhosis.

METHODS

Ambulatory patients with biopsy proven alcoholic cirrhosis, presenting from 1989 to 1997, with no exclusion criteria (e.g. Child-Pugh C, bilirubin > 10 mg/dl and gastrointestinal bleeding in the previous 15 days), were randomized to receive orally, 5 days/week, 1 mg/day of colchicine or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Results were analysed on an intention to treat basis, for survival, incidence of complications, biochemical liver tests and safety.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received colchicine and 26 placebo; characteristics of both groups were similar. The median follow-up was 40.6 (1.4-126.3) months in the colchicine versus 42.4 (5.7-118.2) months in the placebo group (NS). No significant side effects were reported. During follow-up, there were no significant differences in compliance and alcohol abstinence (86% vs 85%). Overall survival was not statistically different (P = 0.38). Cumulative 3-year survival rates were 74.9% in the colchicine versus 91.4% in placebo group (NS). The annual incidence rate of complications was similar with colchicine or placebo: gastrointestinal bleeding, 1.5% vs 1.2%; ascites, 3.7% vs 3.7%; and encephalopathy, 1.0% vs 0.9%. The comparison of changes in biochemical parameters between groups did not show any significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Although well tolerated, colchicine does not appear to overcome the progression and natural history of long-established alcoholic cirrhosis.

Of liver, whisky and plants: a requiem for colchicine in alcoholic cirrhosis?

Colchicine decreases liver fibrosis in experimental and human disease, but a meta-analysis recently concluded that colchicine should not be used for liver fibrosis or cirrhosis irrespective of the aetiology. In this issue, Cortez-Pinto et al. confirm such negative conclusions in their series of 55 outpatients with biopsy-proven alcoholic cirrhosis followed for a median of 3.5 years. Although well tolerated, colchicine did not affect either the annual incidence rate of complications or liver function tests. Current treatment of alcoholic cirrhosis includes correction of nutritional deficiencies, exogenous administration of antioxidants (notably S-adenosylmethionine and polyenylphosphatidylcholine), and liver transplantation. In the future, preventive/therapeutic strategies will include campaigns to decrease alcohol abuse aimed at subjects genetically prone to develop alcoholic liver injury, prevention of liver fibrosis via inhibition of the Na+/H+ exchange, stimulation of apoptosis of stellate cells, antagonism of cytokines involved in liver injury, degradation of extracellular matrix, and reversal of ethanol-induced inflammatory and fibrotic changes via increased nitric oxide levels. On the grounds that it renders the hepatocyte more vulnerable to necrosis, steatosis has a key role in the pathogenesis of alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver disease. Conditions associated with insulin resistance have been recognized as risk factors for chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma in the alcoholic. This suggests that, through steatosis, insulin resistance could be a co-factor of alcoholic liver disease. Were such a hypothesis confirmed, it would unify our view of the pathogenesis of alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver disease, with all its inherent therapeutic implications.

Propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Alcohol is the most common cause of liver disease in the Western world today. Randomised clinical trials have addressed the question whether propylthiouracil has any efficacy in patients with alcoholic liver disease.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to assess the efficacy of propylthiouracil on mortality, clinical symptoms and complications, liver biochemistry, and liver histology in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Adverse events were also analysed.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (searched July 2001), The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2001), MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2001), EMBASE (January 1985 to July 2001) were searched. These electronic searches were combined with full text searches. Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic steatosis, alcoholic fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and/or alcoholic cirrhosis were included. Interventions encompassed propylthiouracil at any dose versus placebo or no intervention. The trials could be double-blind, single-blind, or unblinded. The trials could be unpublished or published as an article, an abstract, or a letter and no language limitations were applied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method. The statistical package (RevMan and MetaView) provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used. The methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by components of quality and the Jadad-scale.

MAIN RESULTS

Combining the results of six randomised clinical trials including 710 patients demonstrated no significant effects of propylthiouracil versus placebo on mortality (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.40), liver related mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.33), complications of the liver disease (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.24), or liver histology. Propylthiouracil was associated with a non significant trend towards an increased risk of non-serious adverse events (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.99) and with the seldom occurrence of serious adverse events (leukopenia).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant efficacy of propylthiouracil on any clinically important outcomes (mortality, liver related mortality, liver complications, and liver histology) of patients with alcoholic liver disease and propylthiouracil was associated with adverse events. Accordingly, there is no evidence for using propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease outside randomised clinical trials.

Meta-analysis of propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease--a Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Review

AIMS/BACKGROUND

The aim of this review was to determine the benefits and adverse effects of propylthiouracil for patients with alcoholic liver disease.

METHODS

Systematic Cochrane Review of randomised clinical trials. The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Controlled Clinical Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and full text searches were combined. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method. Only randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic steatosis, alcoholic fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis and/or alcoholic cirrhosis were included. Interventions encompassed propylthiouracil at any dose versus placebo or no intervention. The trials could be double-blind, single-blind or unblinded.

RESULTS

Six randomised clinical trials randomising 710 patients demonstrated no significant effects of propylthiouracil versus placebo on mortality (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.40), liver-related mortality (OR 0.78, CI 0.45 to 1.33), complications to the liver disease (OR 1.14, CI 0.58 to 2.24), and liver histology. Propylthiouracil was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward an increased risk of nonserious adverse events (OR 1.49, CI 0.74 to 2.99) and with the rare occurrence of serious adverse events (leukopenia).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant effect of propylthiouracil on any clinically important outcomes (mortality, liver-related mortality, liver complications and liver histology) of patients with alcoholic liver disease.

S-adenosyl-L-methionine for alcoholic liver diseases

BACKGROUND

Alcohol is a major cause of liver disease in the Western world today. S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) acts as a methyl donor for all known biological methylation reactions and participates in the synthesis of glutathione, the main cellular anti-oxidant. Randomised clinical trials have addressed the question whether SAMe has any efficacy in patients with alcoholic liver diseases.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to assess the efficacy of SAMe on mortality, clinical symptoms, complications, liver biochemistry, and liver histology in patients with alcoholic liver diseases. Adverse events were also analysed.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and full text searches were combined.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic liver diseases were included. Interventions encompassed peroral or parenteral administration of SAMe at any dose versus placebo or no intervention. The trials could be double blind, single blind, or unblinded. The trials could be unpublished or published as an article, an abstract, or a letter, and no language limitations were applied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method. The statistical package (RevMan and MetaView) provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used. The methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by components of quality and the Jadad-score.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials including a heterogeneous sample of 330 patients with alcoholic liver disease were identified. Only one trial including 123 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis used adequate methodology and reported clearly on mortality and liver transplantation. It demonstrated no significant effects of SAMe on mortality (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 1.29), liver related mortality (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.58), mortality or liver transplantation (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.09), or patients without complications (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.31). SAMe was not significantly associated with adverse events (OR 3.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 20.24).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant effect of SAMe on mortality, liver related mortality, mortality or liver transplantation, and liver complications of patients with alcoholic liver disease. SAMe should not be used for alcoholic liver disease outside randomised clinical trials.