A novel clinical test of recognition reaction time in healthy adults

Utilizing Augmented Reality to Evaluate Service Member Team Performance

INTRODUCTION

Decision-making is a complex process that relies on situational awareness and experience to create a potential list of actions while weighing the risks and benefits of each action. There is a paucity of data evaluating decision-making for individual service members (SM) during the performance of team-based military-relevant activities. Understanding individual performance and decision-making within the context of a team-based activity has potential to aid in the detection and management of mild traumatic brain injuries and assist with safe and timely return-to-duty decision making. The aim of this project was to evaluate cognitive and motor performance in healthy SM during an augmented reality military specific, team-based activity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 110 SMs from Fort Moore Georgia were analyzed for this project. Service members completed 3 augmented reality room breaching and clearing scenarios (Empty Room, Civilian/Combatant, and Incorrect Position of a unit member) with 3 avatar team members. Participants wore a Microsoft HoloLens 2 (HL2) device and used a replica M4 weapon (Haptech Defense Systems) during scenarios. Three-dimensional position data from the HL2 headset was used to compute temporal measures of room breaching and clearing events while the number and timing of weapon discharge was monitored by the M4. Temporal outcomes included time to enter room, time to fire first shot, time in fatal funnel, and total trial time while motor outcomes were distance traveled and average movement velocity.

RESULTS

Pairwise comparisons between the Incorrect Position scenario and the Civilian/Combatant scenario demonstrated no difference in time to enter the room (2.36 seconds in both scenarios). Time to fire the first shot in the Civilian/Combatant scenario was longer (0.97 seconds to 0.58 seconds) while time in fatal funnel (2.58 seconds to 3.31 seconds) and time to trial completion (7.46 seconds to 8.41 seconds) were significantly longer in the Incorrect Position scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

Reaction time to fire the first shot, time in the fatal funnel, and total trial time reflect a change in information-processing and decision-making capabilities during military specific, ecological, team-based scenarios when altering the environment inside of the room and modifying avatar movements. Future studies are planned to evaluate the effects of mild traumatic brain injury on specific aspects of military team performance.

The association of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy with reduced executive function in chemotherapy-treated cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is common and disabling among cancer survivors. Little is known about the association of CIPN with other measures of the nervous system's integrity, such as executive dysfunction. We compared measures of executive function in older chemotherapy-treated cancer survivors with and without CIPN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled 50 chemotherapy-treated cancer survivors (65.6 ± 11.5 years, 88% female) post-chemotherapy treatment who were previously referred for outpatient rehabilitation at the request of the cancer survivor or a medical provider. Twenty-two participants (44%) had CIPN defined by patient-reported distal paresthesia or numbness, which began with chemotherapy and continued to the time of cognitive testing. Measures of executive function included Trails-B, Stroop, and rapid reaction accuracy (RRA) and were evaluated between cancer survivors with and without CIPN using t-tests. Multivariable models were then used to determine whether CIPN was an independent determinant of the measures of executive function (Trails-B, Stroop Incongruent, and RRA). Models were adjusted for age, sex, history of anxiety, and benzodiazepine use due to their known associations with CIPN and executive function.

RESULTS

Cancer survivors with CIPN (CIPN+) had reduced executive function compared to survivors without CIPN (CIPN-) on Trails-B (CIPN+: 84.9 s ± 44.1 s, CIPN-: 59.1 s ± 22.5 s, p = 0.01), Stroop (CIPN+: 100.6 s ± 38.2 s, CIPN-: 82.1 s ± 17.3 s, p = 0.03), and RRA (CIPN+: 60.3% ± 12.9%, CIPN-: 70.6% ± 15.7%, p = 0.01). There were no differences in cancer stage severity or functional status by patient report or sit-to-stand function. The association between CIPN and reduced executive function was found in multivariable models after adjusting for age, sex, anxiety, and benzodiazepine use for Trails-B (ß:17.9, p = 0.046), Stroop (ß:16.9, p = 0.02), and RRA (ß:-0.072, p = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

In this population, CIPN is associated with reduced executive function in older cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy. Future research is required to further understand this preliminary association, the causality, and the potential risk factors.

