Endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal leaks

Iatrogenic colon perforation during colonoscopy, diagnosis/treatment, and follow-up processes: A single-center experience

Objectives

latrogenic colon perforation (ICP) is one of the most feared complications of colonoscopy and causes unwanted morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to discuss the characteristics of the cases of ICP we encountered in our endoscopy clinic, its etiology, our treatment approaches, and results in the light of the current literature.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the cases of ICP among 9.709 lower gastrointestinal system endoscopy procedures (colonoscopy + rectosigmoidoscopy) performed for diagnostic purposes in our endoscopy clinic during 2002-2020.

Results

A total of seven cases of ICP were detected. The diagnosis was made during the procedure in six patients and after eight hours in one patient, and their treatment was performed urgently. Whereas surgical procedures were performed in all patients, the type of the procedure varied; laparoscopic primary repair was performed in two patients and laparotomy in five patients. In the patients who underwent laparotomy, primary repair was performed in three patients, partial colon resection and end-to-end anastomosis in one patient, and loop colostomy in one patient. The patients were hospitalized for an average of 7.14 days. The patients who did not develop complications in the postoperative follow-up were discharged with full recovery.

Conclusion

Prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment of ICP is crucial to prevent morbidity and mortality.

[Medical Dispute Related to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Complications: Prevention and Management]

Because gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy examinations are being performed increasingly frequently, the rate of detection of cancer and of precancerous lesions has increased. Moreover, development of more advanced endoscopic technologies has expanded the indications for, and thus frequency of, therapeutic endoscopic procedures. However, the incidence of complications associated with diagnostic or therapeutic GI endoscopy has also increased. The complications associated with GI endoscopy can be ameliorated by endoscopic or conservative treatment, but caution is needed as some of the more serious complications, such as perforation, can lead to death. In this chapter, we review the possible complications of GI endoscopy and discuss methods for their prevention and treatment.

Endoscopic Management of Iatrogenic Colon Perforation

Colon perforations are difficult to resolve because they occur unexpectedly and infrequently. If the clinician is unprepared or lacks training in dealing with perforations, the clinical prognosis will be affected, which can lead to legal issues. We describe here the proper approach to the management of perforations, including deciding on endoscopic or surgical treatment, selection of endoscopic devices, endoscopic closure procedures, and general management of perforations that occur during diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy.

Endoscopic management of esophageal leaks

Traditionally, gold standard treatment for an acute esophageal perforation has been operative repair. Over the past two decades, there has been a paradigm shift towards the use of esophageal stents. Recent advances in biomaterial allowed a new generation of stents to be manufactured that combined (I) a non-permeable covering; (II) radial force sufficient to occlude a transmural esophageal injury and (III) improved ease of removability. The amalgamation of these developments set the stage for utilizing esophageal stents as part of the management algorithm of an acute esophageal perforation. This provides a safe and less invasive treatment route in lieu of direct primary repair and its well-documented significant failure rate. Esophageal stent placement for failed operative repair or esophageal leaks also had the potential to minimize the need for esophageal resection and diversion. When included in a multimodality hybrid treatment protocol, esophageal stents can optimize healing success rates and minimize the risks of adverse complications. This review summarizes the modern history of esophageal stent use in the treatment of esophageal perforation as well as the evidenced based recommendations for the use of esophageal stent placement in the treatment of acute esophageal perforation.

Clinical Outcomes of Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Leakage According to Treatment Modality

BACKGROUND & AIM

We evaluated the clinical outcomes according to treatment modality for gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage.

METHODS

Of the 19,207 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer from March 2000 to April 2013, we retrospectively analyzed the 133 cases who developed anastomotic leakage. These patients were treated using endoscopic management, surgery, or conservative management (endoscopic treatment was introduced in 2009). To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic treatment, we compared the clinical outcomes between the conservative management-only group before 2009 and the conservative or endoscopic management group from 2009; and between the surgical management-only group before 2009 and the surgical or endoscopic management group from 2009.

