Transgene vectors go retro

Gene transfer into cardiac myocytes

Traditional methods for DNA transfection are often inefficient and toxic for terminally differentiated cells, such as cardiac myocytes. Vector-based gene transfer is an efficient approach for introducing exogenous cDNA into these types of primary cell cultures. In this chapter, separate protocols for adult rat cardiac myocyte isolation and gene transfer with recombinant adenovirus are provided and are routinely utilized for studying the effects of sarcomeric proteins on myofilament function.

Transgenic animal production and animal biotechnology

Considerable progress has been made in methods for production of transgenic livestock; beginning with pronuclear microinjection over 20 years ago. New methods, including the use of viral vectors, sperm-mediated gene transfer and somatic cell cloning, have overcome many of the limitations of pronuclear microinjection. It is now possible to not only readily make simple insertional genetic modifications, but also to accomplish, more complex, homozygous gene targeting and artificial chromosome transfer in livestock.

Lentiviral transgenesis

Transgenic animals are relevant for many fields of modern biomedicine and agriculture. However, the inefficiencies of the presently available techniques--DNA microinjection and retroviral gene transfer--have led to an explosion of costs for transgenics especially in farm animals. The recent success in transferring genes to early embryos of different species (mouse, rat, pig, cattle) by viral vectors derived from lentiviruses, has established lentiviral transgenesis as an exciting alternative to the classical method of DNA microinjection. In addition, lentiviral vectors can be used to transfer genes into embryonic stem cells. Due to its high efficacy and versatility, lentiviral transgenesis should have a big impact on transgenic research.

Efficient transgenesis in farm animals by lentiviral vectors

Microinjection of DNA is now the most widespread method for generating transgenic animals, but transgenesis rates achieved this way in higher mammals are extremely low. To address this longstanding problem, we used lentiviral vectors carrying a ubiquitously active promoter (phosphoglycerate kinase, LV-PGK) to deliver transgenes to porcine embryos. Of the 46 piglets born, 32 (70%) carried the transgene DNA and 30 (94%) of these pigs expressed the transgene (green fluorescent protein, GFP). Direct fluorescence imaging and immunohistochemistry showed that GFP was expressed in all tissues of LV-PGK transgenic pigs, including germ cells. Importantly, the transgene was transmitted through the germ-line. Tissue-specific transgene expression was achieved by infecting porcine embryos with lentiviral vectors containing the human keratin K14 promoter (LV-K14). LV-K14 transgenic animals expressed GFP specifically in basal keratinocytes of the skin. Finally, infection of bovine oocytes after and before in vitro fertilization with LV-PGK resulted in transgene expression in 45% and 92% of the infected embryos, respectively.

Efficient transgenesis in farm animals by lentiviral vectors

Microinjection of DNA is now the most widespread method for generating transgenic animals, but transgenesis rates achieved this way in higher mammals are extremely low. To address this longstanding problem, we used lentiviral vectors carrying a ubiquitously active promoter (phosphoglycerate kinase, LV-PGK) to deliver transgenes to porcine embryos. Of the 46 piglets born, 32 (70%) carried the transgene DNA and 30 (94%) of these pigs expressed the transgene (green fluorescent protein, GFP). Direct fluorescence imaging and immunohistochemistry showed that GFP was expressed in all tissues of LV-PGK transgenic pigs, including germ cells. Importantly, the transgene was transmitted through the germ-line. Tissue-specific transgene expression was achieved by infecting porcine embryos with lentiviral vectors containing the human keratin K14 promoter (LV-K14). LV-K14 transgenic animals expressed GFP specifically in basal keratinocytes of the skin. Finally, infection of bovine oocytes after and before in vitro fertilization with LV-PGK resulted in transgene expression in 45% and 92% of the infected embryos, respectively.

New gene transfer methods

The intentional introduction of recombinant DNA molecules into a living organism can be achieved in many ways. Viruses have been making a living by practicing gene transfer for millennia. Recently, man has gotten into the act. The paradigm employed is fairly straightforward. First, a way must be found to move genetic information across biological membrane barriers. Then, presumably, DNA repair mechanisms do the rest. The array of methods available to move DNA into the nucleus provides the flexibility necessary to transfer genes into cells as physically diverse as sperm and eggs. Some of the more promising alternative strategies such as sperm-mediated gene transfer, restriction enzyme-mediated integration, metaphase II transgenesis, and a new twist on retrovirus-mediated gene transfer will be discussed, among other methods.

Milking the genome for profit

Despite recent accomplishments, significant challenges remain before cloning can become a routine part of transgenic animal production.

Hijacking oocyte DNA repair machinery in transgenesis?

Transgenesis refers to the modification of a genome to carry specified exogenous DNA sequences (transgenes, tgs) in a plant or animal; tgs are ideally transmissible through the germline. It has recently been shown that a membrane-disrupted spermatozoon mixed with exogenous DNA can be microinjected into an unfertilized, metaphase II (mII) oocyte to generate transgenic mouse embryos and offspring. This is here referred to as metaphase II (mII) transgenesis. Exogenous DNA clearly becomes genomically integrated in this process, but how? Presumably, the integration process utilizes DNA repair and recombinational machinery resident within mII oocytes. With recent advances in the description of DNA recombination and repair per se and in relation to meiotic and mitotic cell cycles, we are now poised to explain features of mIl transgenesis. Conversely, the method may of itself provide a new tool to probe these aspects of DNA metabolism. This article describes mil transgenesis in the context of DNA recombination and homeostasis in mII oocytes. A fuller understanding of the underlying recombinational mechanisms may enable improved methods of manipulating mammalian genomes and lead to gene targeting and genetic surgery in mII oocytes.