Development of the Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life Scale: A Hybrid Measure for Use Across Esophageal Conditions

Psychosocial burden in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms with and without pathologic acid reflux

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms, with or without pathologic reflux, frequently have poor response to standard therapies, which may be a result of overlapping cognitive-affective processes. Therefore, the aims of this study included measuring psychosocial distress and laryngeal-specific cognitive distress in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) as well as comparing these among laryngeal symptomatic patients with and without conclusive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

This prospective, single-center study enrolled adults with chronic LPS from 9/22 to 6/23. Patients completed eight questionnaires on quality of life, symptom burden, and psychosocial distress. The laryngeal cognitive affective tool (LCAT) assessed laryngeal-specific hypervigilance and anxiety; LCAT scores ≥33 were elevated. All patients underwent objective testing with endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring and were categorized as proven GERD (GER+) or no proven GERD (GER-).

KEY RESULTS

One hundred twenty-nine patients were included: 66% female, mean age 54.1 (17.5) years, mean BMI 27.6 (6.8) kg/m2, 66% Caucasian, 57% with an elevated LCAT, and 53% GER+. Moderate-to-severe anxiety was found in 39% and moderate-to-severe depression in 19%. An elevated LCAT alone or with an elevated anxiety/depression score was found in 58%. Patient-reported outcomes scores, including LCAT scores (32.9 (13.8) GER- vs. 33.1 (12.6) GER+, p = 0.91), were similar between patients with and without GER+.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Patients with chronic LPS experience heightened levels of hypervigilance, symptom-specific anxiety, and psychosocial distress, regardless of the presence of pathologic GER.

Behavioral Therapy for Functional Heartburn: Recommendation Statements

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Brain-gut behavior therapies (BGBT) are increasingly recognized as effective therapeutic interventions for functional heartburn. However, recommendations regarding candidacy for treatment, initial treatment selection, and navigating treatment non-response have not been established for functional heartburn specifically. The aim of this study was to establish expert-based recommendations for behavioral treatment in patients with functional heartburn.

METHODS

The validated RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method was applied to develop recommendations. A 15-member panel composed of 10 gastrointestinal psychologists and 5 esophageal specialists ranked the appropriateness of a series of statements on a 9-point interval scale over 2 ranking periods. Statements were within the following domains: pre-therapy evaluation, candidacy criteria for BGBT, selection of initial BGBT, role of additional therapy for initial non-response to BGBT, and role of pharmacologic neuromodulation. The primary outcome was appropriateness of each intervention based on the recommendation statements.

RESULTS

Recommendations for psychosocial assessment (eg, hypervigilance, symptom-specific anxiety, health-related quality of life), candidacy criteria (eg, motivated for BGBT, acknowledges the role of stress in symptoms), and treatment were established. Gut-directed hypnotherapy or cognitive behavioral therapy were considered appropriate BGBT for functional heartburn. Neuromodulation and/or additional BGBT were considered appropriate in the context of non-response.

CONCLUSIONS

Gut-directed hypnotherapy and/or cognitive behavioral therapy are recommended as appropriate behavioral interventions for heartburn symptoms, depending on clinical indication, specific gut-brain targets, and preferred treatment modality (pharmacologic vs non-pharmacologic). Pre-therapy evaluation of psychosocial processes and candidacy for BGBT are important to determine eligibility for referral to psychogastroenterology services.

Research gap in esophageal achalasia: a narrative review

In recent years, new translational evidence, diagnostic techniques, and innovative therapies have shed new light on esophageal achalasia and revamped the attention on this relatively rare motility disorder. This narrative review aims to highlight the most recent progress and the areas where further research is needed. The four senior authors identified five topics commonly discussed in achalasia management: i.e. pathogenesis, role of functional lumen imaging probe in the diagnostic flow chart of achalasia, how to define the outcome of achalasia treatments, how to manage persistent chest pain after the treatment, and if achalasia patients' may benefit from a regular follow-up. We searched the bibliographic databases to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized control trials, and original research articles in English up to December 2023. We provide a summary with the most recent findings in each of the five topics and the critical points where to address future research, such as the immune-genetic patterns of achalasia that might explain the transition among the different phenotypes, the need for a validated clinical definition of treatment success, the use of neuromodulators to manage chest pain, and the need for identifying achalasia patients at risk for cancer and who may benefit of long-term follow-up. Although undoubtedly, progress has been made on the definition and management of achalasia, unmet needs remain. Debated aspects range from mechanistic insights, symptoms, objective measure relationships, and accurate clinical responses to therapeutic interventions. Translational research is eagerly awaited to answer these unresolved questions.

