Use of a screening tool to determine nonadherent behavior in inflammatory bowel disease

Development of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Specific Medication Adherence Instrument and Reasons for Non-adherence

BACKGROUND

Medication adherence impacts disease control in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Existing adherence measures such as the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale 8^© are often costly, non-medication-specific, and time-consuming.

AIMS

We aimed to develop a non-proprietary, IBD-specific medication adherence instrument and to assess reasons for suboptimal medication adherence.

METHODS

We developed the IBD Medication Adherence Tool to assess frequency of adherence and indications for missed or delayed medication doses. We co-administered the IBD Medication Adherence Tool and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale 8^© (licensed for use) to participants enrolled in an internet-based cohort of adults with IBD and taking least one daily, oral IBD medication. We used Spearman's correlation to evaluate associations between the IBD Medication Adherence Tool and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale 8^©. We then categorized patients as sub-optimally adherent (IBD Medication Adherence Tool score 1-4) and highly adherent (score 5) and evaluated factors associated with and reasons for suboptimal adherence using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

We evaluated 514 patients (73% female, mean age 49), of whom 21.4% had suboptimal adherence. IBD Medication Adherence Tool scores were moderately correlated with Morisky Medication Adherence Scale 8^© (r = 0.56, p < 0.001). The most commonly reported reasons for suboptimal adherence were forgetting, feeling well, and cost. Younger age and current smoking were associated with suboptimal adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a non-proprietary, IBD-specific tool to assess adherence to IBD medications, validated in a cohort of patients with IBD on daily, oral medications. Common reasons for suboptimal IBD medication adherence include forgetting, feeling well, and cost.

HIGH PREVALENCE OF NON-ADHERENCE TO ULCERATIVE COLITIS THERAPY IN REMISSION: KNOWING THE PROBLEM TO PREVENT LOSS

ABSTRACT Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease whose manifestations can drastically affect the individual’s quality of life, and therefore adherence to treatment is important in order to keep it in remission. Objective To verify the prevalence of non-adherence and the influence of sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacotherapeutic characteristics associated with non-adherence to treatment of UC in remission. Methods Cross-sectional study conducted with 90 individuals diagnosed with UC in remission. The information was collected through interviews during medical consultations at Medical Clinic of Gastroenterology of Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. To verify the association of the variables under study with the outcome of interest and its measure of association, Student’s t-test or Pearson’s chi-square non-parametric test (P<0.05) was used and prevalence ratio and confidence interval were calculated. Results A high prevalence of non-adherence (77.8%) was found among patients with UC in remission. The individuals most likely to not adhere to the treatment were those aged less than 50 years, who were not engaged in paid work, with high scores for anxiety and who used more than one medication as part of the treatment of UC. Conclusion These findings reinforce that acknowledging the factors that influence the non-adherence behavior is of paramount importance for the development of strategies by health care professionals, assuring that those will be really effective to prolong, as much as possible, one of the most successful ways to maintain the UC remission period: the use of medications.

Adherence to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Medications in Southern New Zealand

Background

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) require continuous clinical management; poor medication adherence may result in worse disease outcomes and increased healthcare costs. This study investigated medication adherence and associated risk factors in IBD patients.

Methods

Otago (New Zealand) IBD patients were mailed questionnaires on demographics, medication-taking behavior, and a validated Probabilistic Medication Adherence Scale (ProMAS).

Results

The response rate was 29.7% (n = 174/590). The study sample was mean (SD) 50.5 (16.9) years old, 57.9% female, 49.4% had Crohn's disease, and 43.9% ulcerative colitis, with median of 9.5 years (interquartile range: 5.0-22.0) of IBD duration. About 31.1% scored below medium adherence according to ProMAS. About 11.9%, 24.7%, and 23.1% reported failing to renew, purposely not taking, and stopping taking medications, respectively; 27.2% of those who reported having no issues taking medication scored below medium on the ProMAS. Older age was associated with higher ProMAS adherence score (Pearson's r = .25; P = .0014). There were no differences in medication adherence between the types of IBDs (P = .87), disease activity status (P = .70), or gender (P = .27). There was no correlation between the number of medications and level of adherence (Pearson's r = .09; P = .27). About 18.7%, 10.1%, and 5.0% of patients reported forgetting to take medications when traveling, when out of routine, and when busy, respectively. The most used strategies to remember medications included utilizing specific routines (40.1%) and keeping medications in specific locations (21.1%).

Conclusions

A third of IBD patients had below medium medication adherence. There were discrepancies between self-reported and tool-assessed medication adherence scores with over one-third of patients underestimating/overestimating their adherence.

