Influence of previous night call and sleep deprivation on screening colonoscopy quality

When should we perform colonoscopy to increase the adenoma detection rate?

The rate of adenoma detection is the most reliable quality indicator of colonoscopy. Studies have reported that colonoscopy performed in morning has a higher adenoma detection rate (ADR) than that performed in the afternoon. These studies have explained that several physician-related factors such as undergoing an emergency procedure the night before colonoscopy, accumulated workload, and increased fatigue level in the afternoon might have led to such finding. However, several opposing articles have indicated that the time of day and ADR is not quite related. Complex confounding factors can impact study results. Colonoscopy withdrawal time and bowel preparation quality are key factors. However, queue list numbers, participation of academic fellows, nurses' assistance, and the number of colonoscopies allocated per hour are also notable factors. Recently, an attempt has been made to homogenize the ADR in the morning and afternoon through artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy. This review article introduces the history of this long-debated topic, discusses points to consider in real-world practice, and suggests new ideas for planning future research. By understanding this issue, the rate of adenoma detection during colonoscopy is expected to be improved further.

Morning versus afternoon adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality marker of colonoscopy and operator performance. Prior studies evaluating the effect of an extended workday on the ADR reported variable outcomes that remain controversial. Given the variable results of prior studies and the potential legal implications of reduced ADR in the afternoon, we aimed to further evaluate this parameter and its effect on ADR. We performed a systematic review of the PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus electronic databases. Studies were included if they reported ADR in patients undergoing colonoscopy in the morning session and the afternoon session. Afternoon sessions included both sessions following a morning shift and half-day block shifts. Subgroup analyses were performed for ADR comparing morning and afternoon colonoscopies in a continuous workday, advanced ADRs (AADRs) and polyp detection rates (PDRs) were also compared. Thirteen articles with 17 341 (61.2%) performed in the morning session and 10 994 (38.8%) performed in the afternoon session were included in this study. There was no statistical significance in the ADR or AADR between morning and afternoon sessions, respectively [relative risk (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.14] and (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95-1.5). Afternoon procedures had a significantly higher PDR than morning procedures (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.98). ADR was not significantly influenced in the afternoon session when operators continued to perform procedures throughout the day or on a half-day block schedule.

Does sleep deprivation alter virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills?

Introduction

Robotic surgery is widely used in many surgical specialities, and there has been no study to assess the impact of sleep deprivation on the complex environment of robotic surgery.

Aim

To compare specific metrics of selected robotic simulator exercises on sleep-deprived and non-sleep-deprived surgical residents.

Material and methods

We enrolled 20 volunteers, residents in surgery, evaluated before and after an 18-hour overnight shift, regarding their results on virtual robotic surgery simulator – the sleep deprivation (SD) group. As a control group, the same subjects were evaluated 5–7 days after the post-shift evaluation, without having a shift overnight and at least 7 h of sleep the previous night – the non-sleep-deprivation (nSD) group.

Results

A statistically significant difference between the pre-shift and post-shift overall results for all exercises in the SD group and no statistical differences for the nSD group were observed. As the difficulty of the exercises increased, statistical differences were observed on specific metrics for all exercises between the pre-shift and post-shift as well as between the post-shift and the morning after a normal sleep period overnight. In a subgroup analysis, the overall results revealed a stronger statistical difference between pre-shift and post-shift for residents with more intense sleep deprivation (< 3 h of sleep vs. > 3 h of sleep).

Conclusions

Sleep deprivation leads to impairment of surgical skills assessed by robotic virtual simulator. The more complex and skill demanding the exercise, the higher the difference between sleep deprived and non-deprived residents.

Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Surgeons Dexterity

Sleep deprivation is an ordinary aspect in the global society and its prevalence is increasing. Chronic and acute sleep deprivation have been linked to diabetes and heart diseases as well as depression and enhanced impulsive behaviors. Surgeons are often exposed to long hour on call and few hours of sleep in the previous days. Nevertheless, few studies have focused their attention on the effects of sleep deprivation on surgeons and more specifically on the effects of sleep deprivation on surgical dexterity, often relying on virtual surgical simulators. A better understanding of the consequences of sleep loss on the key surgical skill of dexterity can shed light on the possible risks associated to a sleepy surgeon. In this paper, the authors aim to provide a comprehensive review of the relationship between sleep deprivation and surgical dexterity.

Procedure Delays and Time of Day Are Not Associated With Reductions in Quality of Screening Colonoscopies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There have been conflicting results from studies to determine whether factors unrelated to endoscopist skill, such as fatigue, affect the quality of screening colonoscopy. We studied the effects of human and system factors on screening colonoscopy withdrawal time and likelihood of detecting an adenoma in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of operation and quality improvement data in colonoscopies performed at single academic medical center from November 2012 through February 2014. We collected data from the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse on endoscopy procedure reports, patient demographics, and pathology reports of all patients undergoing endoscopy. We identified all screening colonoscopies during the study period and determined whether an adenoma was identified in each screening colonoscopy procedure. Our study included data from 7004 screening colonoscopies of patients 50-75 years old performed by endoscopists who performed at least 100 screening colonoscopies during the study period (n = 18).

