1
|
Wehbe H, Gutta A, Gromski MA. Updates on the Prevention and Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in the Colon. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2024; 34:363-381. [PMID: 38395489 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) remains a significant procedure-related complication, with multiple risk factors determining the risk including patient demographics, polyp characteristics, endoscopist expertise, and techniques of polypectomy. Immediate PPB is usually treated promptly, but management of delayed PPB can be challenging. Cold snare polypectomy is the optimal technique for small sessile polyps with hot snare polypectomy for pedunculated and large sessile polyps. Topical hemostatic powders and gels are being investigated for the prevention and management of PPB. Further studies are needed to compare these topical agents with conventional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisham Wehbe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 University Boulevard, UH 3533, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Aditya Gutta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 4100 Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Mark A Gromski
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 4100 Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang ST, Kong QZ, Li YQ, Ji R. Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy versus Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Resecting 3-10 mm Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Digestion 2024; 105:157-165. [PMID: 38198754 DOI: 10.1159/000535521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) compared to those of cold endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) have been reported. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of CEMR and CSP. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of CEMR and CSP in removing 3-10 mm polyps. The outcomes assessed included complete resection rate, intraoperative bleeding rate, delayed bleeding rate, perforation, and polyp removal time. The results are reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. RESULTS Seven studies comprising 1,911 polyps were included in the analysis. The complete resection rate of CEMR was comparable to that of CSP (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.04, p = 0.32). Comparable results were also demonstrated for intraoperative bleeding rate (polyp-based analysis: RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.33-4.43, p = 0.77), delayed bleeding rate (polyp-based analysis: RR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.44-4.15, p = 0.61), and polyp removal time (mean difference: 28.31 s, 95% CI: -21.40-78.02, p = 0.26). No studies reported cases of perforation. CONCLUSION CEMR has comparable efficacy and safety to CSP in removing 3-10 mm polyps. Further randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are warranted to compare and validate efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shao-Tong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, Jinan, China
| | - Qing-Zhou Kong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, Jinan, China
| | - Yan-Qing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, Jinan, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Rui Ji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, Jinan, China
- Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khan R, Samnani S, Vaska M, Grover SC, Walsh CM, Mosko J, Bourke M, Heitman SJ, Forbes N. Effectiveness and safety of thin vs. thick cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E99-E107. [PMID: 38250163 PMCID: PMC10798846 DOI: 10.1055/a-2221-7792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Cold-snare polypectomy (CSP) is considered the standard of care for resection of colorectal polyps ≤10 mm. Data on the efficacy of CSP performed with thin-wire snares compared0 with thick-wire snares are conflicting. We performed a meta-analysis comparing complete resection (CR) and adverse event rates of CSP using thin-wire and thick-wire snares. Patients and methods Comparative studies of adult patients with ≧1 colorectal polyp(s) ≦10 mm who underwent CSP with thin-wire or thick-wire snares were included. We collected data on study, patient, polyp, and snare characteristics. The primary outcome was CR rate. Secondary outcomes were polyp retrieval rate, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed post-polypectomy bleeding, deep mural injury or perforation, patient discomfort, total sedation, and procedure time. We used random-effects models to calculate risk ratios for outcomes. We performed risk of bias assessments, rated the certainty of evidence, and assessed publication bias for all studies. Results We included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two observational studies including 1316 patients with 1679 polyps (826 thin-wire CSPs and 853 thick-wire CSPs). There was no significant difference between thin-wire CSP (92.1%) and thick-wire CSP (87.7%) for RCTs (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.16) or observational studies (78.1% versus 79.6%, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.08). There were no significant differences in polyp retrieval rate or intraprocedural bleeding. There were no cases of delayed bleeding or perforation. Conclusions We found no differences in CR rates for CSP between thin-wire and thick-wire snares. CSP, regardless of snare type, is safe and effective for resection of small colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishad Khan
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sunil Samnani
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcus Vaska
- Knowledge Resource Service, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada
| | - Samir C Grover
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Catharine M Walsh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the Research and Learning Institutes, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada
- The Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Mosko
- Gastroenterology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Steven J Heitman
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Nauzer Forbes
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lv YC, Yao YH, Lei JJ, Tang T. Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Indian J Gastroenterol 2023; 42:757-765. [PMID: 37776439 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01441-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International guidelines recommend cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for polyps < 10 mm in size. However, recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) showed conflicting results for the use of cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) vs. CSP for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) (≤ 5 mm), especially for polyps ≤ 3 mm. Herein we compared CFP with CSP for patients with DCPs in this meta-analysis of RCTs. METHODS We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMBASE databases from inception to November 24, 2022, (Registration number INPLASY2022110135). The primary endpoint was DCP complete resection rate. The secondary endpoints were mean polypectomy time, polyp retrieval rate and complications. RESULTS Seven RCTs involving 1023 DCPs were included. The complete resection rate (91.6% vs. 94.7%) for CFP was not significantly lower for polyps ≤ 5 mm (relative risk [RR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.07). Sub-group analysis showed that the complete resection rate (88.7% vs. 92.4%) for CFP was not significantly lower for DCPs > 3 mm (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.97-1.12). Another sub-group analysis showed that the complete resection rate (97.0% vs. 96.3%) was similar for polyps ≤ 3 mm for CFP vs. CSP (RR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.98-1.03). The mean polypectomy time was not different between CFP and CSP (95% CI: -11.86-10.18). The polyp retrieval rate (100% vs. 96.9%) was not significantly higher for CFP (RR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.98-1.07). There were no reported complications in the included studies. The overall study quality was moderate except for the removal of polyps ≤ 5 mm (low-quality evidence). CONCLUSION CFP was comparable to CSP for the resection of polyps ≤ 3 mm; however, caution should be taken for DCPs > 3 mm because of the low complete resection rate (< 90%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Cai Lv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhenning Buyi and Miao Autonomous County People's Hospital, Zhenning, 561200, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Yan-Hua Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhenning Buyi and Miao Autonomous County People's Hospital, Zhenning, 561200, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Jing-Jing Lei
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, 550004, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Tao Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University, No. 1558 Sanhuan North Road, Wuxing District, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liang Z, Wei Y, Zhang S, Li P. The efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy with submucosal injection for the removal of polyps less than 20 mm in size: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:1892-1899. [PMID: 37608577 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Neoplastic polyp removal is important for colorectal cancer prevention. Endoscopists have proposed cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) as a solution to solve positive cutting edges and postoperative bleeding. However, many controversies regarding its specific performance in practice have been reported. The aim of this pooled analysis was to report the efficacy and safety of CS-EMR. METHODS PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library searched up to January 2022 to identify studies in which CS-EMR was performed for the removal of colorectal polyps measuring less than 20 mm. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate (CRR), and the secondary outcome was the rate of adverse events. RESULTS Eleven studies were included in the final analysis, which included 861 colorectal polyps. The overall CRR with CS-EMR was 96.3% (95% CI, 93.9-98.2%). The early and delayed bleeding rates of CS-EMR were 3.1% (95% CI, 1.2-5.5%) and 1.4% (95% CI, 0.6-2.4%), respectively. There were no statistical significances between CS-EMR and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in terms of the CRR and adverse events, as well as CS-EMR and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR). CONCLUSIONS For resecting colorectal polyps measuring ≤20 mm, CS-EMR is an effective attempt. However, compared with CSP and HS-EMR, CS-EMR did not improve the efficiency and safety of polypectomy as expected. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to compare CSP with CS-EMR in the resection of <10 mm polyps and HSP with CS-EMR in the resection of ≥10 mm polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Liang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Yongqiu Wei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Shutian Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Santos CEOD, Malaman D, Sanmartin IDA, Leão ABHS, Bombassaro IZ, Pereira-Lima JC. COLD SNARE POLYPECTOMY: A SAFE PROCEDURE FOR REMOVING SMALL NON-PEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL LESIONS. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2023; 60:470-477. [PMID: 38018552 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.23042023-115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypectomy is an important treatment option for preventing colorectal cancer. Incomplete polyp resection (IPR) is re-cognized as a risk factor for interval cancer. OBJECTIVE The primary objective was to evaluate the complete polyp resection (CPR) rate for cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in small non-pedunculated polyps and, secondarily, specimen retrieval and complication rates. METHODS We prospectively evaluated 479 polyps <10 mm removed by CSP in 276 patients by an inexperienced endoscopist. RESULTS A total of 476 polyps (99.4%) were resected en bloc. A negative margin (classified as CPR) was observed in 435 polyps (90.8%). An unclear or positive margin (classified as IPR) was observed in 43 cases (9.0%) and 1 case (0.2%), respectively, for an overall IPR rate of 9.2% (44/479). The IPR rate was 12.2% in the first half of cases and 5.9% in the second half (P=0.02). Dividing into tertiles, the IPR rate was 15.0% in the first tertile, 6.9% in the second tertile, and 5.7% in the third tertile (P=0.01). Dividing into quartiles, the IPR rate was 15.8% in the first quartile and 5.9% in the fourth quartile (P=0.03). The IPR rate was 6.3% for type 0-IIa lesions and 14.1% for type 0-Is lesions (P=0.01). For serrated and adenomatous lesions, the IPR rate was 9.2%. Specimen retrieval failed in 3.6% of cases. Immediate bleeding (>30 s) occurred in 1 case (0.2%), treated with argon plasma coagulation. No delayed bleeding or perforation occurred. CONCLUSION CSP is a safe technique that provides good results for the resection of small non-pedunculated polyps, with a short learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Eduardo Oliveira Dos Santos
- Hospital Santa Casa de Caridade, Serviço de Endoscopia, Bagé, RS, Brasil
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Endoscopia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Daniele Malaman
- Hospital Santa Casa de Caridade, Serviço de Endoscopia, Bagé, RS, Brasil
| | | | - Ari Ben-Hur Stefani Leão