RESULTS

Seventy-three were initially managed conservatively, 35 were treated surgically, and 25 were treated using endoscopic procedures. Chronologically comparing each treatment group as 'before 2009' (n = 54) and 'from 2009' (n = 79), there were differences in the length of hospital stay (median 32 versus 27, p = 0.048) and duration of antibiotic use (median 28 versus 20, p = 0.013). Patients who underwent conservative or endoscopic management from 2009 showed a shorter hospital stay, period of fasting, and duration of antibiotic use than patients who underwent only conservative management before 2009. Patients who received surgery or endoscopic management from 2009 showed a shorter hospital stay and duration of antibiotic use than patients who underwent only surgery before 2009.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management for selected cases can reduce duration of hospital stay and antibiotic administration in the treatment of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy.

Endoscopic "rescue" treatment for gastrointestinal perforations, anastomotic dehiscence and fistula

Luminal perforations and anastomotic leaks of the gastrointestinal tract are life-threatening events with high morbidity and mortality. Early recognition and prompt therapy is essential for a favourable outcome. Surgery has long been considered the "gold standard" approach for these conditions; however it is associated with high re-intervention morbidity and mortality. The recent development of endoscopic techniques and devices to manage perforations, leaks and fistulae has made non-surgical treatment an attractive and reasonable alternative approach. Although endoscopic therapy is widely accepted, comparative data of the different techniques are still lacking. In this review we describe, benefits and limitations of the current options in the management of patients with perforations and leaks, in order to improve outcomes.

[Management of complications in endoscopic interventions of the upper gastrointestinal tract]

Endoscopic procedures are frequently performed interventions in the clinical routine. Whereas endoscopy was initially regarded as being a secondary diagnostic tool, over the last decades endoscopic procedures have now become an integral part of various treatment strategies. The appeal of these methods is without any doubt the minimally invasive approach in contrast to open surgery. Endoscopic interventions per se necessitate representative technical equipment and the various components are continually being refined. Considering the complexity of the method, profound skills in endoscopic diagnostic procedures and therapeutic interventions are essential prerequisites for adequate procedural quality and patient safety. Endoscopic examinations are in fact invasive interventions in the same way as surgical procedures and are associated with a certain risk of potential complications. The awareness about potential complications and their respective risk factors is of crucial importance for both the patient and the physician. Complications may harm patients and may lead to increased mortality rates; therefore, it is not only important to be aware of them but also to have an efficient management strategy in order to minimize the damage. Recognition and consistent actions are the basic pillars of correct complication management. These aspects are addressed in this article.

Management of post-gastrectomy anastomosis site obstruction with a self-expandable metallic stent

Post-gastrectomy anastomosis site obstruction is a relatively rare complication after a subtotal gastrectomy. We present a case of a 75-year-old man who underwent a truncal vagotomy, omental patch, gastrojejunostomy, and Braun anastomosis for duodenal ulcer perforation and a gastric outlet obstruction. Following the 10^th postoperative day, the patient complained of abdominal discomfort and vomiting. We diagnosed post-gastrectomy anastomosis site obstruction by an upper gastrointestinal series and an upper endoscopic examination. We inserted a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) at the anastomosis site. The stent was fully expanded after deployment. On the day following the stent insertion, the patient began to eat, and his abdominal discomfort was resolved. This paper describes the successful management of post-gastrectomy anastomosis site obstruction with temporary placement of a SEMS.

Management of polypectomy complications

The 2 most significant complications of colonoscopy with polypectomy are bleeding and perforation. Incidence rates for bleeding (0.1%-0.6%) and perforation (0.7%-0.9%) are generally low. Recognition of pertinent risk factors helps to prevent these complications, which can be grouped into patient-related, polyp-related, and technique/device-related factors. Endoscopists should be equipped to manage bleeding and perforation. Currently available devices and techniques are reviewed to achieve hemostasis and close colon perforations.