A Multifaceted Approach to Interpreting Reaction Time Deficits After Adolescent Concussion

CONTEXT

Reaction time (RT) is a critical element of return to participation (RTP), and impairments have been linked to subsequent injury after a concussion. Current RT assessments have limitations in clinical feasibility and in the identification of subtle deficits after concussion symptom resolution.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the utility of RT measurements (clinical drop stick, simple stimulus-response, single-task Stroop, and dual-task Stroop) to differentiate between adolescents with concussion and uninjured control individuals at initial assessment and RTP.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A pediatric sports medicine center associated with a regional tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven adolescents with a concussion (mean age = 14.8 ± 2.1 years; 52% female; tested 7.0 ± 3.3 days postconcussion) and 21 uninjured control individuals (mean age = 15.5 ± 1.6 years; 48% female).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Participants completed the Post-Concussion Symptoms Inventory (PCSI) and a battery of RT tests: clinical drop stick, simple stimulus-response, single-task Stroop, and dual-task Stroop.

RESULTS

The concussion group demonstrated slower clinical drop stick (β = 58.8; 95% CI = 29.2, 88.3; P < .001) and dual-task Stroop (β = 464.2; 95% CI = 318.4, 610.0; P < .001) RT measures at the initial assessment than the uninjured control group. At 1-month follow up, the concussion group displayed slower clinical drop stick (238.9 ± 25.9 versus 188.1 ± 21.7 milliseconds; P < .001; d = 2.10), single-task Stroop (1527.8 ± 204.5 versus 1319.8 ± 133.5 milliseconds; P = .001; d = 1.20), and dual-task Stroop (1549.9 ± 264.7 versus 1341.5 ± 114.7 milliseconds; P = .002; d = 1.04) RT than the control group, respectively, while symptom severity was similar between groups (7.4 ± 11.2 versus 5.3 ± 6.5; P = .44; d = 0.24). Classification accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) values were highest for the clinical drop stick (85.1% accuracy, AUC = 0.86, P < .001) and dual-task Stroop (87.2% accuracy, AUC = 0.92, P < .002) RT variables at initial evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents recovering from concussion may have initial RT deficits that persist despite symptom recovery. The clinical drop stick and dual-task Stroop RT measures demonstrated high clinical utility given high classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to detect postconcussion RT deficits and may be considered for initial and RTP assessment.

Short-latency reaction time and accuracy are impaired in patients with cirrhosis: An international multicenter retrospective study

AIM

The inability to quickly react to an external event can lead to an increased risk for accidents (e.g., falls, car crashes) in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether a novel clinically feasible measure of simple reaction time (SRT) and reaction accuracy (RA)-a go/no-go task occurring within 400 ms-could differentiate patients with cirrhosis from controls.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 160 patients with cirrhosis and 160 controls assessed between January 2010 and October 2022. SRT and RA were evaluated using a ruler drop paradigm and compared using propensity score matching. Factors distinguishing patients with cirrhosis from controls were assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analyses.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching identified 112 participants in each group with comparable baseline characteristics. As compared with controls, patients with cirrhosis exhibited significantly prolonged SRT (200 vs. 174 ms; P < 0.001) and diminished total RA (63% vs. 73%; P < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, SRT and RA independently identified patients with cirrhosis. ROC analyses showed that SRT more effectively identified patients with cirrhosis than did the number-connection test/trail-making test-B (area under the curve, 0.87 vs. 0.60; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cirrhosis demonstrated impairments in short-latency cognitive function. Given that SRT and RA are associated with balance, falls, and response to perturbation, these parameters may present a task-specific method to identify patients with cirrhosis at high risk of falls and motor vehicle crashes. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 25-31.

Executive function is associated with balance and falls in older cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Balance decrements and increased fall risk in older cancer survivors have been attributed to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Cognition is also affected by chemotherapy and may be an additional contributing factor to poor balance through changes in executive functioning. We examined the association of executive function with balance and falls in older cancer survivors who had been treated with chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty cancer survivors (aged 65.6 ± 11.5 years; 88% female) who were all treated with chemotherapy were included in this cross-sectional study at a tertiary medical center. Executive function was measured by Trails-B, Stroop, and rapid reaction accuracy, a measure emphasizing rapid inhibitory function. Balance was measured by five sit-to-stand time (5STS), repetitions of sit-to-stand in thirty seconds (STS30), and unipedal stance time (UST), which was the primary balance outcome measure. Self-reported falls in the past year were also recorded and was a secondary outcome. Bivariate analyses were conducted between executive function measures and balance variables. Multivariable models were constructed for UST and falls outcomes and included covariates of age and chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy status.