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Endoscopia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abuelazm M, Awad AK, Mohamed I, Mahmoud A, Shaikhkhalil H, Shaheen N, Abdelwahab O, Afifi AM, Abdelazeem B, Othman MO. Cold polypectomy techniques for small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:1329-1339. [PMID: 37735986 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2262374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the management of small and diminutive polyps, cold polypectomy is favored over electrocautery polypectomy. However, the optimal cold polypectomy technique is still controversial. Hence, this review aims to investigate the most effective cold technique for small and diminutive colorectal polyps. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through 10 February 2023. R software, (R version 4.2.0) and meta-insight software were used to pool dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) presented with the corresponding confidence interval (CI). Our protocol was prospectively published in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022345619. RESULTS Nineteen RCTs with 3649 patients and 4800 polyps were included in our analysis. Cold techniques (cold forceps polypectomy (CFP), jumbo forceps polypectomy (JFP), dedicated cold snare polypectomy (D-CSP), conventional cold snare polypectomy (C-CSP), underwater cold snare polypectomy (U-CSP), and cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) were included in our comparative analysis. CFP was less effective in achieving complete histological resection than C-CSP (RR: 1.10 with 95% CI [1.03-1.18]), CS-EMR (RR: 1.12 with 95% CI [1.02-1.23]), D-CSP (RR: 1.17 with 95% CI [1.04-1.32]), and U-CSP (RR: 1.21 with 95% CI [1.07-1.38]). However, the rest of the comparisons showed no difference. CONCLUSION CFP is the least effective method for small and diminutive polyps' removal, and any snare polypectomy technique will achieve better results, warranting more large-scale RCTs to investigate the most effective snare polypectomy technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmed K Awad
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Islam Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Nour Shaheen
- Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | | | - Ahmed M Afifi
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Basel Abdelazeem
- Department of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Anderson JC, Rex DK. Performing High-Quality, Safe, Cost-Effective, and Efficient Basic Colonoscopy in 2023: Advice From Two Experts. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1779-1786. [PMID: 37463252 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Based on published evidence and our expert experience, we provide recommendations to maximize the efficacy, safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of routine colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy begins with colon preparation using a split or same-day dose and preferably a low-volume regimen for optimal patient tolerance and compliance. Successful cecal intubation can be achieved by choosing the correct colonoscope and using techniques to facilitate navigation through challenges such as severe angulations and redundant colons. Safety is a primary goal, and complications such as perforation and splenic rupture can be prevented by avoiding pushing through fixed resistance and avoiding loops in proximal colon. Furthermore, barotrauma can be avoided by converting to water filling only (no gas insufflation) in every patient with a narrowed, angulated sigmoid. Optimal polyp detection relies primarily on compulsive attention to inspection as manifested by adequate inspection time, vigorous probing of the spaces between haustral folds, washing and removing residual debris, and achieving full distention. Achieving minimum recommended adenoma detection rate thresholds (30% in men and 20% in women) is mandatory, and colonoscopists should aspire to adenoma detection rate approaching 50% in screening patients. Distal attachments can improve mucosal exposure and increase detection while shortening withdrawal times. Complete resection of polyps complements polyp detection in preventing colorectal cancer. Cold resection is the preferred method for all polyps < 10 mm. For effective cold resection, an adequate rim of normal tissue should be captured in the snare. Finally, cost-effective high-quality colonoscopy requires the procedure not be overused, as demonstrated by following updated United States Multi Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer postpolypectomy surveillance recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tokuhara M, Shimatani M, Tominaga K, Nakahira H, Ohtsu T, Kouda K, Naganuma M. Evaluation of a new method, "non-injection resection using bipolar soft coagulation mode (NIRBS)", for colonic adenomatous lesions. Clin Endosc 2023; 56:623-632. [PMID: 37524565 PMCID: PMC10565442 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2022.200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Endoscopic resection of all colorectal adenomatous lesions with a low complication rate, simplicity, and negative residuals is challenging. Hence, we developed a new method called "non-injection resection using bipolar soft coagulation mode (NIRBS)" method, adapted for colorectal lesions. In addition, we evaluated the effectiveness of this method. METHODS We performed NIRBS throughout a 12-month period for all colorectal lesions which snare resection was acceptable without cancerous lesions infiltrating deeper than the submucosal layer. RESULTS A total of 746 resected lesions were included in the study, with a 4.5 mm mean size (range, 1-35 mm). The major pathological breakdowns were as follows: 64.3% (480/746) were adenomas, and 5.0% (37/746) were intraepithelial adenocarcinomas (Tis lesions). No residuals were observed in any of the 37 Tis lesions (mean size, 15.3 mm). Adverse events included bleeding (0.4%) but no perforation. CONCLUSIONS NIRBS allowed the resection of multiple lesions with simplicity because of the non-injection and without perforating due to the minimal burn effect of the bipolar snare set in the soft coagulation mode. Therefore, NIRBS can be used to resect adenomatous lesions easily, including Tis lesions, from small to large lesions without leaving residuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuo Tokuhara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaaki Shimatani
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tominaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Nakahira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuya Ohtsu
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Katsuyasu Kouda
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Naganuma
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kamal F, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W, Sharma S, Acharya A, Farooq U, Agarwal A, Aziz M, Chuang J, Kumar A, Schlachterman A, Loren D, Kowalski T, Adler D. Cold snare versus cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of diminutive polyps: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:7-18.e4. [PMID: 36907527 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The practices for resection of diminutive colon polyps vary among endoscopists, and U.S. Multi-Society Task force guidelines recommend use of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for this purpose. In this meta-analysis, we compared CSP and cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for resection of diminutive polyps. METHODS Several databases were reviewed to identify randomized controlled trials that compared CSP and CFP for resection of diminutive polyps. The study outcomes of interest were complete resection of all diminutive polyps, complete resection of polyps ≤3 mm in size, failure of tissue retrieval, and polypectomy time. For categorical variables, pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated; for continuous variables, mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs were calculated. Data were analyzed by using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by using the I2 statistic. RESULTS We included 9 studies with 1037 patients. Rate of complete resection of all diminutive polyps was significantly higher in the CSP group (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.58). Subgroup analysis, including jumbo or large-capacity forceps, found no significant difference in complete resection between groups (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, .80-2.56). We found no significant between-groups in the rates of complete resection of polyps ≤3 mm in size (OR, .83; 95% CI, .30-2.31). Rate of failure of tissue retrieval was significantly higher in the CSP group (OR, 10.13; 95% CI, 2.29-44.74). No significant between-group difference was noted in polypectomy time. CONCLUSIONS CFP using large-capacity or jumbo biopsy forceps is noninferior to CSP for complete resection of diminutive polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Sachit Sharma
- Department of Medicine; Division of Gastroenterology
| | - Ashu Acharya
- Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Umer Farooq
- Department of Medicine, Loyola Medicine/MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, Illinois, USA
| | - Amit Agarwal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Muhammad Aziz
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Anand Kumar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Loren
- Division of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas Kowalski
- Division of Gastroenterology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Douglas Adler
- Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Capogreco A, Alfarone L, Massimi D, Repici A. Cold resection for colorectal polyps: where we are and where we are going? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:719-730. [PMID: 37318101 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2223976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic resection of colonic precancerous lesions has been demonstrated to significantly decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Among resection techniques, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has been shown as a highly feasible, effective and safe option and is widely used in clinical practice, being regarded as the first-line technique for removal of small and diminutive colorectal polyps. On the other hand, conventional hot snare polypectomy (HSP) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), namely the gold standard treatments for larger polyps, may be occasionally associated to complications due to electrocautery injury. AREAS COVERED To overcome these shortcomings of electrocautery-based resection techniques, in the last few years CSP has been increasingly assessed as a treatment option for additional indications, with a focus on nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥10 mm. EXPERT OPINION This review aims to present current and widened indications of CSP discussing the latest findings from the most remarkable studies, with an insight into technical issues, novelties and potential advances in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Capogreco
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Ludovico Alfarone
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of biomedical scienses, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Massimi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of biomedical scienses, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gao P, Zhou K, Su W, Yu J, Zhou P. Endoscopic management of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2023; 11:goad027. [PMID: 37251504 PMCID: PMC10224796 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal polyps are premalignant lesions in the lower gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopic polypectomy is an effective strategy to prevent colorectal cancer morbidity and more invasive procedures. Techniques for the endoscopic resection of polyps keep evolving, and endoscopists are required to perform the most appropriate technique for each polyp. In this review, we outline the evaluation and classification of polyps, update the recommendations for optimal treatment, describe the polypectomy procedures and their strengths/weaknesses, and discuss the promising innovative methods or concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Wei Su
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Jia Yu
- Surgery Department, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
- Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Pinghong Zhou
- Corresponding author. Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, P. R. China. Tel: +86-21-64041990;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Winston K, Maulahela H, Raharjo DE, Tjoa K, Jonlean R. A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Hot Snare Polypectomy and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Removing Small Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e38713. [PMID: 37292560 PMCID: PMC10246601 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Both cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) have been shown to be effective methods for removing small colorectal polyps, but the optimal method for achieving complete resection remains unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic search of relevant articles using databases such as PubMed, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost. The search criteria included randomized controlled trials that compared CSP and HSP for small colorectal polyps ≤10 mm and the articles were screened based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using RevMan software (version 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom), and meta-analysis was performed with outcomes measured using pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Mantel-Haenszel random effect model was used to calculate the OR. We selected a total of 14 randomized controlled trials involving 11601 polyps for analysis. Pooled analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the incomplete resection rate between CSP and HSP (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.88-1.73, p-value: 0.27; I2: 51%), en bloc resection rate (OR: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.38-1.13; p: 0.13; I2: 60%), and polyp retrieval rate (OR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.59-1.57; p: 0.89; I2: 17%). For safety endpoints, there is no statistically significant difference in intraprocedural bleeding rate between CSP and HSP per patient analysis (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 0.74-7.54; p: 0.95; I2: 74%) and per polyp basis (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 0.72-4.72; p: 0.20; I2: 85%). CSP had lower OR for the delayed bleeding outcome when compared with the HSP group per patient basis (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.2-0.86; p: 0.02; I2: 25%), but not in the per polyp analysis (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.12-3; p: 0.53; I2: 0%). Total polypectomy time was significantly shorter in the CSP group (mean difference: -0.81 minutes; 95% CI: -0.96, -0.66; p:<0.00001; I2: 0%). Thus, CSP is both an efficacious and safe method for removing small colorectal polyps. Therefore, it can be recommended as a suitable alternative to HSP for the removal of small colorectal polyps. However, more studies are necessary to evaluate any long-term differences between the two methods such as polyp recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Winston
