1
|
Díez-Vives C, Koutsouveli V, Conejero M, Riesgo A. Global patterns in symbiont selection and transmission strategies in sponges. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.1015592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Sponges host dense and diverse communities of microbes (known as the microbiome) beneficial for the host nutrition and defense. Symbionts in turn receive shelter and metabolites from the sponge host, making their relationship beneficial for both partners. Given that sponge-microbes associations are fundamental for the survival of both, especially the sponge, such relationship is maintained through their life and even passed on to the future generations. In many organisms, the microbiome has profound effects on the development of the host, but the influence of the microbiome on the reproductive and developmental pathways of the sponges are less understood. In sponges, microbes are passed on to oocytes, sperm, embryos, and larvae (known as vertical transmission), using a variety of methods that include direct uptake from the mesohyl through phagocytosis by oocytes to indirect transmission to the oocyte by nurse cells. Such microbes can remain in the reproductive elements untouched, for transfer to offspring, or can be digested to make the yolky nutrient reserves of oocytes and larvae. When and how those decisions are made are fundamentally unanswered questions in sponge reproduction. Here we review the diversity of vertical transmission modes existent in the entire phylum Porifera through detailed imaging using electron microscopy, available metabarcoding data from reproductive elements, and macroevolutionary patterns associated to phylogenetic constraints. Additionally, we examine the fidelity of this vertical transmission and possible reasons for the observed variability in some developmental stages. Our current understanding in marine sponges, however, is that the adult microbial community is established by a combination of both vertical and horizontal (acquisition from the surrounding environment in each new generation) transmission processes, although the extent in which each mode shapes the adult microbiome still remains to be determined. We also assessed the fundamental role of filtration, the cellular structures for acquiring external microbes, and the role of the host immune system, that ultimately shapes the stable communities of prokaryotes observed in adult sponges.
Collapse
|
2
|
Utilization of Legume-Nodule Bacterial Symbiosis in Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:biology11050676. [PMID: 35625404 PMCID: PMC9138774 DOI: 10.3390/biology11050676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Simple Summary The legume–rhizobium symbiosis is one of the most beneficial interactions with high importance in agriculture, as it delivers nitrogen to plants and soil, thereby enhancing plant growth. Currently, this symbiosis is increasingly being exploited in phytoremediation of metal contaminated soil to improve soil fertility and simultaneously metal extraction or stabilization. Rhizobia increase phytoremediation directly by nitrogen fixation, protection of plants from pathogens, and production of plant growth-promoting factors and phytohormones. Abstract With the increasing industrial activity of the growing human population, the accumulation of various contaminants in soil, including heavy metals, has increased rapidly. Heavy metals as non-biodegradable elements persist in the soil environment and may pollute crop plants, further accumulating in the human body causing serious conditions. Hence, phytoremediation of land contamination as an environmental restoration technology is desirable for both human health and broad-sense ecology. Legumes (Fabaceae), which play a special role in nitrogen cycling, are dominant plants in contaminated areas. Therefore, the use of legumes and associated nitrogen-fixing rhizobia to reduce the concentrations or toxic effects of contaminants in the soil is environmentally friendly and becomes a promising strategy for phytoremediation and phytostabilization. Rhizobia, which have such plant growth-promoting (PGP) features as phosphorus solubilization, phytohormone synthesis, siderophore release, production of beneficial compounds for plants, and most of all nitrogen fixation, may promote legume growth while diminishing metal toxicity. The aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive description of the main effects of metal contaminants in nitrogen-fixing leguminous plants and the benefits of using the legume–rhizobium symbiosis with both wild-type and genetically modified plants and bacteria to enhance an efficient recovery of contaminated lands.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kohlmeier MG, White CE, Fowler JE, Finan TM, Oresnik IJ. Galactitol catabolism in Sinorhizobium meliloti is dependent on a chromosomally encoded sorbitol dehydrogenase and a pSymB-encoded operon necessary for tagatose catabolism. Mol Genet Genomics 2019; 294:739-755. [DOI: 10.1007/s00438-019-01545-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