Thiopurine adherence: high prevalence with low impact in UC outcomes

Introduction Thiopurines are used as maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). There are contradictory results regarding the relationship between adherence to treatment and risk of relapse. Objectives To quantify and evaluate the trends in thiopurines prescription rates, and to determine the impact and risk factors of non-adherence. Methods Analytical, observational and retrospective study of UC patients, on thiopurines, included in the ENEIDA single-center registry from October 2017 to October 2019. We included adult patients under clinical remission at the beginning of the study on thiopurines maintenance treatment for at least 6 months before recruitment. Adherence was evaluated with an electronic pharmaceutical prescription system. Adherence was considered when 80% or more of the prescribed medication was dispensed at the pharmacy. Kaplan-Meier curves and a regression model were used to examine year-to-year treatment dispensation and identify factors associated to non-adherence. Results A total of 41 patients were included, of whom 71% were males with a mean age of 44 (14) and 26.8% were concomitantly managed with biological therapy. Overall, 22% were non-adherent to thiopurines. No predictive factors of non-adherence were identified. Adherence rate did not correlate with disease activity for two years follow-up (OR 1.6; 95CI =0.3-9.1). Left-sided colitis and concomitant biological treatment were related with disease relapses (p ≤0.01). Conclusion The adherence to thiopurines in UC patients is high (78%). Non-adherence is not related to clinical or pharmacological factors. Adherence rate was not associated with disease activity.

Risk Factors for Medication Nonadherence to Self-Injectable Biologic Therapy in Adult Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), nonadherence to biologic therapy increases risk of disease flare. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for nonadherence.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study evaluating patients with IBD treated at a tertiary care center and prescribed self-injectable biologic therapy using the center's specialty pharmacy. Adherence was defined using medication possession ratio (MPR). Nonadherence was defined as MPR <0.86.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty patients (n = 393 with CD and n = 67 with UC) were evaluated with mean MPR (interquartile range) equaling 0.89 (0.48-1). Overall, 69% of patients were adherent (defined as MPR ≥0.86), 66% of patients with CD and 87% of patients with UC. In univariate analysis, several factors increased risk of nonadherence: CD diagnosis, insurance type, psychiatric history, smoking, prior biologic use, and narcotic use (P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, Medicaid insurance (odds ratio [OR], 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-15.6) and CD diagnosis (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-6.0) increased risk of nonadherence. In CD, as the number of risk factors increased (narcotic use, psychiatric history, prior biologic use, and smoking), the probability of nonadherence increased. Adherence was 72% in patients with 0-1 risk factors, decreasing to 62%, 61%, and 42% in patients with 2, 3, and 4 risk factors, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified risk factors for nonadherence to biologic therapy. In patients with CD, the probability of nonadherence increased as the number of risk factors increased.

Assessing Oral Medication Adherence and Identifying Predictors of Low Adherence in Chinese Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Poor medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) had a negative impact on disease outcomes. In this study, we aimed to determine predictors of low adherence in the Chinese IBD populations and also aimed to compare a self-reported scale to a pharmacy refill index in assessing adherence of 5-ASA and azathioprine taken by Chinese IBD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients with IBD who had been taking 5-ASA or azathioprine for at least 3 months were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. The MPR was calculated from previous six-month pharmacy refill data and the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was issued through QR code questionnaires. Intentional and unintentional adherence scores were calculated according to specific items. Non-adherence was defined as MMAS-8 scores <6 or MPR < 0.8.

RESULTS

The response rate in the IBD patients was as high as 97%. 5-ASA non-adherence rate assessed by MPR was 30% and 37% by MMAS-8, and azathioprine non-adherence rate assessed was 33% by both MPR and MMAS-8. In a linear regression analysis, MPR value was significantly correlated with MMAS-8 score in 5-ASA group (r=0.4, p=0.003), and significantly correlated with unintentional adherence score (r=0.47, p<0.001). No significant correlation was observed between MPR value and MMAS-8 score in azathioprine group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.13; P=0.0015) and previous abdominal surgery (OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 2.09-4.27; P=0.04) were associated with high medication adherence. While patients who had small intestine lesion (OR: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01-0.17; P=0.006) were associated with low adherence.

CONCLUSION

Predictors of low adherence were young age, lesions on small intestine, whereas previous abdominal surgery was a protective factor. This study also demonstrated that the MMAS-8 scale was a valid instrument for assessing 5-ASA adherence in IBD patients. Unintentional non-adherence was significantly related to the total non-adherence, which would allow to use the tool to seek ways for adherence improvement.

Young age and tobacco use are predictors of lower medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Medication adherence is crucial in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) because medication nonadherence in these patients is associated with an increased risk of flare-up, relapse, recurrence, loss of response to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, morbidity and mortality, and poor quality of life. Data on risk factors are very controversial in the literature.

AIM

To assess the prevalence of medication nonadherence and to identify predictors of low medication adherence in Spanish patients with IBD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a cross-sectional study that included consecutive outpatients with IBD attending in our adult tertiary clinic in a 3-month period. Morisky 8-Item Medication Adherence Scale questionnaire as well as a survey of sociodemographic data were used.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients were evaluated. Almost half of the patients (46.4%) had high medication adherence, 30.9% had medium adherence, and 22.7% had low adherence. In relation to predictive factors of medication adherence, multivariate analysis showed that age was associated with high adherence [odds ratio (OR): 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.06; P=0.002]. However, being a smoker and presence of Crohn's disease were associated with low adherence (OR: 3.47; 95% CI: 1.36-8.90; P<0.01 and OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.12-5.79; P<0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Only half of patients were high medication adherers. Young age, active smoking, and Crohn's disease seems to be predictors of low medication adherence. On the basis of these data, efforts for reinforce medication adherence should be especially directed to young patients and smokers.