- Hospital Medicine, Bhakti Medicare Hospital, Sukabumi, IDN
| | - Hasan Maulahela
- Gastroenterology, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, IDN
| | | | - Kevin Tjoa
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IDN
| | - Reganedgary Jonlean
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IDN
- Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Tzu Chi Hospital, Jakarta, IDN
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Motchum L, Djinbachian R, Rahme E, Taghiakbari M, Bouchard S, Bouin M, Sidani S, Deslandres É, Takla M, Frija-Gruman NM, Barkun A, von Renteln D. Incomplete resection rates of 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps when using wide-field cold snare resection with routine submucosal injection. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E480-E489. [PMID: 37206693 PMCID: PMC10191736 DOI: 10.1055/a-2029-2392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Incomplete resection of 4- to 20-mm colorectal polyps occur frequently (> 10 %), putting patients at risk for post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that routine use of wide-field cold snare resection with submucosal injection (CSP-SI) might reduce incomplete resection rates (IRRs). Patients and methods Patients aged 45 to 80 years undergoing elective colonoscopies were enrolled in a prospective clinical study. All 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated polyps were resected using CSP-SI. Post-polypectomy margin biopsies were obtained to determine IRRs through histopathology assessment. The primary outcome was IRR, defined as remnant polyp tissue found on margin biopsies. Secondary outcomes included technical success and complication rates. Results A total of 429 patients (median age 65 years, 47.1 % female, adenoma detection rate 40 %) with 204 non-pedunculated colorectal polyps 4 to 20 mm removed using CSP-SI were included in the final analysis. CSP-SI was technical successful in 97.5 % (199/204) of cases (5 conversion to hot snare polypectomy). IRR for CSP-SI was 3.8 % (7/183) (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.7 %-5.5 %). IRR was 1.6 % (2/129), 16 % (4/25), and 3.4 % (1/29) for adenomas, serrated lesions, and hyperplastic polyps respectively. IRR was 2.3 % (2/87), 6.3 % (4/64), 4.0 % (6/151), and 3.1 % (1/32) for polyps 4 to 5 mm, 6 to 9 mm, < 10 mm, and 10 to 20 mm, respectively. There were no CSP-SI-related serious adverse events. Conclusions Use of CSP-SI results in lower IRRs compared to what has previously been reported in the literature for hot or cold snare polypectomy when not using wide-field cold snare resection with submucosal injection. CSP-SI showed an excellent safety and efficacy profile, however comparative studies to CSP without SI are required to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Motchum
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Roupen Djinbachian
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Elham Rahme
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Simon Bouchard
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Mickaël Bouin
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Sacha Sidani
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Érik Deslandres
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Mark Takla
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine of Montreal University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Alan Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ishibashi F, Suzuki S, Nagai M, Mochida K, Morishita T. Colorectal cold snare polypectomy: Current standard technique and future perspectives. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:278-286. [PMID: 35962754 DOI: 10.1111/den.14420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
It has been shown that resection of adenomatous colorectal polyps can reduce mortality due to colorectal cancer. In daily clinical practice, simpler and safer methods of colorectal polypectomy have been sought to enable endoscopists to resect all detected lesions. Among these, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is widely used in clinical practice because of its advantages in shortening procedure time, reducing delayed bleeding risk, and lowering treatment costs, while maintaining a similar complete resection rate for lesions smaller than 10 mm when compared to conventional hot snare polypectomy. This review introduces the findings of previous studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of the CSP procedure for nonpedunculated polyps smaller than 10 mm, and describes technical points to remember when practicing CSP based on the latest evidence, including using a thin wire snare specifically designed for CSP, and observing the surrounding mucosa of the resection site with chromoendoscopy or image-enhanced endoscopy to ensure that there is no residual lesion. This review also describes the potential of expanding the indication of CSP as a treatment for lesions larger than 10 mm, those with pedunculated morphology, those located near the appendiceal orifice, and for patients under continuous antithrombotic agent therapy. Finally, the perspective on optimal treatments for recurrent lesions after CSP is also discussed, despite the limited related evidence and data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiaki Ishibashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sho Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Mizuki Nagai
- Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kentaro Mochida
- Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Morishita
- Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chang LC, Chang CY, Chen CY, Tseng CH, Chen PJ, Shun CT, Hsu WF, Chen YN, Chen CC, Huang TY, Tu CH, Chen MJ, Chou CK, Lee CT, Chen PY, Wu MS, Chiu HM. Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps : A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:311-319. [PMID: 36802753 DOI: 10.7326/m22-2189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is considered effective in reducing delayed postpolypectomy bleeding risk, direct evidence supporting its safety in the general population remains lacking. OBJECTIVE To clarify whether CSP would reduce delayed bleeding risk after polypectomy compared with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) in the general population. DESIGN Multicenter randomized controlled study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03373136). SETTING 6 sites in Taiwan, July 2018 through July 2020. PARTICIPANTS Participants aged 40 years or older with polyps of 4 to 10 mm. INTERVENTION CSP or HSP to remove polyps of 4 to 10 mm. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was the delayed bleeding rate within 14 days after polypectomy. Severe bleeding was defined as a decrease in hemoglobin concentration of 20 g/L or more, requiring transfusion or hemostasis. Secondary outcomes included mean polypectomy time, successful tissue retrieval, en bloc resection, complete histologic resection, and emergency service visits. RESULTS A total of 4270 participants were randomly assigned (2137 to CSP and 2133 to HSP). Eight patients (0.4%) in the CSP group and 31 (1.5%) in the HSP group had delayed bleeding (risk difference, -1.1% [95% CI, -1.7% to -0.5%]). Severe delayed bleeding was also lower in the CSP group (1 [0.05%] vs. 8 [0.4%] events; risk difference, -0.3% [CI, -0.6% to -0.05%]). Mean polypectomy time (119.0 vs. 162.9 seconds; difference in mean, -44.0 seconds [CI, -53.1 to -34.9 seconds]) was shorter in the CSP group, although successful tissue retrieval, en bloc resection, and complete histologic resection did not differ. The CSP group had fewer emergency service visits than the HSP group (4 [0.2%] vs. 13 [0.6%] visits; risk difference, -0.4% [CI, -0.8% to -0.04%]). LIMITATION An open-label, single-blind trial. CONCLUSION Compared with HSP, CSP for small colorectal polyps significantly reduces the risk for delayed postpolypectomy bleeding, including severe events. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Boston Scientific Corporation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Chun Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (L.C.C., C.C.C., M.J.C., M.S.W., H.M.C.)
| | - Chi-Yang Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan (C.Y.Chang)
| | - Chi-Yi Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan (C.Y.Chen, C.K.C., P.Y.C.)
| | - Cheng-Hao Tseng
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, E-DA Hospital, and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, E-DA Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (C.H.Tseng)
| | - Peng-Jen Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (P.J.C., T.Y.H.)
| | - Chia-Tung Shun
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (C.T.S.)
| | - Wen-Feng Hsu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, and Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan (W.F.H., Y.N.C.)
| | - Yen-Nien Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, and Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan (W.F.H., Y.N.C.)
| | - Chieh-Chang Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (L.C.C., C.C.C., M.J.C., M.S.W., H.M.C.)
| | - Tien-Yu Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (P.J.C., T.Y.H.)
| | - Chia-Hung Tu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Health Management Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (C.H.Tu)
| | - Mei-Jyh Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (L.C.C., C.C.C., M.J.C., M.S.W., H.M.C.)
| | - Chu-Kuang Chou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan (C.Y.Chen, C.K.C., P.Y.C.)
| | - Ching-Tai Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, E-DA Hospital, and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (C.T.L.)
| | - Po-Yueh Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan (C.Y.Chen, C.K.C., P.Y.C.)
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (L.C.C., C.C.C., M.J.C., M.S.W., H.M.C.)
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (L.C.C., C.C.C., M.J.C., M.S.W., H.M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Horii T, Suzuki S, Sugita A, Yamauchi M, Ikehara H, Kusano C, Gotoda T. Comparison of complete resection rates in cold snare polypectomy using two different wire diameter snares: A randomized controlled study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 38:752-760. [PMID: 36565225 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a standard treatment for small colorectal polyps. This study examined the effect of different snare wire diameters on complete histological resection rate, resection depth, and CSP safety. METHODS This randomized controlled trial was conducted at two institutions between June 2019 and March 2021. Eligible colorectal polyps (≤10 mm) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either CSP with a conventional snare made of normal-diameter wire (0.40 mm) or CSP with a dedicated snare made of thin wire (0.23 mm). The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate determined on histological assessment of the resected specimen. RESULTS In total, 254 lesions in 152 patients were included, with 128 and 126 lesions assigned to the normal-diameter wire snare group and the thin-wire snare group, respectively. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the two groups. The histological complete resection rate was significantly higher in the thin-wire snare group than in the normal-diameter wire snare group (70.0% vs 81.0%, P = 0.04). The normal-diameter wire snare group had significantly more cases of unclear horizontal margin evaluation than the thin-wire snare group (28.1% vs 15.9%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the muscularis mucosa and submucosa of the resected specimens or the thickness of the submucosa in the resected specimens. CONCLUSIONS CSP with a dedicated thin-wire snare provides more specimens that can be evaluated at the horizontal end and increases the histological complete resection rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiki Horii
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Sho Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Ichikawa-shi, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akihiro Sugita
- Department of Pathology, Yuri Kumiai General Hospital, Yurihonjo, Akita, Japan
| | - Misa Yamauchi
- Department of Pathology, Yuri Kumiai General Hospital, Yurihonjo, Akita, Japan
| | - Hisatomo Ikehara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Chika Kusano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Li A, Shen J. Current endoscopic diagnosis treatment strategy for superficial nonampullary duodenal tumours. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:290. [DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00940-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Preoperative endoscopic diagnosis and timely treatment are important for the clinical management of sporadically superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumours (SNADETs), including adenoma and adenocarcinoma limited to the submucosal layer.
Methods
This review explores current endoscopic diagnosis and endoscopic resection technology for SNADETs. We compare endoscopic diagnosis accuracy using white light imaging, narrow band imaging, and magnification endoscopy alone or in combination. In addition, we review the current endoscopic resection methods for SNADETs and discuss the limitations and applicable future directions of each technology.