4
|
Sánchez-Cañizares C, Jorrín B, Durán D, Nadendla S, Albareda M, Rubio-Sanz L, Lanza M, González-Guerrero M, Prieto RI, Brito B, Giglio MG, Rey L, Ruiz-Argüeso T, Palacios JM, Imperial J. Genomic Diversity in the Endosymbiotic Bacterium Rhizobium leguminosarum. Genes (Basel) 2018; 9:E60. [PMID: 29364862 PMCID: PMC5852556 DOI: 10.3390/genes9020060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae is a soil α-proteobacterium that establishes a diazotrophic symbiosis with different legumes of the Fabeae tribe. The number of genome sequences from rhizobial strains available in public databases is constantly increasing, although complete, fully annotated genome structures from rhizobial genomes are scarce. In this work, we report and analyse the complete genome of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae UPM791. Whole genome sequencing can provide new insights into the genetic features contributing to symbiotically relevant processes such as bacterial adaptation to the rhizosphere, mechanisms for efficient competition with other bacteria, and the ability to establish a complex signalling dialogue with legumes, to enter the root without triggering plant defenses, and, ultimately, to fix nitrogen within the host. Comparison of the complete genome sequences of two strains of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae, 3841 and UPM791, highlights the existence of different symbiotic plasmids and a common core chromosome. Specific genomic traits, such as plasmid content or a distinctive regulation, define differential physiological capabilities of these endosymbionts. Among them, strain UPM791 presents unique adaptations for recycling the hydrogen generated in the nitrogen fixation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Sánchez-Cañizares
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, OX1 3RB Oxford, UK
| | - Beatriz Jorrín
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, OX1 3RB Oxford, UK
| | - David Durán
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, Calle Francisco Tomás y Valiente 7, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Suvarna Nadendla
- Institute for Genome Sciences (IGS), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; (S.N.); (M.G.G.)
| | - Marta Albareda
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Rubio-Sanz
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Mónica Lanza
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel González-Guerrero
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Isabel Prieto
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Belén Brito
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Michelle G. Giglio
- Institute for Genome Sciences (IGS), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; (S.N.); (M.G.G.)
| | - Luis Rey
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Tomás Ruiz-Argüeso
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - José M. Palacios
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Imperial
- Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)—Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo UPM, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (B.J.); (D.D.); (M.A.); (L.R.-S.); (M.L.); (M.G.-G.); (R.I.P.); (B.B.); (L.R.)
- Departamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaría y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Serrano 115 bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Provorov NA, Andronov EE. Evolution of root nodule bacteria: Reconstruction of the speciation processes resulting from genomic rearrangements in a symbiotic system. Microbiology (Reading) 2016. [DOI: 10.1134/s0026261716020156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
6
|
Provorov NA, Tikhonovich IA. Bacterial genome evolution in superspecies systems: An approach to the reconstruction of symbiogenesis processes. RUSS J GENET+ 2015. [DOI: 10.1134/s1022795414080043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
7
|
Provorov NA, Onishchuk OP, Yurgel SN, Kurchak ON, Chizhevskaya EP, Vorobyov NI, Zatovskaya TV, Simarov BV. Construction of highly-effective symbiotic bacteria: Evolutionary models and genetic approaches. RUSS J GENET+ 2014. [DOI: 10.1134/s1022795414110118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
The purpose of this essay is threefold: to give an outline of the life and the various achievements of Theodor Escherich, to provide a background to his discovery of what he called Bacterium coli commune (now Escherichia coli), and to indicate the enormous impact of studies with this organism, long before it became the cornerstone of research in bacteriology and in molecular biology.