Internet and WeChat used by patients with Crohn's disease in China: a multi-center questionnaire survey

Background

Currently, WeChat is widely used in disease education for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) in China. It is beneficial for the patients to actively engage in their disease management.

Methods

In this study, we examined the source and expectations of disease information for Chinese CD patients, analysing the content of popular WeChat public accounts and their potential association with medication adherence.

Results

Between November 24th, 2017 and April 10th, 2018, online questionnaires were sent to CD patients from eight different large urban hospitals in China. In all, 436 patients with CD were surveyed, and 342 patients responded. Patients most frequently visited Baidu (65%), WeChat (61%) and medical websites such as Haodaifu (35%) when searching for IBD-related information. Among ten WeChat IBD public accounts, the China Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation (CCCF) (73%), “IBD Academic Officer” (21%) and “IBD in love” (21%) were the most popular. CD patients were most interested in information from the internet about diet and day-to-day health-related living with IBD (83%), an introduction to the disease (80%), and medication advances and side effects (80%). The correlation between the information provided by the top five WeChat public accounts and patients’ expectations was low. Additionally, most patients (64%) had greater confidence in overcoming the disease after learning about CD through their internet searches. Medical adherence was also related to internet access and income (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

WeChat has become a major source of information for IBD education in China, but the content of WeChat didn’t fully meet patients’ expectations. Therefore, future initiatives should aim to provide high-quality information that based on patients’ demands.

Adherence to therapy of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases are autoimmune systemic forms of pathology. The concept of continuous life-long drug intake is a cornerstone in their therapy. The review presents the factors that reduce patients adherence to treatment and ways to improve it. They include informing the patient about the disease and treatment, selection of individual therapy regimen, consolidation of achievements, provision of social support and interaction with other specialists.

The complexity of evaluating and increasing adherence in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), due to their chronic and progressive nature, require lifelong treatment to relief and/or prevent inflammation and symptoms, obtaining mucosal healing at best. Therefore, adherence to treatment is an essential topic to address when treating patients with IBD. Nonetheless, adherence remains a common and complex issue in IBD care. Patient characteristics such as young age, male sex and employment has previously been verified as possible predictors of non-adherence. Additionally, evaluating adherence in itself is a challenge since both accurate and easy-to-use screening tools as well as golden standards are lacking.

Medication adherence in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory condition with intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. Medications are the cornerstone of treatment of IBD. However, patients often adhere to medication poorly. Adherence to medications is defined as the process by which patients take their medications as prescribed. Treatment non-adherence is a common problem among chronic diseases, averaging 50% in developed countries and is even poorer in developing countries. In this review, we will examine the adherence data in IBD which vary greatly depending on the study population, route of administration, and methods of adherence measurement used. We will also discuss the adverse clinical outcomes related to non-adherence to medical treatment including increased disease activity, flares, loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, and so forth. There are many methods to measure medication adherence namely direct and indirect methods, each with their advantages and drawbacks. Finally, we will explore different intervention strategies to improve adherence to medications.

Clinical Predictors of Future Nonadherence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to medical therapy is frequently encountered in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to identify predictors for future (non)adherence in IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study with adult patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Data were collected by means of 3-monthly questionnaires on the course of disease and healthcare utilization. Medication adherence was assessed using a visual analogue scale, ranging from 0% to 100%. Levels <80% were considered to indicate nonadherence. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire was used to identify illness perceptions. We used a logistic regression analysis to identify patient- and disease-related factors predictive of nonadherence 3 months after the assessment of predictors.

RESULTS

In total, 1558 patients with CD and 1054 patients with UC were included and followed for 2.5 years. On average, 12.1% of patients with CD and 13.3% of patients with UC using IBD-specific medication were nonadherent. Nonadherence was most frequently observed in patients using mesalazine (CD), budesonide (UC) and rectally administrated therapy (both CD and UC). A higher perceived treatment control and understanding of the disease were associated with adherence to medical therapy. Independent predictors of future nonadherence were age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.99 per year), nonadherence (OR: 26.91), a current flare (OR: 1.30) and feelings of anxiety/depression (OR: 1.17), together with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve of 0.74.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower age at diagnosis, flares, feelings of anxiety or depression, and nonadherence are associated with future nonadherence in patients with IBD. Altering illness perceptions could be an approach to improve adherence behavior.

Factors Predicting the Adherence to the Therapy of Italian IBD Patients

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic gastrointestinal disorders influencing many aspects of the patient's life and accounting for substantial social costs. They require long-term therapies and regular contact with the clinic of reference. Our aim is to investigate therapy adherence and identify predictors of adherence.