Healing of complicated gastric leaks in bariatric patients using endoscopic clips

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopists have used clipping devices to successfully close acute, iatrogenic perforations throughout the gastrointestinal tract. We applied this technology to our bariatric patients, who tend to present with a more delayed anastomotic leak, to determine whether these leaks and fistulae would also heal with endoclip application.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We describe a small series of 2 clinically stable bariatric patients who presented with postoperative anastomotic leaks who met criteria for non-operative therapy. The first underwent a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and presented postoperatively with a leak at her gastrojejunal anastomosis. The location was not amenable to stent placement; therefore, 2 endoclips were placed. The leak was sealed by fluoroscopic examination 14 d later. The second had a reversal of a previous gastric bypass, creating a new gastrogastric anastomosis. A leak was found at this new connection postoperatively. After failure of a stent to seal the leak, 8 endoclips were used. This patient also had successful closure of her leak on fluoroscopy 14 d postprocedure.

DISCUSSION

Anastomotic leaks after bariatric surgery can incur severe morbidity, cost, and detriment to patients' quality of life. Unstable patients require operative intervention. Stable patients are candidates for more-conservative measures. Endoscopic stents have been successful in closing gastric leaks, though some are not anatomically amenable to stent placement, and stents also have the potential to migrate distally. We demonstrate 2 cases of successful closure of leaks in bariatric patients by using endoclips and suggest that this be considered an option in appropriate cases.

Endoscopic treatment of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations: an overview

In the past, the treatment of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations was limited to surgical management or to medical observation. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) has paved the way towards the development of reliable endoscopic closure techniques, which can be applicable in accidental perforations of the gastrointestinal tract. When endoscopic treatment is feasible, hemoclips are preferred in smaller perforations, while over-the-scope-clips or a combination of hemoclips, endoloops, and glue are used in larger ones. Endoscopic stitching is rarely utilized, and endoscopic stapling has been practically abandoned. The use of self-expandable covered stents can be considered in the esophagus and duodenum. Broad spectrum antibiotics are recommended in most cases. Clinical follow-up in a medico-surgical unit is mandatory and surgical intervention should not be delayed more than 24h if clinical or biological worsening occurs. Imaging with oral contrast medium is advisable before resumption of oral feeding in the case of large perforations.

Endolumenal endoscopic full-thickness resection of muscularis propria-originating gastric submucosal tumors

BACKGROUND

This study retrospectively reviewed 48 cases of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) treated by endolumenal endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) microsurgery in our gastrointestinal endoscopy center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 2009 to October 2012, 48 cases underwent endolumenal EFR for resection of muscularis propria-originating gastric SMTs. Characteristics of the 48 patients, clinical efficacy, safety of EFR, and post-EFR pathological diagnoses were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

EFR was successfully performed in 48 cases with 52 lesions. The median operation time was 59.72 minutes (range, 30-270 minutes; standard deviation, 39.72 minutes). The mean tumor size was 1.59 cm (range, 0.50-4.80 cm; standard deviation, 1.01 cm). During the EFR process, dual-channel gastroscopy was applied in 20 cases of SMTs, and paracentesis during the EFR process was applied in 9 cases. EFR for larger SMTs and gastric corpus-originating SMTs had longer operative times. Pathological diagnosis included 43 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 4 leiomyomas, and 1 schwannoma. A larger tumor size was associated with higher risk of malignancy. No severe postoperative complications were observed. No tumor recurrences were confirmed in follow-up gastroscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The endolumenal EFR technique proved to be feasible and minimally invasive, even for the resection of large gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria. However, more data on EFR must be obtained and analyzed.

Endoscopic clip closure of gastrointestinal perforations, fistulae, and leaks

Development of endoscopic devices to close perforations has certainly revolutionized endoscopy. Immediate closure of perforations eliminates the need for surgery, which allows us to push the limits of endoscopic surgery from the mucosal plane to deep submucosal layers and eventually transmurally. The present article focuses on endoscopic closure devices, closure techniques, followed by a review of animal and clinical studies on endoscopic closure of perforations.

Endoscopic closure of postoperative anastomotic leakage with endoclips and detachable snares

Anastomotic leakage, although uncommon, is a life-threatening complication and requires prompt recognition and treatment. Surgical closure has been recommended for defects that are large and symptomatic. However, recent reports on successful endoscopic closure of anastomotic leakage suggest that endoscopic techniques may be a feasible alternative to surgical approaches in patients with comorbid conditions that are not suitable for undergoing second operation or for those who refuse to be reoperated. Herein, we describe a case of postoperative gastrojejunal anastomotic leakage that was successfully treated with endoscopic closure using endoclips and detachable snares.

