Optimizing ribavirin exposure by therapeutic drug monitoring improves treatment response in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotics: Defining the Therapeutic Range

PURPOSE

In the present narrative review, the authors aimed to discuss the relationship between the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) of antibiotics and clinical response (including efficacy and toxicity). In addition, this review describes how this relationship can be applied to define the therapeutic range of a particular antibiotic (or antibiotic class) for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

METHODS

Relevant clinical studies that examined the relationship between PK/PD of antibiotics and clinical response (efficacy and response) were reviewed. The review (performed for studies published in English up to September 2021) assessed only commonly used antibiotics (or antibiotic classes), including aminoglycosides, beta-lactam antibiotics, daptomycin, fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides (teicoplanin and vancomycin), and linezolid. The best currently available evidence was used to define the therapeutic range for these antibiotics.

RESULTS

The therapeutic range associated with maximal clinical efficacy and minimal toxicity is available for commonly used antibiotics, and these values can be implemented when TDM for antibiotics is performed. Additional data are needed to clarify the relationship between PK/PD indices and the development of antibiotic resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM should only be regarded as a means to achieve the main goal of providing safe and effective antibiotic therapy for all patients. The next critical step is to define exposures that can prevent the development of antibiotic resistance and include these exposures as therapeutic drug monitoring targets.

The impact of continuous renal replacement therapy on antibiotic pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients

Introduction: Mortality due to severe infections in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains high. Nevertheless, rapid administration of adequate antibiotic therapy can improve survival. Delivering optimized antibiotic therapy can be a challenge, as standard drug regimens often result in insufficient or excessive serum concentrations due to significant changes in the volume of distribution and/or drug clearance in these patients. Insufficient drug concentrations can be responsible for therapeutic failure and death, while excessive concentrations can cause toxic adverse events.Areas covered: We performed a narrative review of the impact of CRRT on the pharmacokinetics of the most frequently used antibiotics in critically ill patients. We have provided explanations for the changes in the PKs of antibiotics observed and suggestions to optimize dosage regimens in these patients.Expert opinion: Despite considerable efforts to identify optimal antibiotic dosage regimens for critically ill patients receiving CRRT, adequate target achievement remains too low for hydrophilic antibiotics in many patients. Whenever possible, individualized therapy based on results from therapeutic drug monitoring must be given to avoid undertreatment or toxicity.

Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper

Purpose

This Position Paper aims to review and discuss the available data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antibacterials, antifungals and antivirals in critically ill adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This Position Paper also provides a practical guide on how TDM can be applied in routine clinical practice to improve therapeutic outcomes in critically ill adult patients.

Methods

Literature review and analysis were performed by Panel Members nominated by the endorsing organisations, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic and Critically Ill Patient Study Groups of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT) and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC). Panel members made recommendations for whether TDM should be applied clinically for different antimicrobials/classes.

Results

TDM-guided dosing has been shown to be clinically beneficial for aminoglycosides, voriconazole and ribavirin. For most common antibiotics and antifungals in the ICU, a clear therapeutic range has been established, and for these agents, routine TDM in critically ill patients appears meritorious. For the antivirals, research is needed to identify therapeutic targets and determine whether antiviral TDM is indeed meritorious in this patient population. The Panel Members recommend routine TDM to be performed for aminoglycosides, beta-lactam antibiotics, linezolid, teicoplanin, vancomycin and voriconazole in critically ill patients.

Conclusion

Although TDM should be the standard of care for most antimicrobials in every ICU, important barriers need to be addressed before routine TDM can be widely employed worldwide.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06050-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Multiplexed therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiviral drugs by LC-MS/MS

Background

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be a useful tool in the clinical management of anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) drugs. Methods for the determination of various types of anti-HCV drugs in biological samples are, therefore, needed for clinical laboratories.

Objective

In this work, employing the LC-MS/MS approach, we aimed to develop a multiplexed method for identification of the following anti-HCV drugs: Ribavirin (RBV), Boceprevir (BOC), Telaprevir (TVR), Simeprevir (SIM), Daclatasvir (DAC), Sofosbuvir (SOF) and its metabolite GS 331007 (SOFM) in liquid plasma and in dried plasma spots (DPSs).

Method

A single-step extractive-deproteinization was employed for both liquid plasma and DPSs. Reverse-phase liquid chromatography coupled with MRM detection was developed for multiplexed drug detection and quantification.

Results

Sensitivities (expressed as LOQ) were 10 (±1.2), 10 (±4.9), 10 (±4.4), 10 (±4.4), 10 (±6.4), 10 (±3.4), 10 (±6.4) ng/ml for RBV, SOFM, SOF, DAC, BOC, TVR, and SIM, respectively; accuracy (expressed as BIAS%) was <10% for all drugs; reproducibility (intra- and inter-day CV%) was <10% for all drugs; dynamic range was 10-10,000 ng/ml for all drugs.

Conclusions

A novel, simple, rapid and robust LC-MS/MS multiplex assay for the TDM of various anti-HCV drugs that are currently in the clinic was successfully developed. Application to DPS samples enabled TDM to be used for outpatients as well.

Lower Ribavirin Plasma Concentrations in HCV/HIV-Coinfected Patients Than in HCV-Monoinfected Patients Despite Similar Dosage

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients respond worse to dual therapy with ribavirin (RBV)/peginterferon compared with HCV-monoinfected patients. Several trials found that lower RBV plasma concentrations are associated with impaired virological response rates. The aim of this study was to determine RBV plasma concentrations in a cohort of HCV-monoinfected and HCV/HIV-coinfected patients. Our hypothesis is that HCV/HIV-coinfected patients have lower RBV plasma concentrations, which may in part explain their inferior response to dual therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in chronic HCV-monoinfected and HCV/HIV-coinfected patients who received peginterferon and weight-based RBV. Plasma RBV concentrations were determined at weeks 4 and 12 by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. RBV concentrations were compared between monoinfected and coinfected patients. We calculated the proportion of patients with a subtherapeutic RBV plasma concentration defined as <2.0 mg/L.

RESULTS

A total of 61 HCV-infected patients were included, of whom 21 (34%) were coinfected with HIV. Although there was no difference in the weight-based dose of RBV between monoinfected and coinfected patients, RBV exposure was significantly lower in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients than in HCV-monoinfected patients: the mean ± SD RBV plasma concentrations were 1.82 ± 0.63 mg/L versus 2.25 ± 0.80 mg/L (P = 0.04) at week 4 and 2.14 ± 0.65 mg/L versus 2.62 ± 0.81 mg/L (P = 0.05) at week 12, respectively. The percentage of patients with subtherapeutic plasma concentrations of RBV in coinfected patients versus monoinfected patients was 62% versus 46% (P = 0.240) at week 4 and 50% versus 16% (P = 0.01) at week 12 of treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV/HCV-coinfected patients yield significantly lower plasma concentrations of RBV than HCV-monoinfected patients. This puts them at an increased risk of not achieving sustained virological response.