Differential startle reactivity following central CCK-8S and systemic Boc CCK-4 administration in mice: antecedent stressor history and testing condition

Pharmacological modulation of conditioned fear in the fear-potentiated startle test: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Fear conditioning is an important aspect in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. The fear-potentiated startle test is based on classical fear conditioning and over the years, a broad range of drugs have been tested in this test. Synthesis of the available data may further our understanding of the neurotransmitter systems that are involved in the expression of conditioned fear.

METHODS

Following a comprehensive search in Medline and Embase, we included 68 research articles that reported on 103 drugs, covering 56 different drug classes. The systematic review was limited to studies using acute, systemic drug administration in naive animals.

RESULTS

Qualitative data synthesis showed that most clinically active anxiolytics, but not serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, reduced cued fear. Anxiogenic drugs increased fear potentiation in 35% of the experiments, reduced fear potentiation in 29% of the experiments, and were without effect in 29% of the experiments. Meta-analyses could be performed for five drug classes and showed that benzodiazepines, buspirone, 5-HT1A agonists, 5-HT1A antagonists, and mGluR2,3 agonists reduced cued conditioned fear. The non-cued baseline startle response, which may reflect contextual anxiety, was only significantly reduced by benzodiazepines and 5-HT1A antagonists. No associations were found between drug effects and methodological characteristics, except for strain.

CONCLUSIONS

The fear-potentiated startle test appears to have moderate to high predictive validity and may serve as a valuable tool for the development of novel anxiolytics. Given the limited available data, the generally low study quality and high heterogeneity additional studies are warranted to corroborate the findings of this review.

Blockade of the cholecystokinin CCK-2 receptor prevents the normalization of anxiety levels in the rat

Cholecystokinin (CCK), through the CCK-2 receptor, exerts complex effects on anxiety. While CCK agonists are panicogenic, CCK-2 antagonists fail to alleviate human anxiety. Preclinical studies with CCK-2 antagonists are also inconsistent because their anxiolytic effects largely depend on the behavioral paradigm and antecedent stress. The controversy might be accounted by the neuromodulatory role for CCK in anxiety which is ill-defined. If this is its actual role, blocking CCK-2 will have carry-over effects on the anxiety baseline over time. To test this hypothesis, the consequences of acute administration of the CCK-2 antagonist Ly225.910 (0.1 mg Kg^-1) was evaluated in the temporal expression of aversion toward exploration-conflicting tasks. Ly225.910 effects were evaluated in rats exposed to the elevated plus-maze (EPM) twice, an approach-avoidance anxiety-like test. While LY225.910-treated rats had less anxiety than vehicle-treated rats, the difference was reversed during the EPM retest 24 h later without drug. Moreover, Ly225.910 effects in stress-induced cognitive impairment was measured giving the novel-object discrimination (NOD) test to rats not habituated to the exploration apparatus to elicit neophobia. After a first encounter with objects ("old"), Ly225.910-treated rats did not recognize the "novel" object introduced 6 h later. Ly225.910-exposed rats did not discriminate the new location of the "novel object" when it was repositioned in the arena 24 h later. Ly225.910-treated rats also failed to explore objects. In line with its neuromodulatory role, aversive carry-over effects of Ly225.910 suggest that CCK-2 activation by endogenous CCK, rather than triggering anxiety, may return the anxiety state to its normal level.

Effects of angiotensin (5-8) microinfusions into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray on defensive behaviors in rats

Peptides of the renin-angiotensin system modulate blood pressure and hydro-electrolyte composition. Angiotensin (Ang) receptors are localized in brain areas related to the regulation of autonomic and endocrine control and involved in sensory perception, memory process and behavioral responses. Among these areas, the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) is one of the most important structures of the neuronal circuitry controlling the autonomic and behavioral components of emotional states. Although Ang II metabolism in the vlPAG forms several Ang-peptides including Ang (5-8), the role of this tetrapeptide in the organization of defensive responses has not yet been described. To address this issue, the purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of intra-vlPAG injections of Ang (5-8) (0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 nmol/0.25 μL) in rats submitted to the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test. Additionally, it was evaluated the effects of intra-vlPAG Ang (5-8) on the expression of conditioned fear, assessed by the fear-potentiated startle and contextual conditioned freezing tests. The results showed that Ang (5-8) produced an intense, dose-related reduction in the entries into and time spent in the open arms of the EPM, decreased direct exploration and increased risk assessment behaviors. Moreover, intra-vlPAG injections of Ang (5-8) before the test session promoted pro-aversive effects in the FPS and enhanced contextual freezing. Taken together, these results point out to an important anxiogenic-like action for Ang (5-8) in the mediation of defensive behaviors organized in the vlPAG.

PTSD and stress sensitisation: a tale of brain and body Part 2: animal models

Animal models that are characterised by long-lasting conditioned fear responses as well as generalised behavioural sensitisation to novel stimuli following short-lasting but intense stress have a phenomenology that resembles that of PTSD in humans. These models include brief sessions of shocks, social confrontations, and a short sequence of different stressors. Subgroups of animals with different behavioural traits or coping styles during stress exposure show a different degree or pattern of long-term sensitisation. Weeks to months after the trauma, treated animals on average also show a sensitisation to novel stressful stimuli of neuroendocrine, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal motility responses as well as altered pain sensitivity and immune function. Functional neuroanatomical and pharmacological studies in these animal models have provided evidence for involvement of amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex, and of brain stem areas regulating neuroendocrine and autonomic function and pain processing. They have also generated a number of neurotransmitter and neuropeptide targets that could provide novel avenues for treatment in PTSD.