Endoscopic repair of post-surgical gastrointestinal complications

Complications following gastrointestinal surgery may require re-intervention, can lead to prolonged hospitalization, and significantly increase health costs. Some complications, such as anastomotic leakage, fistula, and stricture require a multidisciplinary approach. Therapeutic endoscopy may play a pivotal role in these conditions, allowing minimally invasive treatment. Different endoscopic approaches, including fibrin glue injection, endoclips, self-expanding stents, and endoscopic vacuum-assisted devices have been introduced for both anastomotic leakage and fistula treatment. Similarly endoscopic treatments, such as endoscopic dilation, incisional therapy, and self-expanding stents have been used for anastomotic strictures. All these techniques can be safely performed by skilled endoscopists, and may achieve a high technical success rate in both the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Here we will review the endoscopic management of post-surgical complications; these techniques should be considered as first-line approach in selected patients, allowing to avoid re-operation, reduce hospital stay, and decrease costs.

Clinical Application and Outcomes of Over the Scope Clip Device: Initial US Experience in Humans

Background. OTSCs are now available in the US for various indications. Methods. Retrospective review of OTSCs used from January 2011 to April 2012. Results. Twenty-four patients underwent placement of 28 OTSCs. Indications included postsurgical fistula, perforations, anastomotic leak, prophylactic closure after EMR, postpolypectomy bleeding, tracheoesophageal fistula, and jejunostomy site leak. Instruments used to grasp the tissue were dedicated (bidirectional forceps or tripronged device) and nondedicated devices (rat/alligator forceps or suction). Success was higher with nondedicated devices (12.5% versus 86.5%, P = 0.0004). Overall, OTSC was effective in 15/27 procedures. Defect closure was complete in 12/21. Mean followup was 2.9 months (1–8 m). Mean defect size was 10 mm (5–25 mm). A trend towards higher success was noted in defects <10 mm compared to defects >10 mm (90% versus 60%; P = 0.36). No difference was noted in closure of fresh (<72 hrs) versus chronic defects (>1 month) (75% versus 67%). There were no complications. Conclusion. The OTSC provides a safe alternative to manage fistula, perforation, and bleeding. No significant difference was seen for closure of early fistula or perforations as compared to chronic fistula. Rat-tooth forceps or suction was superior to the dedicated devices.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic and surgical management for postoperative upper gastrointestinal leakage

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic therapy, an alternative and less invasive modality for the management of leakage after gastrectomy.

METHODS

An electronic database of 35 patients with anastomotic leaks after surgery for stomach cancer that were treated with either an endoscopic procedure or surgery between January 2004 and March 2012 was reviewed. The success rates and safety of both modalities were evaluated.

RESULTS

Endoscopic treatment was performed in 20 patients and surgical treatment in 15 patients. The median time interval between the primary surgery and diagnosis of leakage was 8.0 days (interquartile range, 5.0-14.0 days). Of the 20 patients with endoscopic treatment, technical success was achieved in 19 patients (95 %) with resulting clinical success achieved in all of these 19 patients (100 %). One patient with failed endoscopic management went on to receive surgery. There were no cases of leakage-related deaths after endoscopic treatment. Of the 15 patients with surgical treatment, 5 died due to sepsis, bleeding, or hospital-acquired pneumonia. For diagnosis of leakage, 17 patients from the endoscopy group underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning, which revealed leakages in 3 patients (17.6 %) and occult leakages were subsequently defined at fluoroscopy in all 20 patients. Seven of twelve patients (58.3 %) from the surgical group had leakages diagnosed by CT scan.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment can be considered a valuable option for the management of postoperative anastomotic leakage with a high degree of technical feasibility and safety, particularly for leakages that are not excessively large.

Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clip: Including complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection

AIM: To retrospectively review the results of over-the-scope clip (OTSC) use in our hospital and to examine the feasibility of using the OTSC to treat perforations after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS: We enrolled 23 patients who presented with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, fistulae and perforations and were treated with OTSCs (Ovesco Endoscopy GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) between November 2011 and September 2012. Maximum lesion size was defined as lesion diameter. The number of OTSCs to be used per patient was not decided until the lesion was completely closed. We used a twin grasper (Ovesco Endoscopy GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) as a grasping device for all the patients. A 9 mm OTSC was chosen for use in the esophagus and colon, and a 10 mm device was used for the stomach, duodenum and rectum. The overall success rate and complications were evaluated, with a particular emphasis on patients who had undergone ESD due to adenocarcinoma. In technical successful cases we included not only complete closing by using OTSCs, but also partial closing where complete closure with OTSCs is almost difficult. In overall clinical successful cases we included only complete closing by using only OTSCs perfectly. All the OTSCs were placed by 2 experienced endoscopists. The sites closed after ESD included not only the perforation site but also all defective ulcers sites.

RESULTS: A total of 23 patients [mean age 77 years (range 64-98 years)] underwent OTSC placement during the study period. The indications for OTSC placement were GI bleeding (n = 9), perforation (n = 10), fistula (n = 4) and the prevention of post-ESD duodenal artificial ulcer perforation (n = 1). One patient had a perforation caused by a glycerin enema, after which a fistula formed. Lesion closure using the OTSC alone was successful in 19 out of 23 patients, and overall success rate was 82.6%. A large lesion size (greater than 20 mm) and a delayed diagnosis (more than 1 wk) were the major contributing factors for the overall unsuccessful clinical cases. The location of the unsuccessful lesion was in the stomach. The median operation time in the successful cases was 18 min, and the average observation time was 67 d. During the observation period, none of the patients experienced any complications associated with OTSC placement. In addition, we successfully used the OTSC to close the perforation site after ESD in 6 patients. This was a single-center, retrospective study with a small sample size.

CONCLUSION: The OTSC is effective for treating GI bleeding, fistulae as well as perforations, and the OTSC technique proofed effective treatment for perforation after ESD.

Reducing complications in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

This article reviews the principal aspects related to sedation in endoscopy and to the prevention of adverse events in some of the most frequently performed therapeutic upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures (esophageal dilation and stenting, endoscopic resection of upper GI early neoplasia, hemostasis of upper GI bleeding and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion). These procedures have an inherent risk of negative outcomes that cannot be entirely avoided. Endoscopic procedures are best performed by well-trained, competent and thoughtful endoscopists in facilities suited to provide for patient safety. Attention to clinical risk management may effectively reduce the frequency and intensity of adverse events, enhance recognition and early detection, and improve responsiveness.

Endoscopic muscularis dissection for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Based on our experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and new endoscopic techniques for endoscopic closure of iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal (upper-GI) perforations, we developed methods to remove upper-GI subepithelial tumors (SETs) originating from the muscularis propria by endoscopic muscularis dissection (EMD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of EMD.

METHODS

31 patients with upper-GI SETs originating from the muscularis propria were treated by EMD. The EMD differed from ESD in (1) precutting the overlying mucosa above the lesion by using snare or longitudinal incision instead of circumferential incision, (2) dissecting the complete tumors away from submucosal and muscularis propria tissue by electrical dissection combined with blunt dissection, and (3) closing the wound with clips. Perforations occurring during dissection were closed by endoscopic methods.

RESULTS

30 of 31 tumors were resected completely (96.8 %). One esophageal lesion was resected partially because of severe adhesions with surrounding tissue. Mean resected tumor size was 22.1 mm × 15.5 mm, and mean operation time was 76.8 min (range 15-330 min). Histological diagnosis was gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in 16 lesions [6 esophageal, 3 cardial, 7 gastric; 6 very low risk and 10 low risk according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk classification] and leiomyoma in 15 lesions (8 esophageal, 4 cardial, 3 gastric). No patient developed delayed hemorrhage. Perforation occurred in four patients (12.9 %), all of which were managed successfully by endoscopic techniques. The mean follow-up time was 17.7 months (range 7-35 months). Follow-up found no tumor recurrence in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In this early experience, EMD appears to be a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for some patients with upper-GI SETs originating from the muscularis propria. Although there is a higher risk of perforation than with ESD, this will improve with extended practice, and perforations have become manageable endoscopically.