RESULTS

Pearson correlations demonstrated significant relationships between two executive function measures (rapid reaction accuracy, Trails-B) and all the balance measures assessed (UST, STS30, and 5STS). Rapid reaction accuracy correlations were stronger than Trails-B. The Stroop measure correlated solely with UST. In multivariable models, rapid reaction accuracy was associated with better UST (standardized regression coefficient: 64.1, p < 0.01), decreased any fall (odds ratio = 0.000901, p = 0.04), and decreased recurrent falls (odds ratio = 0.0000044, p = 0.01). The interaction of CIPN with the inhibitory measures in the prediction of balance was not significant.

DISCUSSION

Measures of executive function were associated with balance, but among the executive function tests, rapid reaction accuracy had the strongest correlations to balance and was independently associated with falls. The findings suggest that executive function should be considered when assessing fall risk and developing interventions intended to reduce fall risk in older chemotherapy-treated cancer survivors.

The relationship between clinical measures of cognitive function and grip strength in healthy older adults

BACKGROUND

Handgrip strength is considered a surrogate for musculoskeletal strength, however there is emerging evidence of an association with cognition. The specific neurocognitive attribute which best associates with grip strength is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis on baseline data in 49 healthy older adults. Grip strength was corrected for body mass index. Control independent variables included age, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Trails B. Experimental variables included a clinical measure of simple reaction time, and clinical and computerized go/no-go tasks. The clinical Go/No-Go measure was determined with ReacStick, a rod-shaped device which - when released by the examiner - requires the participant to decide within 390 ms whether to catch the device or let it fall to the ground.

RESULTS

Bivariate analysis demonstrated that age and all cognitive measures other than the computer go/no-go response accuracy related to grip strength. Multivariate analyses showed that following inclusion of the control variables, only ReacStick measures (reaction accuracy/simple reaction time) significantly predicted grip strength, explaining an additional 15.90% variance (p = 0.026). In contrast, computerized Go/No-Go accuracy (p = 0.391), response time variability (p = 0.463), and the control variables (p value range = 0.566-0.942) did not predict grip strength.

CONCLUSION

A short latency (< 390 ms) visuomotor Go/No-Go task independently predicted over 15% of grip strength variance, whereas a slower screen-based Go/No-Go task did not. These findings support the notion that declining grip strength likely reflects sub-clinical brain changes as well as musculoskeletal dysfunction, possibly explaining the potent relationships between grip strength, disability, chronic disease, and mortality.

Reliability and Validity of Inertial Sensor Assisted Reaction Time Measurement Tools among Healthy Young Adults

The assessment of movement reaction time (RT) as a sideline assessment is a valuable biomarker for mild TBI or concussion. However, such assessments require controlled laboratory environments, which may not be feasible for sideline testing during a game. Body-worn wearable devices are advantageous as being cost-effective, easy to don and use, wirelessly transmit data, and ensure unhindered movement performance. This study aimed to develop a Drop-stick Test System (DTS) with a wireless inertial sensor and confirm its reliability for different standing conditions (Foam versus No Foam) and task types (Single versus Dual), and postures (Standing versus sitting). Fourteen healthy young participants (seven females, seven males; age 24.7 ± 2.6 years) participated in this study. The participants were asked to catch a falling stick attached to the sensor during a drop test. Reaction Times (RTs) were calculated from data for each trial from DTS and laboratory camera system (gold standard). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 3,k) were computed to determine inter-instrument reliability. The RT measurements from participants using the camera system and sensor-based DTS showed moderate to good inter-instrument reliability with an overall ICC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.85). Bland-Altman plots and 95% levels of agreement revealed a bias where the DTS underestimated RT by approximately 50 ms.

A survey of the incidence of defibrillator damage during double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation

Background

Double Sequential External Defibrillation (DSED) is a proposed treatment strategy for patients in refractory VF (RVF) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Defibrillator damage employing DSED is a theoretical concern expressed by defibrillator manufacturers yet the incidence of damage during resuscitation remains unknown.