RESULTS

Approximately 27% of procedures began on time; the median colonoscope insertion time was 5.9 minutes (interquartile range, 4.0-8.6). In multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for covariates and endoscopist-level clustering, adenoma detection was not associated with procedure delay (P = .48), hour of day (P = .40), or performing the second of 2 colonoscopy blocks in 1 day (P = .88). Adenoma detection was associated with insertion time overall (P = .006), but there was no consistent directional relationship across insertion quintiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedure delays and measured factors associated with fatigue, including time of day and multiple procedure blocks, do not reduce the odds of detecting an adenoma. Adenoma detection varies widely among providers, so efforts to improve adenoma detection should focus mainly on optimizing physician skill.

Fellowship Colonoscopy Training and Preparedness for Independent Gastroenterology Practice

GOALS

To objectively assess when gastroenterology (GI) fellows achieve technical competency to perform colonoscopy independently.

BACKGROUND

New guidelines to assess the procedural competency of GI fellows in training have been developed. Although comprehensive, they do not account for the quality metrics to which independently practicing gastroenterologists are held.

STUDY

We performed a prospective study examining consecutive colonoscopies performed by GI fellows from November 2013 through March 2014 at an academic medical center. Using a brief postprocedure questionnaire and the online medical record, we measured rates of independent fellow cecal intubation rate (CIR), insertion time to the cecum (cecal IT), and independent polypectomy rate. Our secondary outcomes were adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate.

RESULTS

A total of 898 colonoscopies performed by 10 GI fellows were analyzed. In the multivariate analysis, CIR [odds ratio (OR)=1.29, P=0.012], cecal IT (β-coefficient=0.19, P=0.006), and rates of unassisted independent snare polypectomy (OR=1.36, P<0.001) all improved significantly with increased number of procedures performed (OR and β-coefficient per 100 colonoscopies performed). After performing 500 colonoscopies, fellows achieved a mean CIR>90%, cecal IT between 7 and 10 minutes, and independent polypectomy rate of 90% with further improvement in cecal IT to <7 minutes, and independent snare polypectomy of >95% after 700 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Current procedural recommendations for fellowship training may underestimate the technical skill necessary for independent GI practice upon completion of fellowship. Technical proficiency in snare polypectomy may lag behind proficiency in cecal intubation.

Correlation between number of polyps detected per colonoscopy and polyp detection rate in average risk Chinese population of colorectal cancer

AIM: To assess the association between the number of polyps detected per colonoscopy (PPC) and polyp detection rate (PDR).

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the data for patients who underwent screening colonoscopy in the Digestive Endoscopic Center of Changhai Hospital between March 2010 and February 2013. PDR and PPC were calculated by gender, age and endoscopist. Linear regression analysis was applied to study the relationship between PDR and PPC.

RESULTS: A total of 1928 subjects received complete colonoscopies. There were significant linear correlations between PDR and PPC by age in both genders (men: r = 0.96, P = 0.0092; women: r = 0.97, P = 0.0059). There was also a significant linear correlation by endoscopist (r = 0.88, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: There is a significant correlation between PDR and PPC. PPC can act as a supplementary index to help distinguish endoscopists who have different colonoscopy skills.

Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload

BACKGROUND

Operator fatigue may negatively influence adenoma detection (AD) during screening colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To better characterize factors affecting AD, including the number of hours worked, and the number and type of procedures performed before an index screening colonoscopy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving individuals undergoing a screening colonoscopy at a major tertiary care hospital in Montreal, Quebec. Individuals were identified using an endoscopic reporting database; AD was identified by an electronic chart review. A hierarchical logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between patient- and endoscopist-related variables and AD.

RESULTS

A total of 430 consecutive colonoscopies performed by 10 gastroenterologists and two surgeons were included. Patient mean (± SD) age was 63.4±10.9 years, 56.3% were males, 27.7% had undergone a previous colonoscopy and the cecal intubation rate was 95.7%. The overall AD rate was 25.7%. Age was associated with AD (OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.08]), while female sex (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.25 to 0.75]), an indication for average-risk screening (OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.80]) and an increase in the number of hours during which endoscopies were performed before the index colonoscopy (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.99]) were associated with lower AD rates. On exploratory univariable analysis, a threshold of 3 h of endoscopy time performed before the index colonoscopy was associated with decreased AD.

CONCLUSION

The number of hours devoted to endoscopies before the index colonoscopy was inversely associated with AD rate, with decreased performance possibly as early as within 3 h. This metric should be confirmed in future studies and considered when optimizing scheduling practices.