METHODS

151 patients were recruited in IBD clinic at the University of Salerno filled in the modified Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, a standardized questionnaire provided during the visit.

RESULTS

Overall, 71.5% of the patients report to take all medications regularly. According to the scale, our population showed a 62.5% medium-high adherence to oral 5-ASA, a 72% medium-high adherence to immunomodulators, a 60% medium-high adherence to oral steroids, and 94.9% adherence to biologics. Younger patients tend to be less compliant to the therapy. The main reasons for the low adherence to therapy were the "hassle of sticking to the medication plan" and "their feeling better." Conclusion. In Italy, where the healthcare system covers most of the expenses for IBD therapy, almost 30% of IBD patients report low compliance to therapy. Healthcare givers should improve the knowledge regarding the disease and favor the development of combined drugs that would simplify the daily medication plan.

Assessing medication adherence in inflammatory bowel diseases. A comparison between a self-administered scale and a pharmacy refill index

BACKGROUND

Medication non-adherence in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a negative impact on disease outcome. Different tools have been proposed to assess non-adherence. We aimed to compare a self-administered scale and a pharmacy refill index as a reliable measure of medication adherence and to determine what factors are related to adherence.

METHODS

Consecutive non-active IBD outpatients were asked to fill in the self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and the Beliefs about Medication Questionnaire (BMQ). Pharmacy refill data were reviewed from the previous three or six months and the medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated. Non-adherence was defined as MMAS-8 scores < 6 or MPR < 0.8.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and three patients were enrolled (60% ulcerative colitis, 40% Crohn's disease); 51% were men, and the mean age was 46.3 (14) years. Seventy-four per cent of patients were on monotherapy and 26% on combination therapy; altogether, 65% received mesalazine, 46% thiopurines and 16% anti-tumor necrosis factor alfa. Non-adherence rate assessed by MPR was 37% and 22.4% by MMAS-8. Receiver operator curve analysis using a MMAS-8 cut-off of six gave an area under the curve of 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.7), p = 0.001. This score had an 85% sensitivity and 34% specificity to predict medication non-adherence, with negative and positive predictive values of 57% and 70% respectively. High scores in the BMQ potential for harm of medication were significantly associated with MPR non-adherence (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of MMAS-8 to identify medication non-adherence in inactive IBD outpatients in our setting is poor due to a low specificity and a negative predictive value. Psychosocial factors such as beliefs about medication seem to be related to IBD non-adherence.

Medication non-adherence in adult patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review and update of the determining factors, consequences and possible interventions

Achieving adherence to medications can be a serious challenge for patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Medical treatment is fundamental for inducing and maintaining remission, preventing flares and reducing the risk of colorectal cancer. Non-adherence may affect patients' quality of life resulting in unfavourable treatment outcomes, more hospitalizations and higher healthcare-related costs. Recognising and improving adherence is therefore a primary aim for the treatment of IBD. Areas covered: We critically discuss the current knowledge on medication non-adherence in adult patients affected by IBD, also mentioning a few issues concerning the paediatric and adolescent populations. In particular, we reviewed the literature focusing on the definition and detection of non-adherence, on its extent and on the possible non-modifiable and modifiable factors involved (patient-centred, therapy-related, disease-related and physician-related). Furthermore, we analysed the interventional studies performed so far. The literature review was conducted through PubMed addressing medication non-adherence in IBD, using the keywords 'adherence' and related terms and 'IBD, ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease'. Expert commentary: Adherence to therapy for IBD is a complex yet fundamental issue that cannot be solved by addressing a single aspect only. Future studies should focus on patient-tailored and multidimensional interventions.

Re-phrasing the question: A simple tool for evaluation of adherence to therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to medication in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a challenging problem which is often overlooked or under-estimated by the physician or denied by the patient. We aimed to examine if re-phrasing the wording of the question used by the physician could help in revealing more patients who are non-adherent, and for whom appropriate counseling may be instituted.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of IBD patients treated in a tertiary center was conducted. Patients received a questionnaire detailing their treatments and disease course, as well as their perceptions about disease. Two forms of questions about adherence were deliberately placed in two separate parts of the questionnaire: One was 'are you taking your medications regularly as prescribed?' (Standard question), and the second, more emphatic question, was 'how often does it happen that you miss a drug dosing?' (Re-phrased question). The rate of non-adherence disclosed by each of these questions was compared. Sensitivity, specificity and predicative values were computed for each question against the conventional definition of non-adherence as taking of less than 80% of prescribed medication doses disclosed by any of the methods. Predictors of non-compliance and of denying non-compliance were also explored.