Results
A simple scoring system based on the endoscopic findings of white light imaging or magnified endoscopy combined with image-enhanced techniques was applied for the prediction of the histological grade of SNADETs. Benign or low-grade adenoma can be followed up without biopsy, and high-grade adenoma and adenocarcinoma should be resected by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgery. EMR frequently leads to a piecemeal resection, while ESD ensures a high en bloc resection rate with a high risk of complications. Covering or closing post-ESD ulcers is an effective strategy to reduce the risk of delayed perforation and bleeding. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery is a promising treatment for SNADETs with excellent rates of en bloc resection and a low risk of complications, although it is expensive and requires many specialists.
Conclusions
Early endoscopic diagnosis and optimal treatment selection for SNADETs may improve the poor prognosis of duodenal cancer.
Collapse
|
19
|
Haumesser C, Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Taghiakbari M, Djinbachian R, Abou Khalil M, Sidani S, Liu Chen Kiow J, Panzini B, Popescu Crainic I, von Renteln D. Comparing size measurements of simulated colorectal polyp size and morphology groups when using a virtual scale endoscope or visual size estimation: Blinded randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2022. [PMID: 36514183 DOI: 10.1111/den.14498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real-time size measurements. We studied the relative accuracy of VSE compared to visual assessment (VA) for the measuring simulated polyps of different size and morphology groups. METHODS We conducted a blinded randomized controlled trial using simulated polyps within a colon model. Sixty simulated polyps were evenly distributed across four size groups (1-5, >5-9.9, 10-19.9, and ≥20 mm) and three Paris morphology groups (flat, sessile, and pedunculated). Six endoscopists performed polyp size measurements using random allocation of either VA or VSE. RESULTS A total of 359 measurements were completed. The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all size groups >5 mm (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). For polyps ≤5 mm, the relative accuracy of VSE compared to VA was not significantly higher (P = 0.186). The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all morphology groups. VSE misclassified a lower percentage of >5 mm polyps as ≤5 mm (2.9%), ≥10 mm polyps as <10 mm (5.5%), and ≥20 mm polyps as <20 mm (21.7%) compared to VA (11.2%, 24.7%, and 52.3% respectively; P = 0.008, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003). CONCLUSION Virtual scale endoscope had significantly higher relative accuracies for every polyp size group or morphology type aside from diminutive. VSE enables the endoscopist to better classify polyps into correct size categories at clinically relevant size thresholds of 5, 10, and 20 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Haumesser
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,University of Montreal Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Internal Medicine, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Roupen Djinbachian
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Maria Abou Khalil
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Sacha Sidani
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Jeremy Liu Chen Kiow
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Benoit Panzini
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Ioana Popescu Crainic
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,University of Montreal Medical School, Montreal, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li DF, Van Overbeke L, Ohata K, Wang LS, Yao J. Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1486-1493. [PMID: 35168877 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.01.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a promising technique for the removal of sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) ≥ 10 mm. However, the efficacy and safety of this technique remain undetermined. AIMS We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSP for SSPs ≥ 10 mm. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2021. RESULTS A total of 10 studies consisting of 1727 SSPs (range, 10-40 mm) from 1021 patients were included. The overall rates of technical success, adverse events (AEs) and residual SSPs were 100%, 0.7% and 2.9%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the rates of technical success and AEs were comparable between CSP and cold endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (99.9% vs. 100% and 1.3% vs. 0.5%, respectively), between the proximal and distal colon (100% vs. 99.9% and 0.3% vs. 0, respectively), and between polyps of 10-19 mm and ≥20 mm (99.8% vs. 100% and 0.9% vs. 0, respectively). However, subgroup analysis showed that the rate of residual SSPs was slightly lower in CSP compared with cold EMR (1.3% vs. 3.9%), as well as in polyps of 10-19 mm compared with those ≥20 mm (3.1% vs. 4.7%). CONCLUSION CSP was an effective and safe technique for removing SSPs ≥ 10 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- De-Feng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), No.1017, Dongmen North Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, China
| | | | - Ken Ohata
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-8625, Japan
| | - Li-Sheng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), No.1017, Dongmen North Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, China.
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), No.1017, Dongmen North Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pedersen IB, Rawa-Golebiewska A, Calderwood AH, Brix LD, Grode LB, Botteri E, Bugajski M, Kaminski MF, Januszewicz W, Ødegaard H, Kleist B, Kalager M, Løberg M, Bretthauer M, Hoff G, Medhus A, Holme Ø. Complete polyp resection with cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for polyps of 4-9 mm: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2022; 54:961-969. [PMID: 35008112 DOI: 10.1055/a-1734-7952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic screening with polypectomy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). Incomplete polyp removal may attenuate the effect of screening. This randomized trial compared cold snare polypectomy (CSP) with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) in terms of complete polyp resection. METHODS We included patients ≥ 40 years of age at eight hospitals in four countries who had at least one non-pedunculated polyp of 4-9 mm detected at colonoscopy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to CSP or HSP. Biopsies from the resection margins were obtained systematically after polypectomy in both groups. We hypothesized that CSP would be non-inferior to HSP, with a non-inferiority margin of 5 %. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify the factors explaining incomplete resection. RESULTS 425 patients, with 601 polyps, randomized to either CSP or HSP were included in the analysis. Of 318 polyps removed by CSP and 283 polyps removed by HSP, 34 (10.7 %) and 21 (7.4 %) were incompletely resected, respectively, with an adjusted risk difference of 3.2 % (95 %CI -1.4 % to 7.8 %). There was no difference between the groups in terms of post-polypectomy bleeding, perforation, or abdominal pain. Independent risk factors for incomplete removal were serrated histology (odds ratio [OR] 3.96; 95 %CI 1.63 to 9.66) and hyperplastic histology (OR 2.52; 95 %CI 1.30 to 4.86) in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION In this randomized trial, non-inferiority for CSP could not be demonstrated. Polyps with serrated histology are more prone to incomplete resection compared with adenomas. CSP can be used safely for small polyps in routine colonoscopy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina B Pedersen
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna Rawa-Golebiewska
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Lone D Brix
- Department of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Intensive Care, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Louise B Grode
- Department of Medicine, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wladyslaw Januszewicz
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Britta Kleist
- Department of Pathology, Sørlandet hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital Skien, Skien, Norway
| | - Asle Medhus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Murakami T, Kurosawa T, Fukushima H, Shibuya T, Yao T, Nagahara A. Sessile serrated lesions: Clinicopathological characteristics, endoscopic diagnosis, and management. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:1096-1109. [PMID: 35352394 DOI: 10.1111/den.14273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System (5th edition) introduced the term "sessile serrated lesion" (SSL) to replace the term "sessile serrated adenoma/polyp" (SSA/P). SSLs are early precursor lesions in the serrated neoplasia pathway that result in colorectal carcinomas with BRAF mutations, methylation for DNA repair genes, a CpG island methylator phenotype, and high levels of microsatellite instability. Some of these lesions can rapidly become dysplastic or invasive carcinomas that exhibit high lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis potential. The 2019 WHO classification noted that dysplasia arising in an SSL most likely is an advanced polyp, regardless of the morphologic grade of the dysplasia. Detecting SSLs with or without dysplasia is critical; however, detection of SSLs is challenging, and their identification by endoscopists and pathologists is inconsistent. Furthermore, indications for their endoscopic treatment have not been established. Moreover, SSLs are considered to contribute to the development of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers. Herein, the clinicopathological and endoscopic characteristics of SSLs, including features determined using white light and image-enhanced endoscopy, therapeutic indications, therapeutic methods, and surveillance are reviewed based on the literature. This information may lead to more intensive research to improve detection, diagnosis, and rates of complete resection of these lesions and reduce post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Murakami
- Departments of 1Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taro Kurosawa
- Departments of 1Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Human Pathology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Fukushima
- Departments of 1Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyoshi Shibuya
- Departments of 1Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yao
- Human Pathology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihito Nagahara
- Departments of 1Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Choosing the Best Resection Tool for Polyps ≤3 mm: Is Forceps an Acceptable Alternative to Cold Snare? Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1244-1245. [PMID: 35926492 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
24
|
The Cost of Guideline Adherence: A Multicenter Analysis of the Financial Implications of Adopting the US Multi-Society Task Force Polypectomy Guidelines. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:597-600. [PMID: 34267104 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
GOAL The goal of this study was to determine the financial impact of adopting the US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) polypectomy guidelines on physician reimbursement and disposable equipment costs for gastroenterologists in the academic medical center and community practice settings. BACKGROUND In 2020, USMSTF guidelines on polypectomy were introduced with a strong recommendation for cold snare rather than cold forceps technique for removing diminutive and small polyps. Polypectomy with snare technique reimburses physicians at a higher rate compared with cold forceps and also requires different disposable equipment. The financial implications of adopting these guidelines is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients that underwent screening colonoscopy where polypectomy was performed at an academic medical center (Loma Linda University Medical Center) and community practice medical center (Ascension Providence Hospital) between July 2018 and July 2019 were identified. The polypectomy technique performed during each procedure was determined (forceps alone, snare alone, forceps plus snare) along with the number and size of polyps as well as disposable equipment. Actual and projected provider reimbursement and disposable equipment costs were determined based on applying the new polypectomy guidelines. RESULTS A total of 1167 patients underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy. Adhering to new guidelines would increase estimated physician reimbursement by 5.6% and 12.5% at academic and community practice sites, respectively. The mean increase in physician reimbursement per procedure was significantly higher at community practice compared with the academic setting ($29.50 vs. $14.13, P <0.00001). The mean increase in disposable equipment cost per procedure was significantly higher at the community practice setting ($6.11 vs. $1.97, P <0.00001). CONCLUSION Adopting new polypectomy guidelines will increase physician reimbursement and equipment costs when colonoscopy with polypectomy is performed.