Collapse
|
9
|
Laranjo M, Alexandre A, Oliveira S. Legume growth-promoting rhizobia: An overview on the Mesorhizobium genus. Microbiol Res 2014; 169:2-17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2013] [Revised: 09/16/2013] [Accepted: 09/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
10
|
Evolution of symbiotic bacteria within the extra- and intra-cellular plant compartments: experimental evidence and mathematical simulation (Mini-review). Symbiosis 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s13199-012-0220-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
11
|
Harrison PW, Lower RPJ, Kim NKD, Young JPW. Introducing the bacterial 'chromid': not a chromosome, not a plasmid. Trends Microbiol 2010; 18:141-8. [PMID: 20080407 DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 246] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2009] [Revised: 12/02/2009] [Accepted: 12/04/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In addition to the main chromosome, approximately one in ten bacterial genomes have a 'second chromosome' or 'megaplasmid'. Here, we propose that these represent a single class of elements that have a distinct and consistent set of properties, and suggest the term 'chromid' to distinguish them from both chromosomes and plasmids. Chromids carry some core genes, and their nucleotide composition and codon usage are very similar to those of the chromosomes they are associated with. By contrast, they have plasmid replication and partitioning systems and the majority of their genes confer accessory functions. Chromids seem particularly rich in genus-specific genes and appear to be 'reinvented' at the origin of a new genus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter W Harrison
- Department of Biology, University of York, PO Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Genetics and Evolution of Deep-Sea Chemosynthetic Bacteria and Their Invertebrate Hosts. TOPICS IN GEOBIOLOGY 2010. [DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9572-5_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
13
|
Laranjo M, Alexandre A, Rivas R, Velázquez E, Young JPW, Oliveira S. Chickpea rhizobia symbiosis genes are highly conserved across multiple Mesorhizobium species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2008; 66:391-400. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00584.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
14
|
|
15
|
Provorov NA, Vorobyov NI, Andronov EE. Macro- and microevolution of bacteria in symbiotic systems. RUSS J GENET+ 2008. [DOI: 10.1134/s102279540801002x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
16
|
Young JPW, Crossman LC, Johnston AWB, Thomson NR, Ghazoui ZF, Hull KH, Wexler M, Curson ARJ, Todd JD, Poole PS, Mauchline TH, East AK, Quail MA, Churcher C, Arrowsmith C, Cherevach I, Chillingworth T, Clarke K, Cronin A, Davis P, Fraser A, Hance Z, Hauser H, Jagels K, Moule S, Mungall K, Norbertczak H, Rabbinowitsch E, Sanders M, Simmonds M, Whitehead S, Parkhill J. The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components. Genome Biol 2006; 7:R34. [PMID: 16640791 PMCID: PMC1557990 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-r34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 362] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2006] [Revised: 02/20/2006] [Accepted: 03/22/2006] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rhizobium leguminosarum is an alpha-proteobacterial N2-fixing symbiont of legumes that has been the subject of more than a thousand publications. Genes for the symbiotic interaction with plants are well studied, but the adaptations that allow survival and growth in the soil environment are poorly understood. We have sequenced the genome of R. leguminosarum biovar viciae strain 3841. RESULTS The 7.75 Mb genome comprises a circular chromosome and six circular plasmids, with 61% G+C overall. All three rRNA operons and 52 tRNA genes are on the chromosome; essential protein-encoding genes are largely chromosomal, but most functional classes occur on plasmids as well. Of the 7,263 protein-encoding genes, 2,056 had orthologs in each of three related genomes (Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Sinorhizobium meliloti, and Mesorhizobium loti), and these genes were over-represented in the chromosome and had above average G+C. Most supported the rRNA-based phylogeny, confirming A. tumefaciens to be the closest among these relatives, but 347 genes were incompatible with this phylogeny; these were scattered throughout the genome but were over-represented on the plasmids. An unexpectedly large number of genes were shared by all three rhizobia but were missing from A. tumefaciens. CONCLUSION Overall, the genome can be considered to have two main components: a 'core', which is higher in G+C, is mostly chromosomal, is shared with related organisms, and has a consistent phylogeny; and an 'accessory' component, which is sporadic in distribution, lower in G+C, and located on the plasmids and chromosomal islands. The accessory genome has a different nucleotide composition from the core despite a long history of coexistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa C Crossman
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Nicholas R Thomson