Objective

We sought to explore the incidence of defibrillator damage employing DSED for RVF during OHCA.

Methods

We conducted a survey of EMS agencies, authors of previous publications, EMS medical directors, base hospital medical oversight groups, and defibrillator manufacturers to assess the incidence of defibrillator damage during DSED. Our survey focused on the frequency of DSED use, number of shocks used during DSED, technique used to employ DSED (simultaneous or sequential), and the incidence of defibrillator damage during DSED. We specifically targeted groups that were known to be using DSED in clinical practice.

Results

Our survey response rate was 50% (65/129): 61% (34/56) EMS medical directors, 60% (6/10) authors, 100% (8/8) base hospitals, 33% (1/3) defibrillator manufacturers, 31% (16/52) paramedic services. In our case-based analysis the overall incidence of defibrillator damage was 0.4%. The incidence of defibrillator damage based on total number of DSED shocks was estimated between 0.11% and 0.22%. All reported cases of defibrillator damage occurred using a simultaneous defibrillation technique.

Conclusion

When DSED is employed using either a sequential or simultaneous technique the rate of defibrillator damage appears to be exceedingly low. Further high-quality evidence is required to determine the impact of DSED on patient centered outcomes, but the incidence of defibrillator damage should not limit it use. Defibrillator damage should continue to be monitored in future trials and clinical practice.

Central nervous system physiology

This is the second chapter of the series on the use of clinical neurophysiology for the study of movement disorders. It focusses on methods that can be used to probe neural circuits in brain and spinal cord. These include use of spinal and supraspinal reflexes to probe the integrity of transmission in specific pathways; transcranial methods of brain stimulation such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation, which activate or modulate (respectively) the activity of populations of central neurones; EEG methods, both in conjunction with brain stimulation or with behavioural measures that record the activity of populations of central neurones; and pure behavioural measures that allow us to build conceptual models of motor control. The methods are discussed mainly in relation to work on healthy individuals. Later chapters will focus specifically on changes caused by pathology.

Short-latency inhibition mitigates the relationship between conscious movement processing and overly cautious gait

BACKGROUND

Overly cautious gait is common in older adults. This is characterised by excessively slow gait, shortened steps, broadened base of support and increased double limb support. The current study sought to (1) evaluate if overly cautious gait is associated with attempts to consciously process walking movements, and (2) explore whether an individual's ability to rapidly inhibit a dominant motor response serves to mitigate this relationship.

METHODS

A total of 50 older adults walked at a self-selected pace on an instrumented walkway containing two raised wooden obstacles (height = 23 cm). Trait conscious movement processing was measured with the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale. Short-latency inhibitory function was assessed using a validated electronic go/no-go ruler catch protocol. We used linear regressions to explore the relationship between these variables and gait parameters indicative of overly cautious gait.

RESULTS

When controlling for general cognitive function (MoCA), and functional balance (Berg Balance Scale), the interaction between trait conscious movement processing and short-latency inhibition capacity significantly predicted gait velocity, step length and double limb support. Specifically, older adults with higher trait conscious movement processing and poorer inhibition were more likely to exhibit gait characteristics indicative of cautious gait (i.e. reduced velocity, shorter step lengths and increased double limb support). Neither conscious movement processing nor inhibition independently predicted gait performance.

CONCLUSION

The combination of excessive movement processing tendencies and poor short-latency inhibitory capacity was associated with dysfunctional or 'overly cautious' gait. It is therefore plausible that improvement in either factor may lead to improved gait and reduced fall risk.

The Applicability of the Poincaré Plot in the Analysis of Variability of Reaction Time during Serial Testing

(1) Background: This study aims to put into evince the relationship between the variability of the reaction time (RT) during repeated testing, expressed through indicators extracted by the Poincaré plot method, and the age of the participants, their self-reported health (SRH), and level of perceived anxiety. (2) Methods: The study was performed using computerized RT testing software. An observational cross-sectional study was performed on a group of 120 subjects (mean age 42.33 ± 21.12 years), sex ratio men to women 1.14:1. Data were processed through descriptive and inferential statistics. The Poincaré plot method was applied in the analysis of the RT series of data, by calculating the indicators SD₁, SD₂, SD₁/SD₂, and area of the fitting ellipse (AFE) (3) Results: We provided evidence of the excellent reliability of the web-based RT serial testing (Cronbach’s Alpha 0.991) with this sample group. Our results showed that age is an important predictor for mean values of RT, while SD₁, SD₂, and AFE indicators are for SRH (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: the variability of RT, expressed by the Poincaré plot indicators, reflects the health status rather than the aging of the subjects and is barely influenced by their level of anxiety.