Endoscopic complications--avoidance and management

The frequency of endoscopic complications is likely to rise owing to the increased number of indications for therapeutic procedures and also to the increased complexity of endoscopic techniques. Informed patient consent should be obtained as part of the procedure. Prevention of endoscopic adverse events is based on knowledge of the relevant risk factors and their mechanisms of occurrence. Thus, suitable training of future gastroenterologists and endoscopists is required for these complex procedures. When facing a complication, appropriate management is generally provided by an early diagnosis followed by prompt therapeutic care tailored to the situation. The most common complications of diagnostic and therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, retrograde cholangiopancreatography, small bowel endoscopy and colonoscopy are reviewed here. Different modalities of medical, endoscopic or surgical management are also considered.

Gastrointestinal perforations: role of endoscopic closure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Understanding the role of endoscopic closure techniques helps in expanding the endoscopist's role in the management of gastrointestinal neoplasia and explore new frontiers of minimally invasive endoluminal surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article covers recent advances in endoscopic closure of various gastrointestinal perforations, with a special focus on devices, experimental evidence and clinical outcomes of endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal perforations.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic closure techniques help the endoscopist to walk on thin ice and save himself and the patient in the case of mishap.

Endoscopic management of intraoperative small bowel laceration during natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a blinded porcine study

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has recently gained great enthusiasm, but there is concern regarding the ability to endoscopically manage complications purely via natural orifices.

AIM

To assess the feasibility of endoscopically managing enteral perforation during NOTES using currently available endoscopic accessories.

METHODS

Twelve pigs underwent transgastric or transcolonic endoscopic exploration. Full-thickness enterotomies were intentionally created to mimic accidental small bowel lacerations during NOTES. These lacerations were then closed with endoclips. In the blinded arm of the study, small bowel repair was performed by a second blinded endoscopist. Adequate closure of the laceration was confirmed with a leak test. Primary access sites were closed with endoclips or T-anchors. At necropsy, the peritoneal cavity was inspected for abscesses, bleeding, or damage to surrounding structures. The enterotomy site was examined for adequacy of closure, adhesions, or evidence of infection.

RESULTS

Fifteen small bowel lacerations were performed in 12 animals. Successful closure was achieved in all 10 cases in the nonblinded arm. Survival animals had an uncomplicated postoperative course and all enterotomy sites were well healed without evidence of necrosis, adhesions, abscess, or bleeding at necropsy. Leak test was negative in all animals. In the blinded arm, both small intestinal lacerations could not be identified by the blinded endoscopist. Necropsy revealed open small bowel lacerations.

CONCLUSION

Small intestinal injuries are difficult to localize with currently available flexible endoscopes and accessories. Endoscopic clips, however, may be adequate for closure of small bowel lacerations if the site of injury is known.

Endoscopic closure of GI fistulae by using an over-the-scope clip (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have demonstrated the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) to be feasible and safe for closure of gastric, duodenal, and colonic perforations. A retrospective clinical study demonstrated the feasibility and preliminary safety of the OTSC for the treatment of GI bleeding and closure of acute GI perforations.

OBJECTIVE

Because the OTSC allows rapid and easy endoscopic organ wall closure, we hypothesized that it might be a useful tool to close GI fistulae.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Four consecutive patients with GI fistulae.

INTERVENTIONS

In all patients, a 12-mm OTSC, in combination with the dedicated twin grasper, anchor device, or endoscopic suction, was used to facilitate endoscopic closure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

In 2 cases, OTSCs allowed complete closure of a posttraumatic esophagopulmonary fistula and a chronic gastrocutaneous fistula. Leak tests and follow-up examination demonstrated complete leakproof closures. In 1 esophagopulmonary fistula and 1 jejunocutaneous fistula, the initial closure attempts using OTSCs were not successful because of chronic fibrotic changes and scarring at the fistula site. Both OTSCs were removed by using an endoscopic grasping forceps. The mean procedure time was 54 minutes (range 24-93 minutes). There were no procedure-related complications.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The OTSC seems to be a feasible device to close chronic fistulae of the GI tract. It can achieve leakproof, full-thickness closure of transmural defects. Nevertheless, in circumstances of severe fibrosis and scarring, complete incorporation of the defect into the applicator cap and successful OTSC application might not be possible.