RESULTS

Overall, 165 patients were included (49% female, mean age 33.7 ± 12.7 SD, median age 30 years, 29.6% with ulcerative colitis, 62.4% with Crohn's disease). Upon questioning, 50 (30.3%) of the patients admitted to non-adherence in the last month when asked by the emphatic re-phrased question format, compared with only 10 patients (6%) reporting non-adherence when asked directly by the standard question (OR 7.4, 95%CI 3.6-15.2, p < 0.001). Thus, a 'Do you take your medicine regularly' question format disclosed only 20% of genuinely non-compliant patients and had 16% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity for revealing non-adherence (PPV 80%, NPV 72.9%) compared with the reference re-phrased question. The leading cause for non-adherence was skepticism about drug efficacy or safety (20.5%), followed by vacation or weekend (15%), problems with prescription or pharmacy (13.5%) and forgetfulness (10%). No single demographic or clinical factor correlated with non-adherence. The only factor which correlated with higher probability for non-adherence was biological and combination treatment.

CONCLUSION

Non-compliance with treatment is much more common than patients admit. Asking patients how often does it happen that they miss a drug dosing is a simple, practical tool which performs significantly better in disclosing non-adherence compared with asking patients if they take their medication as they should.

Inflammatory bowel disease: adherence to immunomodulators in a biological therapy era

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy, with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents and immunomodulators, is the most effective option to induce and maintain remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Infliximab, with its administration features, determines particular conditions of adherence; the same is not possible with thiopurines. Nevertheless, research on adherence to these treatments is scarce. Nonadherence worsens the prognosis of IBD.

AIM

(a) Assess adherence to immunomodulators and (b) determine therapeutic nonadherence predictors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included all IBD outpatients consecutively evaluated over a 6-month period in our center. Participants completed a study-specific questionnaire on IBD, IBD therapeutic adherence (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8-item), Therapeutics Complexity questionnaire, Beliefs about Medication questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients under azathioprine were considered; 49.1% were also under anti-tumor necrosis factor-α. Self-assessed questionnaire showed that 70.5% were adherent to immunosuppression. Similar adherence was found with and without infliximab (68.4%-monotherapy vs. 72.7%-combination therapy; P=0.61). Nonintentional nonadherence was documented in 57.6%; 42.4% reported voluntary nonadherence. Nonadherence was higher in male patients [odds ratio (OR): 3.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-11.95; P=0.023], younger patients (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-0.98; P=0.01), nonsmokers (OR: 4.90; 95% CI: 1.22-19.73; P=0.025), and those who had depression (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.36-3.62; P=0.001). Most of the IBD patients believed in the necessity of maintaining immunosuppression (86.7%), but 36.6% reported concerns about drugs.

CONCLUSION

Nonadherence to thiopurines plays a significant role in IBD. Nonetheless, it does not increase with association with biological agents. Involuntary nonadherence is higher. Male sex, younger age, nonsmoker, and presence of depression were independent predictors of nonadherence to immunomodulators. More than one-third of IBD patients had concerns about drugs. Optimizing the discussion on patients' concerns to overcome perceptual barriers related to drugs may obviate the negative course of IBD related to nonadherence.

Preventive health measures in inflammatory bowel disease

We aim to review the literature and provide guidance on preventive health measures in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Structured searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from January 1976 to June 2016 using the following keywords: (inflammatory bowel disease OR Crohn’s disease OR ulcerative colitis) AND (health maintenance OR preventive health OR health promotion). Abstracts of the articles selected from each of these multiple searches were reviewed, and those meeting the inclusion criteria (that is, providing data regarding preventive health or health maintenance in IBD patients) were recorded. Reference lists from the selected articles were manually reviewed to identify further relevant studies. Patients with IBD are at increased risk of developing adverse events related to the disease course, therapeutic interventions, or non-adherence to medication. Recent studies have suggested that IBD patients do not receive preventive services with the same thoroughness as patients with other chronic diseases. Preventive health measures can avert morbidity and improve the quality of life of patients with IBD. Gastroenterologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) should have an up to date working knowledge of preventive health measures for IBD patients. A holistic approach and better communication between gastroenterologists and PCPs with explicit clarification of roles will prevent duplication of services and streamline care.

Assessing Self-reported Medication Adherence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparison of Tools

BACKGROUND

Capturing (non)-adherence to medical prescriptions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is challenging. We aimed to compare 3 different tools to measure self-assessed medication adherence of patients with IBD.

METHODS

Adult patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis were prospectively followed. IBD-specific medication use was collected by 3-monthly questionnaires. At 2.5 years of follow-up, medication adherence was assessed using 3 tools: (1) the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), (2) the single question how well patients take their daily medication using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and (3) the Forget Medicine scale (FM), assessing how often patients forget their medication. Cross-sectional agreement among measures was visualized with scatterplots and quantified with Spearman's rank correlations.

RESULTS

In total, 913 patients with IBD were analyzed, 697 of whom received IBD-specific medication. High adherence on the MMAS-8 was consistent with high scores on the VAS and low scores on the FM. Disagreement between tools increased when patients were less adherent. A correlation of 0.44 was found between the MMAS-8 and VAS; -0.59 between the MMAS-8 and FM, and -0.55 between the VAS and FM (all P < 0.01). The VAS most optimally represented the quantitative variability of adherence, whereas the MMAS-8 and the FM might have resulted in overestimation or underestimation of adherence due to unequal differences in outcome possibilities.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IBD, a VAS seems the most appropriate tool for quantifying medication adherence in clinical practice. The MMAS-8 may be used additionally to provide insight in specific reasons for non-adherence.