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Margaret Wexler
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Andrew RJ Curson
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Jonathan D Todd
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Philip S Poole
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Tim H Mauchline
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Alison K East
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Michael A Quail
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carol Churcher
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Claire Arrowsmith
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Inna Cherevach
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tracey Chillingworth
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kay Clarke
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ann Cronin
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Davis
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Audrey Fraser
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Zahra Hance
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Heidi Hauser
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kay Jagels
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sharon Moule
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Karen Mungall
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Halina Norbertczak
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ester Rabbinowitsch
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mandy Sanders
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sally Whitehead
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julian Parkhill
- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Drawing on documents both published and archival, this paper explains how the prokaryote-eukaryote dichotomy of the 1960s was constructed, the purposes it served, and what it implied in terms of classification and phylogeny. In doing so, I first show how the concept was attributed to Edouard Chatton and the context in which he introduced the terms. Following, I examine the context in which the terms were reintroduced into biology in 1962 by Roger Stanier and C. B. van Niel. I study the discourse over the subsequent decade to understand how the organizational dichotomy took on the form of a natural classification as the kingdom Monera or superkingdom Procaryotae. Stanier and van Niel admitted that, in regard to constructing a natural classification of bacteria, structural characteristics were no more useful than physiological properties. They repeatedly denied that bacterial phylogenetics was possible. I thus examine the great historical irony that the "prokaryote," in both its organizational and phylogenetic senses, was defined (negatively) on the basis of structure. Finally, we see how phylogenetic research based on 16S rRNA led by Carl Woese and his collaborators confronted the prokaryote concept while moving microbiology to the center of evolutionary biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Sapp
- Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert C Friedmann
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Egan ES, Fogel MA, Waldor MK. MicroReview: Divided genomes: negotiating the cell cycle in prokaryotes with multiple chromosomes. Mol Microbiol 2005; 56:1129-38. [PMID: 15882408 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04622.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Historically, the prokaryotic genome was assumed to consist of a single circular replicon. However, as more microbial genome sequencing projects are completed, it is becoming clear that multipartite genomes comprised of more than one chromosome are not unusual among prokaryotes. Chromosomes are distinguished from plasmids by the presence of essential genes as well as characteristic cell cycle-linked replication kinetics; unlike plasmids, chromosomes initiate replication once per cell cycle. The existence of multipartite prokaryotic genomes raises several questions regarding how multiple chromosomes are replicated and segregated during the cell cycle. These divided genomes also introduce questions regarding chromosome evolution and genome stability. In this review, we discuss these and other issues, with particular emphasis on the cholera pathogen Vibrio cholerae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Egan
- Genetics Program, Tufts University School of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Caporale LH. Natural selection and the emergence of a mutation phenotype: an update of the evolutionary synthesis considering mechanisms that affect genome variation. Annu Rev Microbiol 2004; 57:467-85. [PMID: 14527288 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Most descriptions of evolution assume that all mutations are completely random with respect to their potential effects on survival. However, much like other phenotypic variations that affect the survival of the descendants, intrinsic variations in the probability, type, and location of genetic change can feel the pressure of natural selection. From site-specific recombination to changes in polymerase fidelity and repair of DNA damage, an organism's gene products affect what genetic changes occur in its genome. Through the action of natural selection on these gene products, potentially favorable mutations can become more probable than random. With examples from variation in bacterial surface proteins to the vertebrate immune response, it is clear that a great deal of genetic change is better than "random" with respect to its potential effect on survival. Indeed, some potentially useful mutations are so probable that they can be viewed as being encoded implicitly in the genome. An updated evolutionary theory includes emergence, under selective pressure, of genomic information that affects the probability of different classes of mutation, with consequences for genome survival.