Age Differences in the Subcomponents of Executive Functioning

OBJECTIVES

Across the life span, deficits in executive functioning (EF) are associated with poor behavioral control and failure to achieve goals. Though EF is often discussed as one broad construct, a prominent model of EF suggests that it is composed of three subdomains: inhibition, set shifting, and updating. These subdomains are seen in both younger (YA) and older adults (OA), with performance deficits across subdomains in OA. Therefore, our goal was to investigate whether subdomains of EF might be differentially affected by age, and how these differences may relate to broader global age differences in EF.

METHODS

To assess these age differences, we conducted a meta-analysis at multiple levels, including task level, subdomain level, and of global EF. Based on previous work, we hypothesized that there would be overall differences in EF in OA.

RESULTS

Using 1,268 effect sizes from 401 articles, we found overall differences in EF with age. Results suggested that differences in performance are not uniform, such that variability in age effects emerged at the task level, and updating was not as affected by age as other subdomains.

DISCUSSION

These findings advance our understanding of age differences in EF, and stand to inform early detection of EF decline.

Neurocognitive and Muscular Capacities Are Associated with Frailty in Adults with Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Frailty is common in cirrhosis and associated with mortality, hospitalization, and reduced quality of life. Interventions aimed at forestalling frailty are limited by a lack of understanding of underlying physiologic deficits.

AIMS

This study's aim was to examine contributions of discrete sensorimotor and neurocognitive capacities to conventional frailty measures of unipedal stance time, chair stands, and grip strength.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled 119 outpatients with cirrhosis (50% female, aged 62.9 ± 7.3 years). Capacities included sensory (lower limb sensation and visual contrast), neurocognitive (Number Connection Tests A and B, simple and recognition reaction time), and muscular (hip/core strength determined by lateral plank time (LPT)). Bivariate analyses and linear regression models were performed to identify significant contributors to each frailty measure.

RESULTS

The average performance was 9.8 ± 3.9 chair stands, 12.7 s ±9.9 unipedal stance time, and 60.3 ± 25.6 lb grip strength. In multivariate models, factors explained 40% of variance in unipedal stance and 43% of variance in chair stands. The LPT was most strongly associated with unipedal stance and chair stands. Grip strength was associated with LPT, but did not have physiologic predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically useful measures of frailty in adults with cirrhosis can be explained by disease severity but also deficits in strength and neurocognitive function. Recognition reaction time, a novel measure in cirrhosis, had a significant contribution to frailty. These findings have implications for frailty assessment and suggest that the optimal rehabilitation approach to frailty targets neurocognitive function in addition to strengthening.

A clinical method of evaluating simple reaction time and reaction accuracy is sensitive to a single dose of lorazepam

RATIONALE

Benzodiazepines are useful and commonly prescribed. Unfortunately, they are associated with subtle but functionally significant neurocognitive side effects that increase the risk of motor vehicle accidents and falls.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether clinically feasible measures of simple reaction time and reaction accuracy are sensitive to a single dose of lorazepam.

METHODS

Using a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, 26 healthy adults (13 women; age = 26.9 ± 8.2 yr) were given 1.0 mg lorazepam or placebo 90 minutes prior to two data collection sessions. Participants completed simple and reaction accuracy tasks using a standardized "ruler drop" testing paradigm during each session. Outcomes were mean and variability of simple reaction time and reaction accuracy, which evaluates a participant's ability to catch the device solely on the random 50% of trials that lights affixed to it illuminate on release. Reaction accuracy requires a go/no-go decision within 420 ms before the falling device strikes the floor.