Identifying predictors of low adherence in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic gastrointestinal conditions requiring medical therapy to maintain clinical remission. Low adherence to therapy leads to poorer disease outcome. Therefore, we aimed to identify predictors of low adherence in the Belgian IBD population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 2013 and March 2014, 570 ambulatory patients (471 patients with IBD and 99 non-IBD controls) visiting a tertiary IBD-referral centre were requested to complete the Morisky 8-Item Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) questionnaire as well as a survey of sociodemographic data (smoking, educational level, marital status and occupation). On the basis of the self-reported MMAS questionnaire, adherence was categorized as low (MMAS-8 score: >2), medium (MMAS-8 score: 1-2) or high (MMAS-8 score: 0).

RESULTS

The response rate in the IBD population was as high as 99%. Low adherence was reported less frequently in the IBD population than in the non-IBD controls (36 vs. 49%, P=0.021). In multivariate analysis, factors associated independently with low adherence in the IBD population were age younger than 40 [odds ratio: 1.589 (95% confidence interval: 1.057-2.389), P=0.026], higher educational level [1.961 (1.305-2.946), P=0.001], being single [1.641 (1.020-2.639), P=0.041] and the use of mesalamine [1.591 (1.018-2.487), P=0.041]. Self-employment was identified as a protective factor for low adherence [0.397 (0.167-0.946), P=0.041].

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of the IBD patients were low adherers. Predictors of low adherence were aged younger than 40 years, higher educational level, being single and mesalamine use, whereas being self-employed was a protective factor. On the basis of these data, personalized algorithms may be developed to improve patient education, empowerment and follow-up.

Non-adherence to Anti-TNF Therapy is Associated with Illness Perceptions and Clinical Outcomes in Outpatients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results from a Prospective Multicentre Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-adherence to anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is a serious problem. In this study, we assessed risk factors for non-adherence and examined the association between adherence to anti-TNF agents and loss of response [LOR].

METHODS

In this multicentre, 12-month observational study, outpatients with IBD were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Adherence was measured with the Modified Morisky Adherence Scale-8 [MMAS-8] and 12-month pharmacy refills [medication possession ratio, MPR]. Risk factors included demographic and clinical characteristics, medication beliefs, and illness perceptions. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the association between MPR and LOR to anti-TNF, IBD-related surgery or hospitalisation, dose intensification, or discontinuation of anti-TNF.

RESULTS

In total, 128 patients were included [67 infliximab, 61 adalimumab], mean age 37 ( ± standard deviation [SD] 14) years, 71 [56%] female. Median disease duration was 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-14) years. Clinical disease activity was present in 41/128 [32%] patients, 36/127 [28%] patients had an MMAS-8 < 6 ['low adherence'], and 25/99 [25%] patients had an MPR < 80% [non-adherence]. Risk factors for non-adherence included adalimumab use (odds ratio [OR] 10.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-40.00), stronger emotional response [OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.31], and shorter timeline perception, i.e. short perceived illness duration [OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.96]. Adherence is linearly and negatively [OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.63] associated with LOR.

CONCLUSION

Non-adherence to anti-TNF agents is strongly associated with LOR to anti-TNF agents, adalimumab use, and illness perceptions. The latter may provide an important target for interventions aimed at improving adherence and health outcomes.

Treatment Nonadherence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Identification, Scope, and Management Strategies

Treatment adherence is of critical importance in the management of patients with IBD. Poor adherence can lead to increased disease activity, loss of response to therapy, and increased costs of care. It has been well established that adherence to long-term therapy for chronic illnesses is extremely poor, averaging around 50% in developed countries. Measured rates of nonadherence in IBD are similar, but vary depending on the type of therapy and the population being observed. This article reviews the scientific data on treatment nonadherence in IBD. The methods commonly used to evaluate treatment adherence investigation are reviewed. The consequences and scope of treatment nonadherence are summarized. Finally, the scientific data on management strategies to address the problem of treatment nonadherence are explored.

A screening instrument to identify ulcerative colitis patients with the high possibility of current non-adherence to aminosalicylate medication based on the Health Belief Model: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to aminosalicylates is observed among 30% to 45% of patients with ulcerative colitis and increases the risk of relapse. The Health Belief Model is a theoretical model that could offer a broader perspective to improve patients' self-medication adherence. This study aimed to develop a screening instrument based on the Health Belief Model to screen patients with ulcerative colitis who had a high possibility of current non-adherence to aminosalicylates. The study was also designed to allow examination of factors of non-adherence.