Validation of the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Cognitive-affective processes, including hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety, may contribute to chronic laryngeal symptoms and are potentially modifiable; however, a validated instrument to assess these constructs is lacking. The aims of this study were to develop and validate the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool (LCAT) instrument.

METHODS

This 2-phase single-center prospective study enrolled participants from November 2021 to June 2023. In the initial phase 1:1 patient cognitive interviews and multidisciplinary team consensus were conducted to develop the LCAT. In the second phase asymptomatic and symptomatic participants completed a series of questionnaires to examine psychometric properties of the LCAT.

RESULTS

A total of 268 participants were included: 8 in the initial phase and 260 in the validation phase (56 asymptomatic; 204 symptomatic). A 15-item LCAT was developed. In the validation phase, mean total LCAT and hypervigilance/anxiety subscores were significantly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic participants (P < .01). The LCAT had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.942) and split-half reliability (Guttman = 0.853). Using a median split, a score of 33 or greater was defined as elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

The 15-item LCAT evaluates laryngeal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety among patients with laryngeal symptoms. It has excellent reliability and construct validity. The LCAT highlights burdensome cognitive-affective processes that can accordingly help tailor treatments.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) gained relevance in research and clinical practice in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. The physical discomfort and social and psychological consequences of this food-related disease substantially affect HRQOL. Determinant of an impaired HRQOL include symptom severity, disease duration, biological disease activity, and psychological factors. Patients prioritize symptom relief and improved HRQOL as treatment objectives. Available treatment options can address these goals; however, there is a suboptimal adherence to treatment. There is a need for enhanced patient guidance and education. The assessment of HRQOL will help to prioritize patient's needs in management.

Pediatric Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Their Parents Identify Symptoms as the Most Important Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Given the lack of data, we aimed to explore which therapeutic endpoints pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and their parents consider to be relevant.

METHODS

We created an educational brochure on EoE and a questionnaire, both of which were content-validated by pediatric patients and parents. Validated documents were sent to 112 patients and parents. They ranked the importance (5 levels) of short (during next 3 months) and long-term (≥1 year) treatment effect on symptoms, quality of life, endoscopic inflammation, stricture formation, histological inflammation, and fibrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 45 parents and 30 pediatric patients ≥11 years completed the questionnaires. Pediatric patients identified improvement in the following domains as most important in the short- and long-term, respectively: symptoms (73% vs. 77%), QoL (53% vs. 57%), histologic inflammation (47% vs. 50%), histologic fibrosis (40% vs. 33%), endoscopic inflammation (47% vs. 40%), and strictures (33% vs. 40%). Parents of children ≥11 years old classified improvement in the following domains as most important in the short- and long-term, respectively: symptoms (70% vs. 83%), QoL (63% vs. 80%), histologic inflammation (67% vs. 77%), histologic fibrosis (47% vs. 63%), endoscopic inflammation (77% vs. 80%), and strictures (40% vs. 53%). Agreement between caregiver and children on the short-term importance of treatment outcomes was as follows: symptoms (77%), QoL (40%), histologic inflammation and fibrosis (47% and 43%), endoscopic inflammation and strictures (50% and 40%).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric patients and parents attributed most importance to improvement in symptoms and QoL. Agreement between parents and patients regarding therapy goals is limited.

Validation of the novel Eosinophilic Esophagitis Impact Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has a detrimental effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The Eosinophilic Esophagitis Impact Questionnaire (EoE-IQ) is a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure assessing the impact of EoE on HRQOL. To assess suitability of the EoE-IQ, its measurement properties were evaluated.

METHODS

Using baseline and week 24 data from the pivotal, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 R668-EE-1774 trial (NCT03633617) of dupilumab, we evaluated EoE-IQ's measurement properties (including reliability, construct and known-groups validity, and ability to detect change) and established the threshold for change in scores that can be considered clinically meaningful.

