Differential Effects of 8-OH-DPAT on Two Forms of Appetitive Pavlovian Conditioning in the Rat

Potential learning and memory disruptors and enhancers in a simple, 1-day operant task in mice

The objective of this study was to develop a rapid, 1-day learning and memory assay in mice that is sensitive to the effects of compounds that could impair or enhance acquisition and retrieval. Swiss-Webster, male mice were placed in experimental chambers for a 1-h acquisition session with an intermittent, audible tone. If a nose-poke response occurred during the tone, an Ensure water solution was presented. After 1 h, the mice returned to the chambers for 2 h. Drugs were injected before or after sessions to determine the effects on acquisition and/or retrieval. Mice injected with saline learned a nose-poke response as measured by decreased latencies to earn 10 reinforcers, increased reinforced response rates, and decreased nonreinforced response rates. Scopolamine and acetazolamide impaired retrieval of the nose-poke response, whereas ketamine only modestly impaired retrieval. Doses of 8-OH-DPAT or the novel carbonic anhydrase activator, MAI27, either had no effect or impaired some measures of responding. Neither 8-OH-DPAT nor MAI27 were able to prevent the modest impairments produced by ketamine. The simple, 1-day operant task is a rapid assay that can be used as an initial screen to test the effects of learning and memory disruptors and potentially enhancers.

Repeated administration of the 5-HT₁B/₁A agonist, RU 24969, facilitates the acquisition of MDMA self-administration: role of 5-HT₁A and 5-HT₁B receptor mechanisms

RATIONALE

3,4 Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) preferentially stimulates the release of serotonin (5-HT) that subsequently produces behavioral responses by activation of post-synaptic receptor mechanisms. The 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors are both well localized to regulate dopamine (DA) release, and have been implicated in modulating the reinforcing effects of many drugs of abuse, but a role in acquisition of self-administration has not been determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine the effect of pharmacological manipulation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor mechanisms on the acquisition of MDMA self-administration.

METHODS

The 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969 (0.0 or 3.0 mg/kg, bid), was administered for 3 days in order to down-regulate both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors. Following the pretreatment phase, latency to acquisition of MDMA self-administration was measured.

RESULTS

Repeated administration of RU 24969 significantly decreased the latency to acquisition and increased the proportion of animals that acquired MDMA self-administration. Dose-effect curves for the 5-HT1A-mediated hyperactivity produced by the 5-HT1A agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, and the 5-HT1B-mediated adipsic response produced by RU 24969 were shifted rightward, suggesting a desensitization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the initial reinforcing effects of MDMA are modulated by 5-HT1A and/or 5-HT1B receptor mechanisms. The potential impact of these changes on the DAergic response relevant to self-administration and a possible role in conditioned reinforcement pertaining to acquisition of self-administration are discussed.

Do serotonin1–7 receptors modulate short and long-term memory?

Evidence from invertebrates to human studies indicates that serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) system modulates short- (STM) and long-term memory (LTM). This work is primarily focused on analyzing the contribution of 5-HT, cholinergic and glutamatergic receptors as well as protein synthesis to STM and LTM of an autoshaping learning task. It was observed that the inhibition of hippocampal protein synthesis or new mRNA did not produce a significant effect on autoshaping STM performance but it did impair LTM. Both non-contingent protein inhibition and 5-HT depletion showed no effects. It was basically the non-selective 5-HT receptor antagonist cyproheptadine, which facilitated STM. However, the blockade of glutamatergic and cholinergic transmission impaired STM. In contrast, the selective 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist SB-224289 facilitated both STM and LTM. Selective receptor antagonists for the 5-HT(1A) (WAY100635), 5-HT(1D) (GR127935), 5-HT(2A) (MDL100907), 5-HT(2C/2B) (SB-200646), 5-HT(3) (ondansetron) or 5-HT(4) (GR125487), 5-HT(6) (Ro 04-6790, SB-399885 and SB-35713) or 5-HT(7) (SB-269970) did not impact STM. Nevertheless, WAY100635, MDL100907, SB-200646, GR125487, Ro 04-6790, SB-399885 or SB-357134 facilitated LTM. Notably, some of these changes shown to be independent of food-intake. Concomitantly, these data indicate that '5-HT tone via 5-HT(1B) receptors' might function in a serial manner from STM to LTM, whereas working in parallel using 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(2A), 5-HT(2B/2C), 5-HT(4), or 5-HT(6) receptors.

5-HT1A receptors and memory

The study of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) systems has benefited from the identification, classification and cloning of multiple 5-HT receptors (5-HT(1)-5-HT(7)). Increasing evidence suggests that 5-HT pathways, reuptake site/transporter complex and 5-HT receptors represent a strategic distribution for learning and memory. A key question still remaining is whether 5-HT markers (e.g., receptors) are directly or indirectly contributing to the physiological and pharmacological basis of memory and its pathogenesis or, rather, if they represent protective or adaptable mechanisms (at least in initial stages). In the current paper, the major aim is to revise recent advances regarding mammalian 5-HT(1A) receptors in light of their physiological, pathophysiological and therapeutic implications in memory. An attempt is made to identify and discuss sources of discrepancies by employing an analytic approach to examine the nature and degree of difficulty of behavioral tasks used, as well as implicating other factors (for example, brain areas, training time or duration, and drug administration) which might offer new insights into the understanding and interpretation of these data. In this context, 8-OH-DPAT deserves special attention since for many years it has been the more selective 5-HT drug and, hence, more frequently used. As 5-HT(1A) receptors are key components of serotonergic signaling, investigation of their memory mechanisms and action sites and the conditions under which they might operate, could yield valuable insights. Moreover, selective drugs with agonists, neutral antagonists or inverse agonist properties for 5-HT(1A) (and 5-HT(7)) receptors may constitute a new therapeutic opportunity for learning and memory disorders.