Endoscopic management of GI perforations with a new over-the-scope clip device (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Through-the-scope endoclips have been used to manage small perforations in the GI tract, but they have limitations. A new over-the-scope clip system, OTSC (Ovesco Endoscopy, Tuebingen, Germany), may be suitable for the closure of larger GI leaks.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with GI perforations of up to 20 mm, treated with OTSC.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-arm, pilot study.

SETTING

General hospitals referral centers for endotherapy.

PATIENTS

This study involved 10 patients (median age 58.5 years [range 27-82 years], 7 men) with GI leaks from perforations, fistulas, and anastomotic dehiscence. Two gastric, 2 duodenal, and 6 colonic leaks were treated with OTSC. The diameter of leaks ranged between 7 and 20 mm.

INTERVENTIONS

OTSC devices were used to seal the GI leaks. Then Gastrografin (Bayer AG, Germany) was introduced via the endoscope and complete sealing confirmed under fluoroscopy. Patients underwent a second endoscopic examination 3 months later.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Complete sealing of the leak.

RESULTS

Complete sealing of leaks was achieved by using OTSC alone in 8 of 10 patients. For one patient, successful endoscopic management was completed by placing two additional covered stents. Only one patient required surgical repair of the leak. Endoscopic examination 3 months after treatment confirmed that leaks in 8 of 9 endoscopically treated patients were healed, and the patients did not have recurrence of the leaks or complications from the OTSC devices. One patient died from neoplastic progression before the second endoscopy could be performed.

LIMITATIONS

Uncontrolled study.

CONCLUSIONS

The OTSC system appears to be a useful device in the management of larger GI leaks in a variety of clinical scenarios.

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for inadvertent colon injury repair: feasibility, risk of abdominal adhesions, and peritoneal contamination in a porcine survival model

BACKGROUND

Adhesions are common after conventional surgery; natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) avoids peritoneal disruption and may reduce adhesions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether adhesions (and peritoneal contamination) are less common with NOTES transgastric colon injury and repair (TGCR) than with laparoscopic colon repair (LCR).

DESIGN/SETTING

Porcine survival study.

INTERVENTIONS

After colon preparation and administration of antibiotics, forty 25-kg male pigs were randomly assigned to either TGCR or LCR. TGCR involved an endoscopic gastrotomy (needle-knife plus balloon dilation), CO(2) pneumoperitoneum, and a 2-cm needle-knife transmural incision of spiral colon. Colotomies were repaired with clips; gastrotomies were closed with clips and a detachable snare.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Adhesions were assessed at necropsy at 21 days; biopsy specimens were blindly reviewed. A 9-point adhesion score (density/vascularity, width, and extent) was averaged from 3 reviewers. Peritoneal lavage was sent for cell count and culture.

RESULTS

Two of 20 TGCR pigs died immediately (unrecognized preoperative autopsy-proven pneumonia). The median procedure times were 70.5 and 19.0 minutes for TGCR and LCR, respectively; weight gains were 7.1 and 8.2 kg, respectively. The median adhesion scores were 4.3 and 3.7, respectively (P = .26); subscores were similar (1.9, 1.5, 1.3 vs 1.7, 1.1, 1.0, respectively (P = .3-.6)). Peritoneal lavage bacterial growth was nonsignificantly lower after TGCR than after LCR (38.9% vs 60.0%, respectively; P = .30); administration of intragastric antibiotics did not decrease contamination. Three TGCR (vs no LCR) pigs had histologic peritonitis.

LIMITATIONS

Animal model, colon prepped, injury immediately recognized.

CONCLUSION

NOTES colon repair is feasible after transmural injury. Adhesions, histologic peritonitis, and contamination were similar to those with laparoscopy and were not helped by intragastric antibiotics.