Collapse
|
25
|
Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Cold Snare and Forceps Polypectomy Among Small POLYPs in Rates of Complete Resection: The TINYPOLYP Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1305-1310. [PMID: 35467557 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Optimizing complete resection during colonoscopy is important because residual neoplastic tissue may play a role in interval cancers. The US Multi-Society Task Force recommends diminutive (≤5 mm) and small (6-9 mm) polyps be removed by cold snare polypectomy (CSP). However, evidence is less clear whether CSP retains significant advantage over cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for polyps ≤3 mm. METHODS This study is a single-center prospective noninferiority randomized clinical trial evaluating CFP and CSP for nonpedunculated polyps ≤3 mm. Patients 18 years and older undergoing colonoscopy for any indication were recruited. During each colonoscopy, polyps underwent block randomization to removal with CFP or CSP. After polypectomy, 2 biopsies were taken from the polypectomy margin. The primary noninferiority outcome was the complete resection rate, defined by absence of residual polyp in the margin biopsies. RESULTS A total of 179 patients were included. Patients had similar distribution in age, sex, race/ethnicity, as well as indication of procedure. A total of 279 polyps ≤3 mm were identified, with 138 in the CSP group and 141 in the CFP group. Mean polypectomy time was longer for CSP compared with CFP (42.3 vs 23.2 seconds, P < 0.001), although a higher proportion of polyps removed by CFP were removed in more than 1 piece compared with CSP (15.6 vs 3.6%, P < 0.001). There were positive margin biopsies in 2 cases per cohort, with a complete resection rate of 98.3% in both groups. There was no significant difference in cohorts in complete resection rates (difference in complete resection rates was 0.057%, 95% confidence interval: -4.30% to 4.53%), demonstrating noninferiority of CFP compared with CSP. DISCUSSION Use of CFP was noninferior to CSP in the complete resection of nonpedunculated polyps ≤3 mm. CSP required significantly more time to perform compared with CFP. CFP should be considered an acceptable alternative to CSP for removal of polyps ≤3 mm.
Collapse
|
26
|
Rex DK, Anderson JC, Pohl H, Lahr RE, Judd S, Antaki F, Lilley K, Castelluccio PF, Vemulapalli KC. Cold versus hot snare resection with or without submucosal injection of 6- to 15-mm colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:330-338. [PMID: 35288147 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cold snare resection of colorectal lesions has been found to be safe and effective for an expanding set of colorectal lesions. In this study, we sought to understand the efficacy of simple cold snare resection and cold EMR versus hot snare resection and hot EMR for colorectal lesions 6 to 15 mm in size. METHODS At 3 U.S. centers, 235 patients with 286 colorectal lesions 6 to 15 mm in size were randomized to cold snaring, cold EMR, hot snaring, or hot EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions 6 to 15 mm in size. The primary outcome was complete resection determined by 4 biopsy samples from the defect margin and 1 biopsy sample from the center of the resection defect. RESULTS The overall incomplete resection rate was 2.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], .8%-7.5%). All 7 incompletely removed polyps were 10 to 15 mm in size and removed by hot EMR (n = 4, 6.2%), hot snare (n = 2, 2.2%), or cold EMR (n = 1, 1.8%). Cold snaring had no incomplete resections, required less procedural time than the other methods, and was not associated with serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Cold snaring is a dominant resection technique for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions 6 to 15 mm in size. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03462706.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Rachel E Lahr
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stephanie Judd
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Fadi Antaki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kirthi Lilley
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Peter F Castelluccio
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Krishna C Vemulapalli
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fudman DI, Singal AG, Cooper MG, Lee M, Murphy CC. Prevalence of Forceps Polypectomy of Nondiminutive Polyps Is Substantial But Modifiable. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:1508-1515. [PMID: 34839039 PMCID: PMC9133266 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The use of forceps for removal of nondiminutive polyps is associated with incomplete resection compared with snare polypectomy. However, few studies have characterized the frequency of forceps polypectomy for nondiminutive polyps or identified strategies to improve this practice. To address this gap, we estimated the prevalence and predictors of forceps polypectomy in clinical practice and examined the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to reduce inappropriate forceps polypectomy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all colonoscopies with polypectomies performed at 2 U.S. health systems between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2019. We used a mixed-effects logistic regression model to examine the effect of a multicomponent intervention, including provider education and a financial incentive, to reduce inappropriate forceps polypectomy, defined as use of forceps polypectomy for polyps ≥5 mm. RESULTS A total of 9968 colonoscopies with 25,534 polypectomies were performed by 42 gastroenterologists during the study period. Overall, 8.5% (n = 2176) of polyps were removed with inappropriate forceps polypectomy. Inappropriate forceps polypectomy significantly decreased after the intervention (odds ratio [OR], 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.39), from 11.4% (n = 1539) to 5.3% (n = 637). Predictors of inappropriate forceps polypectomy included inadequate bowel prep (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.47), polyps in the right colon (vs left: OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.51), and number of polyps removed (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Inappropriate forceps polypectomy also varied by gastroenterologist (median OR, 3.43). In a post hoc analysis, the proportion of polyps >2 mm removed with forceps decreased from 50.0% before the intervention to 43.0% after it (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68). CONCLUSIONS Inappropriate forceps polypectomy is common but modifiable. The proportion of nondiminutive polyps removed with forceps polypectomy should be considered as a quality measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David I. Fudman
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Mark G. Cooper
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - MinJae Lee
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - Caitlin C. Murphy
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kanzaki H, Horii J, Takenaka R, Nakagawa H, Matsueda K, Tsuzuki T, Kita M, Yamasaki Y, Tanaka T, Iwamuro M, Kawano S, Kawahara Y, Tomoda J, Okada H. Prospective multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy for ≤ 6-mm non-ampullary duodenal low-grade adenomas. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E712-E718. [PMID: 35859656 PMCID: PMC9289977 DOI: 10.1055/a-1793-9439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Because the endoscopic treatment for non-ampullary duodenal adenoma (NADA) has a non-negligible risk of adverse events (AEs), a safe and easy treatment for NADA is desirable. This was a multicenter prospective trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for diminutive NADAs. Patients and methods This study was prospectively conducted at six general hospitals and one university hospital. The inclusion criteria were histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of low-grade NADA measuring ≤ 6 mm. A second endoscopy was scheduled for 1 month after CFP. After confirmation of the success of CFP, 6-month and 12-month surveillance endoscopies were scheduled. The primary endpoint was the endoscopic and histologic disease disappearance rates at the 12-month endoscopy. Results Thirty-nine lesions from 38 patients were prospectively included. Median tumor size at enrollment was 5 mm (range 3-6 mm). There were four cases of remnant lesions at the second endoscopy, and the lesion disappearance rate of single CFP was 89.7 % (35 /39; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 76.9 %-97.9 %). In three cases, complete removal of the lesion was achieved with a single re-CFP, but one case required four repeat CFPs. The lesion disappearance rate at 12-month endoscopy was 97.4 % (38 /39; 95 %CI, 86.8 %-99.5 %). During the follow-up period, no AEs related to CFP were observed. Conclusions CFP for NADA ≤ 6 mm was safe and effective in this study. This common endoscopic method to remove lesions may be an option for treatment of diminutive NADAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromitsu Kanzaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama,
Japan
| | - Joichiro Horii
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuyama Medical Center, Hiroshima,
Japan
| | - Ryuta Takenaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tsuyama Central Hospital, Okayama,
Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nakagawa
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima,
Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Matsueda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital,
Okayama, Japan
| | - Takao Tsuzuki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, Hyogo,
Japan
| | - Masahide Kita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama,
Japan
| | - Yasushi Yamasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama,
Japan
| | - Takehiro Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine,
Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masaya Iwamuro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama,
Japan
| | - Seiji Kawano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama,
Japan
| | - Yoshiro Kawahara
- Department of Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Okayama University Graduate
School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Jun Tomoda
- Department of Internal Medicine, Akaiwa Medical Association Hospital, Okayama,
Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama,
Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wei MT, Louie CY, Chen Y, Pan JY, Quan SY, Wong R, Brown R, Clark M, Jensen K, Lau H, Friedland S. Randomized controlled trial investigating use of submucosal injection of EverLift™ in rates of complete resection of non-pedunculated 4-9 mm polyps. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1273-1279. [PMID: 35507047 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04136-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Currently, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) without submucosal injection is recommended for removing polyps < 10 mm. Use of viscous submucosal agents has not been previously evaluated in CSP. We investigate the potential role of EverLift™ (GI Supply, Pennsylvania) in CSP. METHODS The study is a single-center prospective randomized non-inferiority clinical trial evaluating CSP of non-pedunculated 4-9 mm polyps, with or without submucosal injection of EverLift™. Patients 18-80 years of age presenting for colonoscopy were recruited. Eligible polyps underwent block randomization to CSP with or without EverLift™. Following CSP, two biopsies were performed at the CSP site margin. The primary non-inferiority outcome was complete resection rate, defined by absence of residual polyp in the margin biopsies (non-inferiority margin -10%). RESULTS A total of 291 eligible polyps underwent CSP, with 142 removed using EverLift™. There was similar polyp size and distribution of pathology between the two groups. Overall, there was a low rate of positive margins with (1.4%) or without submucosal injection (2.8%), with no significant difference in complete resection (difference 1.28%, 95% CI: -2.66 to 5.42%), demonstrating non-inferiority of EverLift™ injection. Use of EverLift™ significantly increased CSP time (109.8 vs 38.8 s, p < 0.0001) and frequency of use of hemostatic clips (13.4 vs 3.6%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Submucosal injection of EverLift™ was non-inferior to CSP of 4-9 mm polyps without injection and increased time for resection as well as use of hemostatic clips to control acute bleeding. Our results suggest that polypectomy of 4-9 mm polyps can be safely performed without submucosal injection of EverLift™.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike T Wei
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. .,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| | - Christine Y Louie
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Yu Chen
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Pan
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Susan Y Quan
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Robert Wong
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Ryanne Brown
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Melissa Clark
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Kristin Jensen
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Hubert Lau
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Shai Friedland
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fatima H, Rex DK, Imperiale T. A Pilot Randomized Trial of Polypectomy Techniques for 4 to 6 mm Colonic Polyps. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:426-432. [PMID: 34115660 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND GOALS There is variation in polypectomy techniques for resection of small polyps. Aim was to compare techniques for 4 to 6 mm polyps for recurrent adenoma, efficiency, and adverse events and to establish methodological factors for definitive trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was a randomized controlled trial. Outpatients with ≥1, 4 to 6 mm polyps were randomized to cold forceps (CF), cold snare (CS), and hot snare (HS). Polypectomy site was marked with SPOT to assess for recurrence at the original polypectomy site during surveillance colonoscopy. To assess feasibility of a definitive trial we measured (1) rates of patient refusal, participation, ineligibility; (2) retention; (3) recurrent neoplasia; and (4) sample size for a definitive trial. RESULTS Three hundred fifty-three patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 polypectomy techniques, of whom 260 (73.6%) completed the initial colonoscopy (mean age 57 y, 50.4% women), with 91, 87, and 82 patients randomized to CF, CS, and HS polypectomy, respectively. Mean time for polyp resection for CF, CS, and HS were 198.8, 58.5, and 96.8 seconds, respectively, with CS and HS requiring less time than CF (P<0.001). One hundred sixty-four (63.1%) completed surveillance colonoscopy. Polyp recurrences were 9 (14.5%) with CF, 5 (9.6%) with CS, and 0 (0%) with HS. Although the recurrence relative risks with CF and CS polypectomy were 1.84 and 1.65 as compared with HS, respectively, neither was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS CS and HS polypectomy require less time than CF. HS polypectomy may have a lower risk for recurrent neoplasia. High attrition rate is a challenge in conducting randomized controlled trial with polyp recurrence as endpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Fatima
- Department of Internal Medicine/Division of Gastroenterology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
A Comparison of Incomplete Resection Rate of Large and Small Colorectal Polyps by Cold Snare Polypectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:1163-1170. [PMID: 34798334 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There are limited data regarding the safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for large colorectal polyps. We evaluated factors affecting the clinical outcomes of CSP for polyps between 5 and 15 mm in size. METHODS This was a prospective single-center observational study involving 1000 patients undergoing colonoscopy. Polyps (5-15 mm) were removed using CSP, and biopsies were taken from the resection margin. The primary outcome was the incomplete resection rate (IRR), and was determined by the presence of residual neoplasia on biopsy. Correlations between IRR and polyp size, morphology, histology, and resection time were assessed by generalized estimating equation model. RESULTS A total of 440 neoplastic polyps were removed from 261 patients. The overall IRR was 2.27%, 1.98% for small (5-9 mm) vs 3.45% for large (10-15 mm) polyps (P = .411). In univariate analysis, the IRR was more likely to be related to sessile serrated lesions (odds ratio [OR], 6.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88-25.45; P = .004), piecemeal resection (OR, 11.83; 95% CI, 1.20-116.49; P = .034), and prolonged resection time >60 seconds (OR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.75-32.69; P = .007). In multivariable regression analysis, sessile serrated lesions (OR, 6.45; 95% CI, 1.48-28.03; P = .013) and resection time (OR, 7.39; 95% CI, 1.48-36.96; P = .015, respectively) were independent risk factors for IRR. Immediate bleeding was more frequent with resection of large polyps (6.90% vs 1.42%; P = .003). No recurrence was seen on follow-up colonoscopy in 37 cases with large polyps. CONCLUSIONS CSP is safe and effective for removal of colorectal polyps up to 15 mm in size, with a low IRR. (ClinicalTrials.gov; Number: NCT03647176).