RESULTS

As compared with placebo, lorazepam increased simple reaction time variability (range = 43 ± 18 vs. 60 ± 23 ms, respectively; p = 0.004 and standard deviation = 14.6 ± 5.7 vs. 19.7 ± 7.3 ms, respectively; = 0.006) and decreased reaction accuracy (90 ± 7% vs. 84 ± 11%, respectively; p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Given prior work demonstrating associations between simple reaction time and reaction accuracy and functional outcomes such as self-protection, response to perturbations, and fall risk, these clinically available measures may have a role in identifying subtle, functionally significant cognitive changes related to short-term benzodiazepine use.

Catch the ruler: concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the ReacStick measures of reaction time and inhibitory executive function in older people

BACKGROUND

Reduced cognitive function, particularly executive function (EF), is associated with an increased risk of falling in older people. We evaluated the utility of the ReacStick test, a clinical test of reaction time, and inhibitory EF developed, for young athletes, for fall-risk assessment in older people.

AIMS

To evaluate the psychometric properties of ReacStick measures of reaction time and executive functioning in healthy community-dwelling older people.

METHODS

140 participants (aged 77 ± 5 years) underwent testing. Two test conditions-simple and inhibitory go/no-go-provided measures of reaction time, recognition load (difference in reaction time between conditions), and go/no-go accuracy. Concurrent validity was evaluated against the conventional tests of reaction time and EF (simple hand reaction time, trail-making test, and Stroop colour test). Discriminant ability was determined for fall-risk factors (age, gender, physiological profile assessment, and fall history). Test-retest reliability after 1 week was evaluated in 30 participants.

RESULTS

ReacStick reaction time correlated with tests of reaction time and EF, recognition load correlated with inhibitory EF, and go accuracy correlated with reaction time and inhibitory EF. No-go accuracy was not significantly correlated with any of the reaction time and EF tests. Test-retest reliability was good-to-excellent (ICC > 0.6) for all the outcomes. ReacStick reaction time discriminated between groups based on age, recognition load between genders, and no-go accuracy between retrospective fallers and non-fallers.

DISCUSSION

An unavoidable time pressure may result in complementary information to the traditional measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The ReacStick is a reliable test of reaction time and inhibitory EF in older people and could have value for fall-risk assessment.

Examining Practice and Learning Effects With Serial Administration of the Clinical Reaction Time Test in Healthy Young Athletes

Context: The clinical reaction time (RTclin) test has been recommended as a valid test for assessing concussion and determining recovery of reaction time function following concussion. However, it is unknown whether repeat assessment, as is used in postconcussion testing, is affected by learning or practice phenomena. Objective: To determine if a practice or learning effect is present with serial administration of the RTclin test. Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: University athletic training clinics. Participants: A total of 112 healthy collegiate athletes (age = 19.46 [1.34] y). Interventions: The control group completed the RTclin test on days 1 and 60. The experimental group completed the RTclin test on days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 60. Main Outcome Measure: Reaction time as measured with the RTclin test. Results: The difference in RTclin test performance from day 1 to day 60 was not significant (mean change = −2.77 [14.46] ms, P = .42, 95% confidence intervals, −6.40 to 0.862) between groups. The experimental group experienced significant improvement (λ = 0.784, F4,49 = 3.365, P = .02, η2 = .216, power = 0.81) with acute repeat testing. However, post hoc analysis did not reveal a significant difference between scores during the 5 test periods. Conclusions: The results suggest serial administration of the RTclin test does not produce a practice or learning effect. Clinicians, however, should be cautious as the results do provide evidence patients may demonstrate improved scores when testing occurs on repetitive days after initial exposure to the test.

Do Neurocognitive SCAT3 Baseline Test Scores Differ Between Footballers (Soccer) Living With and Without Disability? A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if baseline Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, third Edition (SCAT3) scores differ between athletes with and without disability.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparison of preseason baseline SCAT3 scores for a range of England international footballers.

SETTING

Team doctors and physiotherapists supporting England football teams recorded players' SCAT 3 baseline tests from August 1, 2013 to July 31, 2014.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 249 England footballers, of whom 185 were players without disability (male: 119; female: 66) and 64 were players with disability (male learning disability: 17; male cerebral palsy: 28; male blind: 10; female deaf: 9).

ASSESSMENT AND OUTCOME MEASURES

Between-group comparisons of median SCAT3 total and section scores were made using nonparametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon ranked-sum test.

