Forward and backward masking: a comparison

Metacontrast masking is ineffective in the first 6 months of life

Metacontrast masking is one of the most widely studied types of visual masking, in which a visual stimulus is rendered invisible by a subsequent mask that does not spatially overlap with the target. Metacontrast has been used for many decades as a tool to study visual processing and conscious perception in adults. However, there are so far no infant studies on metacontrast and it remains unknown even whether it occurs in infants. The present study examined metacontrast masking in 3- to 8-month-old infants (N = 168) using a habituation paradigm. We found that metacontrast is ineffective for infants under 7 months and that younger infants can perceive a masked stimulus that older infants cannot. Our results suggest that metacontrast is distinct from other simple types of masking that occur in early infancy, and would be consistent with the idea that metacontrast results from the disruption of recurrent processing.

Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing

In visual backward masking paradigms, the visibility of a target is reduced using various kinds of mask stimuli presented immediately after the target. Four-dot masking is one such kind of backward masking, caused by four surrounding dots neither spatially adjacent nor similar to the target. Four-dot masking is often considered to involve object-level interferences. However, low-level contributions such as lateral inhibition and motion detection are also possible. To elucidate the loci of the underlying mechanism within the visual hierarchy, we compared the masking effect between monoptic and dichoptic viewing conditions. A target and a four-dot mask, which also served as a spatial cue to the target location, were presented to the same eye in monoptic viewing, whereas they were presented to different eyes in dichoptic viewing. Observers were then asked to discriminate the target shape. We found a significant decline in the correct response rate compared to the baseline condition in which the four-dot mask was not presented, and the masking effect was equivalent between the monoptic and dichoptic viewings. These results demonstrate that four-dot masking stems exclusively from processing within the binocular pathway.

Spatial congruency bias in identifying objects is triggered by retinal position congruence: Examination using the Ternus-Pikler illusion

When two different objects are sequentially presented at the same location, the viewer tends to misjudge them as identical (spatial congruency bias). The present study examined whether the spatial congruency bias would involve not only retinotopic but also non-retinotopic processing using the Ternus-Pikler illusion. In the experiments, two objects (central and peripheral) appeared in an initial frame. The target object was presented in the central area of the display, while the peripheral object was either on the left or right side of the target object. In the second frame, the target object was again presented in the central area, and the peripheral object was on the opposite side. Two kinds of inter-stimulus intervals were used. In the no-blank condition, the target object was perceived as stationary, and the peripheral object appeared to move to the opposite side. However, in the long-blank condition, the two objects were perceived to move together. Participants judged whether the target objects in the two frames were identical. As a result, the spatial congruency bias occurred irrespective of the ISI conditions. Our findings suggest that the spatial congruency bias is mainly based on retinotopic processing.

Masking reduces orientation selectivity in rat visual cortex

In visual masking the perception of a target stimulus is impaired by a preceding (forward) or succeeding (backward) mask stimulus. The illusion is of interest because it allows uncoupling of the physical stimulus, its neuronal representation, and its perception. To understand the neuronal correlates of masking, we examined how masks affected the neuronal responses to oriented target stimuli in the primary visual cortex (V1) of anesthetized rats (n = 37). Target stimuli were circular gratings with 12 orientations; mask stimuli were plaids created as a binarized sum of all possible target orientations. Spatially, masks were presented either overlapping or surrounding the target. Temporally, targets and masks were presented for 33 ms, but the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of their relative appearance was varied. For the first time, we examine how spatially overlapping and center-surround masking affect orientation discriminability (rather than visibility) in V1. Regardless of the spatial or temporal arrangement of stimuli, the greatest reductions in firing rate and orientation selectivity occurred for the shortest SOAs. Interestingly, analyses conducted separately for transient and sustained target response components showed that changes in orientation selectivity do not always coincide with changes in firing rate. Given the near-instantaneous reductions observed in orientation selectivity even when target and mask do not spatially overlap, we suggest that monotonic visual masking is explained by a combination of neural integration and lateral inhibition.