Collapse
|
32
|
Uraoka T, Takizawa K, Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano HO, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Saitoh Y, Tsuruta O, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Fujimoto K, Inoue H. Guidelines for Colorectal Cold Polypectomy (supplement to "Guidelines for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection/Endoscopic Mucosal Resection"). Dig Endosc 2022; 34:668-675. [PMID: 35113465 DOI: 10.1111/den.14250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society published the second edition of the "Guidelines for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection/Endoscopic Mucosal Resection" in 2019 to clarify the indications for colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection and to ensure appropriate preoperative diagnoses as well as effective and safe endoscopic treatment in front-line clinical settings. Endoscopic resection with electrocautery, including polypectomy and EMR, is indicated for colorectal polyps. Recently, the number of facilities introducing and implementing cold polypectomy without electrocautery has increased. Herein, we establish supplementary guidelines for cold polypectomy. Considering that the level of evidence for each statement is limited, these supplementary guidelines must be verified in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshio Uraoka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Takizawa
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yutaka Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiro-O Yamano
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Hisabe
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yao
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Haruhiro Inoue
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Djinbachian R, von Renteln D. Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:241-257. [PMID: 35361334 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Diminutive and small colorectal polyps are common findings during colonoscopies, and rarely contain dysplastic elements and progress to colorectal cancer. With improving technology and the advent of artificial intelligence, detection rates of small or diminutive polyps and adenomas are rising, resulting in increasing costs associated with colonoscopy. Incomplete resection rates are an outcome of interest because it correlates with interval colorectal cancer. More effort is warranted to standardize training programs and sensitize endoscopists to the importance of personal performance as a quality metric of colonoscopy. This article reviews indications, methods, and recent developments in polypectomy for small and diminutive polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital (CHUM) and Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Roupen Djinbachian
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital (CHUM) and Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital (CHUM) and Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Perrod G, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Coron E, Pioche M, Becq A, Etchepare N, Danan D, Musquer N, Dray X, Laquiere A, Jais B, Broudin C, Benosman H, Cellier C, Rahmi G. Comparison of cold biopsy forceps vs cold snare for diminutive colorectal polyp removal: A multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2022; 46:101867. [PMID: 35038578 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND European guidelines recommends the use of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCP). However, for DCP < 4 mm cold biopsy forceps (CBF) may be optional. We aimed to compare the efficacy of CSP with CBF for removal of DCP in routine colonoscopy. METHODS We conducted a multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. After screening, 123 patients were prospectively included and 180 DCPs were removed by either CBF or CSP after randomization (1:1). The primary end-point was the histological complete resection rate defined by negative additional biopsies taken from the edge of the polypectomy ulcer site. RESULTS Among DCPs, 121 (67.2%) adenomas or sessile serrated lesions were considered for the analysis. Polyps were 4 [1-5] mm in size, mostly flat (55.4%) and located in the proximal colon (44.6%). The en bloc resection rate was higher in the CSP group than the CBF group (91.7% vs. 42.6%, p < 0.001). The histological complete resection rate was comparable in the two groups (93.33% vs 90.16%; p = 0.527), even for polyps < 4 mm (91.30% vs 91.30%; p = 1). All specimens were retrieved and there was no difference in terms of procedure times and adverse events. Finally, univariate analysis did not identify any potential factor associated with complete resection rate. CONCLUSION In this study, CSP was comparable to CBF for the removal of DCP. Therefore, CBF may be considered as an alternative technique for resection of DCP, together with CSP, ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT04727918).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Perrod
- Hepato-gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre-Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Enrique Perez-Cuadrado-Robles
- Hepato-gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre-Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), University Hospital of Nantes, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of hepato-gastroenterology, Valence Hospital, 179 Avenue du Maréchal Juin, 26953 Valence, France
| | - Aymeric Becq
- Sorbonne Université, Endoscopy Unit, Saint-Antoine hospital, APHP., 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Etchepare
- Hepato-gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy unit, Edouard Herriot hospital, 5 Place D'Arsonval, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - David Danan
- Hepato-gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre-Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Musquer
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (IMAD), University Hospital of Nantes, 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - Xavier Dray
- Sorbonne Université, Endoscopy Unit, Saint-Antoine hospital, APHP., 184 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Arthur Laquiere
- Digestive endoscopy department, Hôpital Saint Joseph, 26, Boulevard de Louvain, 13825 Marseille, France
| | - Bénédicte Jais
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Beaujon Hospital, APHP. Nord-Université de Paris, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Chloé Broudin
- Pathology department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre-Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Hedi Benosman
- Hepato-gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre-Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Cellier
- Hepato-gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre-Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Hepato-gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre-Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bonniaud P, Jacques J, Lambin T, Gonzalez JM, Dray X, Coron E, Leblanc S, Chevaux JB, Léger-Nguyen F, Hamel B, Lienhart I, Rivory J, Ponchon T, Saurin JC, Monzy F, Legros R, Lépilliez V, Subtil F, Barret M, Pioche M. Endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia with different published classifications: comparative study involving CONECCT classification. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E145-E153. [PMID: 35047345 PMCID: PMC8759940 DOI: 10.1055/a-1613-5328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The aim of this study was to validate the COlorectal NEoplasia Classification to Choose the Treatment (CONECCT) classification that groups all published criteria (including covert signs of carcinoma) in a single table. Patients and methods For this multicenter comparative study an expert endoscopist created an image library (n = 206 lesions; from hyperplastic to deep invasive cancers) with at least white light Imaging and chromoendoscopy images (virtual ± dye based). Lesions were resected/biopsied to assess histology. Participants characterized lesions using the Paris, Laterally Spreading Tumours, Kudo, Sano, NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification (NICE), Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis (WASP), and CONECCT classifications, and assessed the quality of images on a web-based platform. Krippendorff alpha and Cohen's Kappa were used to assess interobserver and intra-observer agreement, respectively. Answers were cross-referenced with histology. Results Eleven experts, 19 non-experts, and 10 gastroenterology fellows participated. The CONECCT classification had a higher interobserver agreement (Krippendorff alpha = 0.738) than for all the other classifications and increased with expertise and with quality of pictures. CONECCT classification had a higher intra-observer agreement than all other existing classifications except WASP (only describing Sessile Serrated Adenoma Polyp). Specificity of CONECCT IIA (89.2, 95 % CI [80.4;94.9]) to diagnose adenomas was higher than the NICE2 category (71.1, 95 % CI [60.1;80.5]). The sensitivity of Kudo Vi, Sano IIIa, NICE 2 and CONECCT IIC to detect adenocarcinoma were statistically different ( P < 0.001): the highest sensitivities were for NICE 2 (84.2 %) and CONECCT IIC (78.9 %), and the lowest for Kudo Vi (31.6 %). Conclusions The CONECCT classification currently offers the best interobserver and intra-observer agreement, including between experts and non-experts. CONECCT IIA is the best classification for excluding presence of adenocarcinoma in a colorectal lesion and CONECCT IIC offers the better compromise for diagnosing superficial adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Bonniaud
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University hospital, Limoges, France,Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France
| | - Thomas Lambin
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Michel Gonzalez
- Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France,Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Marseille university North Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Xavier Dray
- Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France,Department of Digestive Diseases, Sorbonne University & APHP, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France,Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Sarah Leblanc
- Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France,Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Mermoz Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Chevaux
- Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France,Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | | | - Benjamin Hamel
- Department of Gastroenterology, North-Ouest Hospital, Villefranche-Sur-Saône, France
| | | | - Jérôme Rivory
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France,Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France,Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France,Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Monzy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinique Claude Bernard, Albi, France
| | - Romain Legros
- Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France
| | - Vincent Lépilliez
- Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France,Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Mermoz Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Fabien Subtil
- Service de Biostatistique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France,Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Hôpital Cochin, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France,Research and Development Committee of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED), Paris, France,Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France,Inserm U1032 LabTau, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
de Benito Sanz M, Hernández L, Garcia Martinez MI, Diez-Redondo P, Joao Matias D, Gonzalez-Santiago JM, Ibáñez M, Núñez Rodríguez MH, Cimavilla M, Tafur C, Mata L, Guardiola-Arévalo A, Feito J, García-Alonso FJ. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2022; 54:35-44. [PMID: 33264811 DOI: 10.1055/a-1327-8357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection techniques for small polyps include cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP). This study compared CSP and HSP in 5-9 mm polyps in terms of complete resection and adverse events. METHODS This was a multicenter, randomized trial conducted in seven Spanish centers between February and November 2019. Patients with ≥ 1 5-9 mm polyp were randomized to CSP or HSP, regardless of morphology or pit pattern. After polypectomy, two marginal biopsies were submitted to a pathologist who was blinded to polyp histology. Complete resection was defined as normal mucosa or burn artifacts in the biopsies. Abdominal pain was only assessed in patients without < 5 mm or > 9 mm polyps. RESULTS 496 patients were randomized: 237 (394 polyps) to CSP and 259 (397 polyps) to HSP. Complete polypectomy rates were 92.5 % with CSP and 94.0 % with HSP (difference 1.5 %, 95 % confidence interval -1.9 % to 4.9 %). Intraprocedural bleeding occurred during three CSPs (0.8 %) and seven HSPs (1.8 %) (P = 0.34). One lesion per group (0.4 %) presented delayed hemorrhage. Post-colonoscopy abdominal pain presented similarly in both groups 1 hour after the procedure (CSP 18.8 % vs. HSP 18.4 %) but was higher in the HSP group after 5 hours (5.9 % vs. 16.5 %; P = 0.02). A higher proportion of patients were asymptomatic 24 hours after CSP than after HSP (97 % vs. 86.4 %; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS We observed no differences in complete resection and bleeding rates between CSP and HSP. CSP reduced the intensity and duration of post-colonoscopy abdominal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina de Benito Sanz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Luis Hernández