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bird DM, Opperman CH, Davies KG. Interactions between bacteria and plant-parasitic nematodes: now and then. Int J Parasitol 2003; 33:1269-76. [PMID: 13678641 DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00160-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Based on genome-to-genome analyses of gene sequences obtained from plant-parasitic, root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.), it seems likely that certain genes have been derived from bacteria by horizontal gene transfer. Strikingly, a common theme underpinning the function of these genes is their apparent direct relationship to the nematodes' parasitic lifestyle. Phylogenetic analyses implicate rhizobacteria as the predominant group of 'gene donor' bacteria. Root-knot nematodes and rhizobia occupy similar niches in the soil and in roots, and thus the opportunity for genetic exchange may be omnipresent. Further, both organisms establish intimate developmental interactions with host plants, and mounting evidence suggests that the mechanisms for these interactions are shared too. We propose that the origin of parasitism in Meloidogyne may have been facilitated by acquisition of genetic material from soil bacteria through horizontal transfer, and that such events represented key steps in speciation of plant-parasitic nematodes. To further understand the mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer, and also to provide experimental tools to manipulate this promising bio-control agent, we have initiated a genomic sequence of the bacterial hyper-parasite of plant parasitic nematodes, Pasteuria penetrans. Initial data have established that P. penetrans is closely related to Bacillus spp., to the extent that considerable genome synteny is apparent. Hence, Bacillus serves as a model for Pasteuria, and vice versa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David McK Bird
- Center for the Biology of Nematode Parasitism, Box 7253, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Van Elsas JD, Turner S, Bailey MJ. Horizontal gene transfer in the phytosphere. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2003; 157:525-537. [PMID: 33873398 DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00697.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Here, the ecological aspects of gene transfer processes between bacteria in the phytosphere are examined in the context of emerging evidence for the dominant role that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has played in the evolutionary shaping of bacterial communities. Moreover, the impact of the putative capture of genetic material by bacteria from plants is discussed. Examples are provided that illustrate how mobile genetic elements (MGEs) influence the behaviour of bacteria in their natural habitat, especially in structured communities such as biofilms on plant surfaces. This community behaviour is used as a framework to pose questions on the evolutionary role and significance of gene transfer processes in plant-associated habitats. Selection within the highly structured phytosphere is likely to represent a dominant force shaping the genetic make-up of plant-associated bacterial communities. Current understanding of the triggering and impact of horizontal gene transfer, however, remains limited by our lack of understanding of the nature of the selective forces that act on bacteria in situ. The individual, colony, population and community level selection benefits imposed by the ability to use specific carbon sources or survive selective compounds are clear, but it is not always possible to assess what drives gene transfer and persistence. The role of HGT in the adaptation of host bacteria to their environmental niche is still not fully understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Dirk Van Elsas