RESULTS

The analysis population comprised 239 adults and adolescents with EoE. Mean age was 28.1 (standard deviation, 13.14) years; 63.6% were male, and 90.4% were White. Reliability estimates for the EoE-IQ average score exceeded acceptable thresholds for patients who were stable as indicated by ratings of Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) and Change (PGIC) (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.75 and 0.81). Construct validity correlations with other EoE-specific PRO scores were moderate at baseline (|r|= 0.44-0.60) and moderate to strong at week 24 (|r|= 0.61-0.72). In known-groups analysis, EoE-IQ average score discriminated among groups of patients at varying EoE severity levels defined by PGIS scores. A ≥ 0.6-point reduction in EoE-IQ average score (where scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse HRQOL) from baseline to week 24 can be considered clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS

The EoE-IQ's measurement properties are acceptable, making it a valid, reliable measure of the HRQOL impacts of EoE among adults and adolescents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03633617. Registered August 14, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03633617 .

Psychological Processes, Not Physiological Parameters, Are Most Important Contributors to Symptom Severity in Patients With Refractory Heartburn/Regurgitation Symptoms

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Physiological and psychological factors have been found to influence esophageal symptom reporting. We aimed to evaluate which of these factors are associated with 3 reflux symptom severity outcomes (ie, Total Reflux, Heartburn, and Sleep Disturbance) through a traditional statistical and a complementary machine-learning approach.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with refractory heartburn/regurgitation symptoms underwent standard 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring and completed questionnaires assessing past and current gastrointestinal and psychological health. In the traditional statistical approach, hierarchical general linear models assessed relationships of psychological and physiological variables (eg, total number of reflux episodes) with reflux severity scores. Mediation analyses further assessed pathways between relevant variables. In the machine-learning approach, all psychological and physiological variables were entered into 11 different models and cross-validated model performance was compared among the different models to select the best model.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-three participants (mean [SD] age, 48.5 [14.1] years; 60% were female) were included. General psychological functioning emerged as an important variable in the traditional statistical approach, as it was significantly associated with all 3 outcomes and mediated the relationship between childhood trauma and both Total Reflux and Heartburn Severity. In the machine-learning analyses, general psychological variables (eg, depressive symptoms) were most important for Total Reflux and Sleep Disturbance outcomes, and symptom-specific variables, like visceral anxiety, were more influential for Heartburn Severity. Physiological variables were not significant contributors to reflux symptom severity outcomes in our sample across reflux classifications and statistical methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychological processes, both general and symptom-specific, should be considered as another important factor within the multifactorial processes that impact reflux symptom severity reporting across the reflux spectrum.

Initial assessment of medical post-traumatic stress among patients with chronic esophageal diseases

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis and management of chronic esophageal disease requires the use of potentially traumatic medical procedures, performed with or without sedation. Medical trauma and post-traumatic stress (PTS) are emerging as important considerations in patients with digestive illness. To date, no study assesses medical PTS from procedures in patients with esophageal disease.

METHODS

Adult patients with achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or functional esophageal disease at a university-based gastroenterology clinic completed: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), Gastroesophageal Disease Questionnaire, Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire, Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life scale (HRQoL), NIH-PROMIS Depression scale, and a study-specific questionnaire about esophageal procedures (endoscopy with sedation; functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) with sedation; high-resolution manometry (HRM); wireless pH testing; or 24-h pH-impedance testing).

KEY RESULTS

Half of 149 participants reported at least one traumatic procedure, with HRM most often cited. Only 2.7% met the cutoff for PTS on PCL-5. This increased to 7.1% for patients with a traumatic procedure combined with experiencing intense fear. Rates of moderate-severe PTS ranged from 7.4%-12% for all patients and 14%-29% for those with a traumatic procedure with fear. Medical PTS was associated with poorer HRQoL, and increased esophageal symptoms, depression, and hypervigilance and symptom anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Preliminary evidence suggests medical PTS affects few patients with esophageal disease. However traumatic procedures, most often associated with HRM, significantly increase PTS symptoms. The potential impacts of medical PTS on esophageal patient assessment and outcomes are considerable and warrants further study.

Spanish translation and validation of a hybrid, health-related quality of life questionnaire for chronic esophageal conditions: NEQOL-S

BACKGROUND

Chronic esophageal conditions (CEC) are associated with significant disease-related burden, disability, and costs. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) constructs are intended to capture the physical, mental, social, and emotional aspects of a patient's life and how health status impacts these domains. The Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life (NEQOL) can be used among esophageal diseases while maintaining sensitivity to specific conditions. We aimed to translate, cross-cultural adapt, and validate the NEQOL into Spanish.