MAIN RESULTS

All footballers with disability scored higher symptom severity scores compared with male players without disability. Male footballers with learning disability demonstrated no significant difference in the total number of symptoms, but recorded significantly lower scores on immediate memory and delayed recall compared with male players without disability. Male blind footballers' scored significantly higher for total concentration and delayed recall, and male footballers with cerebral palsy scored significantly higher on balance testing and immediate memory, when compared with male players without disability. Female footballers with deafness scored significantly higher for total concentration and balance testing than female footballers without disability.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that significant differences exist between SCAT3 baseline section scores for footballers with and without disability. Concussion consensus guidelines should recognize these differences and produce guidelines that are specific for the growing number of athletes living with disability.

Concussion: pathophysiology and clinical translation

The majority of the 3.8 million estimated annual traumatic brain injuries (TBI) in the United States are mild TBIs, or concussions, and they occur primarily in adolescents and young adults. A concussion is a brain injury associated with rapid brain movement and characteristic clinical symptoms, with no associated objective biomarkers or overt pathologic brain changes, thereby making it difficult to diagnose by neuroimaging or other objective diagnostic tests. Most concussion symptoms are transient and resolve within 1-2 weeks. Concussions share similar acute pathophysiologic perturbations to more severe TBI: there is a rapid release of neurotransmitters, which causes ionic disequilibrium across neuronal membranes. Re-establishing ionic homeostasis consumes energy and leads to dynamic changes in cerebral glucose uptake. The magnitude and duration of these changes are related to injury severity, with milder injuries showing faster normalization. Cerebral sex differences add further variation to concussion manifestation. Relative to the male brain, the female brain has higher overall cerebral blood flow, and demonstrates regional differences in glucose metabolism, inflammatory responses, and connectivity. Understanding the pathophysiology and clinical translation of concussion can move research towards management paradigms that will minimize the risk for prolonged recovery and repeat injury.

Complex and Simple Clinical Reaction Times Are Associated with Gait, Balance, and Major Fall Injury in Older Subjects with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to identify relationships between complex and simple clinical measures of reaction time (RTclin) and indicators of balance in older subjects with and without diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort design. Complex RTclin accuracy, simple RTclin latency, and their ratio were determined using a novel device in 42 subjects (mean ± SD age, 69.1 ± 8.3 yrs), 26 with DPN and 16 without. Dependent variables included unipedal stance time (UST), step width variability and range on an uneven surface, and major fall-related injury over 12 months.

RESULTS

In the DPN subjects, the ratio of complex RTclin accuracy to simple RTclin latency was strongly associated with longer UST (R/P = 0.653/0.004), and decreased step width variability and range (R/P = -0.696/0.001 and -0.782/<0.001, respectively) on an uneven surface. Additionally, the 2 DPN subjects sustaining major injuries had lower complex RTclin accuracy:simple RTclin latency than those without.

CONCLUSIONS

The ratio of complex RTclin accuracy:simple RTclin latency is a potent predictor of UST and frontal plane gait variability in response to perturbations and may predict major fall injury in older subjects with DPN. These short latency neurocognitive measures may compensate for lower limb neuromuscular impairments and provide a more comprehensive understanding of balance and fall risk.

RELIABILITY AND CRITERION VALIDITY OF A NOVEL CLINICAL TEST OF SIMPLE AND COMPLEX REACTION TIME IN ATHLETES

Slowed reaction time (RT) represents both a risk factor for and a consequence of sport concussion. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and criterion validity of a novel clinical test of simple and complex RT, called RT(clin), in contact sport athletes. Both tasks were adapted from the well-known ruler drop test of RT and involve manually grasping a falling vertical shaft upon its release, with the complex task employing a go/no-go paradigm based on a light cue. In 46 healthy contact sport athletes (24 men; M = 16.3 yr., SD = 5.0; 22 women: M age = 15.0 yr., SD = 4.0) whose sports included soccer, ice hockey, American football, martial arts, wrestling, and lacrosse, the latency and accuracy of simple and complex RT(clin) had acceptable test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities and correlated with a computerized criterion standard, the Axon Computerized Cognitive Assessment Tool. Medium to large effect sizes were found. The novel RT(clin) tests have acceptable reliability and criterion validity for clinical use and hold promise as concussion assessment tools.