METHODS

A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and prescribed aminosalicylates. Non-adherence was defined as taking less than 80% of the prescribed dose. We hypothesized that there was a significant relationship between current aminosalicylate non-adherence and five components of the HBM: beliefs about taking aminosalicylates, disease characteristics, medication characteristics, abdominal symptoms, and sociodemographic characteristics. A logistic regression model was applied and the coefficients converted to a numeric scores in order to develop a screening instrument which could reliably discriminate non-adherent and adherent subjects.

RESULTS

Non-adherence was observed in 127 (29.6%) of the 429 enrolled subjects. Lower perceptions of belief in taking aminosalicylates, absence of visible bleeding, eight daily tablets or less taken, and no concomitant use of thiopurines were related to non-adherence. We then developed a screening instrument comprising 22 items. When the cut-off point was set at 60, the instrument showed 85.0% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity with an area under the curve of 0.84 (95% confidence interval = 0.79-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The instrument appeared to be reliable for identifying patients with a high possibility of current non-adherence to aminosalicylates. Further, the instrument may provide useful information for detecting patients with a high possibility of current non-adherence and for assessing factors of non-adherence. On the other hand, we need to evaluate disease activity more strictly and examine whether it is included in the screening instrument in the future.

Attitudes to mesalamine questionnaire: a novel tool to predict mesalamine nonadherence in patients with IBD

OBJECTIVES

Poor adherence to mesalamine is common and driven by a combination of lifestyle and behavioral factors, as well as health beliefs. We sought to develop a valid tool to identify barriers to patient adherence and predict those at risk for future nonadherence.

METHODS

A 10-item survey was developed from patient-reported barriers to adherence. The survey was administered to 106 patients with ulcerative colitis who were prescribed mesalamine, and correlated with prospectively collected 12-month pharmacy refills (medication possession ratio (MPR)), urine levels of salicylates, and self-reported adherence (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS)-8).

RESULTS

From the initial 10-item survey, 8 items correlated highly with the MMAS-8 score at enrollment. Computer-generated randomization produced a derivation cohort of 60 subjects and a validation cohort of 46 subjects to assess the survey items in their ability to predict future adherence. Two items from the patient survey correlated with objective measures of long-term adherence: their belief in the importance of maintenance mesalamine even when in remission and their concerns about side effects. The additive score based on these two items correlated with 12-month MPR in both the derivation and validation cohorts (P<0.05). Scores on these two items were associated with a higher risk of being nonadherent over the subsequent 12 months (relative risk (RR) =2.2, 95% confidence interval=1.5-3.5, P=0.04). The area under the curve for the performance of this 2-item tool was greater than that of the 10-item MMAS-8 score for predicting MPR scores over 12 months (area under the curve 0.7 vs. 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' beliefs about the need for maintenance mesalamine and their concerns about side effects influence their adherence to mesalamine over time. These concerns could easily be raised in practice to identify patients at risk of nonadherence (Clinical Trial number NCT01349504).

Current approaches to the management of new-onset ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, inflammatory gastrointestinal disease of the colon. As a chronic condition, UC follows a relapsing and remitting course with medical maintenance during periods of quiescent disease and appropriate escalation of therapy during times of flare. Initial treatment strategies must not only take into account current clinical presentation (with specific regard for extent and severity of disease activity) but must also take into consideration treatment options for the long-term. The following review offers an approach to new-onset UC with a focus on early treatment strategies. An introduction to the disease entity is provided along with an approach to initial diagnosis. Stratification of patients based on clinical parameters, disease extent, and severity of illness is paramount to determining course of therapy. Frequent assessments are required to determine clinical response, and treatment intensification may be warranted if expected improvement goals are not appropriately reached. Mild-to- moderate UC can be managed with aminosalicylates, mesalamine, and topical corticosteroids with oral corticosteroids reserved for unresponsive cases. Moderate-to-severe UC generally requires oral or intravenous corticosteroids in the short-term with consideration of long-term management options such as biologic agents (as initial therapy or in transition from steroids) or thiopurines (as bridging therapy). Patients with severe or fulminant UC who are recalcitrant to medical therapy or who develop disease complications (such as toxic megacolon) should be considered for colectomy. Early surgical referral in severe or refractory UC is crucial, and colectomy may be a life-saving procedure. The authors provide a comprehensive evidence-based approach to current treatment options for new-onset UC with discussion of long-term therapeutic efficacy and safety, patient-centered perspectives including quality of life and medication compliance, and future directions in related inflammatory bowel disease care.

Current and emerging maintenance therapies for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic idiopathic intestinal disease that requires life-long maintenance therapy to maintain clinical remission. This article reviews the current literature on maintenance treatments in UC. It examines the natural history of the condition and the proposed benefits of treatment. These include improving quality of life parameters, decreasing corticosteroid intake, the prevention of relapse, the prevention of colorectal cancer and the avoidance of colectomy. The immunosuppressive era appears to be reducing the need for elective colectomy in UC. The article explores the classes of drug currently used for maintenance of UC, reviews the literature around adherence issues, and summarizes emerging agents in this space.

Factors associated with thiopurine non-adherence in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Medication non-adherence seems to be a particular problem in younger patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and has a negative impact on disease outcome.