METHODS

After language and cross-cultural adaptation, the NEQOL was applied to an outpatient clinic-based population in a single tertiary center. We analyzed the internal consistency, construct, criterion validity, and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire. The criterion validity was tested against the SF-12 questionnaire.

KEY RESULTS

After completing the translation process, no item was considered problematic. A total of 385 patients were included in the validation study. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the total NEQOL-S score was 0.89. The NEQOL-S questionnaire showed moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.828; 95% CI 0.755-0.881; p < 0.001). Criterion validity showed good coherence when correlated with the SF-12 survey (R²  = 0.538; 95% CI 0.491-0.585, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

The translated and cross-culturally adapted NEQOL-S showed good psychometric properties that allow its use in Spanish-speaking patients suffering from CEC.

Validation of the Achalasia Patient-Reported Outcomes Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a debilitating major motor disorder of the oesophagus. Hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety substantially impact dysphagia symptom reporting, and quality of life is a critical patient outcome. Earlier achalasia symptom scales did not consider these constructs in their psychometric development.

AIM

To develop a new symptom measure, the Achalasia Patient-Reported Outcomes (APRO) Questionnaire METHODS: Four gastroenterologists with achalasia expertise generated preliminary items. Patients reviewed items via cognitive interviews. Patients undergoing high-resolution manometry completed the APRO with Oesophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale, Northwestern Oesophageal Quality of Life Scale, and three measures of reflux and dysphagia. Full APRO psychometric assessment (reliability, validity, factor structure) was done. Cluster analysis evaluated APRO + symptom-anxiety/hypervigilance patient phenotypes.

RESULTS

We included 961 patients with normal motility and 296 with achalasia. The APRO yielded three subscales: dysphagia, reflux, chest pain with two items for weight change and diet modifications. Reliability and validity were excellent. Twenty-five percent of achalasia patients may have high levels of anxiety/hypervigilance despite low symptoms, while 8% may report severe symptoms with low anxiety/hypervigilance. The APRO significantly predicted quality of life, but less cognitive-affective processes.

CONCLUSIONS

The APRO is a reliable and valid measure of achalasia symptoms that addresses the limitations of existing questionnaires. Symptom anxiety and hypervigilance moderate the relationship between APRO and quality of life; 33% of patients with achalasia exhibit concerning patterns in symptom severity, anxiety and hypervigilance that may contribute to poorer outcomes.

Pharyngeal-Esophageal Malignancies with Dermatologic Paraneoplastic Syndrome

Systemic changes often send signals to the skin, and certain neoplastic diseases of the internal organs can also trigger skin manifestations. In this article, the authors make clinical photography presentations of the patients seen at our clinic with dermatologic paraneoplastic syndromes within pharyngeal–esophageal malignancies, describe several paraneoplastic dermatoses, and also review high-quality scientific literature in order to be able to highlight the dermatological signs of pharyngoesophageal malignant tumors. The majority of our patients with paraneoplastic dermatoses, filtering for pharyngoesophageal malignancies, had esophageal neoplasms, out of whom seven were female and two were male, making esophageal cancer more common within the paraneoplastic dermatoses within pharyngoesophageal malignancies. An early recognition of paraneoplastic dermatoses can diagnose neoplasms and sequentially contribute to a better prognosis for the patient. This matter is also useful for front-line medical personnel in order to improve early diagnosis of the underlying malignancy, curative interventions with prompt therapy administration and good prognosis.

The Clinical value of brain-gut behavioral therapies for functional esophageal disorders and symptoms

Functional esophageal disorders (functional chest pain, functional heartburn, reflux hypersensitivity, globus, and functional dysphagia) are the disorders of gut-brain interactions (DGBI) and present with esophageal symptoms not associated with a structural, major motility or underlying inflammatory condition. Notably, many patients with the latter conditions may still experience esophageal symptoms beyond what could be attributed to their underlying disorders. Esophageal visceral hypersensitivity and hypervigilance are the two pathways which drive functional esophageal disorders and symptoms. These functional esophageal symptoms may be severe, leaving patients with impaired quality of life and inadequate treatment outcomes. Neuromodulators are the foundation of the pharmacologic approach of many of the functional esophageal disorders and symptoms, modulating both peripheral and central hyperalgesia. There is also emerging evidence for brain-gut behavioral therapies (BGBT) such as gut-directed hypnotherapy and cognitive behavior therapy for the treatment of a variety of DGBIs. In this issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Hurtte et al. add to the literature on the effectiveness of BGBT in treating functional esophageal symptoms, showing multimodal therapy with pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches led to improvement in health-related quality of life. In this review, we outline the mechanistic underpinnings of BGBT and review the existing evidence for BGBT for functional esophageal disorders and symptoms. We also highlight the future research directions and challenges for scaling these therapies.