- Plant Research International, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Toro N, Martínez-Abarca F, Fernández-López M, Muñoz-Adelantado E. Diversity of group II introns in the genome of Sinorhizobium meliloti strain 1021: splicing and mobility of RmInt1. Mol Genet Genomics 2003; 268:628-36. [PMID: 12589437 DOI: 10.1007/s00438-002-0778-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2002] [Accepted: 10/25/2002] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The number and diversity of known group II introns in eubacteria are continually increasing with the addition of new data from sequencing projects, but the significance of these introns in the evolution of bacterial genomes is unknown. We analyzed the main features of the group II introns present in the genome of the soil microorganism Sinorhizobium meliloti (strain 1021), the nitrogen-fixing symbiont of alfalfa, the DNA sequence of which was recently determined. Strain 1021 harbors three different classes of group II introns: RmInt1, of bacterial class D; SMb2147/SMb21167, which cluster within bacterial class C; and SMa1875, the phylogenetic class of which is uncertain. The group II introns SMb2147/SMb21167 and SMa1875 are widely distributed in S. meliloti, but are present in lower copy numbers than RmInt1. Strain 1021 harbors three copies of RmInt1, which is pSym-specific. Although RmInt1 is spliced in strain 1021, mobility assays suggested that, in contrast to other S. meliloti strains, the genetic background of strain 1021 does not support intron homing events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Toro
- Grupo de Ecología Genética, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Calle Profesor Albareda 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Scholl EH, Thorne JL, McCarter JP, Bird DM. Horizontally transferred genes in plant-parasitic nematodes: a high-throughput genomic approach. Genome Biol 2003; 4:R39. [PMID: 12801413 PMCID: PMC193618 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-6-r39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2003] [Revised: 03/27/2003] [Accepted: 04/22/2003] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Published accounts of horizontally acquired genes in plant-parasitic nematodes have not been the result of a specific search for gene transfer per se, but rather have emerged from characterization of individual genes. We present a method for a high-throughput genome screen for horizontally acquired genes, illustrated using expressed sequence tag (EST) data from three species of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne species. RESULTS Our approach identified the previously postulated horizontally transferred genes and revealed six new candidates. Screening was partially dependent on sequence quality, with more candidates identified from clustered sequences than from raw EST data. Computational and experimental methods verified the horizontal gene transfer candidates as bona fide nematode genes. Phylogenetic analysis implicated rhizobial ancestors as donors of horizontally acquired genes in Meloidogyne. CONCLUSIONS High-throughput genomic screening is an effective way to identify horizontal gene transfer candidates. Transferred genes that have undergone amelioration of nucleotide composition and codon bias have been identified using this approach. Analysis of these horizontally transferred gene candidates suggests a link between horizontally transferred genes in Meloidogyne and parasitism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth H Scholl
- Center for the Biology of Nematode Parasitism, Box 7253, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Bioinformatics Research Center, Box 7566, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Thorne
- Bioinformatics Research Center, Box 7566, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - James P McCarter
- Genome Sequencing Center, Department of Genetics, Box 8501, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
- Divergence Inc., 893 North Warson Road, St. Louis, MO 63141, USA
| | - David Mck Bird
- Center for the Biology of Nematode Parasitism, Box 7253, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Bioinformatics Research Center, Box 7566, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Wood DW, Setubal JC, Kaul R, Monks DE, Kitajima JP, Okura VK, Zhou Y, Chen L, Wood GE, Almeida NF, Woo L, Chen Y, Paulsen IT, Eisen JA, Karp PD, Bovee D, Chapman P, Clendenning J, Deatherage G, Gillet W, Grant C, Kutyavin T, Levy R, Li MJ, McClelland E, Palmieri A, Raymond C, Rouse G, Saenphimmachak C, Wu Z, Romero P, Gordon D, Zhang S, Yoo H, Tao Y, Biddle P, Jung M, Krespan W, Perry M, Gordon-Kamm B, Liao L, Kim S, Hendrick C, Zhao ZY, Dolan M, Chumley F, Tingey SV, Tomb JF, Gordon MP, Olson MV, Nester EW. The genome of the natural genetic engineer Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science 2001; 294:2317-23. [PMID: 11743193 DOI: 10.1126/science.1066804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 571] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The 5.67-megabase genome of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 consists of a circular chromosome, a linear chromosome, and two plasmids. Extensive orthology and nucleotide colinearity between the genomes of A. tumefaciens and the plant symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti suggest a recent evolutionary divergence. Their similarities include metabolic, transport, and regulatory systems that promote survival in the highly competitive rhizosphere; differences are apparent in their genome structure and virulence gene complement. Availability of the A. tumefaciens sequence will facilitate investigations into the molecular basis of pathogenesis and the evolutionary divergence of pathogenic and symbiotic lifestyles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D W Wood
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357242, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|