Chapter 11 Visual masking approaches to visual awareness

In visual masking, visible targets are rendered invisible by modifying the context in which they are presented, but not by modifying the targets themselves. Here I summarize a decade of experimentation using visual masking illusions in which my colleagues and I have begun to establish the minimal set of conditions necessary to maintain the awareness of the visibility of simple unattended stimuli. We have established that spatiotemporal edges must be present for targets to be visible. These spatiotemporal edges must be encoded by transient bursts of spikes in the early visual system. If these bursts are inhibited, visibility fails. Target-correlated activity must rise within the visual hierarchy at least to the level of V3, and be processed within the occipital lobe, to achieve visibility. The specific circuits that maintain visibility are not yet known, but we have deduced that lateral inhibition plays a critical role in sculpting our perception of visibility, both by causing interactions between stimuli positioned across space, and also by shaping the responses to stimuli across time. Further, the studies have served to narrow the number of possible theories to explain visibility and visual masking. Finally, we have discovered that lateral inhibition builds iteratively in strength throughout the visual hierarchy, for both monoptic and dichoptic stimuli. Since binocular information is not integrated until inputs from the two eyes reach the primary visual cortex, it follows that the early visual areas contain differential levels of monoptic and dichoptic lateral inhibitions. We exploited this fact to discover that excitatory integration of binocular inputs occurs at an earlier level than interocular suppression. These findings are potentially fundamental to our understanding of all forms of binocular vision and to determining the role of binocular rivalry in visual awareness.

The early facilitatory effect of a peripheral spatially noninformative prime stimulus depends on target stimulus features

We investigated the dependency of the early facilitatory effect of a prime stimulus (S1) on the physical characteristics of the target stimulus (S2). A go-no go reaction time paradigm was used. The S1 was a gray ring and the S2s were a white vertical line, a white horizontal line, a white cross and a white small ring, all inside a white ring with the same dimensions as the S1. S1 onset-S2 onset asynchrony was 100 ms. The stimuli appeared randomly in any one of the quadrants of a monitor screen. The S2 could occur at the same position as the S1 or at a different one. We observed a strong facilitatory effect when the vertical line or the horizontal line was the go stimulus and no effect when the cross was the go stimulus. These results show that the features of the target stimulus can be decisive for the appearance of the facilitatory effect of a peripheral spatially noninformative prime stimulus.

Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system

A brief visual target stimulus may be rendered invisible if it is immediately preceded or followed by another stimulus. This class of illusions, known as visual masking, may allow insights into the neural mechanisms that underlie visual perception. We have therefore explored the temporal characteristics of masking illusions in humans, and compared them with corresponding neuronal responses in the primary visual cortex of awake and anesthetized monkeys. Stimulus parameters that in humans produce forward masking (in which the mask precedes the target) suppress the transient on-response to the target in monkey visual cortex. Those that produce backward masking (in which the mask comes after the target) inhibit the transient after-discharge, the excitatory response that occurs just after the disappearance of the target. These results suggest that, for targets that can be masked (those of short duration), the transient neuronal responses associated with onset and turning off of the target may be important in its visibility.

Abnormal electrophysiological responses to successive stimuli in patients with cortical damage or multiple sclerosis

We studied the cortical potentials of normal subjects and patients with unilateral hemisphere damage to two simultaneous or successive stimuli. Both groups showed variations in the interaction between the signals evoked by the stimuli as a function of interstimulus interval. However, the anomalous stimulus-response function obtained from the patient group suggests pathological signal interaction. Data obtained from patients with multiple sclerosis were similar to those of the cortical-injury group suggesting that localized cerebral damage is not requisite for the disturbed profiles. We hypothesize that the results indicate abnormal temporal processing by these patients and propose that the defect may underlie visual illusions reported by patients with cerebral pathology.

The effect of forward and backward masking by flash on apparent size

Subjects observed a briefly exposed square and set a variable square to match its size. In experiment 1 the square was black or white and was preceded or followed by a flash of light. The preceding adaptation field was complete darkness or an illuminated field. Marked underestimation of size occurred when flash followed the square in all conditions, compared with trials with no flash. Preceding flash produced a small reversal of this effect, the extent of which depended on whether the square was black or white. Absence of an illuminated adaptation field reduced estimates in all conditions except those where flash preceded the square. In experiment 2, a black square was used, and the stimulus duration and the interval between stimulus and flash were varied. No significant effects were found with preceding flash. When flash followed the square, apparent size increased linearly over the first 300 ms with the logarithm of the interval between onset of the square and onset of the flash, then levelled off. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the reduction in apparent size occurred with figure and interfering flash delivered to the same eye but not with dichoptic interference. The results are explained by reference to a suggestion of Georgeson that the optimum frequency of spatially tuned receptors decreases in impoverished viewing conditions. Hence the presented figures trigger receptors which normally are responsive to smaller figures, and the presented figures are therefore categorized as being smaller than they really are.

Retroactive contour enhancement: a new visual storage effect

A test stimulus (a visual form) which is below recognition threshold when flashed briefly against a steady background field can be raised to complete discriminability if the background field is terminated and replaced by darkness within about 100 msec of the test flash. There must therefore be an efficient storage process for the apparently “invisible” form. The phenomenon is shown to occur under a variety of conditions. It appears not to be a simple visual masking phenomenon. The tasks used are forced-choice, and the phenomenon provides a new demonstration of visual storage effects which previously have generally been reported only for supraliminal visual test stimuli.