Validation of the Short-Form Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety are emerging as important drivers of dysphagia symptoms and reduced quality of life across esophageal diagnoses. The esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS) is a validated measure of these cognitive-affective processes. However, its length may preclude it from use in clinical practice. We aimed to create a short form version of the EHAS using established psychometric practices.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a registry of patients who visited a university-based esophageal motility clinic for diagnostic testing was conducted. Patients were included if they completed the 15-item EHAS and questionnaires assessing dysphagia severity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at the time of motility testing. Principle components factor analysis identified items for possible removal. Tests for reliability and concurrent validity were performed on the full EHAS and short-form version (EHAS-7).

RESULTS

3,976 adult patients with confirmed esophageal disease were included: 30% with achalasia or EGJOO, 13% with EoE, 13% with GERD, 39% normal motility. Eight items were removed from the scale based on a factor loading of > 0.70, resulting in a single scale 7-item EHAS-7 scored from 0 to 28. The EHAS-7 demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.91) and split-half reliability (0.88) as was found in the full EHAS in the current study and prior validation. Concurrent validity existed between the EHAS-7 and measures of dysphagia (r = 0.33) and HRQOL (r = -0.73, both P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The EHAS-7 is a 7-item scale to assess esophageal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety that performs as well as the original 15-item version. Shorter questionnaires allow for implementation in clinical practice. The EHAS-7 is a useful tool for clinicians to quickly assess how hypervigilance and anxiety may be contributing to their patients' clinical presentations.

Beyond the Eckardt Score: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Esophageal Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and summarize their role in assessing undifferentiated dysphagia and common esophageal disorders, including achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the subjective nature of swallowing disorders, accurate diagnoses often rely on capturing the patient experience. As a result, the number of PROMs used to characterize esophageal symptoms is increasing with a recent particular emphasis on EoE. Overall, esophageal-focused PROMs are used to interpret patient symptoms and quality of life, diagnosis, and symptom changes over time. There are limitations with each instrument, including factors affecting validity, reliability, accessibility, patient participation, and logistical implementation. PROM instruments can be helpful tools in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal disorders. Instruments should be chosen based on factors such as target population and setting, including research, clinical, and quality improvement efforts. Future research should address how best to implement PROMs and integrate the obtained data with patient care.

Role of psychological questionnaires in clinical practice and research within functional gastrointestinal disorders

Functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, also known as disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), affect 40% of the global population. Up to two-thirds of patients with FGIDs experience a major psychological disorder making a thorough psychosocial assessment a critical part of patient care as it can impact treatment approach. Many psychological questionnaires exist in the clinical realm serving different purposes including screening for anxiety and depression, somatization symptoms, health-related anxiety, illness impact, and health-related quality of life. Given the abundance of questionnaires used to screen for similar psychiatric comorbidities, correlation between different instruments is needed to allow for pooling of data. In this issue of Neurogastroenterology & Motility, Snijkers et al. conducted the first comparative study to assess the correlation between the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) to determine optimal cutoffs for diagnosis of depressive and anxiety disorders in a cohort of irritable bowel syndrome patients. The biopsychosocial framework as it applies to FGID has led to the inclusion of both psychosocial assessments in clinical management and research protocols. Future directions include the development of symptom-specific questionnaires for groups of FGIDs, culturally specific psychosocial questionnaires, and inclusion of psychosocial well-being as primary or secondary outcomes in clinical research trials. In this review, we aim to explore the role of psychological questionnaires in clinical care and research trials and share practical tips on incorporating a biopsychosocial framework in the care of patients with FGIDs.

Esophageal Hypervigilance and Symptom-Specific Anxiety in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patient symptom reporting often does not correlate with the pathophysiological markers of esophageal disease, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety are emerging as important considerations in understanding symptom reporting. As such, we aimed to conduct the first study of these constructs in EoE.