AIMS

To assess whether non-adherence, defined using thiopurine metabolite levels, is more common in young adults attending a transition clinic than adults with IBD and whether psychological co-morbidity is a contributing factor. We also determined the usefulness of the Modified Morisky 8-item Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) to detect non-adherence.

METHODS

Seventy young adults [51% (36) male] and 74 [62% (46) male] adults were included. Psychological co-morbidity was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) and self-reported adherence using the MMAS-8.

RESULTS

Twelve percent (18/144) of the patients were non-adherent. Multivariate analysis [OR, (95% CI), P value] confirmed that being young adult [6.1 (1.7-22.5), 0.001], of lower socio-economic status [1.1 (1.0-1.1), <0.01] and reporting higher HADS-D scores [1.2 (1.0-1.4), 0.01] were associated with non-adherence. Receiver operator curve analysis of MMAS-8 scores gave an area under the curve (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.77-0.92), (P < 0.0001): using a cut-off of <6, the MMAS-8 score has a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 64% to predict thiopurine non-adherence. Non-adherence was associated with escalation in therapy, hospital admission and surgeries in the subsequent 6 months of follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherence to thiopurines is more common in young adults with inflammatory bowel disease, and is associated with lower socio-economic status and depression. The high negative predictive value of MMAS-8 scores <6 suggests that it could be a useful screen for thiopurine non-adherence.

Modifiable factors associated with nonadherence to maintenance medication for inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence frequently impaired the efficacy of therapy to maintain remission from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). There is a lack of practical and effective interventions to improve adherence. This study aimed to identify modifiable risk factors, which may yield targets for new interventions.

METHODS

Participants with IBD were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics and office-based gastroenterologists. Demographic and disease-related data were recorded by means of self-administered questionnaires. Modifiable risk factors were assessed with the validated Belief about Medicine Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score, and short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire. Adherence was assessed separately for 5-aminosalicylates, thiopurines, and biological agents using the validated Medicine Adherence Report Scale (good adherence defined as >16).

RESULTS

Nonadherence occurred in 102 of 356 participants (28.7%). Adherence increased significantly with more aggressive therapies (median Medicine Adherence Report Scale: 5-aminosalicylates 18, thiopurines 19, biological 20; P < 0.0001). Nonadherence was not associated with anxiety and depression or disease-related patient knowledge. Adherent patients had significantly higher belief of necessity for medication (P < 0.0001) and a trend toward lower concerns about medication (P = 0.08). Membership of an IBD patient organization was associated with better adherence (P < 0.0001). Concerns about medication rose significantly with more aggressive therapies (P = 0.009), but belief of necessity was similar for all medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonadherence occurs most frequently with 5-aminosalicylates. Belief of necessity may prove the key target for future interventions, although general IBD education is unlikely to yield an adherence benefit. Patient organization membership should be encouraged.

My treatment approach to the management of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis diagnosis and management represent a challenge for clinicians. The disguises of ischemia and acute infectious colitis continue to confound the diagnosis. The therapeutic options have remarkably expanded in the way of immunomodulators, biologics, or ileoanal pouch surgery, yet all carry potential considerable risks. These risks can confuse and impair patient acceptance, particularly elderly patients and men younger than 30 years. Predictors of outcome of medical and surgical therapy have improved but are far from complete. Nevertheless, therapies focused on the specific patient's condition continue to offer hope.

A random urine test can identify patients at risk of mesalamine non-adherence: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

Mesalamine non-adherence is common among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and can be difficult to identify in practice. We sought to determine whether a random urine test for salicylates could be used as a marker of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) ingestion and identify patients at risk of non-adherence. Our aim is to determine whether measurement of salicylates in a random urine sample correlates with 5-ASA levels, and predicts an individual's risk of mesalamine non-adherence.

METHODS

Prospective observational study. Urinary salicylates (by colorimetry) and 5-ASA (by liquid chromatography and tandem-mass spectrometry) were measured in a random urine sample at baseline in patients and controls. Mesalamine adherence was quantified by patient self-reports at enrollment and pharmacy refills of mesalamine over 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients with UC taking mesalamine maintenance therapy were prospectively enrolled from the clinic. Random urine salicylate levels (by colorimetry) were highly correlated with urine 5-ASA metabolite levels (by mass spectrometry; R2=0.9). A random urine salicylate level above 15 mg/dl distinguished patients who had recently taken mesalamine from controls (area under the curve value 0.9, sensitivity 95%, specificity 77%). A significant proportion of patients (27%) who self-identified as "high adherers" by an adherence questionnaire (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8) had random levels of urine salicylate below this threshold. These patients were at higher risk of objectively measured non-adherence to mesalamine over the subsequent 6 months (RR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1-7.0).

CONCLUSIONS

A random urine salicylate level measured in the clinic can identify patients who have not recently taken mesalamine, and who are at higher risk of longitudinal non-adherence. This test could be used to screen patients who may warrant interventions to improve adherence and prevent disease relapse.