Clinical outcomes in patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell cancer

Prognostic Differences Between Surveillance and Active Treatment After Initial Orchiectomy in Patients With Stage I Mixed Germ Cell Tumors of the Testis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis and optimal treatment approach for stage I mixed germ cell cancers of the testis are not well-established. This study aimed to assess contemporary treatment rates and their correlation with the cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) in patients with stage I testicular mixed germ cell tumors (TMGCT) who underwent orchiectomy, comparing surveillance with active treatment, including chemotherapy (CHT) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical data from stage I TMGCT patients who underwent orchiectomy was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2019. The annual percentage change (APC) in the use of surveillance, postoperative CHT, and RPLND was examined. Propensity score matching (PSM) and cumulative incidence, analyses were employed to compare differences in CSM and OCM between surveillance and active treatment, as well as between CHT and RPLND. Multivariate competing-risks regression models were utilized to investigate independent factors affecting CSM and OCM among stage I TMGCT patients.

RESULTS

The study included 5743 individuals with stage I TMGCT that underwent surveillance (61.6%), CHT(27.2%), or RPLND (11.2%). Among them, 82 deaths were attributed to TMGCT, and 82 deaths resulted from other causes. Surveillance rates increased over time (APC: 0.635%, P = 0.008), as did CHT rates (APC: 0.863%, P < 0.001), while RPLND rates declined (APC: -0.96%, P < 0.001). After PSM, multivariate competing-risks regression analysis showed that, active treatment, compared to surveillance, was not an independent factor for CSM and OCM. In contrast, when compared to CHT, RPLND was an independent factor associated with lower CSM (hazard ratio = 0.247, 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.761; P = 0.015), but not OCM (hazard ratio = 0.946, 95% confidence interval: 0.377-2.37; P = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance and CHT rates have increased over time for patients with stage I TMGCT following initial orchiectomy, while RPLND utilization has decreased. There was no significant difference in CSM between surveillance and active treatment groups, but RPLND demonstrated significantly lower CSM than CHT in active treatment. Our findings suggest that the usage of RPLND in patients with stage I TMGCT should be reconsidered.

Testicular germ cell tumours' clinical stage I: comparison of surveillance with adjuvant treatment strategies regarding recurrence rates and overall survival-a systematic review

PURPOSE

Testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs) represent the most common malignancy in young adult males with two thirds of all cases presenting with clinical stage I (CSI). Active surveillance is the management modality mostly favoured by current guidelines. This systematic review assesses the treatment results in CSI patients concerning recurrence rate and overall survival in non-seminoma (NS) and pure seminoma (SE) resulting from surveillance in comparison to adjuvant strategies.

METHODS/SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

We performed a systematic literature review confining the search to most recent studies published 2010-2021 that reported direct comparisons of surveillance to adjuvant management. We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library with additional hand-searching of reference lists to identify relevant studies. Data extraction and quality assessment of included studies were performed with stratification for histology (NS vs. SE) and treatment modalities. The results were tabulated and evaluated with descriptive statistical methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. In NS patients relapse rates were 12 to 37%, 0 to 10%, and 0 to 11.8% for surveillance, chemotherapy and for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) while overall survival rates were 90.7-100%, 91.7-100%, and 97-99.1%, respectively. In SE CSI, relapse rates were 0-22.3%, 0-5%, and 0-12.5% for surveillance, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, while overall survival rates were 84.1-98.7%, 83.5-100%, and 92.3-100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In both histologic subgroups, active surveillance offers almost identical overall survival as adjuvant management strategies, however, at the expense of higher relapse rates. Each of the management strategies in CSI GCT patients have specific merits and shared-decision-making is advised to tailor treatment.

Construction and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Progression- Free Survival in Patients with Early-Stage Testicular Germ Cell Tumor

BACKGROUND

Testicular Germ Cell Tumor (TGCT) is the most common malignant tumor in young men, but there is a lack of a prediction model to evaluate the prognosis of patients with TGCT.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the prognostic factors for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and construct a nomogram model for patients with early-stage TGCT after radical orchiectomy.

METHODS

Patients with TGCT from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were used as the training cohort; univariate and multivariate cox analysis was performed. A nomogram was constructed based on the independent prognostic factors. Patients from the Nanfang Hospital affiliated with Southern Medical University were used as the cohort to validate the predictive ability using the nomogram model. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots were used to evaluate the nomogram.