METHODS

A retrospective review of an EoE patient registry was conducted and included eosinophils per high power field (from esophagogastroduodenoscopy biopsy: proximal, distal), endoscopic reference score, distal distensibility plateau (functional luminal imaging probe), Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire, Visual Dysphagia Question of EoE Activity Index, Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life scale, and the Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale. Correlational and regression analyses evaluated relationships of hypervigilance and anxiety with Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire, Visual Dysphagia Question of EoE Activity Index, and Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life scale when controlling for histology and endoscopic severity.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients had complete data, 69.9% were male, and the mean (SD) age was 40.66 (13.85) years. Forty-one percent had elevated dysphagia and 46% had elevated hypervigilance and anxiety. Esophageal symptom-specific anxiety emerged as the most important predictor of Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire severity (44.8% of the variance), Visual Dysphagia Question of EoE Activity Index severity (26%), and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (55.3%). Hypervigilance was also important, but to a lesser extent. Pathophysiological variables did not significantly predict symptoms or HRQoL. Recent food impaction can predict symptom-specific anxiety and proton pump inhibitor use can reduce hypervigilance.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety are important for our understanding of self-reported patient outcomes in EoE. These processes outweigh endoscopic and histologic markers of EoE disease activity across dysphagia, difficulty eating, and HRQoL. Clinicians should assess hypervigilance and anxiety, especially in patients with refractory symptoms and poor HRQoL.

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Jejunostomy and Nasogastric Feeding in Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Early postoperative enteral nutrition is recommended for patients undergoing esophagectomy; however, the optimum method of tube feeding remains controversial. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess two common enteral nutrition methods after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was performed with 120 patients who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy from January 2017 to December 2018. The patients were randomly divided so that 58 patients were in the jejunostomy feeding (JF) group and 62 patients were in the nasogastric feeding (NF) group. The postoperative outcomes, including complications, nutritional status, quality of life, and survival rate, were studied and used as the main parameters to compare the abovementioned tube feeding methods.

RESULTS

The incidence of overall complications was equivalent between the two groups (P = 0.625), except for bowel obstruction (which occurred 4 times in the JF group but did not occur in the NF group). In the first month after surgery (postoperative month 1, POM1), a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) was observed in the JF group (23.6 ± 3.2) than in the NF group (20.9 ± 3.5, P = 0.032). The global quality-of-life scores were better in the JF group than in the NF group (P < 0.001). In addition, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.816) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.564).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with NF, JF provides more safety, efficacy, and utility as nutritional support for minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy patients who have a high incidence of anastomotic leakage. However, the higher risk of intestinal obstruction after JF requires attention.

Advancing patient care through the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR)

Recent advances in rare disease research are accelerated by the work of consortia that have been supported by the National Institutes of Health. Development of such consortia rely on multidisciplinary relationships and engagement with patient advocacy groups, as well as the National Institutes of Health and industry and academic partners. In this rostrum we present the development of such a process that focuses on eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Principal investigators, patient advocacy groups, research assistants, and trainees work together to perform natural history studies that promote clinical trial readiness tools, conduct clinical trials, train a new generation of investigators, and perform innovative pilot studies.

A Decade of Investigation: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia

Background: Although laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication has long been considered the gold standard for treatment of patients with achalasia, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged in the last decade as a viable alternative. Methods: A collective review of literature concerning investigations that have reported patient outcomes and treatment success of LHM and POEM for all achalasia subtypes. Results: While POEM has shown excellent short-term safety and efficacy in the relief of symptoms, the long-term symptomatic outcomes after the intervention are yet to be concluded. Further evaluation of patients' interpretations and answers on subjective questionnaires is warranted before determining treatment success for POEM. Use of more reliable and disease-specific health-related quality-of-life questionnaires are better justified when comparing a new endoscopic procedure to an established gold standard. The need for objective parameters to measure reflux, longer follow-up studies, and randomized trials comparing POEM to LHM is particularly important when assessing the outcome of this new technique. High incidence of post-POEM pathologic reflux and indication for daily proton pump inhibitor use is of concern, and the lack of more long-term, objective evidence leaves the clinical value of the procedure in a state of uncertainty. Conclusions: The LHM combined with partial fundoplication is still considered to be the gold standard treatment modality for achalasia, but as the POEM procedure rapidly becomes common practice, this treatment may be performed in the majority of achalasia cases. Given the number of flaws overlooked in seminal investigations, careful consideration should be given to the patients being selected for this therapy.