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Santos Reyes, Aranda de Duero, Burgos, Spain
| | | | - Pilar Diez-Redondo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Diana Joao Matias
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | - Mercedes Ibáñez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Medina del Campo, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Marta Cimavilla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Río Carrión, Palencia, Spain
| | - Carla Tafur
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Medina del Campo, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Laura Mata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Medina del Campo, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Antonio Guardiola-Arévalo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, IdiPAz (Instituto de investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Feito
- Department of Pathology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cold Snare Polypectomy Technique: Technique Matters More Than Snare Wire Diameter. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:100. [PMID: 34817440 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is safe and effective for the removal of small adenomas (≤10 mm); however, reported incomplete resection rates (IRRs) vary. The optimal CSP technique, where a wide margin of normal tissue is resected around the target lesion, and snare design have both been hypothesized to reduce the IRR after CSP. We sought to investigate the efficacy of a thin-wire versus thick-wire diameter snare on IRR, using the standardized CSP technique. METHODS This was an international multicenter parallel design randomized trial with 17 endoscopists of varying experience (NCT02581254). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the use of a thin-wire (0.30 mm) or thick-wire (0.47 mm) snare for CSP of small (≤10 mm) colorectal polyps. The primary end point was the IRR as determined by the histologic assessment of the defect margin after polypectomy. RESULTS Over 52 months to January 2020, 1,393 patients were eligible. A total of 660 patients with polyps (57.4% male) were randomized to a thin-wire (n = 339) or thick-wire (n = 321) snare. The overall IRR of the cohort was 1.5%. There was no significant difference in the IRR between the thin- and thick-wire arms; relative risk-0.41, 95% CI (0.11-1.56), P = 0.21. No significant differences were observed in the rate of adverse events. DISCUSSION In this multicenter randomized trial, CSP is safe and effective with very low rates of incomplete resection independent of the diameter of the snare wire used. This suggests that the optimal operator technique is more important than the snare design alone in minimizing residual adenoma after CSP.
Collapse
|
38
|
Saito M, Yamamura T, Nakamura M, Maeda K, Sawada T, Ishikawa E, Mizutani Y, Ishikawa T, Kakushima N, Furukawa K, Ohno E, Kawashima H, Ishigami M, Fujishiro M. Real-world local recurrence rate after cold polypectomy in colorectal polyps less than 10 mm using propensity score matching. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:8182-8193. [PMID: 35068862 PMCID: PMC8704276 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i47.8182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cold polypectomy (CP) is a simple and safe procedure for polyps less than 10 mm in size; however, there is concern about local recurrence following CP because of unidentified margins of excised specimens and the lack of tumor suppression effect by coagulation. Some clinical trials have evaluated local persistent recurrence; their results suggest that a higher rate of local recurrence has not been documented so far. There were few reports that observed the course over long periods of time after CP in clinical practice.
AIM To evaluate the presence of local recurrence following CP and hot polypectomy (HP) using propensity score matching.
METHODS We analyzed 275 patients who underwent polypectomy for non-pedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10 mm (959 Lesions) between October 2016 and 2017 and underwent follow-up endoscopy subsequently. We divided them into the CP group (706 Lesions), wherein CP was performed, and the HP group (253 Lesions), wherein HP was performed. Using propensity score matching, we extracted 215 Lesions in each group and evaluated the local recurrence and content of CP in the real clinic and adverse events using medical records.
RESULTS After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the patients’ and their endoscopic background (age, use of antithrombotics, indications, size, morphology, location of polyps, and polypectomy device) between the groups. The mean duration between colorectal polypectomy and the next follow-up colonoscopy was 17.5 ± 7.1 (range, 6-39) mo in the CP group and 15.7 ± 6.0 (range, 6-35) mo in the HP group, which was significantly longer in the CP group (P = 0.005). The local recurrence rate was 0.93% in the CP group and 0.93% in the HP group, without a significant difference (P = 0.688). Additionally, no differences were observed in the macroscopic en bloc resection rate, histopathological complete resection rate, and pathological results between the groups. Adverse events did not occur in either group.
CONCLUSION Local recurrence after CP was equivalent to that following HP in clinical practice. CP is useful and safe in the treatment of non-pedunculated polyps of less than 10 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yamamura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Masanao Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Keiko Maeda
- Department of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Tsunaki Sawada
- Department of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Eri Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Mizutani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Takuya Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Naomi Kakushima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Furukawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Eizaburo Ohno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kawashima
- Department of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Ishigami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 4668550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lao W, Prasoon P, Cao G, Tan LT, Dai S, Devadasar GH, Huang X. Risk factors for incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy. LAPAROSCOPIC, ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
40
|
Park E, Barge W, Kramer J, Alajati B, Jakate S, Cimbaluk D, Giusto D, Ritz E, Bishehsari F, Lee S, Singh S, Losurdo J, Brown M, DeMeo M, Abraham R, Ma K, Melson J. Interobserver reliability of methods to determine complete resection of adenomas in colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2021; 53:1250-1255. [PMID: 33285582 DOI: 10.1055/a-1331-4446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Forceps margin biopsy and polypectomy specimen margins have both been used to assess for polypectomy resection adequacy. The interobserver reliability of the two methods has not been well described. METHODS The interpretability of polypectomy specimens for presence of residual neoplasia at the margin was assessed by two blinded pathologists. Next, the concordance of forceps margin biopsy interpretations between three blinded pathologists was evaluated by calculation of interobserver κ. RESULTS Rates of polypectomy specimen margin interpretability were low: 24/92 (26 %) for pathologist A, 28/92 (30.4 %) for pathologist B. Concordance of forceps margin biopsy interpretations (n = 129) between pathologists was high. Two internal pathologists showed substantial agreement in margin biopsy interpretations (κ 0.779; 95 %CL 0.543, 0.912). The concordance remained strong after biopsies were reviewed by a third, external pathologist (κ 0.829; 95 %CL 0.658, 0.924). There was complete agreement on 123/129 (95.3 %) between all three pathologists for presence of neoplasia. CONCLUSION The majority of polypectomy specimen margins were uninterpretable by pathologists for presence of residual neoplasia. Forceps margin biopsy shows strong interobserver reliability in adenomatous lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - William Barge
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jason Kramer
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bana Alajati
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shriram Jakate
- Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Cimbaluk
- Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Deborah Giusto
- 4Path Pathology Services Laboratory, Burr Ridge, Illinois, USA
| | - Ethan Ritz
- Clinical Informatics and Biostatistics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Faraz Bishehsari
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Saline Lee
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shubha Singh
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John Losurdo
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Brown
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark DeMeo
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rana Abraham
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Karen Ma
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joshua Melson
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps: current uses and development. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021; 135:20-22. [PMID: 34812773 PMCID: PMC8850811 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
42
|
Toward safer and more efficacious colonoscopy polypectomy. LAPAROSCOPIC, ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
43
|
Yamasaki Y, Harada K, Yamamoto S, Yasutomi E, Hirai M, Ohmori M, Oka S, Inokuchi T, Kinugasa H, Sugihara Y, Takahara M, Hiraoka S, Tanaka T, Mitsuhashi T, Okada H. Evaluation of complete cold forceps polypectomy resection rate for 3- to 5-mm colorectal polyps. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:948-954. [PMID: 33211353 DOI: 10.1111/den.13895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS The propriety of cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) using jumbo biopsy forceps for diminutive polyps remains controversial. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the complete CFP resection rate of 3-5-mm polyps using additional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens following CFP. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with 3-5-mm protruded or flat elevated colorectal polyps diagnosed endoscopically as adenomas or serrated lesions were prospectively enrolled. CFP using jumbo biopsy forceps was used to remove the eligible polyps and repeated until the absence of residuals were confirmed via image-enhanced endoscopy or chromoendoscopy. After CFP, saline was injected at the defect, and the marginal specimen of the defect was resected using EMR to histologically evaluate the residue. The primary outcome was the complete CFP resection rate, which was defined as no residue at the EMR site. Other outcomes were the number of CFP bites and the complete resection rate by lesion size. RESULTS Eighty patients with 120 polyps were enrolled. The mean polyp size was 4.1 ± 0.7 mm. The overall complete resection rate was 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.7-98.7), and the rates for 3-, 4- and 5-mm polyps were 100% (95% CI, 86.7-100), 96.0% (95% CI, 86.5-98.9) and 95.5% (95% CI, 85.1-98.8), respectively. The one-bite CFP rates were 92%, 60% and 31% for the 3-, 4- and 5-mm polyps, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The complete CFP resection rate for 3-5-mm polyps was acceptable, although the one-bite clearance rate decreased as the polyp size increased (UMIN000028841).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Yamasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keita Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shumpei Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Eriko Yasutomi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Mami Hirai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masayasu Ohmori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shohei Oka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Inokuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hideaki Kinugasa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuusaku Sugihara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Takahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Sakiko Hiraoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takehiro Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toshiharu Mitsuhashi
- Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Fukushima H, Sakamoto N, Shibuya T, Haga K, Nomura O, Murakami T, Ueyama H, Ishikawa D, Hojo M, Nagahara A. A Comparative Study of Early Mucosal Healing Following Hot Polypectomy and Cold Polypectomy. Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e933043. [PMID: 34432770 PMCID: PMC8404476 DOI: 10.12659/msm.933043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cold polypectomy (CP) and hot polypectomy (HP) are both accepted methods for polypectomy. In recent years, the use of CP has increased for reasons of safety. However, there have been few investigations of conditions at follow-up early after resection. This prospective study from a single center aimed to compare colonic mucosal healing at 1 week following HP vs CP of benign colonic polyps <10 mm in diameter. Material/Methods Six patients with a total of 52 lesions under 10 mm in size were randomized to either the HP group (n=25) or CP group (n=27) using information in opaque envelopes. One week after endoscopic treatment, the site of treatment was evaluated using colonoscopy. We assessed the mean tumor size, ulcer diameter, exposed blood vessels, residual lesion, and complications. Results Mean tumor size did not differ between the 2 groups (CP vs HP: 5.41 mm vs 5.68 mm). The CP group had a smaller ulcer base diameter (2.70 mm vs 4.84 mm; P<0.05) and fewer exposed blood vessels than the HP group (3.7% vs 36.0%; P<0.05). One residual lesion was found in the CP group. No patients experienced delayed perforation or post-polypectomy bleeding. Conclusions Our study findings showed that at 1-week follow-up, cold polypectomy resulted in improved colonic mucosal healing, with a smaller ulcer diameter and fewer blood vessels, when compared with hot polypectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirofumi Fukushima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyoshi Shibuya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Haga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Nomura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroya Ueyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dai Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Hojo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihito Nagahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ortigão R, Weigt J, Afifi A, Libânio D. Cold versus hot polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection-A review of current evidence. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9:938-946. [PMID: 34355525 PMCID: PMC8498395 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colonoscopy with polypectomy substantially reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) but interval cancers still account for 9% of all CRCs, some of which are due to incomplete resection. Aim The aim of this review is to compare the outcomes of cold and hot endoscopic resection and provide technical tips and tricks for optimizing cold snare polypectomy. Results Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is the standard technique for small (≤10 mm) colorectal polyps. For large colonic polyps (>10 mm), hot resection techniques with use of electrocautery (polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection) were recommended until recently. However, the use of electrocoagulation brings serious adverse effects in up to 9% of the patients, such as delayed bleeding, post‐polypectomy syndrome and perforation. In recent years, efforts have been made to improve the polypectomy with cold snare in order to avoid these adverse effects of electrocoagulation without compromising the efficacy of the resection. Several authors have recently shown that the complication rates of CSP of polyps >10 mm is close to zero and recurrence rates varies between 5‐18%. Lower recurrence rates are found in serrated lesions (<8%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Ortigão
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal
| | - Jochen Weigt
- Gastroenterology Department, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v.-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Afifi
- Gastroenterology Department, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-v.-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Segmental metachronous adenoma rate as a metric for monitoring incomplete resection in a colonoscopy screening program. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:347-354. [PMID: 33561485 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Polypectomy technique has been shown to vary among colonoscopists, and interval colorectal cancer may result from incomplete resection of an adenoma. Methods to monitor polypectomy quality and the size of polyps resected to monitor have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of metachronous adenoma attributable to incomplete resection in polyps 6 to 9 mm versus polyps 10 to 20 mm. METHODS The segmental metachronous adenoma rate attributable to incomplete resection (SMAR-IR) was calculated by subtracting the rate of metachronous neoplasia (MN) in segments without adenoma from segments with adenoma. The primary outcome of the study was the SMAR-IR in polyps 6 to 9 mm and 10 to 20 mm found on index colonoscopy. RESULTS Of 337 patients included in the analysis, 146 patients had a tubular adenoma (TA) 10 to 20 mm in size and 191 patients a TA 6 to 9 mm in size as the most advanced lesion. For cases in which an index 10- to 20-mm TA was resected, the SMAR in segments with adenoma was 21.0% and in segments without adenoma 9.6%, so the SMAR-IR was 11.4% (95% confidence interval, 4.5-18.3). For cases in which an index 6- to 9-mm TA was resected, the SMAR in segments with adenoma was 22.0% and in segments without adenoma 8.8%, so the SMAR-IR was 13.2% (95% confidence interval, 7.2-19.4). Among 6 colonoscopists, the SMAR-IR ranged between 7.0% and 15.5% for polyps 6 to 20 mm. CONCLUSIONS MN rates in segments with a TA 10-20 mm and a TA 6-9 mm are higher than the MN rates in segments without index neoplasia. Incomplete resection of neoplasia appears to be a significant risk factor for MN in 6- to 9-mm lesions as well as larger ones.
Collapse
|
47
|
Goto O, Koizumi E, Higuchi K, Noda H, Onda T, Omori J, Kaise M, Iwakiri K. Cutting-Edge Technologies for Gastrointestinal Therapeutic Endoscopy. J NIPPON MED SCH 2021; 88:17-24. [PMID: 33692281 DOI: 10.1272/jnms.jnms.2021_88-109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
With advancements in the development of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic devices and the increased demand for minimally invasive treatments, the indications of therapeutic endoscopy have been expanded. Methods of endoscopic treatment used for tissue removal, hemostasis, and dilatation are as follows. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the gold standard curative method for removal of gastrointestinal node-negative neoplasms, regardless of their size or the presence of ulcer formation. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), which incorporates ESD, was introduced for removal of lesions in deeper layers. Another technique is endoscopic full-thickness resection, which is challenging without the assistance of laparoscopy. In terms of hemostasis, management of iatrogenic bleeding after endoscopic treatment is an important issue. Shielding methods and suturing techniques have been introduced for large mucosal defects after ESD, and their efficacy has been investigated clinically. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a new alternative surgical approach for minimally invasive treatment of esophageal achalasia. Furthermore, endoscopic fundoplication after POEM was devised to prevent post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux disease. Many endoscopic treatments, including ESD, LECS, and POEM, have been introduced in Japan. With the aging of the population, more attention will be directed toward therapeutic endoscopy for elderly patients, because it is less invasive. Development of endoscopic treatments with expanded indications is expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Goto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Eriko Koizumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Kazutoshi Higuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Hiroto Noda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Takeshi Onda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Jun Omori
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Mitsuru Kaise
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Katsuhiko Iwakiri
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Saito Y, Oka S, Kawamura T, Shimoda R, Sekiguchi M, Tamai N, Hotta K, Matsuda T, Misawa M, Tanaka S, Iriguchi Y, Nozaki R, Yamamoto H, Yoshida M, Fujimoto K, Inoue H. Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:486-519. [PMID: 33713493 DOI: 10.1111/den.13972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines were developed by the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society as basic guidelines based on the scientific methods. The importance of endoscopic screening and surveillance for both detection and post-treatment follow-up of colorectal cancer has been recognized as essential to reduce disease mortality. There is limited high-level evidence in this field; therefore, we had to focus on the consensus of experts. These clinical practice guidelines consist of 20 clinical questions and eight background knowledge topics that have been determined as the current guiding principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Ryo Shimoda
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Naoto Tamai
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Masashi Misawa
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Ryoichi Nozaki
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Haruhiro Inoue
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chandrasekhara V, Kumta NA, Abu Dayyeh BK, Bhutani MS, Jirapinyo P, Krishnan K, Maple JT, Melson J, Pannala R, Parsi MA, Sethi A, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Lichtenstein DR. Endoscopic polypectomy devices. VideoGIE 2021; 6:283-293. [PMID: 34278088 PMCID: PMC8267590 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Video 1Use of submucosal injection prior to en-bloc endoscopic mucosal resection.Video 2Use of a detachable loop ligating device prior to hot snare resection of a pedunculated polyp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Chandrasekhara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Barham K Abu Dayyeh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pichamol Jirapinyo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kumar Krishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John T Maple
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Joshua Melson
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Mansour A Parsi
- Section for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Department of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Guru Trikudanathan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - David R Lichtenstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Guo Y, Li HM, Zhu WQ. Cold or Hot Snare with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 6-9 mm Colorectal Polyps: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:158-164. [PMID: 33651638 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR) for colorectal polyps with diameters of 6-9 mm. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 485 patients with colorectal polyps (6-9 mm in size) who were treated with CS-EMR or HS-EMR in the endoscopy center of Hangzhou Third People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019. Colorectal polyps were lifted by submucosal injection of normal saline. The CS-EMR group used a cold snare to remove the lifting polyps, while the HS-EMR group used a hot snare. Propensity score matching analysis with 1:1 matching and the nearest neighbor matching method were performed to ensure well-balanced characteristics of the CS-EMR and HS-EMR groups. Matching factors included age, gender, body mass index, blood routine, coagulation indicators, polyp site, size, number, and morphology. This resulted in a balanced cohort of 128 patients per group. Polyp recovery, complications, clipping for disclosure, and length of hospital stay were compared after matching. t-Tests, χ2 tests, McNemar's tests, and Fisher's exact test were used for comparison between the two groups before and after matching. Results: There were no differences between the two groups of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding (P > .05), but the CS-EMR clipping rate was lower than the HS-EMR group (P < .01). There was a higher incidence of post-polypectomy syndrome (PPS) (P = .03) and longer hospital stays (P < .01) in the HS-EMR group than the CS-EMR group. Conclusions: Compared with HS-EMR, CS-EMR is more convenient to operate, with a low incidence of PPS, clipping rates, and short hospital stays. It is a safe and effective removal method for 6-9 mm colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hua-Ming Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei-Qin Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|