RESULTS

A total of 110 and 62 patients with TGCT were included in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. Lymphatic Vascular Invasion (LVI), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and adjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors in multivariate regression analyses and were included to establish a nomogram. The C-index in the training cohort for 1- , 3-, and 5-year PFS were 0.768, 0.74, and 0.689, respectively. While the C-index for 1-, 3-, and 5- year PFS in the external validation cohort were 0.853, 0.663 and 0.609, respectively. The calibration plots for 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS in the training and validation cohort showed satisfactory consistency between predicted and actual outcomes. The nomogram revealed a better predictive ability for PFS than AJCC staging system.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram as a simple and visual tool to predict individual PFS in patients with TGCT could guide clinicians and clinical pharmacists in therapeutic strategy.

Testicular Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Testicular cancer is relatively uncommon and accounts for <1% of all male tumors. However, it is the most common solid tumor in men between the ages of 20 and 34 years, and the global incidence has been steadily rising over the past several decades. Several risk factors for testicular cancer have been identified, including personal or family history of testicular cancer and cryptorchidism. Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) comprise 95% of malignant tumors arising in the testes and are categorized into 2 main histologic subtypes: seminoma and nonseminoma. Although nonseminoma is the more clinically aggressive tumor subtype, 5-year survival rates exceed 70% with current treatment options, even in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the primary treatment for most patients with testicular GCTs. Postorchiectomy management is dictated by stage, histology, and risk classification; treatment options for nonseminoma include surveillance, systemic therapy, and nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Although rarely occurring, prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor, with >50% of patients dying within 1 year of diagnosis. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer focuses on recommendations for the management of adult patients with nonseminomatous GCTs.

Current management and management controversies in early- and intermediate-stage of nonseminoma germ cell tumors

Early stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) remains a treatable disease, with stage I cancer specific survival exceeding 95%. Using a risk-adapted approach; active surveillance (AS), adjuvant chemotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) all options for treatment; with surveillance being increasingly used. With persistently elevated markers (stage IS), chemotherapy remains the hallmark of treatment. Management of stage II NSGCT varies based on status of tumor markers. With negative markers, both induction chemotherapy and upfront RPLND remain options. Management of a residual mass <1 cm after chemotherapy remains controversial, with AS and nerve-sparing RPLND considered options. The development of miR-371a-3p microRNA shows promise a novel biomarker for testicular cancer (GCT). Despite controversies in management, cures for NSGCT are achievable in 95-99% of patients.

Systemic therapy for primary and extragonadal germ cell tumors: prognosis and nuances of treatment

Testicular germ cell tumors are the most common solid tumors in young men. These cancers represent a success story of modern medicine in our ability to cure young patients and offer decades of life, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 95%. This review outlines the staging and risk classification of testicular cancers, and reviews the current state of knowledge and standard of care for the systemic treatment of testicular germ cell tumors with chemotherapy, focusing on the relevant clinical data supporting each treatment regimen. This review also briefly highlights current areas of active investigation, notably in the relapsed and refractory setting, including ongoing clinical trials.

Trans- and extraperitoneal retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in the treatment for nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors (NSGCT): a single Chinese center's retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of two different approaches to perform laparoscopic RPLND: transperitoneal laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (TL-RPLND) and extraperitoneal laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (EL-RPLND).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2003 and April 2013, 39 patients with nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors were treated by RPLND in our center. Twenty-one patients had TL-RPLND, and 18 patients had EL-RPLND. We performed a comprehensive retrospective study comparing TL-RPLND and EL-RPLND. Certain parameters, including operative time, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, resected lymph nodes, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, ejaculation, and postoperative tumor markers, were abstracted and compared.

RESULTS

In the EL-RPLND and TL-RPLND groups, the operation times were 178 ± 31 and 207 ± 25 min; the amounts of estimated blood loss were 87 ± 26 and 111 ± 21 ml; the postoperative intestinal function recovery times were 1.2 ± 0.7 and 2.4 ± 0.6 days; the postoperative hospital stays were 5.8 ± 1.1 and 5.5 ± 1.4 days; and the numbers of resected lymph nodes were 16.2 ± 1.5 and 15.8 ± 1.6, respectively. No conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery occurred. No patient in either group received an intraoperative blood transfusion. Overall, two patients developed postoperative fever, and one developed abdominal distension. After a median follow-up of 45 months, no regional relapse or metastases occurred, but 4 patients at clinical stage II were treated successfully by three cycles of platinum-based postoperative chemotherapy. Currently, all patients show no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that EL-RPLND was superior to the transperitoneal approach in terms of the operation time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative intestinal function recovery time, whereas no differences were observed in the number of lymph nodes resected. EL-RPLND was demonstrated to be safe and feasible, with satisfactory clinical outcomes when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Larger cohorts of patients with longer term follow-up are needed for further studies to determine the role of different approaches to L-RPLND.