2
|
Ahluwalia S, Reddy NK, Johnson R, Emanuel L, Knight SJ. Dyadic Model of Adaptation to Life-Limiting Illness. J Palliat Med 2020; 23:1177-1183. [PMID: 32109183 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: We previously developed the reintegration model to describe the adjustment process for individuals at the end of life. However, caregivers and loved ones also require significant support and must work to reimagine their relationship with one another. Objectives: We sought to develop a dyadic version of the reintegration model that delineates key parts of the adjustment process that occur between the patient and another significant person rather than as two separate individuals. Methods: We refined an initial conceptual model of this dyadic process with findings from a narrative literature review on spousal dyadic mutuality. We assessed emergent themes regarding dyadic adjustment from the literature for their fit with our original reintegration model and through consensus discussion, applied the findings to a final proposed conceptual model of dyadic reintegration at the end of life. Results: Examples of dyadic adjustment in the literature relate to the comprehension, creative adaptation, and reintegration processes described in the original reintegration model. Evidence also supported three substantive additions in the new dyadic model: (1) shared understanding that the harmony of the dyad is interrupted; (2) consideration of the "we" (the dyad) and the "I" (the individual) in mutual reflection to create a shared narrative; and (3) emphasis on relationship as a factor impacting adjustment processes. Conclusions: Available evidence supports interdependent relationships between members of dyads for the three adaptation processes of comprehension, creative adaptation, and reintegration in the model. This dyadic reintegration model can be useful in clinical practice to support dyads facing life-limiting illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeeta Ahluwalia
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.,UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Neha K Reddy
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rebecca Johnson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Linda Emanuel
- General Medicine Division, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sara J Knight
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lewis K, Kulkarni S, Adams SA, Brandt HM, Lead JR, Ureda JR, Fedrick D, Mathews C, Friedman DB. "For lack of knowledge, our people will perish": Using focus group methodology to explore African-American communities' perceptions of breast cancer and the environment. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2018; 121:111-118. [PMID: 30195624 PMCID: PMC6221986 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Among women living in the United States, breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death. Disproportionate racial disparities in breast cancer exist, with African American (AA) women consistently having the highest rates of breast cancer related mortality despite lower incidence. This study attends to the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) call to action recommending the identification of effective strategies for communicating accurate and reliable breast cancer risk information to diverse audiences. Using focus group methodology, this study explores how AAs perceive and decipher information related to breast cancer and its relationship to their environment. Six focus groups were conducted. The sample (n = 50) was African American, 98% female, with an average age of 50.1 years. The focus group protocol consisted of open-ended questions designed to elicit information about participants' perceptions of their environment and its link to breast cancer. Focus groups were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. Analysis of the focus group transcripts revealed themes pertaining to these categories: (1) general knowledge and beliefs about breast cancer, (2) perceived environmental risks factors for breast cancer, (3) importance of seeking knowledge about breast cancer and the environment, and (4) recommended communication strategies. The emergent themes reflect the knowledge participants possessed about breast cancer and environmental risk factors, in addition to concerns about the importance of possessing accurate information, and how culturally appropriate health communication strategies can be used to disseminate breast cancer knowledge in the community. Findings from this study can be used for culturally appropriate communication about breast cancer and the environment with AA communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaleea Lewis
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208; Lewis: ; Kulkarni: ; Brandt: ; Friedman
| | - Shibani Kulkarni
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208; Lewis: ; Kulkarni: ; Brandt: ; Friedman
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208; Adams:
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Discovery 1 Building, Suite 200, 915 Greene Street Columbia, SC 29208
| | - Heather M. Brandt
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208; Lewis: ; Kulkarni: ; Brandt: ; Friedman
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Discovery 1 Building, Suite 200, 915 Greene Street Columbia, SC 29208
| | - Jamie R. Lead
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208; Lead:
- Center for Environmental Nanoscience and Risk, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208
| | - John R. Ureda
- Insights Consulting, Inc., 1441 St Andrews Rd, Columbia, SC 29210; Ureda:
| | - Delores Fedrick
- Chester County Literacy Council, 109 Ella Street Chester, SC 29706; Fedrick:
| | - Chris Mathews
- Turning Pages Greater Columbia Literacy Council, 4840 Forest Drive, Suite 6B-PMB 267 Columbia, SC 29206; Mathews:
| | - Daniela B. Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208; Lewis: ; Kulkarni: ; Brandt: ; Friedman
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Discovery 1 Building, Suite 200, 915 Greene Street Columbia, SC 29208
| |
Collapse
|