Evaluating the reliability and construct validity of the Eckardt symptom score as a measure of achalasia severity

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a disease of mechanical esophageal dysfunction characterized by dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, and malnutrition. The Eckardt symptom score (ESS) is the gold standard self-report assessment tool. Current guidelines outline a three-step approach to patient reported outcomes measure design. Developed prior to these policies, the ESS has not undergone rigorous testing of its reliability and validity.

METHODS

Adult achalasia patients retrospectively identified via a patient registry were grouped based on treatment history. Patients were grouped PREPOST (completed ESS, GERDQ, brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire, NIH PROMIS Global Health, high resolution manometry, timed barium esophagram prior to treatment and after) and POST (completed measures only after treatment). Clinical characteristics, treatment type and date were obtained via medical record. Standardized psychometric analyses for reliability and construct validity were performed.

KEY RESULTS

107 patients identified; 83 POST and 24 PREPOST. The ESS has fair internal consistency and split-half reliability with a single factor structure. Dysphagia accounts for half the variance in ESS, while chest pain and weight loss account for 10% each. Pre-post-surgical assessment demonstrates improvements in ESS, except for weight loss. Effect sizes range from 0.24 to 2.53, with greatest change in regurgitation. Validity of the ESS is supported by modest correlations with GERDQ, HRQOL, and physiological data.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The ESS demonstrates fair reliability and validity, with a single factor structure mostly explained by dysphagia. Based on psychometric findings, weight loss and chest pain items may be decreasing ESS reliability and validity. Further assessment of the ESS under FDA guidelines is warranted.

Validation of the oesophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale for chronic oesophageal disease

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal hypervigilance and anxiety can drive symptom experience in chronic oesophageal conditions, including gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, achalasia and functional oesophageal disorders. To date, no validated self-report measure exists to evaluate oesophageal hypervigilance and anxiety.

AIMS

This study aims to develop a brief and reliable questionnaire assessing these constructs, the oesophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS).

METHODS

Questions for the EHAS were drawn from 4 existing validated measures that assessed hypervigilance and anxiety adapted for the oesophagus. Patients who previously underwent high-resolution manometry testing at a university-based oesophageal motility clinic were retrospectively identified. Patients were included in the analysis if they completed the EHAS as well as questionnaires assessing symptom severity and health-related quality of life at the time of the high-resolution manometry.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and eighty-two patients aged 18-85 completed the study. The EHAS demonstrates excellent internal consistency (α = 0.93) and split-half reliability (Guttman = 0.87). Inter-item correlations indicated multicollinearity was not achieved; thus, no items were removed from the original 15-item scale. Principal components factor analysis revealed two subscales measuring symptom-specific anxiety and symptom-specific hypervigilance. Construct validity for total and subscale scores was supported by positive correlations with symptom severity and negative correlations with health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The EHAS is a 15-item scale assessing oesophageal hypervigilance and symptom-specfic anxiety. The EHAS could be useful in evaluating the role of these constructs in several oesophageal conditions in which hypersensitivity, hypervigilance and anxiety may contribute to symptoms and impact treatment outcomes.

Systematic review: health-related quality of life in children and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis-instruments for measurement and determinant factors

BACKGROUND

Several measures have been used to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).

AIMS

To systematically review these HRQoL measures, to appraise measurement properties of specific instruments and to evaluate determinant factors influencing HRQoL in paediatric and adult EoE patients.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS) and PsycINFO databases for documents providing original information on the development of measurement tools and/or evaluation of HRQoL outcomes in EoE patients of all ages.

RESULTS

Of the 596 references identified, data was collected from 34 studies (with only 16 of them being published as full papers) including a total of 1,689 individual patients. Three disease-specific HRQoL measures in EoE covering different aspects of patients' lives and developed in English, were scored positive regarding measurement properties. The PedsQL inventory (including parent and child report forms) and the Peds-QoL EoE module were the generic and specific instruments respectively used in children, while the SF-36 and EoE-QoL-A were the most used questionnaires in adults. Patients with EoE show an impaired HRQoL compared to controls, which greatly depends on symptom severity and disease duration. Severity of endoscopic features and female gender may also determine an impaired HRQoL. The effect of treatments on HRQoL requires further assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL is a relevant outcome that should be considered in clinical practice and research of EoE. Further validation studies in several languages and populations are required to support the use of disease-specific HRQoL measures.